Ohio 136th General Assembly Status: Introduced 1 R cosponsors

HB 392 — Enact the Ohio Right to Compute Act

Last action — Reported - Amended

  1. 1
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed House
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been introduced in the House. Introduced July 07, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.

Next likely step: a committee referral and hearing.

Odds of enactment

Low chance

Based on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a low chance of becoming law.

Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.

A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.

Prognosis

Stalled 12% · moderate confidence
  • Introduced

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 R).

  • Mixed recorded votes

    1 passed, 1 failed in recorded votes so far.

Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.

In plain language

The bill establishes limits on regulating certain computational systems and mandates risk management for AI-controlled infrastructure.

This bill sets guidelines for the regulation of computational systems and requires risk management policies for AI in critical infrastructure. It aims to clarify the state's approach to managing technology and its implications for safety.

What this means for you
  • Workers: For workers, this may mean changes in how AI systems are managed in the workplace, impacting job roles and safety protocols.
  • Environment: Environmentally, the act may influence how computational systems engage with regulatory practices related to environmental impacts.

Summary

To enact section 9.89 of the Revised Code to limit further regulation of certain computational systems, require risk management policies for AI-controlled critical infrastructure, and to name this act the Ohio Right to Compute Act.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

71 added · 66 removed

Plain-language change summary

The recent changes to Bill HB 392 involve clarifying the scope of what constitutes a public nuisance related to computational resources. The new version specifies that public nuisances can be associated with computational resource infrastructure rather than just physical data centers. Additionally, it emphasizes the governance of acceptable uses of artificial intelligence by employees of state or local agencies. These amendments matter because they aim to better regulate and ensure safe practices in the emerging field of technology, particularly as it relates to artificial intelligence and data management.

→
Previous
Latest
As Introduced 136th General Assembly Regular Session H.
As Reported by the House Technology and Innovation Committee 136th General Assembly Regular Session Am.
H.
392 2025-2026 Representatives Fischer, Demetriou To enact section 9.89 of the Revised Code to limit 1 further regulation of certain computational 2 systems, require risk management policies for 3 AI-controlled critical infrastructure, and to 4 name this act the Ohio Right to Compute Act.
392 2025-2026 Representatives Fischer, Demetriou Cosponsor:
Representative Mathews, T.
To enact section 9.89 of the Revised Code to limit 1 further regulation of certain computational 2 systems, require risk management policies for 3 AI-controlled critical infrastructure, and to 4 name this act the Ohio Right to Compute Act.
8 (1) "Compelling governmental interest" means a 9 governmental interest of the highest order that cannot be 10 achieved without burdening the lawful use of computational 11 resources, including all of the following:
8 (1) "Compelling governmental interest" means a 9 governmental interest of the highest order in protecting the 10 public that cannot be achieved without burdening the lawful use 11 of computational resources, including all of the following:
15 (c) Protecting minors and vulnerable populations from 16 harmful content generated by artificial intelligence systems, 17 such as images or video or audio recordings that replicate the 18 likeness of an individual, commonly known as "deepfakes," that 19 H.
15 (c) Protecting minors and vulnerable populations from 16 harmful content generated by artificial intelligence systems, 17 such as images or video or audio recordings that replicate the 18 Am.
H.
392 Page 2 As Introduced are generated or published without the individual's consent;
392 Page 2 As Reported by the House Technology and Innovation Committee likeness of an individual, commonly known as "deepfakes," that 19 are generated or published without the individual's consent;
20 (d) Preventing and remediating public nuisances associated 21 with physical data center infrastructure.
20 (d) Remediating public nuisances associated with 21 computational resource infrastructure;
22 (2) "Computational resource" means any system, software, 23 network, device, or infrastructure capable of processing, 24 storing, transmitting, manipulating, or disseminating data or 25 information, including hardware, software, algorithms, 26 cryptography, artificial intelligence systems, machine learning 27 systems, quantum computing tools, and any similar technologies.
22 (e) Governing acceptable uses of artificial intelligence 23 systems by employees of the political subdivision or state 24 agency.
28 (3) "Artificial intelligence system" means any system that 29 utilizes machine learning or similar technologies to infer from 30 inputs how to produce outputs that affect or influence physical 31 or virtual environments, including content generation, 32 decisions, recommendations, or predictions.
25 (2) "Computational resource" means any system, software, 26 network, device, or infrastructure capable of processing, 27 storing, transmitting, manipulating, or disseminating data or 28 information, including hardware, software, algorithms, 29 cryptography, artificial intelligence systems, machine learning 30 systems, quantum computing tools, and any similar technologies.
33 (4) "Critical infrastructure facility" has the same 34 meaning as in section 2911.21 of the Revised Code.
31 (3) "Artificial intelligence system" means any system that 32 utilizes machine learning or similar technologies to infer from 33 inputs how to produce outputs that affect or influence physical 34 or virtual environments, including content generation, 35 decisions, recommendations, or predictions.
35 (5) "State agency" means every organized body, office, or 36 agency established by the laws of the state for the exercise of 37 any function of state government.
36 (4) "Critical infrastructure facility" has the same 37 meaning as in section 2911.21 of the Revised Code.
"State agency" does not 38 include the general assembly.
38 (5) "State agency" means every organized body, office, or 39 agency established by the laws of the state for the exercise of 40 any function of state government.
39 (6) "Political subdivision" means any body corporate and 40 politic that is responsible for governmental activities only in 41 a geographic area smaller than the state.
"State agency" does not 41 include the general assembly.
42 (B) No political subdivision or state agency shall enact, 43 adopted, enforce, or maintain any law, rule, regulation, permit 44 requirement, or other administrative practice that restricts or 45 prohibits any person's lawful use, development, deployment, or 46 possession of a computational resource unless the restriction is 47 narrowly tailored to achieve a compelling governmental interest.
42 (6) "Political subdivision" means any body corporate and 43 politic that is responsible for governmental activities only in 44 a geographic area smaller than the state.
48 H.
45 (B) No political subdivision or state agency shall enact, 46 Am.
H.
392 Page 3 As Introduced (C)(1) Any person or other entity that implements or 49 operates an artificial intelligence system that in whole or in 50 part controls a critical infrastructure facility shall, before 51 or within a reasonable period after the deployment of the 52 system, implement a risk management policy that conforms to all 53 of the following:
392 Page 3 As Reported by the House Technology and Innovation Committee adopted, enforce, or maintain any law, rule, regulation, permit 47 requirement, or other administrative practice that restricts or 48 prohibits any person's lawful use, development, deployment, or 49 possession of a computational resource unless the restriction is 50 narrowly tailored to achieve a compelling governmental interest.
54 (a) The latest version of the artificial intelligence risk 55 management framework developed by the national institute of 56 standards and technology under the United States department of 57 commerce;
51 (C)(1) Any person or other entity that implements or 52 operates an artificial intelligence system that in whole or in 53 part controls a critical infrastructure facility shall, before 54 or within a reasonable period after the deployment of the 55 system, implement a risk management policy that conforms to all 56 applicable federal regulations and either of the following:
58 (b) The international organization for standardization and 59 international electrotechnical commission 4200 standard or any 60 other nationally or internationally recognized artificial 61 intelligence risk management standard or framework not referred 62 to in this section;
57 (a) The latest version of the artificial intelligence risk 58 management framework developed by the national institute of 59 standards and technology under the United States department of 60 commerce;
63 (c) All applicable federal regulations.
61 (b) The international organization for standardization and 62 international electrotechnical commission 4200 standard or any 63 other nationally or internationally recognized artificial 64 intelligence risk management standard or framework not referred 65 to in this section.
64 (2) The requirement to implement a risk management policy 65 under division (C)(1) of this section does not apply if the 66 artificial intelligence system is capable of completing only 67 nonexecutive tasks of a procedural or preparatory nature or 68 implementing only those decisions previously made by a human 69 decision maker, or if the artificial intelligence system is 70 exclusively an antivirus, antimalware, or cybersecurity tool.
66 (2) The requirement to implement a risk management policy 67 under division (C)(1) of this section does not apply if the 68 artificial intelligence system is capable of completing only 69 nonexecutive tasks of a procedural or preparatory nature or 70 implementing only those decisions previously made by a human 71 decision maker, or if the artificial intelligence system is 72 exclusively an antivirus, antimalware, or cybersecurity tool.
71 (D) This section shall not be construed to abridge, alter, 72 diminish, or conflict with any legal rights and remedies related 73 to intellectual property, including patent, trademark, 74 copyright, and trade secret protections.
73 (D) This section shall not be construed to abridge, alter, 74 diminish, or conflict with any legal rights and remedies related 75 Am.
75 Section 2.
H.
This act shall be known as the Ohio Right to 76 Compute Act.
B.
77
No.
392 Page 4 As Reported by the House Technology and Innovation Committee to intellectual property, including patent, trademark, 76 copyright, and trade secret protections.
77 Section 2.
This act shall be known as the Ohio Right to 78 Compute Act.
79
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. As Reported by the House Technology and Innovation Committee

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 133 not signed on · 4 voted No

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (133)

133 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 133 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 9 Yea · 4 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 9000
Democratic 0400
Total 9400
% of votes cast 69%31%0%0%
How each member voted (13)
Member Party Vote
Ashley Bryant Bailey Democratic Nay
Christine Cockley Democratic Nay
Erika White Democratic Nay
Ismail Mohamed Democratic Nay
Adam Holmes Republican Yea
Heidi Workman Republican Yea
Melanie Miller Republican Yea
Riordan T. McClain Republican Yea
Ron Ferguson Republican Yea
Steve Demetriou Republican Yea
Thaddeus J. Claggett Republican Yea
Thomas Hall Republican Yea
Ty D. Mathews Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Reported

Failed 9 Yea · 4 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 9000
Democratic 0400
Total 9400
% of votes cast 69%31%0%0%
How each member voted (13)
Member Party Vote
Ashley Bryant Bailey Democratic Nay
Christine Cockley Democratic Nay
Erika White Democratic Nay
Ismail Mohamed Democratic Nay
Adam Holmes Republican Yea
Heidi Workman Republican Yea
Melanie Miller Republican Yea
Riordan T. McClain Republican Yea
Ron Ferguson Republican Yea
Steve Demetriou Republican Yea
Thaddeus J. Claggett Republican Yea
Thomas Hall Republican Yea
Ty D. Mathews Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does HB 392 do?
To enact section 9.89 of the Revised Code to limit further regulation of certain computational systems, require risk management policies for AI-controlled critical infrastructure, and to name this act the Ohio Right to Compute Act.
Who sponsors HB 392?
HB 392 is sponsored by Tex Fischer (Republican).
What is the current status of HB 392?
This bill has been introduced in the House. Introduced July 07, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Where can I track HB 392?
Track HB 392 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HB 392

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of HB 392

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →