Illinois 100th Regular Session Status: Passed Senate 7 D cosponsors

SB 263 — IDOT-CONTRACTORS-EVALUATION

Last action — Session Sine Die

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed House
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 100th Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Amends the Broadband Access on Passenger Rail Law. Makes a technical change in a Section concerning the short title.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

313 added · 19 removed

Plain-language change summary

The amendment to SB 263 introduces a new provision requiring the Department of Transportation to establish a committee that will review the rules for prequalifying minority-owned and women-owned contractors. This change aims to identify and address any barriers that may prevent these contractors from bidding on state contracts. The establishment of this committee matters because it increases opportunities for underrepresented contractors, promoting equity in the bidding process for public projects.

→
Previous
Latest
SB0263 *LRB10005184AXK15194b* 100TH GENERAL ASSEMBLY State of Illinois and 2018 SB0263 Introduced 1/24/2017, by Sen.
SB0263 Engrossed LRB100 05184 AXK 15194 b AN ACT concerning State government.
John J.
Cullerton SYNOPSIS AS INTRODUCED:
ILCS 2712/5-1 Amends the Broadband Access on Passenger Rail Law.
Makes a technical change in a Section concerning the short title.
LRB100 05184 AXK 15194 b A BILL FOR SB0263 LRB100 05184 AXK 15194 b AN ACT concerning State government.
The Broadband Access on Passenger Rail Law is amended by changing Section 5-1 as follows:
The Department of Transportation Law of the Civil Administrative Code of Illinois is amended by changing Section 2705-595 and by adding Section 2705-607 as follows:
(20 ILCS 2712/5-1) Sec.
(20 ILCS 2705/2705-595) Sec.
5-1.
2705-595.
Short title.
Prequalification of minority-owned and women-owned contractors.
This Article may be cited as the the Broadband Access on Passenger Rail Law.
(a) The Department shall, within 30 days after the effective date of this amendatory Act of the 96th General Assembly, establish a committee to review the rules for prequalification of contractors adopted by the Department at 44 Illinois Administrative Code 650.
The purpose of the review is to determine whether the rules for prequalification operate as a barrier to minority-owned and women-owned contractors becoming prequalified to bid on or make proposals for Department contracts.
The committee shall, in addition to Department staff, be constituted with membership representing the construction industry and minority-owned and women-owned contractors.
The committee shall complete its work and make recommendations for any changes to the rules for prequalification to the Secretary of Transportation within 180 SB0263 Engrossed - 2 - LRB100 05184 AXK 15194 b days after the effective date of this amendatory Act of the 96th General Assembly.
(b) The Department, in conjunction with the Capital Development Board, shall hold 2 public hearings to determine whether a more effective, efficient, and less burdensome method exists to prequalify an architect, engineer, or contractor.
The hearings shall also specifically determine how the Department can obtain greater participation in the bidding process of small contractors and minority, female, disabled, and veteran architects, engineers, and contractors.
The Department and the Capital Development Board shall collect data to review at the hearings, which shall include, but is not limited to, percentages and the number of minority, female, disabled, and veteran employees who are hired for each trade necessary for each project.
The Department and the Capital Development Board shall issue their joint findings and recommendations to the Governor and the General Assembly no later than January 1, 2018.
95-9, eff.
96-795, eff.
6-30-07.)
7-1-10 (see Section 5 of P.A.
96-793 for the effective date of P.A.
96-795).) (20 ILCS 2705/2705-607 new) Sec.
2705-607.
Performance evaluation;
contractor.
(a) For purposes of this Section, "Performance Factor" means a numerical value determined by the contractor's performance evaluation in a work category during the previous SB0263 Engrossed - 3 - LRB100 05184 AXK 15194 b year.
(b) At the close of each construction season, the Department, other State agencies or authorities using contractors based on the prequalification standards of the Department, and officials of a unit of local government administering a contract approved for award by the Department, shall evaluate each contractor who performed work for them during the previous year as either a prime contractor or a subcontractor.
The information shall be submitted on the Contractor's Annual Performance Report and shall be subject to disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act.
The performance evaluation shall be based upon:
(1) the quality of work performed for each work category under 44 Ill.
Admin.
Code 650;
and (2) the overall execution of work measured by:
(A) organization and prosecution of work;
(B) cooperation with public agency personnel responsible for contract administration and inspection;
(C) traffic control and site protection under contract requirements;
(D) compliance with the Equal Employment Opportunity program and labor requirements;
(E) erosion control;
and (F) the contractor's ability to meet the Quality Control plan and Quality Assurance plan under contract SB0263 Engrossed - 4 - LRB100 05184 AXK 15194 b requirements for materials production and construction quality control.
(c) The performance evaluation scale is a rating from 0 to 8 in accordance with the following definitions:
Show all 117 changed rows (77 more)
Previous
Latest
(1) "8" means excellent;
(2) "7" means good;
(3) "6" means satisfactory;
(4) "3" means marginal;
and (5) "0" means poor.
(d) The quality and evaluating categories under execution of work are rated as follows:
(1) to determine the contractor's quality of performance, the Department shall consider the project's durability and appearance, knowledge of supervisory personnel, and compliance with contract requirements and shall evaluate the performance based on the following scale:
(A) if the contractor exceeded project requirements in all areas considered, he or she shall receive an 8;
(B) if the contractor exceeded project requirements in a majority of areas considered, he or she shall receive a 7;
(C) if the contractor met project requirements in all areas considered, he or she shall receive a 6;
(D) if the contractor did not meet project SB0263 Engrossed - 5 - LRB100 05184 AXK 15194 b requirements in one area considered, he or she shall receive a 3;
and (E) if the contractor did not meet project requirements in 2 or more areas considered, he or she shall receive a 0;
(2) to determine the contractor's organization and prosecution, the Department shall consider the contractor's ability to diligently prosecute work by planning and scheduling labor, materials, and the work of subcontractors on the project site and shall evaluate the organization and prosecution based on the following scale:
(A) if the contractor exceeded project requirements in all areas considered and completed the project well ahead of schedule, he or she shall receive an 8;
(B) if the contractor exceeded project requirements in a majority of areas considered and the project was completed slightly ahead of schedule, he or she shall receive a 7;
(C) if the contractor met project requirements in all areas considered and the scheduled completion date was met, he or she shall receive a 6;
(D) if the contractor did not meet project requirements in one area considered and occasionally did not work when conditions permitted and the scheduled completion date was met, he or she shall SB0263 Engrossed - 6 - LRB100 05184 AXK 15194 b receive a 3;
and (E) if the contractor did not meet project requirements in 2 or more areas considered and the scheduled completion date was not met, he or she shall receive a 0;
(3) to determine the contractor's cooperation, the Department shall consider the contractor's willingness to negotiate contract disputes, to respond to reasonable requests by the resident engineer, and to respond to various correspondence from the Department and shall evaluate the cooperation based on the following scale:
(A) if the contractor exceeded project requirements in all areas considered, he or she shall receive an 8;
(B) if the contractor exceeded project requirements in a majority of areas considered, he or she shall receive a 7;
(C) if the contractor met project requirements in all areas considered, he or she shall receive a 6;
(D) if the contractor did not meet project requirements in one area considered, he or she shall receive a 3;
and (E) if the contractor did not meet project requirements in 2 or more areas considered, he or she shall receive a 0;
(4) to determine the project's traffic control and site SB0263 Engrossed - 7 - LRB100 05184 AXK 15194 b protection, the Department shall consider the appearance of traffic control devices, the response to repair deficient devices, and the contractor's willingness to comply with the Traffic Control Plan and shall evaluate based on the following scale:
(A) if the contractor exceeded project requirements in all areas considered, he or she shall receive an 8;
(B) if the contractor exceeded project requirements in a majority of areas considered, he or she shall receive a 7;
(C) if the contractor met project requirements in all areas considered, he or she shall receive a 6;
(D) if the contractor did not meet project requirements in one area considered, he or she shall receive a 3;
and (E) if the contractor did not meet project requirements in 2 or more areas considered or the contractor committed an act or omission which seriously compromised the safety of the public, he or she shall receive a 0;
(5) to determine the contractor's compliance with the Equal Employment Opportunity program and labor requirements, the Department shall evaluate the compliance based on the following scale:
(A) if the contractor exceeded project SB0263 Engrossed - 8 - LRB100 05184 AXK 15194 b requirements, he or she shall receive an 8;
(B) if the contractor met project requirements through extraordinary effort and initiative, he or she shall receive a 7;
(C) if the contractor met project requirements with minimum effort and initiative, he or she shall receive a 6;
(D) if the contractor met project requirements, but had to be motivated by Department personnel, he or she shall receive a 3;
and (E) if the contractor did not meet project requirements, he or she shall receive a 0;
(6) to determine the project's erosion control, the Department shall consider the contractor's compliance with the project's erosion control plan and all pertinent federal and State laws, permits, rules, and regulations and shall evaluate based on the following scale:
(A) if the contractor exceeded project requirements, he or she shall receive an 8;
(B) if the contractor exceeded project requirements in a majority of the areas, he or she shall receive a 7;
(C) if the contractor met project requirements in all areas, he or she shall receive a 6;
(D) if the contractor did not meet the project requirements in one area considered, he or she shall SB0263 Engrossed - 9 - LRB100 05184 AXK 15194 b receive a 3;
and (E) if the contractor did not meet the contract requirements in 2 or more areas, he or she shall receive a 0;
(7) to determine the contractor's ability to meet the Quality Control plan and Quality Assurance plan, the Department shall consider the contractor's ability to meet a Quality Control plan and Quality Assurance plan inspection, testing, and documentation requirements, to take control of the product, to take corrective action, and to communicate production and construction issued to Department personnel and shall evaluate based on the following scale:
(A) if the contractor exceeded Quality Control plan and Quality Assurance plan requirements in all areas considered, he or she shall receive an 8;
(B) if the contractor exceeded Quality Control plan and Quality Assurance plan requirements in a majority of areas considered, he or she shall receive a 7;
(C) if the contractor met Quality Control plan and Quality Assurance plan requirements in all areas considered, he or she shall receive a 6;
(D) if the contractor did not meet Quality Control plan and Quality Assurance plan requirements in one area considered, he or she shall receive a 3;
and SB0263 Engrossed - 10 - LRB100 05184 AXK 15194 b (E) if the contractor did not meet Quality Control plan and Quality Assurance plan requirements in 2 or more areas considered, he or she shall receive a 0.
(e) The Department shall calculate the Performance Factor by first determining the Project Cost Ratio for the relevant work category.
The Project Cost Ratio is the ratio of the value of all contracts being evaluated to the value of all contracts performed.
The Department shall establish a weighted performance evaluation value for each performance evaluation completed by determining the product of the Project Cost Ratio, the rating for quality given on the relevant performance evaluation, and the averaged ratings for the execution given on the relevant performance evaluation divided by 6.
Finally, the Department shall divide the summation of all weighted performance evaluation values by 6 to arrive at the Performance Factor.
(f) A work rating shall be subject to denial or revocation if the summation of all weighted performance evaluation values for a work rating category is less than 6 for 2 successive years.
A work rating shall be subject to denial or revocation if the summation of all weighted performance evaluation values for a work rating category is less than 3 for one year.
(g) The Department shall evaluate performance on any individual contract or group of contracts for purposes of determining the current responsibility of a contractor when the Engineer of Construction has determined that performance on any SB0263 Engrossed - 11 - LRB100 05184 AXK 15194 b contract or contracts may not be acceptable and that an immediate evaluation is necessary to assess the responsibility of a contractor in order to protect the interests of the State in sound procurement practices.
If the evaluation ordered by the Engineer of Construction results in the quality of work or the average overall execution of work ratings being rated at less than 3, the work ratings shall be revoked.
(h) If a contractor receives a Quality of Work Rating of 0 for any work category being evaluated on any one contract, the work rating shall be revoked.
(i) The Department shall notify the contractor of the performance evaluation in writing within 14 days of completion of the evaluation with a detailed explanation of any substandard items.
If a performance evaluation results in a denied, reduced, or revoked work rating, the contractor may proceed with the review procedures under 44 Ill.
Admin.
Code 650.150.
(j) If an applicant did not have a contract with the Department in the previous year, the last evaluation issued within a 5-year period shall be used.
If an applicant has not had an evaluation in the last 5 years or is applying for an initial rating in a category and lists no public agencies or private customers as references, a Performance Factor of "1" shall be used until an actual evaluation is made.
(k) As a component of the Auditor's General biennial compliance examination of the Department, the Auditor General SB0263 Engrossed - 12 - LRB100 05184 AXK 15194 b shall review the Department's compliance with the requirements under this Section.
Upon completion of the examination and release of the results to the Department, the Auditor General shall publish the results on its website.
Section 10.
The Criminal Code of 2012 is amended by adding Section 33E-15.5 as follows:
(720 ILCS 5/33E-15.5 new) Sec.
33E-15.5.
Manipulation of work ratings.
(a) Any person who knowingly manipulates a work rating factor for a contractor or subcontractor under Section 2705-907 of the Department of Transportation Law of the Civil Administrative Code of Illinois that results in a rating disqualifying or qualifying a contractor or subcontractor who would have been otherwise qualified or disqualified commits manipulation of work ratings.
A charge of manipulation of work ratings under this Section shall be investigated by the Department of Transportation Division of Internal Investigation.
(b) Sentence.
Manipulation of work ratings is a Class 4 felony.
Section 99.
Effective date.
This Act takes effect upon becoming law.
⬇ Download PDF
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. Session Sine Die

  2. Chief Sponsor Changed to Sen. John J. Cullerton

  3. Pursuant to Senate Rule 3-9(b) / Referred to Assignments

  4. Placed on Calendar Order of Concurrence House Amendment(s) 2 - May 29, 2018

  5. Secretary's Desk - Concurrence House Amendment(s) 2

  6. Added Alternate Co-Sponsor Rep. Juliana Stratton

  7. Third Reading - Short Debate - Passed 098-011-000

  8. Placed on Calendar Order of 3rd Reading - Short Debate

  9. House Floor Amendment No. 2 Adopted

  10. House Floor Amendment No. 1 Withdrawn by Rep. Theresa Mah

  11. House Floor Amendment No. 2 Recommends Be Adopted Transportation: Vehicles & Safety Committee; 009-000-000

  12. Alternate Chief Sponsor Changed to Rep. Theresa Mah

  13. House Floor Amendment No. 2 Rules Refers to Transportation: Vehicles & Safety Committee

  14. House Floor Amendment No. 2 Referred to Rules Committee

  15. House Floor Amendment No. 2 Filed with Clerk by Rep. Theresa Mah

  16. Final Action Deadline Extended-9(b) May 31, 2018

  17. Placed on Calendar 2nd Reading - Short Debate

  18. Approved for Consideration Rules Committee; 004-000-000

  19. Added Alternate Co-Sponsor Rep. Marcus C. Evans, Jr.

  20. Added Alternate Co-Sponsor Rep. Camille Y. Lilly

  21. Added Alternate Co-Sponsor Rep. LaToya Greenwood

  22. Rule 19(a) / Re-referred to Rules Committee

  23. Added Alternate Co-Sponsor Rep. Al Riley

  24. Added Alternate Co-Sponsor Rep. Carol Sente

  25. Added Alternate Co-Sponsor Rep. Silvana Tabares

  26. Added Alternate Co-Sponsor Rep. Thaddeus Jones

  27. Added Alternate Co-Sponsor Rep. Lawrence Walsh, Jr.

  28. Added Alternate Co-Sponsor Rep. Martin J. Moylan

  29. Added Alternate Co-Sponsor Rep. Stephanie A. Kifowit

  30. Added Alternate Co-Sponsor Rep. Rita Mayfield

  31. House Floor Amendment No. 1 Recommends Be Adopted Executive Committee; 009-000-000

  32. Added Alternate Co-Sponsor Rep. Mary E. Flowers

  33. Added Alternate Co-Sponsor Rep. Christian L. Mitchell

  34. Added Alternate Co-Sponsor Rep. Robert Martwick

  35. Added Alternate Co-Sponsor Rep. Barbara Flynn Currie

  36. House Floor Amendment No. 1 Rules Refers to Executive Committee

  37. House Floor Amendment No. 1 Referred to Rules Committee

  38. House Floor Amendment No. 1 Filed with Clerk by Rep. Arthur Turner

  39. Alternate Chief Co-Sponsor Changed to Rep. Chad Hays

  40. Alternate Chief Co-Sponsor Changed to Rep. Norine K. Hammond

  41. Alternate Chief Co-Sponsor Changed to Rep. Ann M. Williams

  42. Alternate Chief Co-Sponsor Changed to Rep. Kelly M. Burke

  43. Added Alternate Chief Co-Sponsor Rep. Chad Hays

  44. Added Alternate Chief Co-Sponsor Rep. Norine K. Hammond

  45. Added Alternate Chief Co-Sponsor Rep. Ann M. Williams

  46. Added Alternate Chief Co-Sponsor Rep. Kelly M. Burke

  47. Alternate Chief Co-Sponsor Removed Rep. Lou Lang

  48. Alternate Chief Co-Sponsor Removed Rep. Sara Feigenholtz

  49. Alternate Chief Co-Sponsor Removed Rep. Barbara Flynn Currie

  50. Final Action Deadline Extended-9(b) November 10, 2017

  51. Placed on Calendar 2nd Reading - Short Debate

  52. Approved for Consideration Rules Committee; 003-000-000

  53. Added Alternate Co-Sponsor Rep. Jaime M. Andrade, Jr.

  54. Added Alternate Chief Co-Sponsor Rep. Sara Feigenholtz

  55. Alternate Chief Co-Sponsor Removed Rep. Arthur Turner

  56. Alternate Chief Sponsor Changed to Rep. Arthur Turner

  57. Added Alternate Chief Co-Sponsor Rep. Arthur Turner

  58. Added Alternate Chief Co-Sponsor Rep. Lou Lang

  59. Added Alternate Chief Co-Sponsor Rep. Barbara Flynn Currie

  60. Alternate Chief Sponsor Changed to Rep. Michael J. Madigan

  61. Rule 19(a) / Re-referred to Rules Committee

  62. Final Action Deadline Extended-9(b) July 7, 2017

  63. Final Action Deadline Extended-9(b) June 30, 2017

  64. Final Action Deadline Extended-9(b) May 31, 2017

  65. Held on Calendar Order of Second Reading - Short Debate

  66. Second Reading - Short Debate

  67. Placed on Calendar 2nd Reading - Short Debate

  68. Do Pass / Short Debate State Government Administration Committee; 006-000-000

  69. Committee Deadline Extended-Rule 9(b) May 26, 2017

  70. Assigned to State Government Administration Committee

  71. Referred to Rules Committee

  72. First Reading

  73. Chief House Sponsor Rep. Barbara Flynn Currie

  74. Arrived in House

  75. Senate Floor Amendment No. 2 Tabled Pursuant to Rule 5-4(a)

  76. Senate Floor Amendment No. 1 Tabled Pursuant to Rule 5-4(a)

  77. Third Reading - Passed; 051-000-000

  78. Placed on Calendar Order of 3rd Reading April 27, 2017

  79. Senate Floor Amendment No. 3 Adopted; Clayborne

  80. Recalled to Second Reading

  81. Senate Floor Amendment No. 3 Recommend Do Adopt State Government; 007-000-000

  82. Senate Floor Amendment No. 3 Assignments Refers to State Government

  83. Senate Floor Amendment No. 2 Assignments Refers to State Government

  84. Senate Floor Amendment No. 3 Referred to Assignments

  85. Senate Floor Amendment No. 3 Filed with Secretary by Sen. James F. Clayborne, Jr.

  86. Added as Chief Co-Sponsor Sen. Jacqueline Y. Collins

  87. Added as Chief Co-Sponsor Sen. Mattie Hunter

  88. Senate Floor Amendment No. 1 Postponed - State Government

  89. Senate Floor Amendment No. 1 Assignments Refers to State Government

  90. Senate Floor Amendment No. 2 Referred to Assignments

  91. Senate Floor Amendment No. 2 Filed with Secretary by Sen. James F. Clayborne, Jr.

  92. Chief Sponsor Changed to Sen. James F. Clayborne, Jr.

  93. Placed on Calendar Order of 3rd Reading March 29, 2017

  94. Second Reading

  95. Senate Floor Amendment No. 1 Referred to Assignments

  96. Senate Floor Amendment No. 1 Filed with Secretary by Sen. James F. Clayborne, Jr.

  97. Placed on Calendar Order of 2nd Reading March 28, 2017

  98. Do Pass Executive; 014-000-000

  99. Assigned to Executive

  100. Referred to Assignments

  101. First Reading

  102. Filed with Secretary by Sen. John J. Cullerton

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

0 sponsors · 18 co-sponsors · 165 not signed on · 3 voted No

Sponsors (0)

None.

Co-sponsors (18)

Not signed on (165)

165 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 165 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Third Reading

Passed 98 Yea · 11 Nay · 9 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 58808
Republican 10200
Democrat 30101
Total 981109
% of votes cast 83%9%0%8%
How each member voted (118)
Member Party Vote
Batinick — Yea
Bellock — Yea
Bourne — Yea
Breen — Nay
Bristow — Yea
Butler — Yea
Carroll — Yea
McAuliffe — Yea
Pritchard — Yea
Sente — Yea
Stewart — Yea
Stratton — Yea
Bennett — Yea
Sauer — Yea
Tabares — Yea
Thapedi — Yea
Brady — Yea
Harris, David — Yea
Harris, Gregory — Yea
Turner — Yea
Unes — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Burke, Daniel — Yea
Wehrli — Yea
Jones — Yea
Cavaletto — Yea
Connor — Yea
Conroy — Yea
Conyears-Ervin — Yea
Costello — Yea
Currie — Yea
D'Amico — Yea
Frese — Yea
Greenwood — Yea
Hays — Yea
Hurley — Yea
Jimenez — Yea
Davis — Yea
Long — Nay
Wheeler, Barbara — Yea
McDermed — Yea
Mitchell, Bill — Yea
McSweeney — Yea
Williams — Yea
Mitchell, Christian — Yea
Finnie, Natalie — Yea
Olsen — Yea
Parkhurst — Nay
Skillicorn — Nay
Sommer — Nay
Wallace — Not Voting
Welter — Yea
Wheeler, Keith — Nay
Willis — Yea
Winger — Yea
Yingling — Yea
Burke, Kelly — Not Voting
Demmer — Yea
Drury — Yea
Durkin — Yea
Flowers — Yea
Fortner — Not Voting
Jesiel — Not Voting
Ives — Nay
Phillips — Nay
Reis — Yea
Riley — Not Voting
Soto — Not Voting
Zalewski — Yea
Lang — Yea
Madigan — Not Voting
Andersson — Yea
Arroyo — Yea
Chapa LaVia — Not Voting
Anna Moeller Democrat Yea
Anthony DeLuca Democrat Not Voting
Camille Y. Lilly Democrat Yea
Carol Ammons Democrat Yea
Emanuel "Chris" Welch Democrat Yea
Fred Crespo Democrat Yea
Jaime M. Andrade, Jr. Democrat Yea
Jay Hoffman Democrat Yea
Jehan Gordon-Booth Democrat Yea
Julie A. Morrison Democrat Nay
Justin Slaughter Democrat Yea
Katie Stuart Democrat Yea
Kelly M. Cassidy Democrat Yea
La Shawn K. Ford Democrat Yea
Laura Fine Democrat Yea
Lawrence "Larry" Walsh, Jr. Democrat Yea
Marcus C. Evans, Jr. Democrat Yea
Martin J. Moylan Democrat Yea
Michael W. Halpin Democrat Yea
Michelle Mussman Democrat Yea
Natalie A. Manley Democrat Yea
Nicholas K. Smith Democrat Yea
Rita Mayfield Democrat Yea
Robert "Bob" Rita Democrat Yea
Robert F. Martwick Democrat Yea
Robyn Gabel Democrat Yea
Sara Feigenholtz Democrat Yea
Sonya M. Harper Democrat Yea
Stephanie A. Kifowit Democrat Yea
Sue Scherer Democrat Yea
Theresa Mah Democrat Yea
Will Guzzardi Democrat Yea
Brad Halbrook Republican Nay
Charles Meier Republican Yea
Christopher "C.D." Davidsmeyer Republican Yea
Dan Swanson Republican Yea
Dave Severin Republican Yea
Joe C. Sosnowski Republican Yea
John M. Cabello Republican Nay
Norine K. Hammond Republican Yea
Ryan Spain Republican Yea
Steven Reick Republican Yea
Terri Bryant Republican Yea
Tony M. McCombie Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Third Reading

Passed 51 Yea · 0 Nay · 8 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 32005
Democrat 11003
Republican 8000
Total 51008
% of votes cast 86%0%0%14%
How each member voted (59)
Member Party Vote
Bertino-Tarrant — Not Voting
Biss — Not Voting
Bivins — Yea
Landek — Yea
Bush — Yea
Clayborne — Yea
Link — Yea
Rooney — Yea
McCann — Yea
McCarter — Not Voting
McConnaughay — Yea
Harris — Yea
Bennett — Yea
McGuire — Yea
Mulroe — Yea
Muñoz — Yea
Radogno — Yea
Brady — Yea
Silverstein — Yea
Cullerton — Yea
Steans — Yea
Cullerton, T. — Yea
Trotter — Yea
Connelly — Yea
Haine — Not Voting
Hutchinson — Yea
Nybo — Yea
Oberweis — Yea
Raoul — Yea
Righter — Not Voting
Sandoval — Yea
Schimpf — Yea
Manar — Yea
Althoff — Yea
Martinez — Yea
Barickman — Yea
Van Pelt — Yea
Bill Cunningham Democrat Yea
Cristina Castro Democrat Yea
David Koehler Democrat Not Voting
Don Harmon Democrat Yea
Emil Jones, III Democrat Yea
Julie A. Morrison Democrat Not Voting
Kimberly A. Lightford Democrat Yea
Lakesia Collins Democrat Yea
Laura M. Murphy Democrat Yea
Linda Holmes Democrat Yea
Mattie Hunter Democrat Yea
Michael E. Hastings Democrat Not Voting
Omar Aquino Democrat Yea
Steve Stadelman Democrat Yea
Chapin Rose Republican Yea
Dale Fowler Republican Yea
Dan McConchie Republican Yea
Dave Syverson Republican Yea
Jil Tracy Republican Yea
Neil Anderson Republican Yea
Sue Rezin Republican Yea
Travis Weaver Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

transportation technology
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 263 do?
Amends the Broadband Access on Passenger Rail Law. Makes a technical change in a Section concerning the short title.
Who sponsors SB 263?
SB 263 is sponsored by John J. Cullerton, Jaime M. Andrade, Jr. (Democrat), Barbara Flynn Currie, Christian L. Mitchell, Mary E. Flowers, Rita Mayfield (Democrat), Stephanie A. Kifowit (Democrat), Martin J. Moylan, Lawrence Walsh, Jr., Thaddeus Jones (Democrat), Silvana Tabares, Carol Sente, Al Riley, LaToya Greenwood, Camille Y. Lilly (Democrat), Marcus C. Evans, Jr. (Democrat), Juliana Stratton, and Robert F. Martwick (Democrat).
What is the current status of SB 263?
This bill died with 100th Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 263?
Track SB 263 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 263

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of SB 263

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →