An Act relative to the definition of livestock
This bill changes the definition of livestock, potentially affecting which animals fall under that category. This change could have various implications for agriculture and regulatory practices.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when H138 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on H138.
You're tracking H138
We'll email you the moment it moves.
H138 — An Act relative to the definition of livestock
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
1Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 194th General Court. It reached “Introduced” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
In plain language
The bill modifies what is considered livestock.
This bill changes the definition of livestock, potentially affecting which animals fall under that category. This change could have various implications for agriculture and regulatory practices.
What this means for you
- Small Business: If you operate a farm, the new livestock definition may affect how you manage your animals and comply with regulations.
Summary
An Act relative to the definition of livestock
Bill Text
- Full text Current
AI-generated reading aid from the bill's amendatory text — verify against the official bill.
The bill specifies that Section 1A of chapter 128 does not apply to certain commercial activities involving dogs and cats.
-
Chapter 128, Section 1A
This section shall not apply to the raising of dogs or cats for breeding, the raising or keeping of dogs or cats for other commercial use, or to the commercial grooming of dogs or cats.
This change exempts specific commercial activities with dogs and cats from the regulations of Section 1A.
Sponsors
- Adam J. Scanlon · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 203 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Adam J. Scanlon Democrat
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (203)
203 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 203 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does H138 do?
- An Act relative to the definition of livestock
- Who sponsors H138?
- H138 is sponsored by Adam J. Scanlon (Democrat).
- What is the current status of H138?
- This bill died with 194th General Court. It reached “Introduced” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track H138?
- Track H138 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on H138
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of H138
Last checked for changes 4 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →