United States 119th Congress Status: In Committee Bipartisan · 7 R · 3 D cosponsors

HR 3108 — RPM Access Act

Last action — Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute by the Yeas and Nays: 39 - 0.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed House
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill is in committee in the House. Introduced April 30, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.

Next likely step: a committee vote, then a floor vote in the House.

Odds of enactment

Low chance

Based on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a low chance of becoming law.

Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.

A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.

Prognosis

Advancing 42% · moderate confidence

  • In Committee

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 10 sponsors

    1 primary, 9 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Bipartisan support

    Sponsored across 2 parties (7 R · 3 D) — cross-party backing.

Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.

In plain language

The bill aims to enhance access to Remote Patient Monitoring technology.

This legislation focuses on improving access to Remote Patient Monitoring (RPM) services for patients. It seeks to ensure that more individuals can benefit from these technologies, enhancing healthcare delivery.

What this means for you
  • Healthcare: Healthcare providers may have more tools to monitor patients remotely, potentially improving care continuity.

Summary

Rural Patient Monitoring Access Act or the RPM Access ActThis bill conditions Medicare payment for remote patient monitoring services on certain requirements.Specifically, the bill conditions payment on (1) the ability of certain health care practitioners to be available in real time to respond to any detected anomalies; (2) the use of a system that can transmit relevant data in a format that is compatible with electronic health records, as needed; and (3) the reporting of such data, as required by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), to evaluate any cost savings as a result of such services.The bill also establishes a floor for certain payment calculations with respect to such services.The CMS must report on cost savings realized and expenses incurred from the use of such services over a four-year period.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Introduced in House

  2. Introduced in House

  3. Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

  4. Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

  5. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held

  6. Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute by the Yeas and Nays: 39 - 0.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 9 co-sponsors · 537 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (9)

Not signed on (537)

537 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 537 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

healthcare health-insurance
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does HR 3108 do?
Rural Patient Monitoring Access Act or the RPM Access ActThis bill conditions Medicare payment for remote patient monitoring services on certain requirements.Specifically, the bill conditions payment on (1) the ability of certain health care practitioners to be available in real time to respond to any detected anomalies; (2) the use of a system that can transmit relevant data in a format that is compatible with electronic health records, as needed; and (3) the reporting of such data, as required by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), to evaluate any cost savings as a result of such services.The bill also establishes a floor for certain payment calculations with respect to such services.The CMS must report on cost savings realized and expenses incurred from the use of such services over a four-year period.
Who sponsors HR 3108?
HR 3108 is sponsored by Kustoff, David (Republican), Balderson, Troy (Republican), Davis, Donald G. (Democratic), Pocan, Mark (Democratic), Miller, Carol D. (Republican), Wittman, Robert J. (Republican), Smith, Adrian (Republican), Steube, W. Gregory (Republican), Bergman, Jack (Republican), and Davids, Sharice (Democratic).
What is the current status of HR 3108?
This bill is in committee in the House. Introduced April 30, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Where can I track HR 3108?
Track HR 3108 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HR 3108

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of HR 3108

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →