Illinois 103rd Regular Session Status: Passed House Bipartisan · 4 D · 2 R cosponsors

HB 280 — COURTS-TECH

Last action — Referred to Assignments

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed House
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 103rd Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Amends the Access to Justice Act. Makes a technical change in a Section concerning the short title.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

323 added · 19 removed

Plain-language change summary

The legislation has been amended to include a section specifying that the Director of Public Health must report monthly on the revenue generated from commemorative birth certificates. Half of this excess revenue will be allocated to the Child Abuse Prevention Fund, while the other half will go to the Domestic Violence Shelter and Service Fund. This change is significant because it aims to create a sustainable funding source for vital support services that assist victims of child abuse and domestic violence.

→
Previous
Latest
HB0280 *LRB10303806LNS48812b* 103RD GENERAL ASSEMBLY State of Illinois and 2024 HB0280 Introduced 1/12/2023, by SYNOPSIS AS INTRODUCED:
HB0280 Engrossed LRB103 03806 LNS 48812 b AN ACT concerning courts.
ILCS 95/1 Amends the Access to Justice Act.
Makes a technical change in a Section concerning the short title.
LRB103 03806 LNS 48812 b A BILL FOR HB0280 LRB103 03806 LNS 48812 b AN ACT concerning courts.
The Access to Justice Act is amended by changing Section 1 as follows:
The State Finance Act is amended by changing Section 6b-4 as follows:
(705 ILCS 95/1) Sec.
(30 ILCS 105/6b-4) (from Ch.
1.
127, par.
Short title.
142b4) Sec.
This Act may be cited as the the Access to Justice Act.
6b-4.
On the second Monday of every month, the Director of Public Health shall certify to the State Comptroller and the State Treasurer the amount generated by the issuance of commemorative birth certificates under subsection (14) of Section 25 of the Vital Records Act in excess of the costs incurred in issuing the documents.
Within 15 days of receipt of the certification required by this Section, the State Comptroller and the State Treasurer shall transfer from the General Revenue Fund, one-half of the amount certified as being received from the issuance of commemorative birth certificates to the Child Abuse Prevention Fund and one-half of the amount to the Domestic Violence Shelter and Service Fund.
The State Treasurer shall deposit into the Domestic Violence Shelter and Service Fund each assessment received under the Criminal and Traffic Assessment Act.
In addition to any other amounts deposited into the HB0280 Engrossed - 2 - LRB103 03806 LNS 48812 b Domestic Violence Shelter and Service Fund, the State Treasurer shall deposit into the Fund all moneys donated to the State by private individuals or entities for purposes for which moneys in the Fund may be used as provided in this paragraph.
Subject to appropriation, the Department of Human Services shall use moneys in the Fund to make grants to defray the reasonable and necessary travel expenses of victims of domestic violence who were members of the United States Armed Forces when the domestic violence occurred and who have been discharged from the United States Armed Forces to participate and travel to domestic violence proceedings.
Military personnel may qualify for and have access to moneys from the Fund for the purposes set forth in this paragraph.
The Department shall adopt rules necessary for making grants under this paragraph.
County Veterans Assistance Commissions and organizations described in Section 501(c)(19) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 may receive grants under this paragraph.
The State Treasurer shall deposit into the Sexual Assault Services Fund and the Domestic Violence Shelter and Service Fund each of those fines received from circuit clerks under Section 5-9-1.7 of the Unified Code of Corrections in accordance with the provisions of that Section.
98-351, eff.
100-987, eff.
8-15-13.)
7-1-19.) Section 10.
The Code of Criminal Procedure of 1963 is amended by changing Sections 112A-6.1 and 112A-23 as follows:
HB0280 Engrossed - 3 - LRB103 03806 LNS 48812 b (725 ILCS 5/112A-6.1) Sec.
112A-6.1.
Application of rules of civil procedure;
criminal law.
(a) Any proceeding to obtain, modify, re-open, or appeal a protective order and service of pleadings and notices shall be governed by the rules of civil procedure of this State.
The Code of Civil Procedure and Supreme Court and local court rules applicable to civil proceedings shall apply, except as otherwise provided by law.
Civil law on venue, discovery, and penalties for untrue statements shall not apply to protective order proceedings heard under this Article.
(b) Criminal law on discovery, venue, and penalties for untrue statements apply to protective order proceedings under this Article.
(c) Court proceedings related to the entry of a protective order and the determination of remedies shall not be used to obtain discovery that would not otherwise be available in a criminal prosecution or juvenile delinquency case.
(c) The Supreme Court of Illinois may adopt rules that promote the use of attorneys serving on a pro bono basis to represent victims under this Article.
(Source:
P.A.
100-597, eff.
6-29-18.) (725 ILCS 5/112A-23) (from Ch.
38, par.
112A-23) Sec.
112A-23.
Enforcement of protective orders.
HB0280 Engrossed - 4 - LRB103 03806 LNS 48812 b (a) When violation is crime.
Show all 135 changed rows (95 more)
Previous
Latest
A violation of any protective order, whether issued in a civil, quasi-criminal proceeding or by a military judge or by a military commander of the United States Armed Forces, shall be enforced by a criminal court when:
(1) The respondent commits the crime of violation of a domestic violence order of protection pursuant to Section 12-3.4 or 12-30 of the Criminal Code of 1961 or the Criminal Code of 2012, by having knowingly violated:
(i) remedies described in paragraph (1), (2), (3), (14), or (14.5) of subsection (b) of Section 112A-14 of this Code, (ii) a remedy, which is substantially similar to the remedies authorized under paragraph (1), (2), (3), (14), or (14.5) of subsection (b) of Section 214 of the Illinois Domestic Violence Act of 1986, in a valid order of protection, which is authorized under the laws of another state, tribe, or United States territory, or (iii) any other remedy when the act constitutes a crime against the protected parties as defined by the Criminal Code of 1961 or the Criminal Code of 2012.
Prosecution for a violation of a domestic violence order of protection shall not bar concurrent prosecution for any other crime, including any crime that may have been committed at the time of the violation of the HB0280 Engrossed - 5 - LRB103 03806 LNS 48812 b domestic violence order of protection;
or (2) The respondent commits the crime of child abduction pursuant to Section 10-5 of the Criminal Code of 1961 or the Criminal Code of 2012, by having knowingly violated:
(i) remedies described in paragraph (5), (6), or (8) of subsection (b) of Section 112A-14 of this Code, or (ii) a remedy, which is substantially similar to the remedies authorized under paragraph (1), (5), (6), or (8) of subsection (b) of Section 214 of the Illinois Domestic Violence Act of 1986, in a valid domestic violence order of protection, which is authorized under the laws of another state, tribe, or United States territory.
(3) The respondent commits the crime of violation of a civil no contact order when the respondent violates Section 12-3.8 of the Criminal Code of 2012.
Prosecution for a violation of a civil no contact order shall not bar concurrent prosecution for any other crime, including any crime that may have been committed at the time of the violation of the civil no contact order.
(4) The respondent commits the crime of violation of a stalking no contact order when the respondent violates Section 12-3.9 of the Criminal Code of 2012.
Prosecution for a violation of a stalking no contact order shall not HB0280 Engrossed - 6 - LRB103 03806 LNS 48812 b bar concurrent prosecution for any other crime, including any crime that may have been committed at the time of the violation of the stalking no contact order.
(b) When violation is contempt of court.
A violation of any valid protective order, whether issued in a civil or criminal proceeding or by a military judge or by a military commander of the United States Armed Forces, may be enforced through civil or criminal contempt procedures, as appropriate, by any court with jurisdiction, regardless where the act or acts which violated the protective order were committed, to the extent consistent with the venue provisions of this Article.
Nothing in this Article shall preclude any Illinois court from enforcing any valid protective order issued in another state.
Illinois courts may enforce protective orders through both criminal prosecution and contempt proceedings, unless the action which is second in time is barred by collateral estoppel or the constitutional prohibition against double jeopardy.
(1) In a contempt proceeding where the petition for a rule to show cause sets forth facts evidencing an immediate danger that the respondent will flee the jurisdiction, conceal a child, or inflict physical abuse on the petitioner or minor children or on dependent adults in petitioner's care, the court may order the attachment of the respondent without prior service of the rule to show cause or the petition for a rule to show cause.
Bond HB0280 Engrossed - 7 - LRB103 03806 LNS 48812 b shall be set unless specifically denied in writing.
(2) A petition for a rule to show cause for violation of a protective order shall be treated as an expedited proceeding.
(c) Violation of custody, allocation of parental responsibility, or support orders.
A violation of remedies described in paragraph (5), (6), (8), or (9) of subsection (b) of Section 112A-14 of this Code may be enforced by any remedy provided by Section 607.5 of the Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act.
The court may enforce any order for support issued under paragraph (12) of subsection (b) of Section 112A-14 of this Code in the manner provided for under Parts V and VII of the Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act.
(d) Actual knowledge.
A protective order may be enforced pursuant to this Section if the respondent violates the order after the respondent has actual knowledge of its contents as shown through one of the following means:
(1) (Blank).
(2) (Blank).
(3) By service of a protective order under subsection (f) of Section 112A-17.5 or Section 112A-22 of this Code.
(4) By other means demonstrating actual knowledge of the contents of the order.
(e) The enforcement of a protective order in civil or criminal court shall not be affected by either of the HB0280 Engrossed - 8 - LRB103 03806 LNS 48812 b following:
(1) The existence of a separate, correlative order entered under Section 112A-15 of this Code.
(2) Any finding or order entered in a conjoined criminal proceeding.
(e-5) If a civil no contact order entered under subsection (6) of Section 112A-20 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of 1963 conflicts with an order issued pursuant to the Juvenile Court Act of 1987 or the Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act, the conflicting order issued under subsection (6) of Section 112A-20 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of 1963 shall be void.
(f) Circumstances.
The court, when determining whether or not a violation of a protective order has occurred, shall not require physical manifestations of abuse on the person of the victim.
(g) Penalties.
(1) Except as provided in paragraph (3) of this subsection (g), where the court finds the commission of a crime or contempt of court under subsection (a) or (b) of this Section, the penalty shall be the penalty that generally applies in such criminal or contempt proceedings, and may include one or more of the following:
incarceration, payment of restitution, a fine, payment of attorneys' fees and costs, or community service.
(2) The court shall hear and take into account HB0280 Engrossed - 9 - LRB103 03806 LNS 48812 b evidence of any factors in aggravation or mitigation before deciding an appropriate penalty under paragraph (1) of this subsection (g).
(3) To the extent permitted by law, the court is encouraged to:
(i) increase the penalty for the knowing violation of any protective order over any penalty previously imposed by any court for respondent's violation of any protective order or penal statute involving petitioner as victim and respondent as defendant;
(ii) impose a minimum penalty of 24 hours imprisonment for respondent's first violation of any protective order;
and (iii) impose a minimum penalty of 48 hours imprisonment for respondent's second or subsequent violation of a protective order unless the court explicitly finds that an increased penalty or that period of imprisonment would be manifestly unjust.
(4) In addition to any other penalties imposed for a violation of a protective order, a criminal court may consider evidence of any violations of a protective order:
(i) to modify the conditions of pretrial release on an underlying criminal charge pursuant to Section 110-6 of this Code;
(ii) to revoke or modify an order of probation, HB0280 Engrossed - 10 - LRB103 03806 LNS 48812 b conditional discharge, or supervision, pursuant to Section 5-6-4 of the Unified Code of Corrections;
(iii) to revoke or modify a sentence of periodic imprisonment, pursuant to Section 5-7-2 of the Unified Code of Corrections.
(Source:
P.A.
102-184, eff.
1-1-22;
102-558, eff.
8-20-21;
102-813, eff.
5-13-22;
102-890, eff.
5-19-22;
103-407, eff.
7-28-23.) Section 15.
The Illinois Domestic Violence Act of 1986 is amended by changing Sections 205 and 222.5 as follows:
(750 ILCS 60/205) (from Ch.
40, par.
2312-5) Sec.
205.
Application of rules of civil procedure;
Domestic abuse advocates.
(a) Any proceeding to obtain, modify, reopen or appeal an order of protection, whether commenced alone or in conjunction with a civil or criminal proceeding, shall be governed by the rules of civil procedure of this State.
The standard of proof in such a proceeding is proof by a preponderance of the evidence, whether the proceeding is heard in criminal or civil court.
The Code of Civil Procedure and Supreme Court and local court rules applicable to civil proceedings, as now or hereafter amended, shall apply, except as otherwise provided by this law.
(b) (1) In all circuit court proceedings under this Act, HB0280 Engrossed - 11 - LRB103 03806 LNS 48812 b domestic abuse advocates shall be allowed to attend and sit at counsel table and confer with the victim, unless otherwise directed by the court.
(2) In criminal proceedings in circuit courts, domestic abuse advocates shall be allowed to accompany the victim and confer with the victim, unless otherwise directed by the court.
(3) Court administrators shall allow domestic abuse advocates to assist victims of domestic violence in the preparation of petitions for orders of protection.
(4) Domestic abuse advocates are not engaged in the unauthorized practice of law when providing assistance of the types specified in this subsection (b).
(c) The Supreme Court of Illinois may adopt rules that promote the use of attorneys serving on a pro bono basis to represent victims under this Act.
(Source:
P.A.
87-1186;
87-1255;
88-45.) (750 ILCS 60/222.5) Sec.
222.5.
Filing of an order of protection issued in another state or other jurisdiction.
(a) A person entitled to protection under an order of protection issued by the court of another state, tribe, or United States territory or military judge or by a military commander of the United States Armed Forces may file a certified copy of the order of protection with the clerk of the HB0280 Engrossed - 12 - LRB103 03806 LNS 48812 b court in a judicial circuit in which the person believes that enforcement may be necessary.
(a-5) The Illinois National Guard shall file a certified copy of any military order of protection with the clerk of the court in a judicial circuit in which the person entitled to protection resides or if the person entitled to protection is not a State resident, in a judicial circuit in which it is believed that enforcement may be necessary.
(b) The clerk shall:
(1) treat the foreign order of protection, including, but not limited to, an order of protection issued by a military judge or by a military commander of the United States Armed Forces, in the same manner as a judgment of the circuit court for any county of this State in accordance with the provisions of the Uniform Enforcement of Foreign Judgments Act, except that the clerk shall not mail notice of the filing of the foreign order to the respondent named in the order;
and (2) on the same day that a foreign order of protection is filed, file a certified copy of that order with the sheriff or other law enforcement officials charged with maintaining Illinois State Police records as set forth in Section 222 of this Act.
(c) Neither residence in this State nor filing of a foreign order of protection, including, but not limited to, an order of protection issued by a military judge or by a military HB0280 Engrossed - 13 - LRB103 03806 LNS 48812 b commander of the United States Armed Forces, shall be required for enforcement of the order by this State.
Failure to file the foreign order shall not be an impediment to its treatment in all respects as an Illinois order of protection.
(d) The clerk shall not charge a fee to file a foreign order of protection under this Section.
(e) The sheriff shall inform the Illinois State Police as set forth in Section 302 of this Act.
(Source:
P.A.
102-538, eff.
8-20-21;
102-890, eff.
5-19-22;
103-407, eff.
7-28-23.)
View plain text versions (2)

Amendments

2 amendments

Click Show changes on an amendment above to see how it modifies the bill.

Action History

  1. Referred to Assignments

  2. First Reading

  3. Chief Senate Sponsor Sen. Don Harmon

  4. Placed on Calendar Order of First Reading

  5. Arrive in Senate

  6. Added Co-Sponsor Rep. Debbie Meyers-Martin

  7. Added Chief Co-Sponsor Rep. Brandun Schweizer

  8. Added Chief Co-Sponsor Rep. Carol Ammons

  9. Added Co-Sponsor Rep. Kevin Schmidt

  10. House Floor Amendment No. 1 Tabled

  11. Third Reading - Short Debate - Passed 111-000-000

  12. Placed on Calendar Order of 3rd Reading - Short Debate

  13. House Floor Amendment No. 2 Adopted

  14. House Floor Amendment No. 2 Recommends Be Adopted Judiciary - Civil Committee; 015-000-000

  15. House Floor Amendment No. 2 Rules Refers to Judiciary - Civil Committee

  16. House Floor Amendment No. 2 Referred to Rules Committee

  17. House Floor Amendment No. 2 Filed with Clerk by Rep. Stephanie A. Kifowit

  18. Chief Sponsor Changed to Rep. Stephanie A. Kifowit

  19. House Floor Amendment No. 1 Rules Refers to Judiciary - Civil Committee

  20. House Floor Amendment No. 1 Referred to Rules Committee

  21. House Floor Amendment No. 1 Filed with Clerk by Rep. Stephanie A. Kifowit

  22. Placed on Calendar 2nd Reading - Short Debate

  23. Approved for Consideration Rules Committee; 005-000-000

  24. Rule 19(a) / Re-referred to Rules Committee

  25. Held on Calendar Order of Second Reading - Short Debate **

  26. Second Reading - Short Debate

  27. Placed on Calendar 2nd Reading - Short Debate **

  28. Do Pass / Short Debate Executive Committee; 011-000-000

  29. Assigned to Executive Committee

  30. Referred to Rules Committee

  31. First Reading

  32. Prefiled with Clerk by Rep. Emanuel "Chris" Welch

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

2 sponsors · 4 co-sponsors · 177 not signed on

Sponsors (2)

Co-sponsors (4)

Not signed on (177)

177 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 177 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Third Reading

Passed 111 Yea · 0 Nay · 7 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 13003
Republican 35002
Democrat 63002
Total 111007
% of votes cast 94%0%0%6%
How each member voted (118)
Member Party Vote
Nichols — Yea
Ortiz — Yea
Caulkins — Yea
Frese — Yea
Yednock — Yea
Flowers — Not Voting
Burke — Not Voting
Costa Howard — Yea
Du Buclet — Yea
Faver Dias — Yea
Hernandez, Lisa — Not Voting
Katz Muhl — Yea
La Ha — Yea
Ladisch Douglass — Yea
Williams, Jawaharial — Yea
Yang Rohr — Yea
Abdelnasser Rashid Democrat Yea
Angelica Guerrero-Cuellar Democrat Yea
Ann M. Williams Democrat Yea
Anna Moeller Democrat Yea
Anne Stava Democrat Yea
Anthony DeLuca Democrat Yea
Barbara Hernandez Democrat Yea
Bob Morgan Democrat Yea
Camille Y. Lilly Democrat Not Voting
Carol Ammons Democrat Yea
Curtis J. Tarver, II Democrat Yea
Dagmara Avelar Democrat Yea
Daniel Didech Democrat Yea
Dave Vella Democrat Yea
Debbie Meyers-Martin Democrat Yea
Diane Blair-Sherlock Democrat Yea
Edgar González, Jr. Democrat Yea
Emanuel "Chris" Welch Democrat Yea
Eva-Dina Delgado Democrat Yea
Fred Crespo Democrat Yea
Gregg Johnson Democrat Yea
Harry Benton Democrat Yea
Hoan Huynh Democrat Yea
Jaime M. Andrade, Jr. Democrat Yea
Jay Hoffman Democrat Yea
Jehan Gordon-Booth Democrat Yea
Jennifer Gong-Gershowitz Democrat Yea
Joyce Mason Democrat Yea
Justin Slaughter Democrat Yea
Kam Buckner Democrat Not Voting
Katie Stuart Democrat Yea
Kelly M. Cassidy Democrat Yea
Kevin John Olickal Democrat Yea
La Shawn K. Ford Democrat Yea
Lawrence "Larry" Walsh, Jr. Democrat Yea
Lilian Jiménez Democrat Yea
Lindsey LaPointe Democrat Yea
Marcus C. Evans, Jr. Democrat Yea
Margaret Croke Democrat Yea
Mark L. Walker Democrat Yea
Martin J. Moylan Democrat Yea
Mary Beth Canty Democrat Yea
Mary Gill Democrat Yea
Matt Hanson Democrat Yea
Maura Hirschauer Democrat Yea
Maurice A. West, II Democrat Yea
Michael J. Kelly Democrat Yea
Michelle Mussman Democrat Yea
Nabeela Syed Democrat Yea
Natalie A. Manley Democrat Yea
Nicholas K. Smith Democrat Yea
Norma Hernandez Democrat Yea
Rita Mayfield Democrat Yea
Robert "Bob" Rita Democrat Yea
Robyn Gabel Democrat Yea
Sharon Chung Democrat Yea
Sonya M. Harper Democrat Yea
Stephanie A. Kifowit Democrat Yea
Sue Scherer Democrat Yea
Suzanne M. Ness Democrat Yea
Thaddeus Jones Democrat Yea
Theresa Mah Democrat Yea
Will Guzzardi Democrat Yea
William "Will" Davis Democrat Yea
Yolonda Morris Democrat Yea
Adam M. Niemerg Republican Yea
Amy Elik Republican Yea
Amy L. Grant Republican Yea
Blaine Wilhour Republican Yea
Brad Halbrook Republican Yea
Brad Stephens Republican Yea
Bradley Fritts Republican Yea
Brandun Schweizer Republican Yea
Charles Meier Republican Yea
Chris Miller Republican Yea
Christopher "C.D." Davidsmeyer Republican Yea
Dan Swanson Republican Yea
Daniel J. Ugaste Republican Yea
Dave Severin Republican Yea
David Friess Republican Yea
Dennis Tipsword Republican Yea
Jackie Haas Republican Yea
Jason R. Bunting Republican Yea
Jed Davis Republican Yea
Jeff Keicher Republican Yea
Jennifer Sanalitro Republican Yea
Joe C. Sosnowski Republican Yea
John M. Cabello Republican Yea
Kevin Schmidt Republican Yea
Martin McLaughlin Republican Yea
Michael J. Coffey, Jr. Republican Yea
Norine K. Hammond Republican Yea
Patrick Sheehan Republican Yea
Patrick Windhorst Republican Yea
Paul Jacobs Republican Yea
Ryan Spain Republican Yea
Steven Reick Republican Yea
Tom Weber Republican Yea
Tony M. McCombie Republican Yea
Travis Weaver Republican Not Voting
Wayne A. Rosenthal Republican Yea
William E Hauter Republican Not Voting

Official roll call →

Passed 15 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 3000
Democrat 7000
Republican 5000
Total 15000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (15)
Member Party Vote
Ladisch Douglass, Jenn — Yea
Costa Howard — Yea
Katz Muhl — Yea
Ann M. Williams Democrat Yea
Curtis J. Tarver, II Democrat Yea
Daniel Didech Democrat Yea
Eva-Dina Delgado Democrat Yea
Jennifer Gong-Gershowitz Democrat Yea
Kam Buckner Democrat Yea
Thaddeus Jones Democrat Yea
Daniel J. Ugaste Republican Yea
David Friess Republican Yea
Jed Davis Republican Yea
Martin McLaughlin Republican Yea
Tom Weber Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Executive

Passed 11 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 3001
Democrat 7000
Unaffiliated 1000
Total 11001
% of votes cast 92%0%0%8%
How each member voted (12)
Member Party Vote
Ortiz, Aaron M — Yea
Elizabeth "Lisa" Hernandez Democrat Yea
Jay Hoffman Democrat Yea
Marcus C. Evans, Jr. Democrat Yea
Natalie A. Manley Democrat Yea
Nicholas K. Smith Democrat Yea
Robert "Bob" Rita Democrat Yea
Theresa Mah Democrat Yea
Christopher "C.D." Davidsmeyer Republican Not Voting
John M. Cabello Republican Yea
Norine K. Hammond Republican Yea
Ryan Spain Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does HB 280 do?
Amends the Access to Justice Act. Makes a technical change in a Section concerning the short title.
Who sponsors HB 280?
HB 280 is sponsored by Stephanie A. Kifowit (Democrat), Brandun Schweizer (Republican), Carol Ammons (Democrat), Kevin Schmidt (Republican), Debbie Meyers-Martin (Democrat), and Don Harmon (Democrat).
What is the current status of HB 280?
This bill died with 103rd Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track HB 280?
Track HB 280 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HB 280

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of HB 280

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →