State Agencies/Adjust Hiring Practices.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when HB 409 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on HB 409.
You're tracking HB 409
We'll email you the moment it moves.
HB 409 — State Agencies/Adjust Hiring Practices.
Last action — Regular Message Received From House
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2017-2018 Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
55 added · 55 removedPlain-language change summary
The amendments to Bill HB 409 clarify the process related to how job applicants with criminal histories are handled. Specifically, it ensures that applicants cannot be asked about their criminal records until they have signed a waiver, are being considered for a specific job, and have had an interview. This change aims to provide a fairer opportunity for applicants with past convictions by focusing on their qualifications and rehabilitation rather than their criminal history at the initial stages of hiring.
GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2017 H 21 HOUSE BILL 409 Committee Substitute Favorable 4/11/17 Short Title:
Representatives R.
Turner, Hardister, Grange, and Pierce (Primary Sponsors).
For a complete list of sponsors, refer to the North Carolina General Assembly web site.
State Personnel, if favorable, Judiciary III March 21, 2017 A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT DIRECTING STATE AGENCIES TO ADJUST EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES TO REDUCE BARRIERS TO EMPLOYMENT FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH A CRIMINAL HISTORY.
(2) Criminal history.History.
*H409-v-1* General Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2017 (d) Applicant Criminal History.
– An applicant shall not be asked to disclose, orally or in writing, information concerning the applicant's criminal record or history, including any *H409-v-2* General Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2017 inquiry on any employment application, until the applicant (i) has signed the appropriate waiver authorizing release, (ii) is being considered for a specific position, and (iii) has received an interview.
… (7)(6) Criminal history.History.
Page 2 House Bill 409-Second409-First Edition
Compared against the N.C. General Statutes as published AI-generated reading aid — verify against the official bill.
The bill adds new provisions regarding the hiring practices of State agencies concerning individuals with criminal histories, establishing guidelines and protections for applicants.
-
N.C.G.S. § 126-20
§ 126-20. State agency hiring practices; criminal histories. (a) Definitions. – The following definitions apply in this section: (1) Applicant. – Any individual considered for, or who requests to be considered for, employment with the State or any current State employee considered for, or who requests to be considered for, another position in State employment. (2) Criminal history. – A State or federal conviction of a crime, whether a misdemeanor or felony, that bears upon an applicant's fitness for public employment. The term includes a record of arrests that have not resulted in a conviction and those that have resulted in a favorable disposition such as a dismissal or a verdict of not guilty. (3) Inquiry. – Any direct or indirect conduct intended to gather information, using any mode of communication. (b) Findings and Purpose. – The General Assembly finds that the ability to procure meaningful employment is essential to reinstating good citizenship for individuals who have a criminal record. The General Assembly declares that the State encourages the successful reintegration of people with a criminal history and recognizes that reducing barriers to employment for persons with a criminal history is a matter of statewide concern. The purpose of this section is to implement hiring practices that will increase employment opportunities and will reduce recidivism and improve community stability. (c) Scope. – This section applies to all State agencies and positions in State government employment, except that this section does not apply to any of the following: (1) A public employer that is required by State or federal law to conduct a criminal history inquiry as a preliminary qualification to be considered for public employment. (2) A position that includes law enforcement or public safety. (3) A position that involves direct interaction with minors or the elderly. (d) Applicant Criminal History. – An applicant shall not be asked to disclose, orally or in writing, information concerning the applicant's criminal record or history, including any inquiry on any employment application, until the applicant (i) has signed the appropriate waiver authorizing release, (ii) is being considered for a specific position, and (iii) has received an interview. (e) Considerations. – If a background check has been lawfully completed and a criminal history exists, the following criteria shall be considered by the State agency before either proffering or denying an offer of employment: (1) The nature and gravity of the offense. (2) The length of time that has elapsed since the offense occurred. (3) The age of the person at the time of the conviction. (4) Whether the offense is reasonably related to the duties and responsibilities of the employment sought by the applicant. (5) Any information pertaining to the degree of rehabilitation that may have taken place in the applicant. The State agency must inform the applicant of the potential adverse employment decision based on the background check report prior to a final decision and must provide the applicant an opportunity to demonstrate that the applicant was not correctly identified in the background check report or that the report is otherwise inaccurate. (f) Record of Arrest. – A record of arrest that did not result in conviction shall not be the basis for disqualification from public employment. (g) Violations of This Section. – A grievance concerning an alleged violation of this section may be brought by an applicant under G.S. 126-34.01 and G.S. 126-34.02. (h) Data Collection. – The Office of State Human Resources shall do the following: (1) Record and log the positions that are statutorily required to conduct background checks prior to a conditional offer of employment. (2) Conduct quarterly reviews to determine compliance with this Article and make a report on all such reviews to the General Assembly annually. (3) Collect, and make available to the public, data on: (a) The number of applicants for public employment with criminal histories given conditional offers of employment. (b) The number of applicants for public employment with criminal histories who are subsequently employed. (c) The retention rate of public employees with criminal histories. (i) Non-State Employers. – The General Assembly encourages comparable hiring practices among local governments and private employers operating in the State.
This section establishes comprehensive guidelines for State agencies concerning the hiring of individuals with criminal histories, including prohibitions on inquiries about criminal records before certain stages in the hiring process.
-
N.C.G.S. § 126-34.02(b)
(7) Criminal history. – A grievance arising under G.S. 126-20 that is related to an applicant's or State employee's criminal history.
This change allows grievances related to an applicant's or employee's criminal history under the newly established G.S. 126-20 to be contested.
-
N.C.G.S. § 126-5
(c14) Notwithstanding any other provision of this Chapter, the provisions of G.S. 126-20 apply to all State employees and applicants for State employment, except as specifically excluded by that section.
This addition clarifies that the provisions regarding criminal histories apply universally to all State employees and applicants, reinforcing the mandate of G.S. 126-20.
Action History
-
Regular Message Received From House
-
Passed 1st Reading
-
Ref To Com On Rules and Operations of the Senate
-
Reptd Fav Com Substitute
-
Cal Pursuant Rule 36(b)
-
Added to Calendar
-
Passed 2nd Reading
-
Passed 3rd Reading
-
Regular Message Sent To Senate
-
Reptd Fav
-
Re-ref Com On Judiciary III
-
Passed 1st Reading
-
Ref to the Com on State Personnel, if favorable, Judiciary III
-
Filed
Sponsors
- Zachary · Cosponsor
- Williams · Cosponsor
- Terry · Cosponsor
- II Robert T. Reives · Cosponsor
- Garland E. Pierce · Cosponsor
- McGrady · Cosponsor
- Holley · Cosponsor
- Pricey Harrison · Cosponsor
- Hardister · Primary
- Grange · Primary
- Floyd · Cosponsor
- Fisher · Cosponsor
- Dulin · Cosponsor
- Deb Butler · Cosponsor
- Boswell · Cosponsor
- Mary Belk · Cosponsor
- G. Graham · Cosponsor
- C. Graham · Cosponsor
- Brian Turner · Primary
- Cecil Brockman · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →3 sponsors · 17 co-sponsors · 159 not signed on · 4 voted No
Sponsors (3)
- Hardister
- Grange
- Brian Turner Democratic
Co-sponsors (17)
- Zachary
- Williams
- Terry
- Robert T. Reives, II Democratic
- Garland E. Pierce Democratic
- McGrady
- Holley
- Pricey Harrison Democratic
- Floyd
- Fisher
- Dulin
- Deb Butler Democratic
- Boswell
- Mary Belk Democratic
- G. Graham
- C. Graham
- Cecil Brockman Democratic
Not signed on (159)
159 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 159 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 59 | 10 | 0 | 7 |
| Democratic | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 23 | 4 | 0 | 1 |
| U | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 98 | 14 | 0 | 8 |
| % of votes cast | 82% | 12% | 0% | 7% |
How each member voted (120)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Lucas | — | Yea |
| Michaux | — | Yea |
| Millis | — | Nay |
| Presnell | — | Yea |
| Steinburg | — | Yea |
| Yarborough | — | Not Voting |
| Zachary | — | Yea |
| Autry | — | Yea |
| Black | — | Yea |
| Boles | — | Yea |
| Boswell | — | Yea |
| Burr | — | Yea |
| Dobson | — | Yea |
| Farmer-Butterfield | — | Yea |
| Fisher | — | Yea |
| Floyd | — | Yea |
| Fraley | — | Yea |
| Garrison | — | Yea |
| Gill | — | Yea |
| G.Adcock | — | Yea |
| L.Bell | — | Yea |
| DuaneHall | — | Yea |
| C.Graham | — | Yea |
| G.Graham | — | Yea |
| Beasley | — | Yea |
| Earle | — | Yea |
| Goodman | — | Yea |
| Hanes | — | Yea |
| Holley | — | Yea |
| Hunter | — | Yea |
| Jackson | — | Yea |
| R.Moore | — | Yea |
| W.Richardson | — | Yea |
| B.Turner | — | Yea |
| J.Bell | — | Yea |
| BertJones | — | Yea |
| K.Hall | — | Yea |
| Johnson | — | Yea |
| Malone | — | Yea |
| S.Martin | — | Yea |
| Stone | — | Yea |
| R.Turner | — | Yea |
| Brawley | — | Nay |
| BrendenJones | — | Nay |
| Bradford | — | Nay |
| Bumgardner | — | Yea |
| Cleveland | — | Nay |
| Conrad | — | Yea |
| Dulin | — | Yea |
| Faircloth | — | Yea |
| Grange | — | Yea |
| Hardister | — | Yea |
| Horn | — | Yea |
| Insko | — | Yea |
| Jordan | — | Yea |
| Lewis | — | Yea |
| McGrady | — | Yea |
| McNeill | — | Yea |
| Murphy | — | Yea |
| Saine | — | Yea |
| Speciale | — | Yea |
| Szoka | — | Yea |
| Terry | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Wray | — | Yea |
| DestinHall | — | Nay |
| T.Moore(Speaker) | — | Not Voting |
| G.Martin | — | Not Voting |
| B.Richardson | — | Not Voting |
| Collins | — | Nay |
| Dollar | — | Nay |
| Elmore | — | Nay |
| Henson | — | Not Voting |
| Hurley | — | Nay |
| McElraft | — | Not Voting |
| Rogers | — | Not Voting |
| Amos L. Quick, III | Democratic | Yea |
| Becky Carney | Democratic | Yea |
| Cecil Brockman | Democratic | Yea |
| Cynthia Ball | Democratic | Yea |
| Dante Pittman | Democratic | Yea |
| Deb Butler | Democratic | Yea |
| Eric Ager | Democratic | Yea |
| Garland E. Pierce | Democratic | Yea |
| Graig Meyer | Democratic | Yea |
| Joe John | Democratic | Yea |
| Marcia Morey | Democratic | Yea |
| Mary Belk | Democratic | Yea |
| Pricey Harrison | Democratic | Yea |
| Robert T. Reives, II | Democratic | Yea |
| Shelly Willingham | Democratic | Yea |
| Carl Ford | Republican | Nay |
| Dean Arp | Republican | Yea |
| Dennis Riddell | Republican | Yea |
| Donna McDowell White | Republican | Yea |
| Donny Lambeth | Republican | Not Voting |
| Frank Iler | Republican | Yea |
| Harry Warren | Republican | Yea |
| Hugh Blackwell | Republican | Yea |
| Jay Adams | Republican | Yea |
| Jimmy Dixon | Republican | Yea |
| John A. Torbett | Republican | Yea |
| John M. Blust | Republican | Nay |
| John Sauls | Republican | Yea |
| Julia C. Howard | Republican | Yea |
| Kelly E. Hastings | Republican | Yea |
| Kevin Corbin | Republican | Yea |
| Larry C. Strickland | Republican | Yea |
| Larry W. Potts | Republican | Yea |
| Mark Brody | Republican | Nay |
| Mike Clampitt | Republican | Yea |
| Mitchell S. Setzer | Republican | Yea |
| Phil Shepard | Republican | Yea |
| Sam Watford | Republican | Yea |
| Sarah Stevens | Republican | Nay |
| Stephen M. Ross | Republican | Yea |
| Ted Davis, Jr. | Republican | Yea |
| W. Ted Alexander | Republican | Yea |
| William D. Brisson | Republican | Yea |
| Carla D. Cunningham | U | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HB 409?
- HB 409 is sponsored by Zachary, Williams, Terry, Robert T. Reives, II (Democratic), Garland E. Pierce (Democratic), McGrady, Holley, Pricey Harrison (Democratic), Hardister, Grange, Floyd, Fisher, Dulin, Deb Butler (Democratic), Boswell, Mary Belk (Democratic), G. Graham, C. Graham, Brian Turner (Democratic), and Cecil Brockman (Democratic).
- What is the current status of HB 409?
- This bill died with 2017-2018 Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track HB 409?
- Track HB 409 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 409
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 409
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →