Ohio 136th General Assembly Status: Passed House 1 R cosponsors

HB 644 — Create Higher Ed Evidence-Based Innovation Fund, Grant Program

Last action — Referred to committee

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed House
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has passed the House. Introduced January 12, 2026. It now moves to the second chamber.

Next likely step: consideration and a floor vote in the Senate.

Odds of enactment

Moderate chance

Based on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a moderate chance of becoming law.

Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.

A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.

Prognosis

Stalled 32% · moderate confidence
  • Passed House

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 R).

  • Mixed recorded votes

    3 passed, 1 failed in recorded votes so far.

Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.

In plain language

The bill creates a grant program for evidence-based reforms in higher education to improve student success.

This bill establishes the Higher Education Evidence-Based Innovation Fund and grant program to support state institutions in implementing evidence-based reforms. The Chancellor of Higher Education will distribute grants every two years starting in 2027, prioritizing effective strategies for improving student outcomes, especially for low-income students.

What this means for you
  • Workers: This bill may benefit workers by enhancing the skills and completion rates of students entering the job market.
  • Families: Families of low-income students may see improved support for their children's education through targeted student success programs.

Summary

To enact section 3333.1211 of the Revised Code to create the Higher Education Evidence-Based Innovation Fund and Grant Program and to require the Chancellor of Higher Education to conduct a study on retrenchment processes at state institutions of higher education.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

10 added · 7 removed

Plain-language change summary

The latest version of Bill HB 644 now includes a longer list of cosponsors, adding several representatives who support the bill. This change is important because a broader range of support can indicate increased consensus among lawmakers, which may help the bill progress through the legislative process more smoothly. Additionally, removing the earlier mention of the bill's cosponsors as reported by a committee highlights the transition from committee discussion to a full House vote.

→
Previous
Latest
As Reported by the House Workforce and Higher Education Committee 136th General Assembly Regular Session Sub.
As Passed by the House 136th General Assembly Regular Session Sub.
Representatives Miller, J., Williams To enact section 3333.1211 of the Revised Code to 1 create the Higher Education Evidence-Based 2 Innovation Fund and Grant Program.
Representatives Miller, J., Williams, Brennan, Brent, Brownlee, Ghanbari, Glassburn, Grim, Hall, D., John, Johnson, Lett, Mathews, T., Piccolantonio, Rader, Russo, Sigrist, Sims, Tims, White, A., White, E., Willis, Young To enact section 3333.1211 of the Revised Code to 1 create the Higher Education Evidence-Based 2 Innovation Fund and Grant Program.
16 (a) Demonstrates a statistically significant effect on 17 improving student outcomes or other relevant outcomes based on 18 Sub.
16 Sub.
644 Page 2 As Reported by the House Workforce and Higher Education Committee one of the following:
644 Page 2 As Passed by the House (a) Demonstrates a statistically significant effect on 17 improving student outcomes or other relevant outcomes based on 18 one of the following:
38 (5) "Evidence tier-two reform or practice" means an 39 evidence tier-one reform or practice or other reform or practice 40 meeting similar criteria, that through rigorous evaluation, 41 including through the use of existing administrative data, as 42 applicable, has been found to improve student achievement or 43 attainment and for which the impact and cost-effectiveness can 44 be meaningfully measured.
38 (5) "Evidence tier-two reform or practice" means an 39 evidence tier-one reform or practice or other reform or practice 40 meeting similar criteria, that through rigorous evaluation, 41 including through the use of existing administrative data, as 42 applicable, has been found to improve student achievement or 43 attainment and for which the impact and cost-effectiveness can 44 Sub.
45 (6) "Evidence tier-three reform or practice" means an 46 Sub.
644 Page 3 As Reported by the House Workforce and Higher Education Committee evidence tier-two reform or practice, or other reform or 47 practice meeting similar criteria, that has been found to 48 produce sizable, important impacts on student achievement or 49 attainment and which can be expected to provide information 50 related to both of the following:
644 Page 3 As Passed by the House be meaningfully measured.
45 (6) "Evidence tier-three reform or practice" means an 46 evidence tier-two reform or practice, or other reform or 47 practice meeting similar criteria, that has been found to 48 produce sizable, important impacts on student achievement or 49 attainment and which can be expected to provide information 50 related to both of the following:
73 Additional competitive grant periods may be held at the 74 discretion of the chancellor.
73 Sub.
The chancellor shall not award 75 grants in excess of the amount held in the higher education 76 Sub.
644 Page 4 As Reported by the House Workforce and Higher Education Committee evidence-based innovation fund.
644 Page 4 As Passed by the House Additional competitive grant periods may be held at the 74 discretion of the chancellor.
The chancellor shall not award 75 grants in excess of the amount held in the higher education 76 evidence-based innovation fund.
99 (4) A plan to evaluate the evidence-based reform or 100 practice that includes, to the maximum extent feasible, 101 experimental designs using random assignment or other research 102 methodologies that allow for the strongest possible causal 103 inferences when random assignment is not feasible;
99 (4) A plan to evaluate the evidence-based reform or 100 practice that includes, to the maximum extent feasible, 101 experimental designs using random assignment or other research 102 Sub.
104 Sub.
644 Page 5 As Reported by the House Workforce and Higher Education Committee (5) A description of how the evidence-based reform or 105 practice will be sustained once the grant expires.
644 Page 5 As Passed by the House methodologies that allow for the strongest possible causal 103 inferences when random assignment is not feasible;
104 (5) A description of how the evidence-based reform or 105 practice will be sustained once the grant expires.
127 (a) Availability of data to support evaluation and 128 research;
127 Sub.
129 Sub.
644 Page 6 As Reported by the House Workforce and Higher Education Committee (b) The evidence tier of the evidence-based reform or 130 practice that would be used.
644 Page 6 As Passed by the House (a) Availability of data to support evaluation and 128 research;
129 (b) The evidence tier of the evidence-based reform or 130 practice that would be used.
View plain text versions (3)

Action History

  1. As Passed by the House

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 133 not signed on · 7 voted No

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (133)

133 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 133 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 12 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 4000
Republican 8000
Total 12000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (12)
Member Party Vote
Beryl Brown Piccolantonio Democratic Yea
Desiree Tims Democratic Yea
Joseph A. Miller, III Democratic Yea
Munira Abdullahi Democratic Yea
Gayle Manning Republican Yea
Heidi Workman Republican Yea
Josh Williams Republican Yea
Kevin Ritter Republican Yea
Marilyn John Republican Yea
Nick Santucci Republican Yea
Tom Young Republican Yea
Tracy M. Richardson Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed

Passed 81 Yea · 7 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 30000
Republican 51700
Total 81700
% of votes cast 92%8%0%0%
How each member voted (88)
Member Party Vote
Anita Somani Democratic Yea
Ashley Bryant Bailey Democratic Yea
Beryl Brown Piccolantonio Democratic Yea
Bride Rose Sweeney Democratic Yea
C. Allison Russo Democratic Yea
Cecil Thomas Democratic Yea
Chris Glassburn Democratic Yea
Christine Cockley Democratic Yea
Crystal Lett Democratic Yea
Dani Isaacsohn Democratic Yea
Daniel P. Troy Democratic Yea
Derrick Hall Democratic Yea
Desiree Tims Democratic Yea
Dontavius L. Jarrells Democratic Yea
Eric Synenberg Democratic Yea
Erika White Democratic Yea
Ismail Mohamed Democratic Yea
Joseph A. Miller, III Democratic Yea
Juanita O. Brent Democratic Yea
Karen Brownlee Democratic Yea
Lauren McNally Democratic Yea
Mark Sigrist Democratic Yea
Meredith R. Lawson-Rowe Democratic Yea
Michele Grim Democratic Yea
Phillip M. Robinson, Jr. Democratic Yea
Rachel B. Baker Democratic Yea
Sean P. Brennan Democratic Yea
Terrence Upchurch Democratic Yea
Tristan Rader Democratic Yea
Veronica R. Sims Democratic Yea
Adam C. Bird Republican Yea
Adam Holmes Republican Yea
Adam Mathews Republican Yea
Andrea White Republican Yea
Angela N. King Republican Yea
Bernard Willis Republican Yea
Beth Lear Republican Nay
Bill Roemer Republican Yea
Bob Peterson Republican Yea
Brian Lampton Republican Yea
Brian Lorenz Republican Yea
Brian Stewart Republican Yea
D. J. Swearingen Republican Nay
David Thomas Republican Yea
Diane Mullins Republican Nay
Gary Click Republican Yea
Gayle Manning Republican Yea
Haraz N. Ghanbari Republican Yea
Heidi Workman Republican Yea
Jack K. Daniels Republican Yea
Jamie Callender Republican Yea
Jason Stephens Republican Yea
Jean Schmidt Republican Yea
Jeff LaRe Republican Yea
Jim Thomas Republican Yea
Johnathan Newman Republican Yea
Josh Williams Republican Yea
Justin Pizzulli Republican Yea
Kellie Deeter Republican Yea
Kevin D. Miller Republican Yea
Kevin Ritter Republican Yea
Levi Dean Republican Nay
Marilyn John Republican Yea
Mark Hiner Republican Yea
Mark Johnson Republican Yea
Matt Huffman Republican Yea
Matthew Kishman Republican Yea
Meredith Craig Republican Yea
Michael D. Dovilla Republican Yea
Michelle Teska Republican Nay
Mike Odioso Republican Yea
Monica Robb Blasdel Republican Yea
Nick Santucci Republican Yea
Phil Plummer Republican Yea
Riordan T. McClain Republican Yea
Rodney Creech Republican Yea
Ron Ferguson Republican Nay
Roy Klopfenstein Republican Yea
Sarah Fowler Arthur Republican Yea
Scott Oelslager Republican Yea
Steve Demetriou Republican Yea
Tex Fischer Republican Nay
Thomas Hall Republican Yea
Tim Barhorst Republican Yea
Tom Young Republican Yea
Tracy M. Richardson Republican Yea
Ty D. Mathews Republican Yea
Ty Moore Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Reported

Failed 12 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 8000
Democratic 4000
Total 12000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (12)
Member Party Vote
Beryl Brown Piccolantonio Democratic Yea
Desiree Tims Democratic Yea
Joseph A. Miller, III Democratic Yea
Munira Abdullahi Democratic Yea
Gayle Manning Republican Yea
Heidi Workman Republican Yea
Josh Williams Republican Yea
Kevin Ritter Republican Yea
Marilyn John Republican Yea
Nick Santucci Republican Yea
Tom Young Republican Yea
Tracy M. Richardson Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does HB 644 do?
To enact section 3333.1211 of the Revised Code to create the Higher Education Evidence-Based Innovation Fund and Grant Program and to require the Chancellor of Higher Education to conduct a study on retrenchment processes at state institutions of higher education.
Who sponsors HB 644?
HB 644 is sponsored by Gayle Manning (Republican).
What is the current status of HB 644?
This bill has passed the House. Introduced January 12, 2026. It now moves to the second chamber.
Where can I track HB 644?
Track HB 644 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HB 644

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of HB 644

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →