Illinois 100th Regular Session Status: Enacted 1 D cosponsors

SB 67 — COLLABORATIVE PROCESS ACT

Last action — Public Act . . . . . . . . . 100-0205

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed House
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 11, 2017. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 72% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    0 primary, 1 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 D).

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 2 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

Creates the Collaborative Process Act. Defines terms. Provides that the Act applies to collaborative process participation agreements that meet the requirements of the Act signed on or after the effective date of the Act. Contains provisions concerning: requirements of collaborative process participation agreements; the beginning and conclusion of the collaborative process; proceedings before the court; disclosure of information; standards of professional responsibility and mandatory reporting; confidentiality; and privileges. Provides that the Act is subject to the supervisory authority of the Illinois Supreme Court.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

13 added · 13 removed

Plain-language change summary

The bill SB 67 has undergone some edits, specifically with the removal of previous language and the addition of new text. These changes indicate a refinement in the bill's proposals or clarifications to its intentions. It is important because such updates can affect how the law is interpreted and implemented, ultimately impacting the people it is designed to serve. Staying informed about these changes helps ensure that all stakeholders understand the current rules and requirements.

→
Previous
Latest
SB0067 Engrossed LRB100 00354 HEP 10358 b AN ACT concerning alternative dispute resolution.
SB0067 Enrolled LRB100 00354 HEP 10358 b AN ACT concerning alternative dispute resolution.
(A) sign a collaborative process participation SB0067 Engrossed - 2 - LRB100 00354 HEP 10358 b agreement;
(A) sign a collaborative process participation SB0067 Enrolled - 2 - LRB100 00354 HEP 10358 b agreement;
or (iii) resulted in a currently SB0067 Engrossed - 3 - LRB100 00354 HEP 10358 b open case with the Illinois Department of Children and Family Services.
or (iii) resulted in a currently SB0067 Enrolled - 3 - LRB100 00354 HEP 10358 b open case with the Illinois Department of Children and Family Services.
(11) "Prospective party" means a person that discusses with a prospective collaborative process lawyer the possibility of SB0067 Engrossed - 4 - LRB100 00354 HEP 10358 b signing a collaborative process participation agreement.
(11) "Prospective party" means a person that discusses with a prospective collaborative process lawyer the possibility of SB0067 Enrolled - 4 - LRB100 00354 HEP 10358 b signing a collaborative process participation agreement.
(3) state the parties' intention to resolve a collaborative process matter through a collaborative SB0067 Engrossed - 5 - LRB100 00354 HEP 10358 b process under this Act;
(3) state the parties' intention to resolve a collaborative process matter through a collaborative SB0067 Enrolled - 5 - LRB100 00354 HEP 10358 b process under this Act;
(2) resolution of a part of the collaborative process matter, evidenced by a signed record of the parties, in which the parties agree that the remaining parts of the SB0067 Engrossed - 6 - LRB100 00354 HEP 10358 b matter will not be resolved in the process;
(2) resolution of a part of the collaborative process matter, evidenced by a signed record of the parties, in which the parties agree that the remaining parts of the SB0067 Enrolled - 6 - LRB100 00354 HEP 10358 b matter will not be resolved in the process;
(f) A party may terminate a collaborative process with or SB0067 Engrossed - 7 - LRB100 00354 HEP 10358 b without cause.
(f) A party may terminate a collaborative process with or SB0067 Enrolled - 7 - LRB100 00354 HEP 10358 b without cause.
status SB0067 Engrossed - 8 - LRB100 00354 HEP 10358 b report.
status SB0067 Enrolled - 8 - LRB100 00354 HEP 10358 b report.
SB0067 Engrossed - 9 - LRB100 00354 HEP 10358 b Section 30.
SB0067 Enrolled - 9 - LRB100 00354 HEP 10358 b Section 30.
The parties may define the scope of disclosure during the collaborative SB0067 Engrossed - 10 - LRB100 00354 HEP 10358 b process.
The parties may define the scope of disclosure during the collaborative SB0067 Enrolled - 10 - LRB100 00354 HEP 10358 b process.
(2) A nonparty participant may refuse to disclose, and SB0067 Engrossed - 11 - LRB100 00354 HEP 10358 b may prevent any other person from disclosing, a collaborative process communication of the nonparty participant.
(2) A nonparty participant may refuse to disclose, and SB0067 Enrolled - 11 - LRB100 00354 HEP 10358 b may prevent any other person from disclosing, a collaborative process communication of the nonparty participant.
(1) available to the public under the Freedom of Information Act or made during a session of a collaborative SB0067 Engrossed - 12 - LRB100 00354 HEP 10358 b process that is open, or is required by law to be open, to the public;
(1) available to the public under the Freedom of Information Act or made during a session of a collaborative SB0067 Enrolled - 12 - LRB100 00354 HEP 10358 b process that is open, or is required by law to be open, to the public;
(c) There is no privilege under Section 55 if a court finds, after a hearing in camera, that the party seeking discovery or the proponent of the evidence has shown the evidence is not otherwise available, the need for the evidence substantially outweighs the interest in protecting confidentiality, and the collaborative process communication SB0067 Engrossed - 13 - LRB100 00354 HEP 10358 b is sought or offered in:
(c) There is no privilege under Section 55 if a court finds, after a hearing in camera, that the party seeking discovery or the proponent of the evidence has shown the evidence is not otherwise available, the need for the evidence substantially outweighs the interest in protecting confidentiality, and the collaborative process communication SB0067 Enrolled - 13 - LRB100 00354 HEP 10358 b is sought or offered in:
⬇ Download PDF
View plain text versions (3)

Action History

  1. Public Act . . . . . . . . . 100-0205

  2. Effective Date January 1, 2018

  3. Governor Approved

  4. Sent to the Governor

  5. Passed Both Houses

  6. Third Reading - Short Debate - Passed 113-000-000

  7. Placed on Calendar Order of 3rd Reading - Short Debate

  8. Second Reading - Short Debate

  9. Placed on Calendar 2nd Reading - Short Debate

  10. Do Pass / Short Debate Judiciary - Civil Committee; 010-000-000

  11. Reported Back To Judiciary - Civil Committee;

  12. Recommends Do Pass Subcommittee/ Judiciary - Civil Committee; 003-000-000

  13. To Domestic Relations Law Subcommittee

  14. Assigned to Judiciary - Civil Committee

  15. Alternate Chief Sponsor Changed to Rep. Ann M. Williams

  16. Referred to Rules Committee

  17. First Reading

  18. Chief House Sponsor Rep. Kelly M. Burke

  19. Arrived in House

  20. Third Reading - Passed; 053-001-000

  21. Added as Co-Sponsor Sen. Napoleon Harris, III

  22. Placed on Calendar Order of 3rd Reading March 15, 2017

  23. Second Reading

  24. Added as Chief Co-Sponsor Sen. Michael Connelly

  25. Placed on Calendar Order of 2nd Reading March 2, 2017

  26. Do Pass as Amended Judiciary; 011-000-000

  27. Senate Committee Amendment No. 1 Adopted

  28. Senate Committee Amendment No. 1 Assignments Refers to Judiciary

  29. Senate Committee Amendment No. 1 Referred to Assignments

  30. Senate Committee Amendment No. 1 Filed with Secretary by Sen. Michael E. Hastings

  31. Assigned to Judiciary

  32. Referred to Assignments

  33. First Reading

  34. Filed with Secretary by Sen. Michael E. Hastings

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

0 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 182 not signed on

Sponsors (0)

None.

Co-sponsors (1)

Not signed on (182)

182 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 182 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Third Reading

Passed 113 Yea · 0 Nay · 5 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 69005
Republican 12000
Democrat 32000
Total 113005
% of votes cast 96%0%0%4%
How each member voted (118)
Member Party Vote
Batinick — Not Voting
Beiser — Yea
Bellock — Yea
Bourne — Yea
Breen — Yea
Butler — Not Voting
McAuliffe — Yea
Unes — Yea
Lang — Yea
Long — Yea
Phillips — Yea
Sente — Yea
Harris, David — Yea
Stewart — Yea
Sauer — Yea
Harris, Gregory — Yea
Bennett — Yea
Stratton — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Brady — Yea
Tabares — Yea
Thapedi — Yea
Turner — Yea
Burke, Daniel — Yea
Burke, Kelly — Yea
Jones — Yea
Cavaletto — Yea
Conroy — Yea
Conyears-Ervin — Yea
Costello — Yea
Currie — Yea
D'Amico — Yea
Greenwood — Yea
Hays — Yea
Hurley — Yea
Ives — Yea
Jesiel — Yea
Davis — Yea
McAsey — Not Voting
Mitchell, Bill — Yea
McDermed — Yea
Wheeler, Barbara — Yea
Mitchell, Christian — Yea
Wheeler, Keith — Yea
McSweeney — Yea
Williams — Yea
Olsen — Yea
Wallace — Yea
Wehrli — Yea
Welter — Yea
Willis — Yea
Winger — Yea
Yingling — Yea
Zalewski — Yea
Demmer — Yea
Drury — Not Voting
Durkin — Yea
Flowers — Yea
Fortner — Yea
Frese — Yea
Nekritz — Yea
Jimenez — Yea
Parkhurst — Not Voting
Phelps — Yea
Pritchard — Yea
Reis — Yea
Riley — Yea
Skillicorn — Yea
Sommer — Yea
Soto — Yea
Madigan — Yea
Andersson — Yea
Arroyo — Yea
Chapa LaVia — Yea
Anna Moeller Democrat Yea
Anthony DeLuca Democrat Yea
Camille Y. Lilly Democrat Yea
Carol Ammons Democrat Yea
Elgie R. Sims, Jr. Democrat Yea
Emanuel "Chris" Welch Democrat Yea
Fred Crespo Democrat Yea
Jaime M. Andrade, Jr. Democrat Yea
Jay Hoffman Democrat Yea
Jehan Gordon-Booth Democrat Yea
Julie A. Morrison Democrat Yea
Justin Slaughter Democrat Yea
Katie Stuart Democrat Yea
Kelly M. Cassidy Democrat Yea
La Shawn K. Ford Democrat Yea
Laura Fine Democrat Yea
Lawrence "Larry" Walsh, Jr. Democrat Yea
Marcus C. Evans, Jr. Democrat Yea
Martin J. Moylan Democrat Yea
Michael W. Halpin Democrat Yea
Michelle Mussman Democrat Yea
Natalie A. Manley Democrat Yea
Rita Mayfield Democrat Yea
Robert "Bob" Rita Democrat Yea
Robert F. Martwick Democrat Yea
Robyn Gabel Democrat Yea
Sara Feigenholtz Democrat Yea
Sonya M. Harper Democrat Yea
Stephanie A. Kifowit Democrat Yea
Sue Scherer Democrat Yea
Theresa Mah Democrat Yea
Will Guzzardi Democrat Yea
Brad Halbrook Republican Yea
Charles Meier Republican Yea
Christopher "C.D." Davidsmeyer Republican Yea
Dan Swanson Republican Yea
Dave Severin Republican Yea
Joe C. Sosnowski Republican Yea
John M. Cabello Republican Yea
Norine K. Hammond Republican Yea
Ryan Spain Republican Yea
Steven Reick Republican Yea
Terri Bryant Republican Yea
Tony M. McCombie Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Third Reading

Passed 53 Yea · 1 Nay · 5 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 34102
Democrat 13001
Republican 6002
Total 53105
% of votes cast 90%2%0%8%
How each member voted (59)
Member Party Vote
Barickman — Yea
Bertino-Tarrant — Yea
Biss — Yea
Bivins — Yea
Bush — Yea
McCarter — Yea
Mulroe — Yea
Rooney — Yea
Landek — Not Voting
Manar — Yea
McCann — Yea
McConnaughay — Yea
Harris — Yea
Bennett — Yea
McGuire — Yea
Nybo — Yea
Radogno — Yea
Silverstein — Yea
Steans — Yea
Brady — Yea
Trotter — Nay
Cullerton — Yea
Cullerton, T. — Yea
Clayborne — Yea
Connelly — Yea
Haine — Yea
Muñoz — Yea
Hutchinson — Yea
Oberweis — Yea
Raoul — Yea
Righter — Not Voting
Sandoval — Yea
Schimpf — Yea
Link — Yea
Althoff — Yea
Martinez — Yea
Van Pelt — Yea
Bill Cunningham Democrat Not Voting
Cristina Castro Democrat Yea
David Koehler Democrat Yea
Don Harmon Democrat Yea
Emil Jones, III Democrat Yea
Julie A. Morrison Democrat Yea
Kimberly A. Lightford Democrat Yea
Lakesia Collins Democrat Yea
Laura M. Murphy Democrat Yea
Linda Holmes Democrat Yea
Mattie Hunter Democrat Yea
Michael E. Hastings Democrat Yea
Omar Aquino Democrat Yea
Steve Stadelman Democrat Yea
Chapin Rose Republican Yea
Dale Fowler Republican Yea
Dan McConchie Republican Yea
Dave Syverson Republican Yea
Jil Tracy Republican Yea
Neil Anderson Republican Yea
Sue Rezin Republican Not Voting
Travis Weaver Republican Not Voting

Official roll call →

Subjects

civil-rights labor technology
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 67 do?
Creates the Collaborative Process Act. Defines terms. Provides that the Act applies to collaborative process participation agreements that meet the requirements of the Act signed on or after the effective date of the Act. Contains provisions concerning: requirements of collaborative process participation agreements; the beginning and conclusion of the collaborative process; proceedings before the court; disclosure of information; standards of professional responsibility and mandatory reporting; confidentiality; and privileges. Provides that the Act is subject to the supervisory authority of the Illinois Supreme Court.
Who sponsors SB 67?
SB 67 is sponsored by Michael E. Hastings (Democrat).
What is the current status of SB 67?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 11, 2017. Enacted.
Where can I track SB 67?
Track SB 67 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 67

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of SB 67

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →