North Carolina 2017-2018 Session Status: Enacted 3 R cosponsors

SB 560 — Clarify Cleveland Board of Education Election.

Last action — Reptd Fav Com Substitute

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed House
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced March 30, 2017. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 78% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 4 sponsors

    2 primary, 2 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (3 R).

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 2 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

88 added · 24 removed

Plain-language change summary

The latest version of Senate Bill 560 has updated the language to clarify its sponsorship and ensure it aligns with the current session's official records. This change is important because it helps maintain accurate documentation of who is supporting the bill and reinforces its place in the legislative process. Keeping records clear and up-to-date aids in transparency for the public and others involved in governance.

→
Previous
Latest
GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2017 S 2 SENATE BILL 560 House Committee Substitute Favorable 8/3/17 Short Title:
GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2017 S 1 SENATE BILL 560 Short Title:
Clarify Cleveland Board of Education Election.
Citizen's Warrants.
(Local) Sponsors:
(Public) Sponsors:
Senators J.
Jackson, Britt, Tucker (Primary Sponsors);
and Lee.
April 3, 2017 A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT TO CLARIFY THE PROCESS FOR ELECTION OF THE CLEVELAND COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION.
Rules and Operations of the Senate April 3, 2017 A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT TO PROVIDE THAT A PRIVATE CITIZEN'S SHOWING OF PROBABLE CAUSE TO THE MAGISTRATE SHALL INCLUDE SUFFICIENT INFORMATION SUPPORTED BY OATH OR AFFIRMATION THAT A CRIME HAS OCCURRED AND SHALL ISSUE AS A SUMMONS UNLESS A SUBSTANTIAL LIKELIHOOD EXISTS THAT THE DEFENDANT WILL NOT RESPOND TO A SUMMONS.
Section 3.1 of S.L.
G.S.
2017-78 reads as rewritten:
15A-304 reads as rewritten:
"SECTION 3.1.
"§ 15A-304.
Notwithstanding the Plan for the Merger of the Cleveland County, Kings Mountain District, and Shelby City Schools and S.L.
Warrant for arrest.
2004-41, as amended by S.L.
(a) Definition.
2007-49, beginning with the 2017 elections, members of the Cleveland County Board of Education shall be elected in elections conducted on a partisan basis, as provided in G.S.
– A warrant for arrest consists of a statement of the crime of which the person to be arrested is accused, and an order directing that the person so accused be arrested and held to answer to the charges made against him.
163-291.
It is based upon a showing of probable cause supported by oath or affirmation.Definitions.
Unaffiliated candidates shall be nominated by petition as provided in G.S.
– (1) Warrant for arrest.
163-296.
– A warrant for arrest consists of a statement of the crime of which the person to be arrested is accused and an order directing that the person so accused be arrested and held to answer to the charges made against that person.
Vacancies for members elected in 2017 and thereafter shall be filled as provided in G.S.
It is based upon a showing of probable cause supported by oath or affirmation.
115C-37.1." SECTION 2.
(2) Citizen's warrant.
S.L.
– A citizen's warrant is a warrant for arrest issued by a magistrate or a clerk based upon a showing of probable cause supported solely by information presented by a private person.
2017-78 is amended by adding a new section to read:
(b) When Issued.
"SECTION 3.3.
– A warrant for arrest may be issued, instead of or subsequent to a criminal summons, when it appears to the judicial official that the person named should be taken into custody.
Notwithstanding the petition signature requirements of G.S.
Circumstances to be considered in determining whether the person should be taken into custody may include, but are not limited to, failure to appear when previously summoned, facts making it apparent that a person summoned will fail to appear, danger that the person accused will escape, danger that there may be injury to person or property, or the seriousness of the offense.
163-296, for the 2017 elections for the Cleveland County Board of Education only, petitions for an unaffiliated candidate to be placed upon the ballot for that office shall be signed by at least 500 voters of Cleveland County qualified to vote in the Cleveland County Board of Education election according to the voter registration records of the Bipartisan State Board of Elections and Ethics Enforcement as of January 1, 2017." SECTION 3.
(c) Statement of the Crime.
This act is effective when it becomes law.
– TheBoth a warrant for arrest and a citizen's warrant must contain a statement of the crime of which the person to be arrested is accused.
*S560-v-2*
No warrant for arrest,warrant, nor any arrest made pursuant thereto, is invalid because of any technicality of pleading if the statement is sufficient to identify the crime.
(d) Showing of Probable Cause.Cause for a Warrant for Arrest.
– A judicial official may issue a warrant for arrest only when hethe official is supplied with sufficient information, supported by oath or affirmation, to make an independent judgment that there is probable cause *S560-v-1* General Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2017 to believe that a crime has been committed and that the person to be arrested committed it.
The information must be shown by one or more of the following:
(1) Affidavit;
(2) Oral testimony under oath or affirmation before the issuing official;
or (3) Oral testimony under oath or affirmation presented by a sworn law enforcement officer to the issuing official by means of an audio and video transmission in which both parties can see and hear each other.
Prior to the use of audio and video transmission pursuant to this subdivision, the procedures and type of equipment for audio and video transmission shall be submitted to the Administrative Office of the Courts by the senior regular resident superior court judge and the chief district court judge for a judicial district or set of districts and approved by the Administrative Office of the Courts.
If the information is insufficient to show probable cause, the warrant may not be issued.
A judicial official shall not refuse to issue a warrant for the arrest of a person solely because a prior warrant has been issued for the arrest of another person involved in the same matter.
(d1) Showing of Probable Cause for a Citizen's Warrant.
– A magistrate may issue a warrant or criminal summons only when the magistrate is supplied with sufficient information, provided by a private person, supported by oath or affirmation, to make an independent judgment that there is probable cause to believe that a crime has been committed and that the person to be arrested committed it.
The information shall be shown by one or more of the methods listed in subdivisions (1) through (3) of subsection (d) of this section.
A summons rather than a warrant shall be issued unless:
(1) The accused has a history of failure to appear before the court as required;
(2) There is evidence that the accused is likely to escape or otherwise flee the State in order to avoid prosecution for the offense alleged;
Show all 59 changed rows (19 more)
Previous
Latest
(3) There is evidence of imminent danger of harm to persons or property if the accused is not taken into custody;
(4) The location of the accused is not readily discoverable, such that a criminal summons would be unlikely to be served before any court date assigned at the time of issue;
(5) A relevant statute provides that arrest is mandatory for an offense charged;
or (6) The seriousness of the offense constitutes grounds for a warrant.
(e) Order for Arrest.
– The order for arrest must direct that a law-enforcement officer take the defendant into custody and bring him without unnecessary delay before a judicial official to answer to the charges made against him.
(f) Who May Issue.
– A warrant for arrest, valid throughout the State, may be issued by:
(1) A Justice of the Supreme Court.
(2) A judge of the Court of Appeals.
(3) A judge of the superior court.
(4) A judge of the district court, as provided in G.S.
7A-291.
(5) A clerk, as provided in G.S.
7A-180 and 7A-181.
(6) A magistrate, as provided in G.S.
7A-273." SECTION 2.
This act becomes effective December 1, 2017, and applies to warrants issued on or after that date.
Page 2 Senate Bill 560-First Edition
View plain text versions (5)

Action History

  1. Reptd Fav Com Substitute

  2. Cal Pursuant Rule 36(b)

  3. Added to Calendar

  4. Passed 2nd Reading

  5. Passed 3rd Reading

  6. Special Message Sent To Senate

  7. Special Message Received For Concurrence in H Com Sub

  8. Placed on Today's Calendar

  9. Concurred In H/Com Sub

  10. Ordered Enrolled

  11. Ratified

  12. Ch. SL 2017-200

  13. Regular Message Sent To House

  14. Regular Message Received From Senate

  15. Passed 1st Reading

  16. Ref To Com On Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House

  17. Reptd Fav

  18. Placed on Today's Supplemental Calendar

  19. Passed 2nd Reading

  20. Passed 3rd Reading

  21. Reptd Fav

  22. Re-ref Com On Rules and Operations of the Senate

  23. Withdrawn From Com

  24. Re-ref to Judiciary. If fav, re-ref to Rules and Operations of the Senate

  25. Passed 1st Reading

  26. Ref To Com On Rules and Operations of the Senate

  27. Filed

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

2 sponsors · 2 co-sponsors · 175 not signed on · 2 voted No

Sponsors (2)

Co-sponsors (2)

Not signed on (175)

175 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 175 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Second Reading

Passed 106 Yea · 0 Nay · 14 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 660010
Democratic 14001
Republican 25003
U 1000
Total 1060014
% of votes cast 88%0%0%12%
How each member voted (120)
Member Party Vote
Lewis — Yea
McElraft — Yea
Michaux — Yea
Millis — Yea
Szoka — Not Voting
Yarborough — Not Voting
Zachary — Yea
Boles — Yea
Boswell — Yea
Cleveland — Yea
Conrad — Yea
Dobson — Yea
Dulin — Yea
Faircloth — Yea
Farmer-Butterfield — Yea
Fisher — Not Voting
Floyd — Not Voting
Fraley — Yea
Garrison — Yea
L.Bell — Yea
DuaneHall — Yea
Autry — Yea
Beasley — Yea
Black — Yea
C.Graham — Yea
G.Graham — Yea
Jackson — Yea
G.Martin — Yea
R.Moore — Yea
B.Richardson — Yea
W.Richardson — Yea
B.Turner — Yea
J.Bell — Yea
BertJones — Yea
Brawley — Yea
BrendenJones — Yea
DestinHall — Yea
K.Hall — Yea
Johnson — Yea
Malone — Yea
S.Martin — Yea
T.Moore(Speaker) — Yea
Bumgardner — Yea
Burr — Yea
Collins — Yea
Dollar — Yea
Earle — Yea
Elmore — Yea
Gill — Yea
Goodman — Yea
Grange — Yea
Hanes — Yea
Henson — Yea
Holley — Yea
Hunter — Yea
Hurley — Yea
Insko — Yea
Lucas — Yea
McGrady — Yea
McNeill — Yea
Murphy — Yea
Presnell — Yea
Wray — Yea
Stone — Yea
R.Turner — Yea
G.Adcock — Not Voting
Bradford — Not Voting
Hardister — Not Voting
Horn — Not Voting
Jordan — Not Voting
Rogers — Yea
Saine — Yea
Speciale — Yea
Steinburg — Yea
Terry — Not Voting
Williams — Yea
Amos L. Quick, III Democratic Yea
Becky Carney Democratic Yea
Cecil Brockman Democratic Not Voting
Cynthia Ball Democratic Yea
Dante Pittman Democratic Yea
Deb Butler Democratic Yea
Eric Ager Democratic Yea
Garland E. Pierce Democratic Yea
Graig Meyer Democratic Yea
Joe John Democratic Yea
Marcia Morey Democratic Yea
Mary Belk Democratic Yea
Pricey Harrison Democratic Yea
Robert T. Reives, II Democratic Yea
Shelly Willingham Democratic Yea
Carl Ford Republican Yea
Dean Arp Republican Yea
Dennis Riddell Republican Yea
Donna McDowell White Republican Yea
Donny Lambeth Republican Not Voting
Frank Iler Republican Yea
Harry Warren Republican Yea
Hugh Blackwell Republican Yea
Jay Adams Republican Not Voting
Jimmy Dixon Republican Yea
John A. Torbett Republican Yea
John M. Blust Republican Yea
John Sauls Republican Yea
Julia C. Howard Republican Yea
Kelly E. Hastings Republican Yea
Kevin Corbin Republican Yea
Larry C. Strickland Republican Yea
Larry W. Potts Republican Yea
Mark Brody Republican Yea
Mike Clampitt Republican Yea
Mitchell S. Setzer Republican Yea
Phil Shepard Republican Yea
Sam Watford Republican Yea
Sarah Stevens Republican Not Voting
Stephen M. Ross Republican Yea
Ted Davis, Jr. Republican Yea
W. Ted Alexander Republican Yea
William D. Brisson Republican Yea
Carla D. Cunningham U Yea

Official roll call →

Motion 9 To Concur

Passed 38 Yea · 2 Nay · 9 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 25007
Democratic 5200
Republican 8002
Total 38209
% of votes cast 78%4%0%18%
How each member voted (49)
Member Party Vote
McKissick — Yea
Randleman — Yea
Tillman — Not Voting
Ballard — Yea
Barefoot — Yea
Foushee — Not Voting
Harrington — Yea
D.Davis — Yea
J.Jackson — Yea
Smith — Yea
VanDuyn — Yea
Brown — Yea
Barringer — Yea
Bishop — Yea
Curtis — Yea
Edwards — Yea
Gunn — Yea
B.Jackson — Yea
Newton — Yea
Tucker — Yea
J.Davis — Not Voting
Bryant — Not Voting
Dunn — Not Voting
Horner — Yea
Krawiec — Yea
Meredith — Not Voting
Pate — Yea
Rabin — Yea
Tarte — Yea
Wade — Yea
Wells — Yea
Woodard — Not Voting
Amanda P. Cook Democratic Yea
Dan Blue Democratic Nay
Gladys A. Robinson Democratic Nay
Jay J. Chaudhuri Democratic Yea
Joyce Waddell Democratic Yea
Paul A. Lowe, Jr. Democratic Yea
Tracy Clark Democratic Yea
Bill Rabon Republican Yea
Carl Ford Republican Not Voting
Danny Earl Britt, Jr. Republican Yea
Michael V. Lee Republican Not Voting
Norman W. Sanderson Republican Yea
Phil Berger Republican Yea
Ralph Hise Republican Yea
Tom McInnis Republican Yea
W. Ted Alexander Republican Yea
Warren Daniel Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SB 560?
SB 560 is sponsored by Danny Earl Britt, Jr. (Republican), Tucker, Brent Jackson (Republican), and Michael V. Lee (Republican).
What is the current status of SB 560?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced March 30, 2017. Enacted.
Where can I track SB 560?
Track SB 560 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 560

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 560

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →