North Carolina 2017-2018 Session Status: Enacted 1 R cosponsors

SB 78 — Cost to Comply/Fed Ed Funds/PED Study.

Last action — Signed by Gov. 7/20/2017

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed House
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 14, 2017. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 82% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 6 sponsors

    0 primary, 6 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 R).

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 2 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

16 added · 111 removed

Plain-language change summary

The revised version of Senate Bill 78 now includes a more detailed introduction that specifies the session year and lists additional sponsors. It also removes outdated references to the clerical details related to the bill's filing. These changes clarify the bill's context and enhance transparency about who is supporting it, which can help the public better understand who is advocating for the proposed legislation.

→
Previous
Latest
GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2017 S 2 SENATE BILL 78 House Committee Substitute Favorable 6/29/17 Short Title:
GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2017 S 1 SENATE BILL 78 Short Title:
Senators Daniel (Primary Sponsor);
Brock, Cook, Krawiec, Pate, and Rabin.
February 15, 2017 A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT TO STUDY THE FINANCIAL COSTS TO THE STATE AND LOCAL SCHOOL ADMINISTRATIVE UNITS OF COMPLIANCE WITH FEDERAL MANDATES RELATED TO THE RECEIPT OF FEDERAL EDUCATION FUNDING AND TO ESTABLISH THE JOINT LEGISLATIVE STUDY COMMISSION ON EFFICIENCY AND COST-SAVINGS IN STATE GOVERNMENT.
Rules and Operations of the Senate February 15, 2017 A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT TO STUDY THE FINANCIAL COSTS TO THE STATE AND LOCAL SCHOOL ADMINISTRATIVE UNITS OF COMPLIANCE WITH FEDERAL MANDATES RELATED TO THE RECEIPT OF FEDERAL EDUCATION FUNDING.
9 PART I.
SECTION 1.
STUDY FINANCIAL COSTS OF FEDERAL MANDATES SECTION 1.(a) By no later than January 15, 2018, the Department of Public Instruction shall study, report, and provide any supporting data to the Fiscal Research Division and the Program Evaluation Division of the General Assembly on the cost of compliance with federal education funding mandates to local school administrative units.
By no later than January 15, 2018, the Department of Public Instruction shall study, report, and provide any supporting data to the Fiscal Research Division and the Program Evaluation Division of the General Assembly on the cost of compliance with federal education funding mandates to local school administrative units.
SECTION 1.(b) The Joint Legislative Program Evaluation Oversight Committee shall consider including in the 2017-2018 Work Plan for the Program Evaluation Division an evaluation of the cost of compliance with federal education funding mandates for K-12 education and, if included in the Work Plan, report its findings and recommendations to the General Assembly at a date to be determined by the Committee.
SECTION 2.
PART II.
The Joint Legislative Program Evaluation Oversight Committee shall consider including in the 2017-2018 Work Plan for the Program Evaluation Division an evaluation of the cost of compliance with federal education funding mandates for K-12 education and, if included in the Work Plan, report its findings and recommendations to the General Assembly at a date to be determined by the Committee.
JOINT LEGISLATIVE STUDY COMMISSION ON EFFICIENCY AND COST-SAVINGS IN STATE GOVERNMENT SECTION 2.(a) There is established the Joint Legislative Study Commission on Efficiency and Cost-Savings in State Government (Commission).
SECTION 3.
SECTION 2.(b) The Commission shall be composed of 10 members appointed as follows:
This act is effective when it becomes law.
(1) Five senators appointed by the President Pro Tempore of the Senate.
*S78-v-1*
(2) Five representatives appointed by the Speaker of the House of Representatives.
Vacancies on the Commission shall be filled by the appointing authority.
The President Pro Tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives shall each designate a cochair.
A quorum of the Commission shall be a majority of its members.
The Commission may meet at any time upon call of the chairs.
The Commission may meet in the Legislative Building or the Legislative Office Building.
The Commission may contract for professional, clerical, or consultant services as provided by G.S.
120-32.02.
The Commission, while in the discharge of its official duties, may exercise all powers provided for under G.S.
120-19 and G.S.
120-19.1 through G.S.
120-19.4, including the *S78-v-2* General Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2017 power to request all officers, agents, agencies, and departments of the State to provide any information, data, or documents within their possession, ascertainable from their records, or otherwise available to them, and the power to subpoena witnesses and documents.
The Legislative Services Commission, through the Legislative Services Officer, shall assign other professional staff to assist the Commission in its work.
The House of Representatives' and Senate's Directors of Legislative Assistants shall assign clerical staff to the Commission, and the expenses relating to the clerical employees shall be borne by the Commission.
Members of the Commission shall receive subsistence and travel expenses at the rates set forth in G.S.
120-3.1.
SECTION 2.(c) The Commission shall use a zero-based budgeting review process to study whether there are obsolete programs, cost-reduction opportunities in State government, and any cases where existing funds can be redirected to meet new and changing demands for public services.
The Commission shall start the review process with the Department of the Secretary of State.
The Commission may require any agency under review to submit written information in a form specified by the Commission by a specified time.
The Commission may accept or reject any or part of any information submitted and require revision or resubmission.
The Commission may require information as follows:
(1) Identification of decision units.
– The agency shall identify decision units representing any group of services with a common set of objectives or comprising an agency program or administrative support unit.
(2) Impact of discontinuing each decision unit.
– The agency shall provide a quantitative estimate of any adverse impacts that could reasonably be expected should the State discontinue a decision unit, together with a full description of the methods by which the adverse impact is estimated.
(3) Division of decision units into decision packages.
– The agency shall divide each decision unit into the following four discrete decision packages:
a.
Minimum.
Show all 62 changed rows (22 more)
Previous
Latest
– A quantitative estimate of any adverse impacts that could reasonably be expected and an itemized account of expenditures that would be required to maintain the activity at the minimum level of service required by any statutory authorization and below which would effectively eliminate all services, together with a concise statement of the resulting quantity and quality of services.
This service level shall be below the level described by sub-subdivision b.
of this subdivision.
b.
Reduced.
– A quantitative estimate of any adverse impacts that could reasonably be expected and an itemized account of expenditures that would be required if funding were reduced by the percentage or amount specified by the Commission below the current level as defined by sub-subdivision c.
of this subdivision and a concise statement of the resulting quantity and quality of services.
c.
Current.
– A quantitative description of benefits from and an itemized account of expenditures that would be required to maintain the activity at the current level of service, together with a full description of the methods by which the current level is determined and a concise statement of the resulting quantity and quality of services.
d.
Enhanced.
– A quantitative estimate of benefits that could reasonably be expected and an itemized account of expenditures that would be required to increase the current level of service, together with a full description of the methods by which the enhanced level is estimated Page 2 Senate Bill 78-Second Edition General Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2017 and a concise statement of the resulting quantity and quality of services.
(4) Service delivery alternatives.
– For each decision package, a description of alternative methods for delivering services, which may include, but not be limited to, shedding one or more services and relying upon the free market for delivery, delegation to another level of government, using Requests for Information or competitive selection to outsource to private for-profit or nonprofit organizations, in whole or in part, including franchising, assisting or providing incubator arrangements for current State employees to form non-State organizations to compete for outsourcing opportunities, or through methods used by other states or nations.
(5) Ranking.
– As instructed by the Commission, a ranking of all decision packages compared with each other without ties.
SECTION 2.(d) The Commission shall make an interim report to the 2018 Regular Session of the 2017 General Assembly and shall make a final report to the 2019 General Assembly.
The report shall include any proposed legislation.
The Commission shall terminate upon filing its final report or upon the convening of the 2019 General Assembly, whichever is earlier.
SECTION 2.(e) This act is effective when it becomes law.
Senate Bill 78-Second Edition Page 3
View plain text versions (7)

Action History

  1. Signed by Gov. 7/20/2017

  2. Ch. SL 2017-142

  3. Ratified

  4. Pres. To Gov. 6/30/2017

  5. Reptd Fav Com Substitute

  6. Cal Pursuant Rule 36(b)

  7. Added to Calendar

  8. Amend Adopted A1

  9. Passed 2nd Reading

  10. Passed 3rd Reading

  11. Ordered Engrossed

  12. Special Message Sent To Senate

  13. Special Message Received For Concurrence in H Com Sub

  14. Placed on Today's Calendar

  15. Concurred In H/Com Sub

  16. Ordered Enrolled

  17. Withdrawn From Com

  18. Re-ref Com On Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House

  19. Withdrawn From Com

  20. Re-ref Com On Education - K-12

  21. Passed 1st Reading

  22. Ref To Com On Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House

  23. Regular Message Sent To House

  24. Regular Message Received From Senate

  25. Passed 2nd Reading

  26. Passed 3rd Reading

  27. Reptd Fav

  28. Reptd Fav

  29. Re-ref Com On Rules and Operations of the Senate

  30. Withdrawn From Com

  31. Re-ref to Education/Higher Education. If fav, re-ref to Rules and Operations of the Senate

  32. Passed 1st Reading

  33. Ref To Com On Rules and Operations of the Senate

  34. Filed

Sponsors

  • Rabin · Cosponsor
  • Pate · Cosponsor
  • Krawiec · Cosponsor
  • Warren Daniel · Cosponsor
  • Cook · Cosponsor
  • Brock · Cosponsor

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

0 sponsors · 6 co-sponsors · 173 not signed on · 4 voted No

Sponsors (0)

None.

Co-sponsors (6)

Not signed on (173)

173 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 173 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Second Reading

Passed 109 Yea · 2 Nay · 9 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 68107
Democratic 13101
Republican 27001
U 1000
Total 109209
% of votes cast 91%2%0%8%
How each member voted (120)
Member Party Vote
McElraft — Yea
Michaux — Yea
Millis — Yea
Presnell — Yea
Steinburg — Not Voting
Terry — Yea
Williams — Yea
Zachary — Yea
Autry — Yea
Boswell — Yea
Burr — Yea
Conrad — Yea
Dobson — Yea
Dulin — Yea
Faircloth — Yea
Farmer-Butterfield — Not Voting
Fisher — Nay
Floyd — Yea
Fraley — Yea
Garrison — Yea
Insko — Yea
G.Adcock — Yea
L.Bell — Yea
DuaneHall — Yea
G.Graham — Yea
Jackson — Yea
G.Martin — Yea
R.Moore — Yea
B.Richardson — Yea
W.Richardson — Yea
B.Turner — Yea
J.Bell — Yea
BertJones — Yea
Brawley — Yea
Beasley — Yea
Black — Yea
DestinHall — Yea
K.Hall — Yea
Johnson — Yea
Malone — Yea
S.Martin — Yea
T.Moore(Speaker) — Yea
Stone — Yea
R.Turner — Yea
C.Graham — Not Voting
BrendenJones — Not Voting
Bradford — Not Voting
Cleveland — Yea
Collins — Yea
Dollar — Yea
Elmore — Yea
Grange — Yea
Hardister — Yea
Henson — Yea
Horn — Yea
Hurley — Yea
Jordan — Yea
Lewis — Not Voting
Lucas — Not Voting
McGrady — Yea
McNeill — Yea
Murphy — Yea
Rogers — Yea
Saine — Yea
Speciale — Yea
Szoka — Yea
Yarborough — Yea
Boles — Yea
Bumgardner — Yea
Earle — Yea
Gill — Yea
Goodman — Yea
Hanes — Yea
Holley — Yea
Hunter — Yea
Wray — Yea
Amos L. Quick, III Democratic Not Voting
Becky Carney Democratic Yea
Cecil Brockman Democratic Yea
Cynthia Ball Democratic Yea
Dante Pittman Democratic Yea
Deb Butler Democratic Yea
Eric Ager Democratic Yea
Garland E. Pierce Democratic Yea
Graig Meyer Democratic Yea
Joe John Democratic Yea
Marcia Morey Democratic Yea
Mary Belk Democratic Yea
Pricey Harrison Democratic Nay
Robert T. Reives, II Democratic Yea
Shelly Willingham Democratic Yea
Carl Ford Republican Yea
Dean Arp Republican Yea
Dennis Riddell Republican Yea
Donna McDowell White Republican Yea
Donny Lambeth Republican Yea
Frank Iler Republican Yea
Harry Warren Republican Yea
Hugh Blackwell Republican Yea
Jay Adams Republican Yea
Jimmy Dixon Republican Yea
John A. Torbett Republican Yea
John M. Blust Republican Yea
John Sauls Republican Yea
Julia C. Howard Republican Yea
Kelly E. Hastings Republican Yea
Kevin Corbin Republican Yea
Larry C. Strickland Republican Yea
Larry W. Potts Republican Yea
Mark Brody Republican Yea
Mike Clampitt Republican Yea
Mitchell S. Setzer Republican Yea
Phil Shepard Republican Yea
Sam Watford Republican Yea
Sarah Stevens Republican Yea
Stephen M. Ross Republican Yea
Ted Davis, Jr. Republican Yea
W. Ted Alexander Republican Not Voting
William D. Brisson Republican Yea
Carla D. Cunningham U Yea

Official roll call →

Motion 9 To Concur

Passed 32 Yea · 8 Nay · 10 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 22506
Democratic 2302
Republican 8002
Total 328010
% of votes cast 64%16%0%20%
How each member voted (50)
Member Party Vote
Randleman — Yea
Tillman — Not Voting
Ballard — Yea
Barefoot — Yea
Brock — Yea
Dunn — Yea
Foushee — Nay
Horner — Yea
VanDuyn — Yea
Brown — Yea
B.Jackson — Yea
Barringer — Yea
Bishop — Yea
Curtis — Yea
Edwards — Yea
Gunn — Yea
Harrington — Yea
McKissick — Yea
Tucker — Yea
D.Davis — Nay
Smith — Nay
Newton — Not Voting
J.Jackson — Not Voting
J.Davis — Not Voting
Bryant — Nay
Krawiec — Yea
Meredith — Not Voting
Pate — Yea
Rabin — Yea
Tarte — Not Voting
Wade — Yea
Wells — Yea
Woodard — Nay
Amanda P. Cook Democratic Yea
Dan Blue Democratic Yea
Gladys A. Robinson Democratic Not Voting
Jay J. Chaudhuri Democratic Not Voting
Joyce Waddell Democratic Nay
Paul A. Lowe, Jr. Democratic Nay
Tracy Clark Democratic Nay
Bill Rabon Republican Yea
Carl Ford Republican Not Voting
Danny Earl Britt, Jr. Republican Yea
Michael V. Lee Republican Yea
Norman W. Sanderson Republican Yea
Phil Berger Republican Yea
Ralph Hise Republican Not Voting
Tom McInnis Republican Yea
W. Ted Alexander Republican Yea
Warren Daniel Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SB 78?
SB 78 is sponsored by Rabin, Pate, Krawiec, Warren Daniel (Republican), Cook, and Brock.
What is the current status of SB 78?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 14, 2017. Enacted.
Where can I track SB 78?
Track SB 78 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 78

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 78

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →