Illinois 103rd Regular Session Status: Passed Senate 3 D cosponsors

SB 698 — LOCAL GOVERNMENT-TECH

Last action — House Floor Amendment No. 3 Recommends Be Adopted Transportation: Vehicles & Safety; 007-003-000

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed House
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 103rd Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Amends the Local Government Wage Increase Transparency Act. Makes a technical change in a Section concerning the short title.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

318 added · 19 removed

Plain-language change summary

The bill SB 698 has been amended to focus on automated speed enforcement systems in safety zones, providing a detailed definition of what these systems are and how they operate. It emphasizes that these systems are meant to record speeding violations and include details like the time, date, and location of the offense. This change is important because it clarifies the regulations surrounding automated speed enforcement, potentially leading to better enforcement of traffic laws and increased safety in areas where speeding is a concern.

→
Previous
Latest
SB0698 *LRB10303151AWJ48157b* 103RD GENERAL ASSEMBLY State of Illinois and 2024 SB0698 Introduced 2/2/2023, by Sen.
SB0698 Engrossed LRB103 03151 AWJ 48157 b AN ACT concerning local government.
Don Harmon SYNOPSIS AS INTRODUCED:
ILCS 155/1 Amends the Local Government Wage Increase Transparency Act.
Makes a technical change in a Section concerning the short title.
LRB103 03151 AWJ 48157 b A BILL FOR SB0698 LRB103 03151 AWJ 48157 b AN ACT concerning local government.
The Local Government Wage Increase Transparency Act is amended by changing Section 1 as follows:
The Illinois Vehicle Code is amended by changing Section 11-208.8 as follows:
(50 ILCS 155/1) Sec.
(625 ILCS 5/11-208.8) Sec.
1.
11-208.8.
Short title.
Automated speed enforcement systems in safety zones.
This Act may be cited as the the Local Government Wage Increase Transparency Act.
(a) As used in this Section:
"Automated speed enforcement system" means a photographic device, radar device, laser device, or other electrical or mechanical device or devices installed or utilized in a safety zone and designed to record the speed of a vehicle and obtain a clear photograph or other recorded image of the vehicle and the vehicle's registration plate or digital registration plate while the driver is violating Article VI of Chapter 11 of this Code or a similar provision of a local ordinance.
An automated speed enforcement system is a system, located in a safety zone which is under the jurisdiction of a municipality, that produces a recorded image of a motor vehicle's violation of a provision of this Code or a local ordinance and is designed to obtain a clear recorded image of the vehicle and the vehicle's license plate.
The recorded SB0698 Engrossed - 2 - LRB103 03151 AWJ 48157 b image must also display the time, date, and location of the violation.
"Owner" means the person or entity to whom the vehicle is registered.
"Recorded image" means images recorded by an automated speed enforcement system on:
(1) 2 or more photographs;
(2) 2 or more microphotographs;
(3) 2 or more electronic images;
or (4) a video recording showing the motor vehicle and, on at least one image or portion of the recording, clearly identifying the registration plate or digital registration plate number of the motor vehicle.
"Safety zone" means an area that is within one-eighth of a mile from the nearest property line of any public or private elementary or secondary school, or from the nearest property line of any facility, area, or land owned by a school district that is used for educational purposes approved by the Illinois State Board of Education, not including school district headquarters or administrative buildings.
A safety zone also includes an area that is within one-eighth of a mile from the nearest property line of any facility, area, or land owned by a park district used for recreational purposes.
However, if any portion of a roadway is within either one-eighth mile radius, the safety zone also shall include the roadway extended to the furthest portion of the next furthest intersection.
The term SB0698 Engrossed - 3 - LRB103 03151 AWJ 48157 b "safety zone" does not include any portion of the roadway known as Lake Shore Drive or any controlled access highway with 8 or more lanes of traffic.
(a-5) The automated speed enforcement system shall be operational and violations shall be recorded only at the following times:
(i) if the safety zone is based upon the property line of any facility, area, or land owned by a school district, only on school days and no earlier than 6 a.m.
and no later than 8:30 p.m.
if the school day is during the period of Monday through Thursday, or 9 p.m.
if the school day is a Friday;
and (ii) if the safety zone is based upon the property line of any facility, area, or land owned by a park district, no earlier than one hour prior to the time that the facility, area, or land is open to the public or other patrons, and no later than one hour after the facility, area, or land is closed to the public or other patrons.
(b) A municipality that produces a recorded image of a motor vehicle's violation of a provision of this Code or a local ordinance must make the recorded images of a violation accessible to the alleged violator by providing the alleged violator with a website address, accessible through the Internet.
(c) Notwithstanding any penalties for any other violations of this Code, the owner of a motor vehicle used in a traffic SB0698 Engrossed - 4 - LRB103 03151 AWJ 48157 b violation recorded by an automated speed enforcement system shall be subject to the following penalties:
(1) if the recorded speed is no less than 6 miles per hour and no more than 10 miles per hour over the legal speed limit, a civil penalty not exceeding $50, plus an additional penalty of not more than $50 for failure to pay the original penalty in a timely manner;
or (2) if the recorded speed is more than 10 miles per hour over the legal speed limit, a civil penalty not exceeding $100, plus an additional penalty of not more than $100 for failure to pay the original penalty in a timely manner.
A penalty may not be imposed under this Section if the driver of the motor vehicle received a Uniform Traffic Citation from a police officer for a speeding violation occurring within one-eighth of a mile and 15 minutes of the violation that was recorded by the system.
A violation for which a civil penalty is imposed under this Section is not a violation of a traffic regulation governing the movement of vehicles and may not be recorded on the driving record of the owner of the vehicle.
A law enforcement officer is not required to be present or to witness the violation.
No penalty may be imposed under this Section if the recorded speed of a vehicle is 5 miles per hour or less over the legal speed limit.
The municipality may send, in the same manner that notices are sent under this Section, a speed violation warning notice SB0698 Engrossed - 5 - LRB103 03151 AWJ 48157 b where the violation involves a speed of 5 miles per hour or less above the legal speed limit.
(d) The net proceeds that a municipality receives from civil penalties imposed under an automated speed enforcement system, after deducting all non-personnel and personnel costs associated with the operation and maintenance of such system, shall be expended or obligated by the municipality for the following purposes:
(i) public safety initiatives to ensure safe passage around schools, and to provide police protection and surveillance around schools and parks, including but not limited to:
Show all 101 changed rows (61 more)
Previous
Latest
(1) personnel costs;
and (2) non-personnel costs such as construction and maintenance of public safety infrastructure and equipment;
(ii) initiatives to improve pedestrian and traffic safety;
(iii) construction and maintenance of infrastructure within the municipality, including but not limited to roads and bridges;
and (iv) after school programs.
(e) For each violation of a provision of this Code or a local ordinance recorded by an automated speed enforcement system, the municipality having jurisdiction shall issue a written notice of the violation to the registered owner of the vehicle as the alleged violator.
The notice shall be delivered to the registered owner of the vehicle, by mail, within 30 days SB0698 Engrossed - 6 - LRB103 03151 AWJ 48157 b after the Secretary of State notifies the municipality of the identity of the owner of the vehicle, but in no event later than 90 days after the violation.
(f) The notice required under subsection (e) of this Section shall include:
(1) the name and address of the registered owner of the vehicle;
(2) the registration number of the motor vehicle involved in the violation;
(3) the violation charged;
(4) the date, time, and location where the violation occurred;
(5) a copy of the recorded image or images;
(6) the amount of the civil penalty imposed and the date by which the civil penalty should be paid;
(7) a statement that recorded images are evidence of a violation of a speed restriction;
(8) a warning that failure to pay the civil penalty or to contest liability in a timely manner is an admission of liability;
(9) a statement that the person may elect to proceed by:
(A) paying the fine;
or (B) challenging the charge in court, by mail, or by administrative hearing;
and (10) a website address, accessible through the SB0698 Engrossed - 7 - LRB103 03151 AWJ 48157 b Internet, where the person may view the recorded images of the violation.
(g) (Blank).
(h) Based on inspection of recorded images produced by an automated speed enforcement system, a notice alleging that the violation occurred shall be evidence of the facts contained in the notice and admissible in any proceeding alleging a violation under this Section.
(i) Recorded images made by an automated speed enforcement system are confidential and shall be made available only to the alleged violator and governmental and law enforcement agencies for purposes of adjudicating a violation of this Section, for statistical purposes, or for other governmental purposes.
Any recorded image evidencing a violation of this Section, however, may be admissible in any proceeding resulting from the issuance of the citation.
(j) The court or hearing officer may consider in defense of a violation:
(1) that the motor vehicle or registration plates or digital registration plates of the motor vehicle were stolen before the violation occurred and not under the control or in the possession of the owner or lessee at the time of the violation;
(1.5) that the motor vehicle was hijacked before the violation occurred and not under the control of or in the possession of the owner or lessee at the time of the SB0698 Engrossed - 8 - LRB103 03151 AWJ 48157 b violation;
(2) that the driver of the motor vehicle received a Uniform Traffic Citation from a police officer for a speeding violation occurring within one-eighth of a mile and 15 minutes of the violation that was recorded by the system;
and (3) any other evidence or issues provided by municipal ordinance.
(k) To demonstrate that the motor vehicle was hijacked or the motor vehicle or registration plates or digital registration plates were stolen before the violation occurred and were not under the control or possession of the owner or lessee at the time of the violation, the owner or lessee must submit proof that a report concerning the motor vehicle or registration plates was filed with a law enforcement agency in a timely manner.
(l) A roadway equipped with an automated speed enforcement system shall be posted with a sign conforming to the national Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices that is visible to approaching traffic stating that vehicle speeds are being photo-enforced and indicating the speed limit.
The municipality shall install such additional signage as it determines is necessary to give reasonable notice to drivers as to where automated speed enforcement systems are installed.
(m) A roadway where a new automated speed enforcement system is installed shall be posted with signs providing 30 SB0698 Engrossed - 9 - LRB103 03151 AWJ 48157 b days notice of the use of a new automated speed enforcement system prior to the issuance of any citations through the automated speed enforcement system.
(n) The compensation paid for an automated speed enforcement system must be based on the value of the equipment or the services provided and may not be based on the number of traffic citations issued or the revenue generated by the system.
(n-1) No member of the General Assembly and no officer or employee of a municipality or county shall knowingly accept employment or receive compensation or fees for services from a vendor that provides automated speed enforcement system equipment or services to municipalities or counties.
No former member of the General Assembly shall, within a period of 2 years immediately after the termination of service as a member of the General Assembly, knowingly accept employment or receive compensation or fees for services from a vendor that provides automated speed enforcement system equipment or services to municipalities or counties.
No former officer or employee of a municipality or county shall, within a period of 2 years immediately after the termination of municipal or county employment, knowingly accept employment or receive compensation or fees for services from a vendor that provides automated speed enforcement system equipment or services to municipalities or counties.
(o) (Blank).
SB0698 Engrossed - 10 - LRB103 03151 AWJ 48157 b (p) No person who is the lessor of a motor vehicle pursuant to a written lease agreement shall be liable for an automated speed or traffic law enforcement system violation involving such motor vehicle during the period of the lease;
provided that upon the request of the appropriate authority received within 120 days after the violation occurred, the lessor provides within 60 days after such receipt the name and address of the lessee.
The drivers license number of a lessee may be subsequently individually requested by the appropriate authority if needed for enforcement of this Section.
Upon the provision of information by the lessor pursuant to this subsection, the municipality may issue the violation to the lessee of the vehicle in the same manner as it would issue a violation to a registered owner of a vehicle pursuant to this Section, and the lessee may be held liable for the violation.
(q) A municipality using an automated speed enforcement system must provide notice to drivers by publishing the locations of all safety zones where system equipment is installed on the website of the municipality.
(r) A municipality operating an automated speed enforcement system shall conduct a statistical analysis to assess the safety impact of the system following installation of the system and every 2 years thereafter.
A municipality operating an automated speed enforcement system before the effective date of this amendatory Act of the 103rd General SB0698 Engrossed - 11 - LRB103 03151 AWJ 48157 b Assembly shall conduct a statistical analysis to assess the safety impact of the system by no later than one year after the effective date of this amendatory Act of the 103rd General Assembly and every 2 years thereafter.
Each statistical analysis shall be based upon the best available crash, traffic, and other data, and shall cover a period of time before and after installation of the system sufficient to provide a statistically valid comparison of safety impact.
Each statistical analysis shall be consistent with professional judgment and acceptable industry practice.
Each statistical analysis also shall be consistent with the data required for valid comparisons of before and after conditions and shall be conducted within a reasonable period following the installation of the automated traffic law enforcement system.
Each statistical analysis required by this subsection shall be made available to the public and shall be published on the website of the municipality.
(s) This Section applies only to municipalities with a population of 1,000,000 or more inhabitants and home rule municipalities with over 35,000 or more inhabitants in a county with a population of 3,000,000 or more.
(t) If a county or municipality selects a new vendor for its automated speed enforcement system and must, as a consequence, apply for a permit, approval, or other authorization from the Department for reinstallation of one or more malfunctioning components of that system and if, at the SB0698 Engrossed - 12 - LRB103 03151 AWJ 48157 b time of the application for the permit, approval, or other authorization, the new vendor operates an automated speed enforcement system for any other county or municipality in the State, then the Department shall approve or deny the county or municipality's application for the permit, approval, or other authorization within 90 days after its receipt.
(u) The Department may revoke any permit, approval, or other authorization granted to a county or municipality for the placement, installation, or operation of an automated speed enforcement system if any official or employee who serves that county or municipality is charged with bribery, official misconduct, or a similar crime related to the placement, installation, or operation of the automated speed enforcement system in the county or municipality.
The Department shall adopt any rules necessary to implement and administer this subsection.
The rules adopted by the Department shall describe the revocation process, shall ensure that notice of the revocation is provided, and shall provide an opportunity to appeal the revocation.
Any county or municipality that has a permit, approval, or other authorization revoked under this subsection may not reapply for such a permit, approval, or other authorization for a period of 1 year after the revocation.
99-646, eff.
102-905, eff.
7-28-16.)
1-1-23;
103-364, eff.
7-28-23.) Section 99.
Effective date.
This Act takes effect upon becoming law.
⬇ Download PDF
View plain text versions (2)

How this bill changes current law

3 changes Share ↗

Compared against the Illinois Compiled Statutes as published AI-generated reading aid — verify against the official bill.

The bill expands and clarifies the provisions related to automated speed enforcement systems in safety zones.

  • 625 ILCS 5/11-208.8

    any roadway in which the 30 mile per hour maximum speed limit is decreased by local ordinance without an engineering or traffic investigation in accordance with subsection (b) of Section 11-604 after the effective date of this amendatory Act of the 104th General Assembly.

    The definition of 'safety zone' is simplified by removing language regarding speed limits decreased by local ordinance.

  • 625 ILCS 5/11-208.8

    non-personnel costs such as construction and maintenance of public saf → non-personnel costs such as construction and maintenance of public safety infrastructure and equipment;

    Clarifies the use of proceeds from speed enforcement penalties to include broader public safety infrastructure.

  • 625 ILCS 5/11-208.8

    A roadway where a new automated speed enforcement system is installed shall be posted with signs providing 30 days notice of the use of a new automated speed enforcement system prior to the issuance of any citations through the automated speed enforcement system. → A roadway where a new automated speed enforcement system is installed shall be posted with signs providing 30 days notice of the use of a new automated speed enforcement system prior to the issuance of any citations through the automated speed enforcement system.

    Restates the requirement for advance notice before issuing citations from new automated speed enforcement systems.

Amendments

4 amendments

Click Show changes on an amendment above to see how it modifies the bill.

Action History

  1. House Floor Amendment No. 3 Recommends Be Adopted Transportation: Vehicles & Safety; 007-003-000

  2. Added Alternate Chief Co-Sponsor Rep. Dave Vella

  3. House Floor Amendment No. 3 Rules Refers to Transportation: Vehicles & Safety

  4. House Floor Amendment No. 2 Rules Refers to Transportation: Vehicles & Safety

  5. Placed on Calendar 2nd Reading - Short Debate

  6. Approved for Consideration Rules Committee; 003-002-000

  7. Third Reading/Final Action Deadline Extended-9(b) January 8, 2025

  8. Rule 19(a) / Re-referred to Rules Committee

  9. House Floor Amendment No. 3 Referred to Rules Committee

  10. House Floor Amendment No. 3 Filed with Clerk by Rep. Jaime M. Andrade, Jr.

  11. House Floor Amendment No. 2 Referred to Rules Committee

  12. House Floor Amendment No. 2 Filed with Clerk by Rep. Jaime M. Andrade, Jr.

  13. Held on Calendar Order of Second Reading - Short Debate

  14. Second Reading - Short Debate

  15. Placed on Calendar 2nd Reading - Short Debate

  16. House Committee Amendment No. 1 Tabled

  17. Do Pass / Short Debate Transportation: Vehicles & Safety; 007-004-000

  18. Motion to Suspend Rule 21 - Prevailed 071-038-000

  19. Motion Filed to Suspend Rule 21 Transportation: Vehicles & Safety; Rep. Elizabeth "Lisa" Hernandez

  20. House Committee Amendment No. 1 Referred to Rules Committee

  21. House Committee Amendment No. 1 Filed with Clerk by Rep. Jaime M. Andrade, Jr.

  22. Committee/Final Action Deadline Extended-9(b) May 31, 2024

  23. Assigned to Transportation: Vehicles & Safety

  24. Referred to Rules Committee

  25. First Reading

  26. Chief House Sponsor Rep. Jaime M. Andrade, Jr.

  27. Arrived in House

  28. Third Reading - Passed; 040-015-000

  29. Placed on Calendar Order of 3rd Reading

  30. Senate Floor Amendment No. 1 Adopted; Murphy

  31. Recalled to Second Reading

  32. Chief Sponsor Changed to Sen. Laura M. Murphy

  33. Rule 2-10 Third Reading Deadline Established As May 26, 2024

  34. Senate Floor Amendment No. 1 Recommend Do Adopt Executive; 009-003-000

  35. Senate Floor Amendment No. 1 Assignments Refers to Executive

  36. Rule 2-10 Third Reading Deadline Established As May 25, 2024

  37. Senate Floor Amendment No. 1 Referred to Assignments

  38. Senate Floor Amendment No. 1 Filed with Secretary by Sen. Laura M. Murphy

  39. Rule 2-10 Third Reading Deadline Established As May 24, 2024

  40. Placed on Calendar Order of 3rd Reading May 24, 2024

  41. Approved for Consideration Assignments

  42. Rule 3-9(a) / Re-referred to Assignments

  43. Placed on Calendar Order of 3rd Reading March 21, 2023

  44. Second Reading

  45. Placed on Calendar Order of 2nd Reading March 10, 2023

  46. Do Pass Executive; 011-000-000

  47. Assigned to Executive

  48. Referred to Assignments

  49. First Reading

  50. Filed with Secretary by Sen. Don Harmon

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

2 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 180 not signed on · 17 voted No

Sponsors (2)

Co-sponsors (1)

Not signed on (180)

180 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 180 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Transportation: Vehicles & Safety, Amendment 3

Passed 7 Yea · 3 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 5000
Unaffiliated 2000
Republican 0301
Total 7301
% of votes cast 64%27%0%9%
How each member voted (11)
Member Party Vote
Hernández, Barbara — Yea
Katz Muhl — Yea
Dave Vella Democrat Yea
Eva-Dina Delgado Democrat Yea
Katie Stuart Democrat Yea
Maurice A. West, II Democrat Yea
Michael J. Kelly Democrat Yea
Bradley Fritts Republican Nay
Dan Swanson Republican Nay
Jason R. Bunting Republican Nay
Wayne A. Rosenthal Republican Not Voting

Official roll call →

Transportation: Vehicles & Safety

Passed 7 Yea · 4 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 6000
Unaffiliated 1000
Republican 0400
Total 7400
% of votes cast 64%36%0%0%
How each member voted (11)
Member Party Vote
Katz Muhl — Yea
Barbara Hernandez Democrat Yea
Dave Vella Democrat Yea
Eva-Dina Delgado Democrat Yea
Jaime M. Andrade, Jr. Democrat Yea
Maurice A. West, II Democrat Yea
Michael J. Kelly Democrat Yea
Bradley Fritts Republican Nay
Dan Swanson Republican Nay
Jason R. Bunting Republican Nay
Wayne A. Rosenthal Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Third Reading

Passed 40 Yea · 15 Nay · 4 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 32003
Republican 31301
Unaffiliated 5200
Total 401504
% of votes cast 68%25%0%7%
How each member voted (59)
Member Party Vote
Simmons — Yea
Stoller — Nay
Bennett — Nay
Toro — Yea
Harris, N. — Yea
Glowiak Hilton — Yea
Loughran Cappel — Yea
Bill Cunningham Democrat Yea
Celina Villanueva Democrat Yea
Christopher Belt Democrat Yea
Cristina Castro Democrat Yea
David Koehler Democrat Yea
Don Harmon Democrat Yea
Doris Turner Democrat Yea
Elgie R. Sims, Jr. Democrat Yea
Emil Jones, III Democrat Yea
Gregg Johnson Democrat Yea
Javier L. Cervantes Democrat Yea
Julie A. Morrison Democrat Yea
Karina Villa Democrat Yea
Kimberly A. Lightford Democrat Yea
Lakesia Collins Democrat Yea
Laura Ellman Democrat Yea
Laura Fine Democrat Yea
Laura M. Murphy Democrat Yea
Linda Holmes Democrat Yea
Mark L. Walker Democrat Yea
Mary Edly-Allen Democrat Yea
Mattie Hunter Democrat Yea
Michael E. Hastings Democrat Yea
Michael W. Halpin Democrat Yea
Mike Porfirio Democrat Yea
Omar Aquino Democrat Yea
Patrick J. Joyce Democrat Yea
Paul Faraci Democrat Yea
Rachel Ventura Democrat Not Voting
Ram Villivalam Democrat Yea
Robert F. Martwick Democrat Yea
Robert Peters Democrat Yea
Sara Feigenholtz Democrat Yea
Steve Stadelman Democrat Not Voting
Willie Preston Democrat Not Voting
Andrew S. Chesney Republican Nay
Chapin Rose Republican Nay
Craig Wilcox Republican Nay
Dale Fowler Republican Yea
Dan McConchie Republican Nay
Dave Syverson Republican Not Voting
Donald P. DeWitte Republican Yea
Erica Harriss Republican Nay
Jason Plummer Republican Nay
Jil Tracy Republican Nay
John F. Curran Republican Nay
Neil Anderson Republican Nay
Sally J. Turner Republican Nay
Seth Lewis Republican Nay
Steve McClure Republican Nay
Sue Rezin Republican Nay
Terri Bryant Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Executive, Amendment 1

Passed 9 Yea · 3 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 8000
Unaffiliated 1000
Republican 0301
Total 9301
% of votes cast 69%23%0%8%
How each member voted (13)
Member Party Vote
Harris III, Napoleon — Yea
Bill Cunningham Democrat Yea
Cristina Castro Democrat Yea
Don Harmon Democrat Yea
Kimberly A. Lightford Democrat Yea
Laura M. Murphy Democrat Yea
Linda Holmes Democrat Yea
Mattie Hunter Democrat Yea
Omar Aquino Democrat Yea
Chapin Rose Republican Nay
Jil Tracy Republican Nay
John F. Curran Republican Not Voting
Sue Rezin Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Executive

Passed 11 Yea · 0 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 7001
Republican 3001
Unaffiliated 1000
Total 11002
% of votes cast 85%0%0%15%
How each member voted (13)
Member Party Vote
Harris III, Napoleon — Yea
Bill Cunningham Democrat Yea
Cristina Castro Democrat Yea
Don Harmon Democrat Yea
Kimberly A. Lightford Democrat Yea
Laura M. Murphy Democrat Not Voting
Linda Holmes Democrat Yea
Mattie Hunter Democrat Yea
Omar Aquino Democrat Yea
Jil Tracy Republican Yea
John F. Curran Republican Yea
Neil Anderson Republican Not Voting
Sue Rezin Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

labor technology
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 698 do?
Amends the Local Government Wage Increase Transparency Act. Makes a technical change in a Section concerning the short title.
Who sponsors SB 698?
SB 698 is sponsored by Laura M. Murphy (Democrat), Jaime M. Andrade, Jr. (Democrat), and Dave Vella (Democrat).
What is the current status of SB 698?
This bill died with 103rd Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 698?
Track SB 698 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 698

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of SB 698

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →