North Carolina 2017-2018 Session Status: Passed House 7 D cosponsors

HB 409 — State Agencies/Adjust Hiring Practices.

Last action — Regular Message Received From House

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed House
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2017-2018 Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

55 added · 55 removed

Plain-language change summary

The amendments to Bill HB 409 clarify the process related to how job applicants with criminal histories are handled. Specifically, it ensures that applicants cannot be asked about their criminal records until they have signed a waiver, are being considered for a specific job, and have had an interview. This change aims to provide a fairer opportunity for applicants with past convictions by focusing on their qualifications and rehabilitation rather than their criminal history at the initial stages of hiring.

→
Previous
Latest
GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2017 H 2 HOUSE BILL 409 Committee Substitute Favorable 4/11/17 Short Title:
GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2017 H 1 HOUSE BILL 409 Short Title:
Representatives R.
Turner, Hardister, Grange, and Pierce (Primary Sponsors).
For a complete list of sponsors, refer to the North Carolina General Assembly web site.
March 21, 2017 A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT DIRECTING STATE AGENCIES TO ADJUST EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES TO REDUCE BARRIERS TO EMPLOYMENT FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH A CRIMINAL HISTORY.
State Personnel, if favorable, Judiciary III March 21, 2017 A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT DIRECTING STATE AGENCIES TO ADJUST EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES TO REDUCE BARRIERS TO EMPLOYMENT FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH A CRIMINAL HISTORY.
(2) Criminal history.
(2) Criminal History.
(d) Applicant Criminal History.
*H409-v-1* General Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2017 (d) Applicant Criminal History.
– An applicant shall not be asked to disclose, orally or in writing, information concerning the applicant's criminal record or history, including any *H409-v-2* General Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2017 inquiry on any employment application, until the applicant (i) has signed the appropriate waiver authorizing release, (ii) is being considered for a specific position, and (iii) has received an interview.
– An applicant shall not be asked to disclose, orally or in writing, information concerning the applicant's criminal record or history, including any inquiry on any employment application, until the applicant (i) has signed the appropriate waiver authorizing release, (ii) is being considered for a specific position, and (iii) has received an interview.
… (7) Criminal history.
… (6) Criminal History.
Page 2 House Bill 409-Second Edition
Page 2 House Bill 409-First Edition
View plain text versions (3)

How this bill changes current law

3 changes Share ↗

Compared against the N.C. General Statutes as published AI-generated reading aid — verify against the official bill.

The bill adds new provisions regarding the hiring practices of State agencies concerning individuals with criminal histories, establishing guidelines and protections for applicants.

  • N.C.G.S. § 126-20

    § 126-20. State agency hiring practices; criminal histories. (a) Definitions. – The following definitions apply in this section: (1) Applicant. – Any individual considered for, or who requests to be considered for, employment with the State or any current State employee considered for, or who requests to be considered for, another position in State employment. (2) Criminal history. – A State or federal conviction of a crime, whether a misdemeanor or felony, that bears upon an applicant's fitness for public employment. The term includes a record of arrests that have not resulted in a conviction and those that have resulted in a favorable disposition such as a dismissal or a verdict of not guilty. (3) Inquiry. – Any direct or indirect conduct intended to gather information, using any mode of communication. (b) Findings and Purpose. – The General Assembly finds that the ability to procure meaningful employment is essential to reinstating good citizenship for individuals who have a criminal record. The General Assembly declares that the State encourages the successful reintegration of people with a criminal history and recognizes that reducing barriers to employment for persons with a criminal history is a matter of statewide concern. The purpose of this section is to implement hiring practices that will increase employment opportunities and will reduce recidivism and improve community stability. (c) Scope. – This section applies to all State agencies and positions in State government employment, except that this section does not apply to any of the following: (1) A public employer that is required by State or federal law to conduct a criminal history inquiry as a preliminary qualification to be considered for public employment. (2) A position that includes law enforcement or public safety. (3) A position that involves direct interaction with minors or the elderly. (d) Applicant Criminal History. – An applicant shall not be asked to disclose, orally or in writing, information concerning the applicant's criminal record or history, including any inquiry on any employment application, until the applicant (i) has signed the appropriate waiver authorizing release, (ii) is being considered for a specific position, and (iii) has received an interview. (e) Considerations. – If a background check has been lawfully completed and a criminal history exists, the following criteria shall be considered by the State agency before either proffering or denying an offer of employment: (1) The nature and gravity of the offense. (2) The length of time that has elapsed since the offense occurred. (3) The age of the person at the time of the conviction. (4) Whether the offense is reasonably related to the duties and responsibilities of the employment sought by the applicant. (5) Any information pertaining to the degree of rehabilitation that may have taken place in the applicant. The State agency must inform the applicant of the potential adverse employment decision based on the background check report prior to a final decision and must provide the applicant an opportunity to demonstrate that the applicant was not correctly identified in the background check report or that the report is otherwise inaccurate. (f) Record of Arrest. – A record of arrest that did not result in conviction shall not be the basis for disqualification from public employment. (g) Violations of This Section. – A grievance concerning an alleged violation of this section may be brought by an applicant under G.S. 126-34.01 and G.S. 126-34.02. (h) Data Collection. – The Office of State Human Resources shall do the following: (1) Record and log the positions that are statutorily required to conduct background checks prior to a conditional offer of employment. (2) Conduct quarterly reviews to determine compliance with this Article and make a report on all such reviews to the General Assembly annually. (3) Collect, and make available to the public, data on: (a) The number of applicants for public employment with criminal histories given conditional offers of employment. (b) The number of applicants for public employment with criminal histories who are subsequently employed. (c) The retention rate of public employees with criminal histories. (i) Non-State Employers. – The General Assembly encourages comparable hiring practices among local governments and private employers operating in the State.

    This section establishes comprehensive guidelines for State agencies concerning the hiring of individuals with criminal histories, including prohibitions on inquiries about criminal records before certain stages in the hiring process.

  • N.C.G.S. § 126-34.02(b)

    (7) Criminal history. – A grievance arising under G.S. 126-20 that is related to an applicant's or State employee's criminal history.

    This change allows grievances related to an applicant's or employee's criminal history under the newly established G.S. 126-20 to be contested.

  • N.C.G.S. § 126-5

    (c14) Notwithstanding any other provision of this Chapter, the provisions of G.S. 126-20 apply to all State employees and applicants for State employment, except as specifically excluded by that section.

    This addition clarifies that the provisions regarding criminal histories apply universally to all State employees and applicants, reinforcing the mandate of G.S. 126-20.

Action History

  1. Regular Message Received From House

  2. Passed 1st Reading

  3. Ref To Com On Rules and Operations of the Senate

  4. Reptd Fav Com Substitute

  5. Cal Pursuant Rule 36(b)

  6. Added to Calendar

  7. Passed 2nd Reading

  8. Passed 3rd Reading

  9. Regular Message Sent To Senate

  10. Reptd Fav

  11. Re-ref Com On Judiciary III

  12. Passed 1st Reading

  13. Ref to the Com on State Personnel, if favorable, Judiciary III

  14. Filed

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

3 sponsors · 17 co-sponsors · 159 not signed on · 4 voted No

Sponsors (3)

Co-sponsors (17)

Not signed on (159)

159 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 159 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Second Reading

Passed 98 Yea · 14 Nay · 8 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 591007
Democratic 15000
Republican 23401
U 1000
Total 981408
% of votes cast 82%12%0%7%
How each member voted (120)
Member Party Vote
Lucas — Yea
Michaux — Yea
Millis — Nay
Presnell — Yea
Steinburg — Yea
Yarborough — Not Voting
Zachary — Yea
Autry — Yea
Black — Yea
Boles — Yea
Boswell — Yea
Burr — Yea
Dobson — Yea
Farmer-Butterfield — Yea
Fisher — Yea
Floyd — Yea
Fraley — Yea
Garrison — Yea
Gill — Yea
G.Adcock — Yea
L.Bell — Yea
DuaneHall — Yea
C.Graham — Yea
G.Graham — Yea
Beasley — Yea
Earle — Yea
Goodman — Yea
Hanes — Yea
Holley — Yea
Hunter — Yea
Jackson — Yea
R.Moore — Yea
W.Richardson — Yea
B.Turner — Yea
J.Bell — Yea
BertJones — Yea
K.Hall — Yea
Johnson — Yea
Malone — Yea
S.Martin — Yea
Stone — Yea
R.Turner — Yea
Brawley — Nay
BrendenJones — Nay
Bradford — Nay
Bumgardner — Yea
Cleveland — Nay
Conrad — Yea
Dulin — Yea
Faircloth — Yea
Grange — Yea
Hardister — Yea
Horn — Yea
Insko — Yea
Jordan — Yea
Lewis — Yea
McGrady — Yea
McNeill — Yea
Murphy — Yea
Saine — Yea
Speciale — Yea
Szoka — Yea
Terry — Yea
Williams — Yea
Wray — Yea
DestinHall — Nay
T.Moore(Speaker) — Not Voting
G.Martin — Not Voting
B.Richardson — Not Voting
Collins — Nay
Dollar — Nay
Elmore — Nay
Henson — Not Voting
Hurley — Nay
McElraft — Not Voting
Rogers — Not Voting
Amos L. Quick, III Democratic Yea
Becky Carney Democratic Yea
Cecil Brockman Democratic Yea
Cynthia Ball Democratic Yea
Dante Pittman Democratic Yea
Deb Butler Democratic Yea
Eric Ager Democratic Yea
Garland E. Pierce Democratic Yea
Graig Meyer Democratic Yea
Joe John Democratic Yea
Marcia Morey Democratic Yea
Mary Belk Democratic Yea
Pricey Harrison Democratic Yea
Robert T. Reives, II Democratic Yea
Shelly Willingham Democratic Yea
Carl Ford Republican Nay
Dean Arp Republican Yea
Dennis Riddell Republican Yea
Donna McDowell White Republican Yea
Donny Lambeth Republican Not Voting
Frank Iler Republican Yea
Harry Warren Republican Yea
Hugh Blackwell Republican Yea
Jay Adams Republican Yea
Jimmy Dixon Republican Yea
John A. Torbett Republican Yea
John M. Blust Republican Nay
John Sauls Republican Yea
Julia C. Howard Republican Yea
Kelly E. Hastings Republican Yea
Kevin Corbin Republican Yea
Larry C. Strickland Republican Yea
Larry W. Potts Republican Yea
Mark Brody Republican Nay
Mike Clampitt Republican Yea
Mitchell S. Setzer Republican Yea
Phil Shepard Republican Yea
Sam Watford Republican Yea
Sarah Stevens Republican Nay
Stephen M. Ross Republican Yea
Ted Davis, Jr. Republican Yea
W. Ted Alexander Republican Yea
William D. Brisson Republican Yea
Carla D. Cunningham U Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors HB 409?
HB 409 is sponsored by Zachary, Williams, Terry, Robert T. Reives, II (Democratic), Garland E. Pierce (Democratic), McGrady, Holley, Pricey Harrison (Democratic), Hardister, Grange, Floyd, Fisher, Dulin, Deb Butler (Democratic), Boswell, Mary Belk (Democratic), G. Graham, C. Graham, Brian Turner (Democratic), and Cecil Brockman (Democratic).
What is the current status of HB 409?
This bill died with 2017-2018 Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track HB 409?
Track HB 409 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HB 409

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of HB 409

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →