SCR 20 — Urge Congress accelerate deployment of new energy infrastructure
Last action — Offered
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has passed the Senate. Introduced April 09, 2026. It now moves to the second chamber.
Next likely step: consideration and a floor vote in the House.
Odds of enactment
Moderate chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a moderate chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
Passed Senate
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 R).
-
Mixed recorded votes
2 passed, 2 failed in recorded votes so far.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
In plain language
The bill urges Congress to speed up federal permitting for new energy projects.
This resolution asks Congress to make changes to federal permitting rules to help install new energy infrastructure more quickly. It aims to support projects that may contribute to energy development.
Summary
To urge Congress to enact reforms to federal permitting policies to accelerate deployment of new energy infrastructure.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
7 added · 5 removedPlain-language change summary
The latest version of Bill SCR 20 has added a list of cosponsors from the Senate, which includes Senators Brenner, Chavez, and others. This change signifies broader support for the bill among legislators, which could enhance its chances of passing. The previous text referencing the Senate Energy Committee's report has been removed, indicating a shift in focus towards the full Senate's endorsement rather than committee analysis. This matters because it reflects a more unified and potentially stronger push for the bill in its legislative journey.
As ReportedAdopted by the Senate Energy Committee 136th General Assembly Regular Session S.
20 2025-2026 Senator Wilkin ACosponsors: C O N C U R R E N T R E S O L U T I O N To urge Congress to enact reforms to federal permitting 1 policies to accelerate deployment of new energy 2 infrastructure.
Senators Brenner, Chavez, Cirino, Gavarone, Johnson, Landis, Patton, Reineke, Romanchuk, Schaffer, Timken A C O N C U R R E N T R E S O L U T I O N To urge Congress to enact reforms to federal permitting 1 policies to accelerate deployment of new energy 2 infrastructure.
and 17 WHEREAS, Energy is produced in the United States at a much 18 higher environmental standard than is typically the case in the 19 countries from which energy is imported, so prevention of 20 S.
20 Page 2 As ReportedAdopted by the Senate Energyhigher Committeeenvironmental standard than is typically the case in the 19 countries from which energy is imported, so prevention of 20 domestic energy production undermines the goals of those very 21 same environmental laws;
48 and 49 WHEREAS, Other developed nations that share our goals to 50 protect the environment while producing abundant energy 51 S.
20 Page 3 As ReportedAdopted by the Senate EnergyWHEREAS, CommitteeOther developed nations that share our goals to 50 protect the environment while producing abundant energy 51 resources, such as Canada and Australia, have shown that they 52 can permit new mines within two to three years instead of nearly 53 ten years, as is often the case in the United States;
and 77 WHEREAS, Failure to reform federal permitting laws is 78 already resulting in fewer jobs, reduced security, and higher 79 prices for Americans without providing additional benefits for 80 theS. environment;
and 81 WHEREAS, Failing to reform these laws in the coming months 82 S.
20 Page 4 As ReportedAdopted by the Senate Energy Committee will result in even greater limitations on our energy 83 infrastructure, costing even more American jobs while raising 84 costs for consumers and businesses and leaving us vulnerable to 85 unreliability, blackouts, and the resultingenvironment; severe harm to the 86 American people;
and 81 WHEREAS, Failing to reform these laws in the coming months 82 will result in even greater limitations on our energy 83 infrastructure, costing even more American jobs while raising 84 costs for consumers and businesses and leaving us vulnerable to 85 unreliability, blackouts, and the resulting severe harm to the 86 American people;
and be it further 108 RESOLVED, That these legislative reforms should also 109 strive to ensure accountability for federal agencies conducting 110 permitting and environmental review processes, including better 111 data and more aggressive timelines for projects at all levels of 112 environmental review, whether environmental impact statements, 113 environmental assessments, or categorically excluded projects 114 S.
20 Page 5 As ReportedAdopted by the Senate Energyenvironmental Committeereview, whether environmental impact statements, 113 environmental assessments, or categorically excluded projects 114 under NEPA;
View plain text versions (3)
- As Adopted by the Senate View text Current pdf
- Reported As Reported by the Senate Energy Committee pdf
- Introduced As Introduced pdf
Action History
-
As Adopted by the Senate
Sponsors
- Shane Wilkin · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 133 not signed on · 9 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Shane Wilkin Republican
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (133)
133 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 133 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 24 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 0 | 9 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 24 | 9 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 73% | 27% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (33)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Beth Liston | Democratic | Nay |
| Casey Weinstein | Democratic | Nay |
| Catherine D. Ingram | Democratic | Nay |
| Hearcel F. Craig | Democratic | Nay |
| Kent Smith | Democratic | Nay |
| Nickie J. Antonio | Democratic | Nay |
| Paula Hicks-Hudson | Democratic | Nay |
| William P. DeMora | Democratic | Nay |
| Willis E. Blackshear, Jr. | Democratic | Nay |
| Al Cutrona | Republican | Yea |
| Al Landis | Republican | Yea |
| Andrew O. Brenner | Republican | Yea |
| Bill Reineke | Republican | Yea |
| Brian M. Chavez | Republican | Yea |
| George F. Lang | Republican | Yea |
| Jane M. Timken | Republican | Yea |
| Jerry C. Cirino | Republican | Yea |
| Kristina D. Roegner | Republican | Yea |
| Kyle Koehler | Republican | Yea |
| Louis W. Blessing, III | Republican | Yea |
| Mark Romanchuk | Republican | Yea |
| Michele Reynolds | Republican | Yea |
| Nathan H. Manning | Republican | Yea |
| Rob McColley | Republican | Yea |
| Sandra O'Brien | Republican | Yea |
| Shane Wilkin | Republican | Yea |
| Stephen A. Huffman | Republican | Yea |
| Steve Wilson | Republican | Yea |
| Susan Manchester | Republican | Yea |
| Terry Johnson | Republican | Yea |
| Theresa Gavarone | Republican | Yea |
| Thomas F. Patton | Republican | Yea |
| Tim Schaffer | Republican | Yea |
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 8 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 73% | 27% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Casey Weinstein | Democratic | Nay |
| Kent Smith | Democratic | Nay |
| William P. DeMora | Democratic | Nay |
| Al Landis | Republican | Yea |
| Bill Reineke | Republican | Yea |
| Brian M. Chavez | Republican | Yea |
| George F. Lang | Republican | Yea |
| Jane M. Timken | Republican | Yea |
| Jerry C. Cirino | Republican | Yea |
| Shane Wilkin | Republican | Yea |
| Tim Schaffer | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SCR 20 do?
- To urge Congress to enact reforms to federal permitting policies to accelerate deployment of new energy infrastructure.
- Who sponsors SCR 20?
- SCR 20 is sponsored by Shane Wilkin (Republican).
- What is the current status of SCR 20?
- This bill has passed the Senate. Introduced April 09, 2026. It now moves to the second chamber.
- Where can I track SCR 20?
- Track SCR 20 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SCR 20
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SCR 20
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →