DOA Efficiency/PED.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 759 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 759.
You're tracking SB 759
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 759 — DOA Efficiency/PED.
Last action — Reptd Fav Com Substitute
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2017-2018 Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
68 added · 75 removedPlain-language change summary
The amendment to Senate Bill 759 added new language to clarify the bill’s purpose and make it more specific, while also removing some previous references that were likely confusing or unnecessary. These changes are important because they help ensure that everyone reading the bill can understand its intent and implications more easily, which can lead to better informed discussions and decisions during the legislative process.
GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2017 S 21 SENATE BILL 759* State and Local Government Committee Substitute Adopted 6/12/18 Short Title:
Senators Wells, Tarte, and Edwards (Primary Sponsors).
Rules and Operations of the Senate May 30, 2018 A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT RECOMMENDING IMPROVED EFFICIENCIES OF THE STATE'S ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, AS RECOMMENDED BY THE JOINT LEGISLATIVE PROGRAM EVALUATION OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE.
(2) By December 1, 2018, implement a new requirement for State agencies to obtain a ten percent (10%) reduction from the annual value of each contract as a condition of awarding an amendment that extends the length of the contractcontract. except as specifically authorized by the Department.
The new requirement implementedbytheDepartment shall not applyto thosecontracts entered into by the Department of State Treasurer under G.S.
147-69.3(g), 135-96, 142-17, 135-48.23(c), and 135-48.34 that are not subject to Article 3 of Chapter 143 of the General Statutes.
In making recommendations under this subdivision, the *S759-v-2* General Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2017 assigned division or the contracted vendor shall consider the feasibility of requiring each State agency to enter the office space requirements and facility location of each of its employees into the Integrated HR/Payroll System, or the State's payroll system that supersedes the current system.
*S759-v-1* General Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2017 (2) Conduct a business case analysis to evaluate alternatives to reduce facility management costs and generate additional revenue through the sale or lease of the Old Revenue Building located at 2 South Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina.
(6) Each business case analysis conducted under this sectionsubsection shall include, at a minimum, each of the factors identified in Program Evaluation Division Report No.
SectionThis 4 of this act becomesis effective Novemberwhen 1,it 2018,becomes andlaw. applies to requisitions for purchases occurring on or after that date.
ThePage remainder2 ofSenate thisBill act759*-First isEdition effective when it becomes law.
Page 2 Senate Bill 759*-Second Edition
Action History
-
Reptd Fav Com Substitute
-
Com Substitute Adopted
-
Re-ref Com On Rules and Operations of the Senate
-
Withdrawn From Com
-
Re-ref to State and Local Government. If fav, re-ref to Rules and Operations of the Senate
-
Passed 1st Reading
-
Ref To Com On Rules and Operations of the Senate
-
Filed
Sponsors
- Wells · Primary
- Tarte · Primary
- Edwards · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →2 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 176 not signed on
Sponsors (2)
- Wells
- Tarte
Co-sponsors (1)
- Edwards
Not signed on (176)
176 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 176 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 759?
- SB 759 is sponsored by Wells, Tarte, and Edwards.
- What is the current status of SB 759?
- This bill died with 2017-2018 Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 759?
- Track SB 759 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 759
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 759
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →