Ohio 136th General Assembly Status: Enacted 1 R cosponsors

SB 262 — Require construction contracts note variation from standard form

Last action — Effective 9/17/26

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed House
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced September 17, 2026. Enacted.

Odds of enactment

High chance

Based on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.

Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.

A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.

Prognosis

Advancing 56% · moderate confidence
  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 R).

  • Mixed recorded votes

    6 passed, 2 failed in recorded votes so far.

Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.

In plain language

This bill requires noting changes from standard construction contract forms.

The bill amends several sections of the Revised Code to mandate that any variations from standard construction contract forms be explicitly noted by public authorities or parties involved in the contract. This aims to increase transparency and clarity in construction agreements.

Summary

To amend sections 9.334, 153.12, 153.501, 153.503, and 153.693 of the Revised Code to require a public authority or other party to a construction contract to note variations from an industry standard form.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

318 added · 461 removed

Plain-language change summary

The amendments to Bill SB 262 introduce a requirement for public authorities involved in construction contracts to specifically note any differences from standard industry forms. This change is important because it ensures transparency in contracting and helps align expectations between the public authority and construction managers, potentially reducing disputes and misunderstandings down the line. By highlighting variations, it aims to create a clearer framework for construction projects, especially for those under four million dollars.

→
Previous
Latest
As Passed by the Senate 136th General Assembly Regular Session S.
(136th GeneralAssembly) (Amended Senate Bill Number 262) ANACT To amend sections 9.334, 153.12, 153.501, 153.503, and 153.693 of the Revised Code to require a public authority or other party to a construction contract to note variations from an industry standard form.
B.
Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Ohio:
No.
SECTION 1.
262 2025-2026 Senator Blessing Cosponsors:
That sections 9.334, 153.12, 153.501, 153.503, and 153.693 of the Revised Code be amended to read as follows:
Senators Roegner, Antonio, Blackshear, Cirino, DeMora, Gavarone, Hicks-Hudson, Huffman, Ingram, Reineke, Reynolds, Schaffer, Timken, Weinstein To amend sections 9.334, 153.12, 153.501, 153.503, 1 and 153.693 of the Revised Code to require a 2 public authority or other party to a 3 construction contract to note variations from an 4 industry standard form.
Sec.
5 BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF OHIO:
Section 1.
That sections 9.334, 153.12, 153.501, 153.503, 6 and 153.693 of the Revised Code be amended to read as follows:
7 Sec.
(A)(1) Every public authority planning to 8 contract for construction management services with a 9 construction manager at risk shall evaluate the proposals 10 submitted and select not fewer than three construction managers 11 at risk the public authority considers to be the most qualified 12 to provide the required construction management services, except 13 that the public authority shall select and rank fewer than three 14 when the public authority determines in writing that fewer than 15 three qualified construction managers at risk are available.
(A)(1) Every public authority planning to contract for construction management services with a construction manager at risk shall evaluate the proposals submitted and select not fewer than three construction managers at risk the public authority considers to be the most qualified to provide the required construction management services, except that the public authority shall select and rank fewer than three when the public authority determines in writing that fewer than three qualified construction managers at risk are available.
16 (2) For projects valued at less than four million dollars, 17 the public authority may require the construction manager at 18 risk to submit a proposal described in division (A)(1) of this 19 S.
(2) For projects valued at less than four million dollars, the public authority may require the construction manager at risk to submit a proposal described in division (A)(1) of this section along with a pricing proposal described in division (C) of this section.
The public authority shall provide each construction manager at risk who desires to submit a proposal under this division a pre- proposal meeting to explore the proposals further, in which the public authority shall provide the construction manager at risk with a description of the project, including the scope and nature of the proposed services and potential technical approaches.
The public authority shall proceed with selection and ranking as described in division (A)(1) of this section, based only on the proposal submitted under that division.
Once the construction managers at risk have been selected, the public authority shall proceed to evaluate the pricing proposals of each selected construction manager at risk as described in division (D) of this section, continuing the selection process from there.
(B)(B)(1) The public authority shall provide each construction manager at risk selected under division (A) of this section with a description of the project, including a statement of available design detail, a description of how the guaranteed maximum price for the project shall be determined, including the estimated level of design detail upon which the guaranteed maximum price shall be based, the form of the construction management contract, and a request for a pricing proposal.
(2) When utilizing an industry standard published construction management contract form, the public authority shall provide the contract form in a manner that indicates any alteration to the standard form by striking through and underlining any changes to the original language of the Am.
S.
262 Page 2 As Passed by the Senate section along with a pricing proposal described in division (C) 20 of this section.
262 136th G.A.
The public authority shall provide each 21 construction manager at risk who desires to submit a proposal 22 under this division a pre-proposal meeting to explore the 23 proposals further, in which the public authority shall provide 24 the construction manager at risk with a description of the 25 project, including the scope and nature of the proposed services 26 and potential technical approaches.
standard form, by cross-referencing conditions that are supplemental to the standard form, or by including conditions that are supplemental to the standard form that cross-reference the section or sections of the standard form being altered.
The public authority shall 27 proceed with selection and ranking as described in division (A) 28 (1) of this section, based only on the proposal submitted under 29 that division.
Failure to indicate an alteration to the original language of the standard form in the manner required above results in the alteration being void and without effect such that the original language prevails.
Once the construction managers at risk have been 30 selected, the public authority shall proceed to evaluate the 31 pricing proposals of each selected construction manager at risk 32 as described in division (D) of this section, continuing the 33 selection process from there.
(C) The pricing proposal of each construction manager at risk shall include at least the following regarding the construction manager at risk:
34 (B)(B)(1) The public authority shall provide each 35 construction manager at risk selected under division (A) of this 36 section with a description of the project, including a statement 37 of available design detail, a description of how the guaranteed 38 maximum price for the project shall be determined, including the 39 estimated level of design detail upon which the guaranteed 40 maximum price shall be based, the form of the construction 41 management contract, and a request for a pricing proposal.
(1) A list of key personnel for the project;
42 (2) When utilizing an industry standard published 43 construction management contract form, the public authority 44 shall provide the contract form in a manner that indicates any 45 alteration to the standard form by striking through and 46 underlining any changes to the original language of the standard 47 form or by cross-referencing conditions that are supplemental to 48 the standard form.
(2) A statement of the general conditions and contingency requirements;
Failure to indicate an alteration to the 49 original language of the standard form in the manner required 50 S.
(3) A fee proposal divided into a preconstruction fee, a construction fee, and the portion of the construction fee to be at risk in a guaranteed maximum price.
(D) The public authority shall evaluate the submitted pricing proposals and may hold discussions with individual construction managers at risk to explore their proposals further, including the scope and nature of the proposed services and potential technical approaches.
(E) After evaluating the pricing proposals, the public authority shall rank the selected construction managers at risk based on its evaluation of the value of each pricing proposal, with such evaluation considering the proposed cost and qualifications.
(F) The public authority shall enter into negotiations for a construction management contract with the construction manager at risk whose pricing proposal the public authority determines to be the best value under division (E) of this section.
Contract negotiations shall be directed toward:
(1) Ensuring that the construction manager at risk and the public authority mutually understand the essential requirements involved in providing the required construction management services, including the provisions for the use of contingency funds and the possible distribution of savings in the final costs of the project;
(2) Ensuring that the construction manager at risk will be able to provide the necessary personnel, equipment, and facilities to perform the construction management services within the time required by the construction management contract;
(3) Agreeing upon a procedure and schedule for determining a guaranteed maximum price using an open book pricing method that shall represent the total maximum amount to be paid by the public authority to the construction manager at risk for the project and that shall include the costs of all the work, the cost of its general conditions, the contingency, and the fee payable to the construction manager at risk.
(G)(1) If the public authority fails to negotiate a construction management contract with the construction manager at risk whose pricing proposal the public authority determines to be the best value under division (E) of this section, the public authority shall inform the construction manager at risk, in writing, of the termination of negotiations.
(2) Upon terminating negotiations, the public authority may enter into negotiations as provided in this section with the construction manager at risk that the public authority ranked next Am.
S.
262 Page 3 As Passed by the Senate above results in the alteration being void and without effect 51 such that the original language prevails.
262 136th G.A.
52 (C) The pricing proposal of each construction manager at 53 risk shall include at least the following regarding the 54 construction manager at risk:
highest under division (E) of this section.
55 (1) A list of key personnel for the project;
If negotiations fail, the public authority may enter into negotiations as provided in this section with the construction manager at risk the public authority ranked next highest under division (E) of this section.
56 (2) A statement of the general conditions and contingency 57 requirements;
(3) If a public authority fails to negotiate a construction management contract with a construction manager at risk whose pricing proposal the public authority determines to be the best value under division (E) of this section, the public authority may select additional construction managers at risk to provide pricing proposals to the public authority pursuant to this section or may select an alternative delivery method for the project.
58 (3) A fee proposal divided into a preconstruction fee, a 59 construction fee, and the portion of the construction fee to be 60 at risk in a guaranteed maximum price.
(H) If the public authority and construction manager at risk fail to agree on a guaranteed maximum price, nothing in this section shall prohibit the public authority from allowing the construction manager at risk to provide the management services that a construction manager is authorized to provide.
61 (D) The public authority shall evaluate the submitted 62 pricing proposals and may hold discussions with individual 63 construction managers at risk to explore their proposals 64 further, including the scope and nature of the proposed services 65 and potential technical approaches.
(I) Nothing in this section affects a public authority's right to accept or reject any or all proposals in whole or in part.
Show all 187 changed rows (147 more)
Previous
Latest
66 (E) After evaluating the pricing proposals, the public 67 authority shall rank the selected construction managers at risk 68 based on its evaluation of the value of each pricing proposal, 69 with such evaluation considering the proposed cost and 70 qualifications.
Sec.
71 (F) The public authority shall enter into negotiations for 72 a construction management contract with the construction manager 73 at risk whose pricing proposal the public authority determines 74 to be the best value under division (E) of this section.
75 Contract negotiations shall be directed toward:
76 (1) Ensuring that the construction manager at risk and the 77 public authority mutually understand the essential requirements 78 S.
B.
No.
262 Page 4 As Passed by the Senate involved in providing the required construction management 79 services, including the provisions for the use of contingency 80 funds and the possible distribution of savings in the final 81 costs of the project;
82 (2) Ensuring that the construction manager at risk will be 83 able to provide the necessary personnel, equipment, and 84 facilities to perform the construction management services 85 within the time required by the construction management 86 contract;
87 (3) Agreeing upon a procedure and schedule for determining 88 a guaranteed maximum price using an open book pricing method 89 that shall represent the total maximum amount to be paid by the 90 public authority to the construction manager at risk for the 91 project and that shall include the costs of all the work, the 92 cost of its general conditions, the contingency, and the fee 93 payable to the construction manager at risk.
94 (G)(1) If the public authority fails to negotiate a 95 construction management contract with the construction manager 96 at risk whose pricing proposal the public authority determines 97 to be the best value under division (E) of this section, the 98 public authority shall inform the construction manager at risk, 99 in writing, of the termination of negotiations.
100 (2) Upon terminating negotiations, the public authority 101 may enter into negotiations as provided in this section with the 102 construction manager at risk that the public authority ranked 103 next highest under division (E) of this section.
If negotiations 104 fail, the public authority may enter into negotiations as 105 provided in this section with the construction manager at risk 106 the public authority ranked next highest under division (E) of 107 this section.
108 S.
B.
No.
262 Page 5 As Passed by the Senate (3) If a public authority fails to negotiate a 109 construction management contract with a construction manager at 110 risk whose pricing proposal the public authority determines to 111 be the best value under division (E) of this section, the public 112 authority may select additional construction managers at risk to 113 provide pricing proposals to the public authority pursuant to 114 this section or may select an alternative delivery method for 115 the project.
116 (H) If the public authority and construction manager at 117 risk fail to agree on a guaranteed maximum price, nothing in 118 this section shall prohibit the public authority from allowing 119 the construction manager at risk to provide the management 120 services that a construction manager is authorized to provide.
121 (I) Nothing in this section affects a public authority's 122 right to accept or reject any or all proposals in whole or in 123 part.
124 Sec.
(A) With respect to award of any contract for 125 the construction, reconstruction, improvement, enlargement, 126 alteration, repair, painting, or decoration of a public 127 improvement made by the state, or any county, township, 128 municipal corporation, school district, or other political 129 subdivision, or any public board, commission, authority, 130 instrumentality, or special purpose district of or in the state 131 or a political subdivision or that is authorized by state law, 132 the award, and execution of the contract, shall be made within 133 sixty days after the date on which the bids are opened.
(A) With respect to award of any contract for the construction, reconstruction, improvement, enlargement, alteration, repair, painting, or decoration of a public improvement made by the state, or any county, township, municipal corporation, school district, or other political subdivision, or any public board, commission, authority, instrumentality, or special purpose district of or in the state or a political subdivision or that is authorized by state law, the award, and execution of the contract, shall be made within sixty days after the date on which the bids are opened.
The 134 failure to award and execute the contract within sixty days 135 invalidates the entire bid proceedings and all bids submitted, 136 unless the time for awarding and executing the contract is 137 extended by mutual consent of the owner or its representatives 138 S.
The failure to award and execute the contract within sixty days invalidates the entire bid proceedings and all bids submitted, unless the time for awarding and executing the contract is extended by mutual consent of the owner or its representatives and the bidder whose bid the owner accepts and with respect to whom the owner subsequently awards and executes a contract.
The public owners referred to in this section shall include, in the plans and specifications for the project for which bids are solicited, the estimate of cost.
The bid for which the award is to be made shall be opened at the time and place named in the advertisement for bids, unless extended by the owner or its representative or unless, within seventy-two hours prior to the published time for the opening of bids, excluding Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays, any modification of the plans or specifications and estimates of cost for the project for which bids are solicited is issued and mailed or otherwise furnished to persons who have obtained plans or specifications for the project, for which the time for opening of bids shall be extended one week, with no further advertising of bids required.
The contractor, upon request, is entitled to a notice to proceed with the work by the owner or its representative upon execution of the contract.
No contract to which this section applies shall be entered into if the price of the contract, or, if the project involves multiple contracts where the total price of all contracts for the project, is in excess of ten per cent, in the case of a contract made by the state or a public board, commission, authority, or instrumentality of the state, or twenty per cent, in the case of a contract made by a county, township, municipal corporation, school district, special purpose district, or other Am.
S.
262 Page 6 As Passed by the Senate and the bidder whose bid the owner accepts and with respect to 139 whom the owner subsequently awards and executes a contract.
262 136th G.A.
The 140 public owners referred to in this section shall include, in the 141 plans and specifications for the project for which bids are 142 solicited, the estimate of cost.
political subdivision or a public board, commission, authority, or instrumentality of the political subdivision, above the entire estimate thereof, nor shall the entire cost of the construction, reconstruction, repair, painting, decorating, improvement, alteration, addition, or installation, including changes and estimates of expenses for architects or engineers, exceed in the aggregate the amount authorized by law.
The bid for which the award is 143 to be made shall be opened at the time and place named in the 144 advertisement for bids, unless extended by the owner or its 145 representative or unless, within seventy-two hours prior to the 146 published time for the opening of bids, excluding Saturdays, 147 Sundays, and legal holidays, any modification of the plans or 148 specifications and estimates of cost for the project for which 149 bids are solicited is issued and mailed or otherwise furnished 150 to persons who have obtained plans or specifications for the 151 project, for which the time for opening of bids shall be 152 extended one week, with no further advertising of bids required.
The unit or lump sum price stated in the contract shall be used in determining the amount to be paid and shall constitute full and final compensation for all the work.
153 The contractor, upon request, is entitled to a notice to proceed 154 with the work by the owner or its representative upon execution 155 of the contract.
Partial payment to the contractor for work performed under the lump sum price shall be based on a schedule prepared by the contractor and approved by the architect or engineer who shall apportion the lump sum price to the major components entering into or forming a part of the work under the lump sum price.
No contract to which this section applies shall 156 be entered into if the price of the contract, or, if the project 157 involves multiple contracts where the total price of all 158 contracts for the project, is in excess of ten per cent, in the 159 case of a contract made by the state or a public board, 160 commission, authority, or instrumentality of the state, or 161 twenty per cent, in the case of a contract made by a county, 162 township, municipal corporation, school district, special 163 purpose district, or other political subdivision or a public 164 board, commission, authority, or instrumentality of the 165 political subdivision, above the entire estimate thereof, nor 166 shall the entire cost of the construction, reconstruction, 167 repair, painting, decorating, improvement, alteration, addition, 168 or installation, including changes and estimates of expenses for 169 architects or engineers, exceed in the aggregate the amount 170 S.
Partial payments to the contractor for labor performed under either a unit or lump sum price contract shall be made at a rate of not less than ninety-six per cent of the estimates prepared by the contractor and approved by the architect or engineer.
B.
No subcontract shall be paid at a rate lower than the rate being paid to the contractor by the public authority.
No.
The amounts and time of payments of any public improvements contract made by the state or any county, township, municipal corporation, school district, or other political subdivision, or any public board, commission, authority, instrumentality, or special purpose district of or in the state or a political subdivision or that is authorized by state law, except as provided in section 5525.19 of the Revised Code, shall be governed by this section and sections 153.13 and 153.14 of the Revised Code.
262 Page 7 As Passed by the Senate authorized by law.
If the time for awarding the contract is extended by mutual consent, or if the owner or its representative fails to issue a timely notice to proceed as required by this section, the owner or its representative shall issue a change order authorizing delay costs to the contractor, which does not invalidate the contract.
171 The unit or lump sum price stated in the contract shall be 172 used in determining the amount to be paid and shall constitute 173 full and final compensation for all the work.
The amount of such a change order to the owner shall be determined in accordance with the provisions of the contract for change orders or force accounts or, if no such provision is set forth in the contract, the cost to the owner shall be the contractor's actual costs including wages, labor costs other than wages, wage taxes, materials, equipment costs and rentals, insurance, and subcontracts attributable to the delay, plus a reasonable sum for overhead.
174 Partial payment to the contractor for work performed under 175 the lump sum price shall be based on a schedule prepared by the 176 contractor and approved by the architect or engineer who shall 177 apportion the lump sum price to the major components entering 178 into or forming a part of the work under the lump sum price.
In the event of a dispute between the owner and the contractor concerning such change order, procedures shall be commenced under the applicable terms of the contract, or, if the contract contains no provision for resolving the dispute, it shall be resolved pursuant to the procedures for arbitration in Chapter 2711.
179 Partial payments to the contractor for labor performed 180 under either a unit or lump sum price contract shall be made at 181 a rate of not less than ninety-six per cent of the estimates 182 prepared by the contractor and approved by the architect or 183 engineer.
of the Revised Code, except as provided in division (B) of this section.
No subcontract shall be paid at a rate lower than the 184 rate being paid to the contractor by the public authority.
Nothing in this division shall be construed as a limitation upon the authority of the director of transportation granted in Chapter 5525.
185 The amounts and time of payments of any public 186 improvements contract made by the state or any county, township, 187 municipal corporation, school district, or other political 188 subdivision, or any public board, commission, authority, 189 instrumentality, or special purpose district of or in the state 190 or a political subdivision or that is authorized by state law, 191 except as provided in section 5525.19 of the Revised Code, shall 192 be governed by this section and sections 153.13 and 153.14 of 193 the Revised Code.
If the time for awarding the contract is 194 extended by mutual consent, or if the owner or its 195 representative fails to issue a timely notice to proceed as 196 required by this section, the owner or its representative shall 197 issue a change order authorizing delay costs to the contractor, 198 which does not invalidate the contract.
The amount of such a 199 change order to the owner shall be determined in accordance with 200 S.
B.
No.
262 Page 8 As Passed by the Senate the provisions of the contract for change orders or force 201 accounts or, if no such provision is set forth in the contract, 202 the cost to the owner shall be the contractor's actual costs 203 including wages, labor costs other than wages, wage taxes, 204 materials, equipment costs and rentals, insurance, and 205 subcontracts attributable to the delay, plus a reasonable sum 206 for overhead.
In the event of a dispute between the owner and 207 the contractor concerning such change order, procedures shall be 208 commenced under the applicable terms of the contract, or, if the 209 contract contains no provision for resolving the dispute, it 210 shall be resolved pursuant to the procedures for arbitration in 211 Chapter 2711.
of the Revised Code, except as provided in 212 division (B) of this section.
Nothing in this division shall be 213 construed as a limitation upon the authority of the director of 214 transportation granted in Chapter 5525.
215 (B) If a dispute arises between the state and a contractor 216 concerning the terms of a public improvement contract let by the 217 state or concerning a breach of the contract, and after 218 administrative remedies provided for in such contract and any 219 alternative dispute resolution procedures provided in accordance 220 with guidelines established by the executive director of the 221 Ohio facilities construction commission are exhausted, the 222 contractor may bring an action to the court of claims in 223 accordance with Chapter 2743.
(B) If a dispute arises between the state and a contractor concerning the terms of a public improvement contract let by the state or concerning a breach of the contract, and after administrative remedies provided for in such contract and any alternative dispute resolution procedures provided in accordance with guidelines established by the executive director of the Ohio facilities construction Am.
of the Revised Code.
S.
The state or 224 the contractor may request the chief justice of the supreme 225 court to appoint a referee or panel of referees in accordance 226 with division (C)(3) of section 2743.03 of the Revised Code.
As 227 used in this division, "dispute" means a disagreement between 228 the state and the contractor concerning a public improvement 229 contract let by the state.
230 (C) When utilizing an industry standard published 231 S.
262 Page 9 As Passed by the Senate construction management contract form, the public authority 232 shall provide the contract form in a manner that indicates any 233 alteration to the standard form by striking through and 234 underlining any changes to the original language of the standard 235 form or by cross-referencing conditions that are supplemental to 236 the standard form.
262 136th G.A.
Failure to indicate an alteration to the 237 original language of the standard form in the manner required 238 above results in the alteration being void and without effect 239 such that the original language prevails.
commission are exhausted, the contractor may bring an action to the court of claims in accordance with Chapter 2743.
240 Sec.
of the Revised Code.
The state or the contractor may request the chief justice of the supreme court to appoint a referee or panel of referees in accordance with division (C)(3) of section 2743.03 of the Revised Code.
As used in this division, "dispute" means a disagreement between the state and the contractor concerning a public improvement contract let by the state.
(C) When utilizing an industry standard published construction management contract form, the public authority shall provide the contract form in a manner that indicates any alteration to the standard form by striking through and underlining any changes to the original language of the standard form, by cross-referencing conditions that are supplemental to the standard form, or by including conditions that are supplemental to the standard form that cross-reference the section or sections of the standard form being altered.
Failure to indicate an alteration to the original language of the standard form in the manner required above results in the alteration being void and without effect such that the original language prevails.
Sec.
(A) A public authority may accept a 241 subcontract awarded by a construction manager at risk, a design- 242 build firm, or a general contracting firm, or may reject any 243 such subcontract if the public authority determines that the 244 bidder is not responsible.
(A) A public authority may accept a subcontract awarded by a construction manager at risk, a design-build firm, or a general contracting firm, or may reject any such subcontract if the public authority determines that the bidder is not responsible.
When utilizing an industry standard 245 published construction management contract form, the public 246 authority shall provide the contract form in a manner that 247 indicates any alteration to the standard form by striking 248 through and underlining any changes to the original language of 249 the standard form or by cross-referencing conditions that are 250 supplemental to the standard form.
When utilizing an industry standard published construction management contract form, the public authority shall provide the contract form in a manner that indicates any alteration to the standard form by striking through and underlining any changes to the original language of the standard form, by cross- referencing conditions that are supplemental to the standard form, or by including conditions that are supplemental to the standard form that cross-reference the section or sections of the standard form being altered.
Failure to indicate an 251 alteration to the original language of the standard form in the 252 manner required above results in the alteration being void and 253 without effect such that the original language prevails.
Failure to indicate an alteration to the original language of the standard form in the manner required above results in the alteration being void and without effect such that the original language prevails.
254 (B) A public authority may authorize a construction 255 manager at risk or design-build firm to utilize a design-assist 256 firm on any public improvement project without transferring any 257 design liability to the design-assist firm.
(B) A public authority may authorize a construction manager at risk or design-build firm to utilize a design-assist firm on any public improvement project without transferring any design liability to the design-assist firm.
258 (C) If the construction manager at risk or design-build 259 firm intends and is permitted by the public authority to self- 260 perform a portion of the work to be performed, the construction 261 S.
(C) If the construction manager at risk or design-build firm intends and is permitted by the public authority to self-perform a portion of the work to be performed, the construction manager at risk or design-build firm shall submit a sealed bid to the public authority for the portion of the work prior to accepting and opening any bids for the same work, except when the public authority requests a guaranteed maximum price proposal due at the time of selection.
B.
Sec.
No.
262 Page 10 As Passed by the Senate manager at risk or design-build firm shall submit a sealed bid 262 to the public authority for the portion of the work prior to 263 accepting and opening any bids for the same work, except when 264 the public authority requests a guaranteed maximum price 265 proposal due at the time of selection.
266 Sec.
(A) The Ohio facilities construction 267 commission, pursuant to Chapter 119.
(A) The Ohio facilities construction commission, pursuant to Chapter 119.
of the Revised Code, shall 268 adopt rules to do all of the following:
of the Revised Code, shall adopt rules to do all of the following:
269 (A)(1) Prescribe the procedures and criteria for 270 determining the best value selection of a construction manager 271 at risk or design-build firm;
(A)(1) Prescribe the procedures and criteria for determining the best value selection of a construction manager at risk or design-build firm;
272 (B)(2) Set forth standards to be followed by construction 273 managers at risk and design-build firms when establishing 274 prequalification criteria pursuant to section 153.502 of the 275 Revised Code;
(B)(2) Set forth standards to be followed by construction managers at risk and design-build firms when establishing prequalification criteria pursuant to section 153.502 of the Revised Code;
276 (C)(3) Prescribe the form for the contract documents to be 277 used by a construction manager at risk, design-build firm, or 278 general contractor when entering into a subcontract;
Am.
279 (D)(4) Prescribe the form for the contract documents to be 280 used by a public authority when entering into a contract with a 281 construction manager at risk or design-build firm.
S.
282 (B) The rules adopted under divisions (A)(3) and (4) of 283 this section shall include a requirement that a public 284 authority, construction manager at risk, design-build firm, or 285 general contracting firm utilizing a prescribed industry 286 standard published contract or subcontract form shall provide 287 the form in a manner that indicates any alteration to the 288 standard form by striking through and underlining any changes to 289 the original language of the standard form or by cross- 290 S.
262 Page 11 As Passed by the Senate referencing conditions that are supplemental to the standard 291 form.
262 136th G.A.
Failure to indicate an alteration to the original language 292 of the standard form in the manner required above results in the 293 alteration being void and without effect such that the original 294 language prevails.
(C)(3) Prescribe the form for the contract documents to be used by a construction manager at risk, design-build firm, or general contractor when entering into a subcontract;
295 Sec.
(D)(4) Prescribe the form for the contract documents to be used by a public authority when entering into a contract with a construction manager at risk or design-build firm.
(B) The rules adopted under divisions (A)(3) and (4) of this section shall include a requirement that a public authority, construction manager at risk, design-build firm, or general contracting firm utilizing a prescribed industry standard published contract or subcontract form shall provide the form in a manner that indicates any alteration to the standard form by striking through and underlining any changes to the original language of the standard form, by cross-referencing conditions that are supplemental to the standard form, or by including conditions that are supplemental to the standard form that cross-reference the section or sections of the standard form being altered.
Failure to indicate an alteration to the original language of the standard form in the manner required above results in the alteration being void and without effect such that the original language prevails.
Sec.
(A)(1) For every design-build contract, the 296 public authority planning to contract for design-build services, 297 in consultation with the criteria architect or engineer, shall 298 evaluate the statements of qualifications submitted by design- 299 build firms specifically regarding the project, including the 300 design-build firm's proposed architect or engineer of record.
(A)(1) For every design-build contract, the public authority planning to contract for design-build services, in consultation with the criteria architect or engineer, shall evaluate the statements of qualifications submitted by design-build firms specifically regarding the project, including the design-build firm's proposed architect or engineer of record.
301 (2) For projects valued at less than four million dollars, 302 the public authority may require the design-build firm to submit 303 a statement along with a pricing proposal described in division 304 (B)(2)(h) of this section.
(2) For projects valued at less than four million dollars, the public authority may require the design-build firm to submit a statement along with a pricing proposal described in division (B)(2)(h) of this section.
The public authority shall provide 305 each design-build firm who desires to submit both a statement 306 and a proposal a pre-proposal meeting to explore the proposals 307 further, in which the public authority shall provide the design- 308 build firm with a description of the project, including the 309 scope and nature of the proposed services and potential 310 technical approaches.
The public authority shall provide each design-build firm who desires to submit both a statement and a proposal a pre-proposal meeting to explore the proposals further, in which the public authority shall provide the design-build firm with a description of the project, including the scope and nature of the proposed services and potential technical approaches.
After and only after the public authority 311 ranks and selects firms under division (B)(1) of this section, 312 the public authority shall review the pricing proposals 313 submitted by selected firms under this division, and proceed 314 under division (B)(3) of this section, continuing the selection 315 process from there.
After and only after the public authority ranks and selects firms under division (B)(1) of this section, the public authority shall review the pricing proposals submitted by selected firms under this division, and proceed under division (B)(3) of this section, continuing the selection process from there.
316 (B) Following this evaluation, the public authority shall:
(B) Following this evaluation, the public authority shall:
317 (1) Select and rank not fewer than three firms which it 318 considers to be the most qualified to provide the required 319 design-build services, except that the public authority shall 320 S.
(1) Select and rank not fewer than three firms which it considers to be the most qualified to provide the required design-build services, except that the public authority shall select and rank fewer than three firms when the public authority determines in writing that fewer than three qualified firms are available;
(2) Provide each selected design-build firm with all of the following:
(a) A description of the project and project delivery;
(b) The design criteria produced by the criteria architect or engineer under section 153.692 of the Revised Code;
(c) A preliminary project schedule;
(d) A description of any preconstruction services;
Am.
S.
262 Page 12 As Passed by the Senate select and rank fewer than three firms when the public authority 321 determines in writing that fewer than three qualified firms are 322 available;
262 136th G.A.
323 (2) Provide each selected design-build firm with all of 324 the following:
(e) A description of the proposed design services;
325 (a) A description of the project and project delivery;
(f) A description of a guaranteed maximum price, including the estimated level of design on which such guaranteed maximum price is based;
326 (b) The design criteria produced by the criteria architect 327 or engineer under section 153.692 of the Revised Code;
(g) The form of the design-build services contract;.
328 (c) A preliminary project schedule;
If using an industry standard published design-build services contract form, the public authority shall provide the form in a manner that indicates any alteration to the standard form by striking through and underlining any changes to the original language of the standard form, by cross-referencing conditions that are supplemental to the standard form, or by including conditions that are supplemental to the standard form that cross- reference the section or sections of the standard form being altered.
329 (d) A description of any preconstruction services;
If the public authority fails to indicate an alteration to the original language of the standard form, the alteration is void and without effect and the original language prevails.
330 (e) A description of the proposed design services;
(h) Except for projects under division (A)(2) of this section, a request for a pricing proposal that shall be divided into a design services fee and a preconstruction and design-build services fee.
331 (f) A description of a guaranteed maximum price, including 332 the estimated level of design on which such guaranteed maximum 333 price is based;
The pricing proposal of each design-build firm shall include at least all of the following:
334 (g) The form of the design-build services contract;.
(i) A list of key personnel and consultants for the project;
If 335 using an industry standard published design-build services 336 contract form, the public authority shall provide the form in a 337 manner that indicates any alteration to the standard form by 338 striking through and underlining any changes to the original 339 language of the standard form or by cross-referencing conditions 340 that are supplemental to the standard form.
(ii) Design concepts adhering to the design criteria produced by the criteria architect or engineer under section 153.692 of the Revised Code;
If the public 341 authority fails to indicate an alteration to the original 342 language of the standard form, the alteration is void and 343 without effect and the original language prevails.
(iii) The design-build firm's statement of general conditions and estimated contingency requirements;
344 (h) Except for projects under division (A)(2) of this 345 section, a request for a pricing proposal that shall be divided 346 into a design services fee and a preconstruction and design- 347 build services fee.
(iv) A preliminary project schedule.
The pricing proposal of each design-build 348 S.
(3) Evaluate the pricing proposal submitted by each selected firm and, at its discretion, hold discussions with each firm to further investigate its pricing proposal, including the scope and nature of the firm's proposed services and potential technical approaches;
(4) Rank the selected firms based on the public authority's evaluation of the value of each firm's pricing proposal, with such evaluation considering each firm's proposed costs and qualifications;
(5) Enter into contract negotiations for design-build services with the design-build firm whose pricing proposal the public authority determines to be the best value under this section.
(C) In complying with division (B)(5) of this section, contract negotiations shall be directed toward:
(1) Ensuring that the design-build firm and the public authority mutually understand the essential requirements involved in providing the required design-build services, the provisions for the use of contingency funds, and the terms of the contract, including terms related to the possible distribution of savings in the final costs of the project;
(2) Ensuring that the design-build firm shall be able to provide the necessary personnel, equipment, and facilities to perform the design-build services within the time required by the design- build construction contract;
(3) Agreeing upon a procedure and schedule for determining a guaranteed maximum price Am.
S.
262 Page 13 As Passed by the Senate firm shall include at least all of the following:
262 136th G.A.
349 (i) A list of key personnel and consultants for the 350 project;
using an open book pricing method that shall represent the total maximum amount to be paid by the public authority to the design-build firm for the project and that shall include the costs of all work, the cost of its general conditions, the contingency, and the fee payable to the design-build firm.
351 (ii) Design concepts adhering to the design criteria 352 produced by the criteria architect or engineer under section 353 153.692 of the Revised Code;
(D) If the public authority fails to negotiate a contract with the design-build firm whose pricing proposal the public authority determines to be the best value as determined under this section, the public authority shall inform the design-build firm in writing of the termination of negotiations.
354 (iii) The design-build firm's statement of general 355 conditions and estimated contingency requirements;
The public authority may then do the following:
356 (iv) A preliminary project schedule.
(1) Negotiate a contract with a design-build firm ranked next highest under this section following the negotiation procedure described in this section;
357 (3) Evaluate the pricing proposal submitted by each 358 selected firm and, at its discretion, hold discussions with each 359 firm to further investigate its pricing proposal, including the 360 scope and nature of the firm's proposed services and potential 361 technical approaches;
(2) If negotiations fail with the design-build firm under division (D)(1) of this section, negotiate a contract with the design-build firm ranked next highest under this section following the negotiation procedure described in this section and continue negotiating with the design-build firms selected under this section in the order of their ranking until a contract is negotiated.
362 (4) Rank the selected firms based on the public 363 authority's evaluation of the value of each firm's pricing 364 proposal, with such evaluation considering each firm's proposed 365 costs and qualifications;
(E) If the public authority fails to negotiate a contract with a design-build firm whose pricing proposal the public authority determines to be the best value as determined under this section, it may select additional design-build firms to provide pricing proposals to the public authority pursuant to this section or may select an alternative delivery method for the project.
366 (5) Enter into contract negotiations for design-build 367 services with the design-build firm whose pricing proposal the 368 public authority determines to be the best value under this 369 section.
(F) The public authority may provide a stipend for pricing proposals received from design- build firms.
370 (C) In complying with division (B)(5) of this section, 371 contract negotiations shall be directed toward:
(G) Nothing in this section affects a public authority's right to accept or reject any or all proposals in whole or in part.
372 (1) Ensuring that the design-build firm and the public 373 authority mutually understand the essential requirements 374 involved in providing the required design-build services, the 375 provisions for the use of contingency funds, and the terms of 376 S.
SECTION 2.
That existing sections 9.334, 153.12, 153.501, 153.503, and 153.693 of the Revised Code are hereby repealed.
SECTION 3.
The changes in sections 9.334, 153.501, 153.503, and 153.693 of the Revised Code and division (C) of section 153.12 of the Revised Code as amended by this act apply to a contract entered into on or after the effective date of this section and do not apply to a contract already in effect on the effective date of this section.
Am.
S.
262 Page 14 As Passed by the Senate the contract, including terms related to the possible 377 distribution of savings in the final costs of the project;
262 136th G.A.
378 (2) Ensuring that the design-build firm shall be able to 379 provide the necessary personnel, equipment, and facilities to 380 perform the design-build services within the time required by 381 the design-build construction contract;
Speaker ___________________ of the House of Representatives.
382 (3) Agreeing upon a procedure and schedule for determining 383 a guaranteed maximum price using an open book pricing method 384 that shall represent the total maximum amount to be paid by the 385 public authority to the design-build firm for the project and 386 that shall include the costs of all work, the cost of its 387 general conditions, the contingency, and the fee payable to the 388 design-build firm.
President ___________________ of the Senate.
389 (D) If the public authority fails to negotiate a contract 390 with the design-build firm whose pricing proposal the public 391 authority determines to be the best value as determined under 392 this section, the public authority shall inform the design-build 393 firm in writing of the termination of negotiations.
Passed ________________________, 20____ Approved ________________________, 20____ Governor.
The public 394 authority may then do the following:
Am.
395 (1) Negotiate a contract with a design-build firm ranked 396 next highest under this section following the negotiation 397 procedure described in this section;
S.
398 (2) If negotiations fail with the design-build firm under 399 division (D)(1) of this section, negotiate a contract with the 400 design-build firm ranked next highest under this section 401 following the negotiation procedure described in this section 402 and continue negotiating with the design-build firms selected 403 under this section in the order of their ranking until a 404 contract is negotiated.
405 S.
262 Page 15 As Passed by the Senate (E) If the public authority fails to negotiate a contract 406 with a design-build firm whose pricing proposal the public 407 authority determines to be the best value as determined under 408 this section, it may select additional design-build firms to 409 provide pricing proposals to the public authority pursuant to 410 this section or may select an alternative delivery method for 411 the project.
262 136th G.A.
412 (F) The public authority may provide a stipend for pricing 413 proposals received from design-build firms.
The section numbering of law of a general and permanent nature is complete and in conformity with the Revised Code.
414 (G) Nothing in this section affects a public authority's 415 right to accept or reject any or all proposals in whole or in 416 part.
Director, Legislative Service Commission.
417 Section 2.
Filed in the office of the Secretary of State at Columbus, Ohio, on the ____ day of ___________,A.
That existing sections 9.334, 153.12, 153.501, 418 153.503, and 153.693 of the Revised Code are hereby repealed.
D.
419 Section 3.
20____.
The changes in sections 9.334, 153.501, 420 153.503, and 153.693 of the Revised Code and division (C) of 421 section 153.12 of the Revised Code as amended by this act apply 422 to a contract entered into on or after the effective date of 423 this section and do not apply to a contract already in effect on 424 the effective date of this section.
Secretary of State.
425
File No.
_________ Effective Date ___________________
View plain text versions (6)

How this bill changes current law

1 change Share ↗

AI-generated reading aid from the bill's amendatory text — verify against the official bill.

The bill requires public authorities to indicate variations from industry standard construction contract forms.

  • Section 9.334

    When utilizing an industry standard published construction management contract form, the public authority shall provide the contract form in a manner that indicates any alteration to the standard form by striking through and underlining any changes to the original language of the standard form, by cross-referencing conditions that are supplemental to the standard form, or by including conditions that are supplemental to the standard form that cross-reference the section or sections of the standard form being altered. → When utilizing an industry standard published construction management contract form, the public authority or other party to a construction contract shall note variations from the standard form.

    This change mandates that any variations from standard construction contract forms must be noted explicitly.

Action History

  1. As Enrolled

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 133 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (133)

133 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 133 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 33 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 24000
Democratic 9000
Total 33000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (33)
Member Party Vote
Beth Liston Democratic Yea
Casey Weinstein Democratic Yea
Catherine D. Ingram Democratic Yea
Hearcel F. Craig Democratic Yea
Kent Smith Democratic Yea
Nickie J. Antonio Democratic Yea
Paula Hicks-Hudson Democratic Yea
William P. DeMora Democratic Yea
Willis E. Blackshear, Jr. Democratic Yea
Al Cutrona Republican Yea
Al Landis Republican Yea
Andrew O. Brenner Republican Yea
Bill Reineke Republican Yea
Brian M. Chavez Republican Yea
George F. Lang Republican Yea
Jane M. Timken Republican Yea
Jerry C. Cirino Republican Yea
Kristina D. Roegner Republican Yea
Kyle Koehler Republican Yea
Louis W. Blessing, III Republican Yea
Mark Romanchuk Republican Yea
Michele Reynolds Republican Yea
Nathan H. Manning Republican Yea
Rob McColley Republican Yea
Sandra O'Brien Republican Yea
Shane Wilkin Republican Yea
Stephen A. Huffman Republican Yea
Steve Wilson Republican Yea
Susan Manchester Republican Yea
Terry Johnson Republican Yea
Theresa Gavarone Republican Yea
Thomas F. Patton Republican Yea
Tim Schaffer Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Reported

Failed 13 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 9000
Democratic 4000
Total 13000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (13)
Member Party Vote
Beryl Brown Piccolantonio Democratic Yea
Desiree Tims Democratic Yea
Eric Synenberg Democratic Yea
Ismail Mohamed Democratic Yea
Adam Mathews Republican Yea
Brian Stewart Republican Yea
D. J. Swearingen Republican Yea
Jamie Callender Republican Yea
Jim Thomas Republican Yea
Josh Williams Republican Yea
Mike Odioso Republican Yea
Phil Plummer Republican Yea
Scott Oelslager Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed

Passed 93 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 32000
Republican 61000
Total 93000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (93)
Member Party Vote
Anita Somani Democratic Yea
Ashley Bryant Bailey Democratic Yea
Beryl Brown Piccolantonio Democratic Yea
Bride Rose Sweeney Democratic Yea
C. Allison Russo Democratic Yea
Cecil Thomas Democratic Yea
Chris Glassburn Democratic Yea
Christine Cockley Democratic Yea
Crystal Lett Democratic Yea
Dani Isaacsohn Democratic Yea
Daniel P. Troy Democratic Yea
Darnell T. Brewer Democratic Yea
Derrick Hall Democratic Yea
Desiree Tims Democratic Yea
Dontavius L. Jarrells Democratic Yea
Elgin Rogers, Jr. Democratic Yea
Eric Synenberg Democratic Yea
Erika White Democratic Yea
Ismail Mohamed Democratic Yea
Juanita O. Brent Democratic Yea
Karen Brownlee Democratic Yea
Latyna M. Humphrey Democratic Yea
Mark Sigrist Democratic Yea
Meredith R. Lawson-Rowe Democratic Yea
Michele Grim Democratic Yea
Munira Abdullahi Democratic Yea
Phillip M. Robinson, Jr. Democratic Yea
Rachel B. Baker Democratic Yea
Sean P. Brennan Democratic Yea
Terrence Upchurch Democratic Yea
Tristan Rader Democratic Yea
Veronica R. Sims Democratic Yea
Adam C. Bird Republican Yea
Adam Holmes Republican Yea
Adam Mathews Republican Yea
Andrea White Republican Yea
Angela N. King Republican Yea
Bernard Willis Republican Yea
Beth Lear Republican Yea
Bill Roemer Republican Yea
Bob Peterson Republican Yea
Brian Lampton Republican Yea
Brian Lorenz Republican Yea
Brian Stewart Republican Yea
Cindy Abrams Republican Yea
D. J. Swearingen Republican Yea
David Thomas Republican Yea
Diane Mullins Republican Yea
Gary Click Republican Yea
Gayle Manning Republican Yea
Haraz N. Ghanbari Republican Yea
Heidi Workman Republican Yea
Jack K. Daniels Republican Yea
James M. Hoops Republican Yea
Jamie Callender Republican Yea
Jason Stephens Republican Yea
Jean Schmidt Republican Yea
Jeff LaRe Republican Yea
Jennifer Gross Republican Yea
Jim Thomas Republican Yea
Jodi Salvo Republican Yea
Johnathan Newman Republican Yea
Josh Williams Republican Yea
Justin Pizzulli Republican Yea
Kellie Deeter Republican Yea
Kevin D. Miller Republican Yea
Kevin Ritter Republican Yea
Levi Dean Republican Yea
Marilyn John Republican Yea
Mark Hiner Republican Yea
Mark Johnson Republican Yea
Matt Huffman Republican Yea
Matthew Kishman Republican Yea
Melanie Miller Republican Yea
Meredith Craig Republican Yea
Mike Odioso Republican Yea
Monica Robb Blasdel Republican Yea
Nick Santucci Republican Yea
Phil Plummer Republican Yea
Riordan T. McClain Republican Yea
Rodney Creech Republican Yea
Ron Ferguson Republican Yea
Roy Klopfenstein Republican Yea
Sarah Fowler Arthur Republican Yea
Scott Oelslager Republican Yea
Steve Demetriou Republican Yea
Tex Fischer Republican Yea
Thaddeus J. Claggett Republican Yea
Thomas Hall Republican Yea
Tim Barhorst Republican Yea
Tom Young Republican Yea
Tracy M. Richardson Republican Yea
Ty D. Mathews Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 262 do?
To amend sections 9.334, 153.12, 153.501, 153.503, and 153.693 of the Revised Code to require a public authority or other party to a construction contract to note variations from an industry standard form.
Who sponsors SB 262?
SB 262 is sponsored by Louis W. Blessing, III (Republican).
What is the current status of SB 262?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced September 17, 2026. Enacted.
Where can I track SB 262?
Track SB 262 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 262

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 262

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →