SB 307 — Allow tax increment financing for police, firefighting facilities
Last action — Referred to committee
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has passed the Senate. Introduced October 28, 2025. It now moves to the second chamber.
Next likely step: consideration and a floor vote in the House.
Odds of enactment
Moderate chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a moderate chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
Passed Senate
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 R).
-
Mixed recorded votes
3 passed, 1 failed in recorded votes so far.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
In plain language
The bill allows tax increment financing for police and firefighting facilities.
This legislation amends tax increment financing rules to include police and firefighting facilities as eligible projects. It aims to support the funding of these essential services through property tax revenues from improvements in designated areas.
Summary
To amend section 5709.40 of the Revised Code to allow funding for police and firefighting facilities in tax increment financing arrangements.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
25 added · 23 removedPlain-language change summary
The amendments to Bill SB 307 mainly involve a change in the list of cosponsors. The final version includes a larger group of senators who support the bill, expanding from three to sixteen cosponsors. This change matters because it indicates broader bipartisan support, which can increase the likelihood of the bill passing and ultimately becoming law.
As ReportedPassed by the Senate Ways and Means Committee 136th General Assembly Regular Session S.
Senators Roegner, Liston, SchafferSchaffer, Antonio, Brenner, Chavez, Cirino, Craig, DeMora, Gavarone, Ingram, Landis, O'Brien, Patton, Reineke, Reynolds, Weinstein, Wilkin, Wilson To amend section 5709.40 of the Revised Code to 1 allow funding for police and firefighting 2 facilities in tax increment financing 3 arrangements.
14 (4) "Improvement" means the increase in the assessed value 15 of any real property that would first appear on the tax list and 16 duplicate of real and public utility property after the 17 effective date of an ordinance adopted under this section were 18 S.
307 Page 2 As ReportedPassed by the Senate Wayseffective anddate Meansof Committeean ordinance adopted under this section were 18 it not for the exemption granted by that ordinance.
41 (f) As certified by the engineer for the political 42 subdivision, the public infrastructure serving the district is 43 inadequate to meet the development needs of the district as 44 evidenced by a written economic development plan or urban 45 renewal plan for the district that has been adopted by the 46 legislativeS. authority of the subdivision.
47 S.
307 Page 3 As ReportedPassed by the Senate Wayslegislative andauthority Means Committee (g) The district is comprised entirely of unimproved land 48 that is located in a distressed area as defined in section 49 122.23 of the Revisedsubdivision. Code.
47 (g) The district is comprised entirely of unimproved land 48 that is located in a distressed area as defined in section 49 122.23 of the Revised Code.
the enhancement of public waterways 76 throughS. improvements that allow for greater public access;
and 77 S.
307 Page 4 As ReportedPassed by the Senate Waysthrough andimprovements Meansthat Committeeallow off-street parking facilities, including those in which all or a 78 portion of the parking spaces are reserved for specificgreater usespublic 79access; when determined to be necessary for economic development 80 purposes.
and 77 off-street parking facilities, including those in which all or a 78 portion of the parking spaces are reserved for specific uses 79 when determined to be necessary for economic development 80 purposes.
103 Except as otherwise provided under division (D) of this section 104 or section 5709.51 of the Revised Code, not more than seventy- 105 five per cent of an improvement thus declared to be a public 106 S.
307 Page 5 As ReportedPassed by the Senate Waysfive andper Meanscent Committeeof an improvement thus declared to be a public 106 purpose may be exempted from real property taxation for a period 107 of not more than ten years.
120 (C)(1) The legislative authority of a municipal 121 corporation may adopt an ordinance creating an incentive 122 district and declaring improvements to parcels within the 123 district to be a public purpose and, except as provided in 124 division (C)(2) of this section, exempt from taxation as 125 provided in this section, but no legislative authority of a 126 municipal corporation that has a population that exceeds twenty- 127 five thousand, as shown by the most recent federal decennial 128 census, shall adopt an ordinance that creates an incentive 129 district if the sum of the taxable value of real property in the 130 proposed district for the preceding tax year and the taxable 131 value of all real property in the municipal corporation that 132 would have been taxable in the preceding year were it not for 133 the fact that the property was in an existing incentive district 134 and therefore exempt from taxation exceeds twenty-five per cent 135 of the taxable value of real property in the municipal 136 corporationS. for the preceding tax year.
The ordinance shall 137 S.
307 Page 6 As ReportedPassed by the Senate Wayscorporation andfor Means Committee delineate the boundarypreceding oftax theyear. proposed district and specifically 138 identify each parcel within the district.
The ordinance shall 137 delineate the boundary of the proposed district and specifically 138 identify each parcel within the district.
Not 165 later than thirty days prior to the public hearing, the 166 legislative authority shall give notice of the public hearing 167 and the proposed ordinance by first class mail to every real 168 S.
307 Page 7 As ReportedPassed by the Senate Ways and Meansthe Committeeproposed ordinance by first class mail to every real 168 property owner whose property is located within the boundaries 169 of the proposed incentive district that is the subject of the 170 proposed ordinance.
198 (c) Before adopting an ordinance under division (C)(1) of 199 S.
307 Page 8 As ReportedPassed by the Senate Ways(c) andBefore Meansadopting Committeean ordinance under division (C)(1) of 199 this section, the legislative authority of a municipal 200 corporation shall amend the ordinance to exclude any parcel 201 located wholly or partly outside the overlay for which a written 202 response has been submitted under division (C)(2)(b) of this 203 section.
229 An ordinance adopted under division (C)(1) of this section 230 S.
307 Page 9 As ReportedPassed by the Senate WaysAn andordinance Meansadopted Committeeunder division (C)(1) of this section 230 on or after March 30, 2006, shall not designate police or fire 231 equipment as public infrastructure improvements, and no service 232 payment provided for in section 5709.42 of the Revised Code and 233 received by the municipal corporation under the ordinance shall 234 be used for police or fire equipment.
With approval of the board of education, 258 the life of a district may be not more than thirty years, and 259 the percentage of improvements to be exempted may be not more 260 thanS. one hundred per cent.
The approval of a board of education 261 S.
307 Page 10 As ReportedPassed by the Senate Waysthan andone Meanshundred Committeeper shallcent. be obtained in the manner provided in division (D) of this 262 section.
The approval of a board of education 261 shall be obtained in the manner provided in division (D) of this 262 section.
The notice regarding 291 improvements with respect to a parcel under division (B) of this 292 S.
307 Page 11 As ReportedPassed by the Senate Waysimprovements andwith Meansrespect Committeeto a parcel under division (B) of this 292 section shall identify the parcels for which improvements are to 293 be exempted from taxation, provide an estimate of the true value 294 in money of the improvements, specify the period for which the 295 improvements would be exempted from taxation and the percentage 296 of the improvement that would be exempted, and indicate the date 297 on which the legislative authority intends to adopt the 298 ordinance.
If an agreement is negotiated between the 323 legislative authority and the board to compensate the school 324 S.
307 Page 12 As ReportedPassed by the Senate Wayslegislative authority and Meansthe Committeeboard to compensate the school 324 district for all or part of the taxes exempted, including 325 agreements for payments in lieu of taxes under section 5709.42 326 of the Revised Code, the legislative authority shall compensate 327 the joint vocational school district within which the parcel or 328 district is located at the same rate and under the same terms 329 received by the city, local, or exempted village school 330 district.
352 The legislative authority may adopt the ordinance at any time 353 after the board of education certifies its resolution approving 354 the exemption to the legislative authority, or, if the board 355 S.
307 Page 13 As ReportedPassed by the Senate Waysthe andexemption Meansto Committeethe legislative authority, or, if the board 355 approves the exemption on the condition that a mutually 356 acceptable compensation agreement be negotiated, at any time 357 after the compensation agreement is agreed to by the board and 358 the legislative authority.
383 (6) Nothing in division (D) of this section prohibits the 384 legislative authority of a municipal corporation from amending 385 S.
307 Page 14 As ReportedPassed by the Senate Wayslegislative andauthority Meansof Committeea municipal corporation from amending 385 the ordinance or resolution under section 5709.51 of the Revised 386 Code to extend the term of the exemption.
If 414 the board of county commissioners objects, and the board and 415 legislative authority fail to negotiate a mutually acceptable 416 S.
307 Page 15 As ReportedPassed by the Senate Wayslegislative andauthority Meansfail Committeeto negotiate a mutually acceptable 416 compensation agreement, the ordinance adopted under division (C) 417 (1) of this section shall provide to the board compensation in 418 the eleventh and subsequent years of the exemption period equal 419 in value to not more than fifty per cent of the taxes that would 420 be payable to the county or, if the board's objection includes 421 an objection to an exemption percentage in excess of seventy- 422 five per cent, compensation equal in value to not more than 423 fifty per cent of the taxes that would be payable to the county, 424 on the portion of the improvement in excess of seventy-five per 425 cent, were that portion to be subject to taxation.
445 (F) Service payments in lieu of taxes that are 446 attributable to any amount by which the effective tax rate of 447 S.
307 Page 16 As ReportedPassed by the Senate Waysattributable andto Meansany Committeeamount by which the effective tax rate of 447 either a renewal levy with an increase or a replacement levy 448 exceeds the effective tax rate of the levy renewed or replaced, 449 or that are attributable to an additional levy, for a levy 450 authorized by the voters for any of the following purposes on or 451 after January 1, 2006, and which are provided pursuant to an 452 ordinance creating an incentive district under division (C)(1) 453 of this section that is adopted on or after January 1, 2006, or 454 a later date as specified in this division, shall be distributed 455 to the appropriate taxing authority as required under division 456 (C) of section 5709.42 of the Revised Code in an amount equal to 457 the amount of taxes from that additional levy or from the 458 increase in the effective tax rate of such renewal or 459 replacement levy that would have been payable to that taxing 460 authority from the following levies were it not for the 461 exemption authorized under division (C) of this section:
Show all 54 changed lines (14 more)
475 (5) A tax levied under section 5705.23 of the Revised Code 476 S.
307 Page 17 As ReportedPassed by the Senate Ways(5) andA Meanstax Committeelevied under section 5705.23 of the Revised Code 476 for library purposes;
500 (13) A tax levied by a township under section 505.39, 501 division (I) of section 5705.19, or division (JJ) of section 502 5705.19 of the Revised Code to the extent the proceeds are used 503 for the purposes described in division (I) of that section, for 504 S.
307 Page 18 As ReportedPassed by the Senate Waysfor andthe Meanspurposes Committeedescribed in division (I) of that section, for 504 the purpose of funding fire, emergency medical, and ambulance 505 services as described in that section and those divisions.
With respect to the exemption of improvements to 531 parcels under division (B) of this section, the ordinance may 532 allow for the exemption to commence in different tax years on a 533 parcel-by-parcel basis, with a separate exemption term specified 534 forS. each parcel.
535 S.
307 Page 19 As ReportedPassed by the Senate Waysfor andeach Meansparcel. Committee Except as otherwise provided in this division or section 536 5709.51 of the Revised Code, the exemption ends on the date 537 specified in the ordinance as the date the improvement ceases to 538 be a public purpose or the incentive district expires, or ends 539 on the date on which the public infrastructure improvements and 540 housing renovations are paid in full from the municipal public 541 improvement tax increment equivalent fund established under 542 division (A) of section 5709.43 of the Revised Code, whichever 543 occurs first.
535 Except as otherwise provided in this division or section 536 5709.51 of the Revised Code, the exemption ends on the date 537 specified in the ordinance as the date the improvement ceases to 538 be a public purpose or the incentive district expires, or ends 539 on the date on which the public infrastructure improvements and 540 housing renovations are paid in full from the municipal public 541 improvement tax increment equivalent fund established under 542 division (A) of section 5709.43 of the Revised Code, whichever 543 occurs first.
If 562 the municipal corporation issues bonds or notes to finance the 563 public infrastructure improvements and housing renovations and 564 pledges money from the municipal public improvement tax 565 increment equivalent fund to pay the interest on and principal 566 S.
307 Page 20 As ReportedPassed by the Senate Waysincrement equivalent fund to pay the interest on and Meansprincipal Committee566 of the bonds or notes, the bonds or notes are not subject to 567 Chapter 133.
591 (L)(1) Notwithstanding the limitations on the life of an 592 incentive district and the number of years that improvements to 593 a parcel or parcels within an incentive district may be exempted 594 from taxation prescribed by divisions (C) and (D) of this 595 section, the legislative authority of a municipal corporation 596 S.
307 Page 21 As ReportedPassed by the Senate Wayssection, andthe Meanslegislative Committeeauthority of a municipal corporation 596 may amend an ordinance originally adopted under division (C) of 597 this section before January 1, 2006, to extend the life of an 598 incentive district created by that ordinance.
623 (a) The amendment provides for compensation to the city, 624 local, or exempted village school district in which the 625 S.
307 Page 22 As ReportedPassed by the Senate Wayslocal, andor Meansexempted Committeevillage school district in which the 625 incentive district is located equal in value to the amount of 626 taxes that would be payable to the school district if the 627 improvements exempted from taxation had not been exempted for 628 the additional period.
Show all 54 changed rows (14 more)
View plain text versions (3)
- As Passed by the Senate View text Current pdf
- Reported As Reported by the Senate Ways and Means Committee pdf
- Introduced As Introduced pdf
Action History
-
As Passed by the Senate
Sponsors
- Jane M. Timken · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 133 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Jane M. Timken Republican
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (133)
133 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 133 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 23 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 31 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (31)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Beth Liston | Democratic | Yea |
| Casey Weinstein | Democratic | Yea |
| Catherine D. Ingram | Democratic | Yea |
| Hearcel F. Craig | Democratic | Yea |
| Kent Smith | Democratic | Yea |
| Nickie J. Antonio | Democratic | Yea |
| William P. DeMora | Democratic | Yea |
| Willis E. Blackshear, Jr. | Democratic | Yea |
| Al Cutrona | Republican | Yea |
| Al Landis | Republican | Yea |
| Andrew O. Brenner | Republican | Yea |
| Bill Reineke | Republican | Yea |
| Brian M. Chavez | Republican | Yea |
| George F. Lang | Republican | Yea |
| Jane M. Timken | Republican | Yea |
| Jerry C. Cirino | Republican | Yea |
| Kristina D. Roegner | Republican | Yea |
| Kyle Koehler | Republican | Yea |
| Louis W. Blessing, III | Republican | Yea |
| Mark Romanchuk | Republican | Yea |
| Michele Reynolds | Republican | Yea |
| Nathan H. Manning | Republican | Yea |
| Rob McColley | Republican | Yea |
| Sandra O'Brien | Republican | Yea |
| Shane Wilkin | Republican | Yea |
| Stephen A. Huffman | Republican | Yea |
| Steve Wilson | Republican | Yea |
| Susan Manchester | Republican | Yea |
| Theresa Gavarone | Republican | Yea |
| Thomas F. Patton | Republican | Yea |
| Tim Schaffer | Republican | Yea |
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Beth Liston | Democratic | Yea |
| William P. DeMora | Democratic | Yea |
| Kristina D. Roegner | Republican | Yea |
| Louis W. Blessing, III | Republican | Yea |
| Sandra O'Brien | Republican | Yea |
| Steve Wilson | Republican | Yea |
| Tim Schaffer | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 307 do?
- To amend section 5709.40 of the Revised Code to allow funding for police and firefighting facilities in tax increment financing arrangements.
- Who sponsors SB 307?
- SB 307 is sponsored by Jane M. Timken (Republican).
- What is the current status of SB 307?
- This bill has passed the Senate. Introduced October 28, 2025. It now moves to the second chamber.
- Where can I track SB 307?
- Track SB 307 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 307
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 307
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →