HB 2839 — CIV PRO-ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW
Last action — Added Co-Sponsor Rep. Jonathan "Yoni" Pizer
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 101st Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Amends the Code of Civil Procedure. Provides that unless the action is governed by the procedures or provisions of another statute, a person suffering legal wrong because of a final administrative decision, or adversely affected or aggrieved by a final administrative decision, is entitled to judicial review of the final administrative decision to the same extent, with the same rights and the same responsibilities, as a person who is a party, except that a person seeking judicial review is not entitled to relief if there was a previous public hearing at which the person failed to present his or her position. Provides that to the extent necessary, such a person may provide new or additional evidence to the court for the limited purpose of demonstrating the legal wrong or adverse effect or impairment that he or she has experienced or may experience as a result of the final administrative decision. Provides that the right to judicial review under the new provisions is limited to final administrative permitting decisions made by the Department of Agriculture, Environmental Protection Agency, Department of Natural Resources, Department of Public Health, or Department of Transportation that impact the public trust in the waters and lands of this State, State parks or natural areas, threatened or endangered species, surface or ground water quality, air quality, or other matters affecting the right to a healthful environment under the Illinois Constitution. Makes a corresponding change in a Section concerning scope of review. Effective immediately.
Bill Text
- Introduced View text Current html
Action History
-
Added Co-Sponsor Rep. Jonathan "Yoni" Pizer
-
House Committee Amendment No. 2 Rule 19(c) / Re-referred to Rules Committee
-
House Committee Amendment No. 1 Rule 19(c) / Re-referred to Rules Committee
-
Rule 19(a) / Re-referred to Rules Committee
-
House Committee Amendment No. 2 Rules Refers to Judiciary - Civil Committee
-
House Committee Amendment No. 1 Rules Refers to Judiciary - Civil Committee
-
House Committee Amendment No. 2 Referred to Rules Committee
-
House Committee Amendment No. 2 Filed with Clerk by Rep. Jennifer Gong-Gershowitz
-
House Committee Amendment No. 1 Referred to Rules Committee
-
House Committee Amendment No. 1 Filed with Clerk by Rep. Jennifer Gong-Gershowitz
-
Added Co-Sponsor Rep. Kelly M. Cassidy
-
To Civil Procedure Subcommittee
-
Assigned to Judiciary - Civil Committee
-
Referred to Rules Committee
-
First Reading
-
Added Co-Sponsor Rep. Theresa Mah
-
Added Chief Co-Sponsor Rep. Ann M. Williams
-
Added Chief Co-Sponsor Rep. Robyn Gabel
-
Added Chief Co-Sponsor Rep. Sara Feigenholtz
-
Filed with the Clerk by Rep. Jennifer Gong-Gershowitz
Sponsors
- Jennifer Gong-Gershowitz · Cosponsor
- Sara Feigenholtz · Cosponsor
- Robyn Gabel · Cosponsor
- Ann M. Williams · Cosponsor
- Theresa Mah · Cosponsor
- Kelly M. Cassidy · Cosponsor
- Jonathan "Yoni" Pizer · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →0 sponsors · 7 co-sponsors · 176 not signed on
Sponsors (0)
None.
Co-sponsors (7)
- Jennifer Gong-Gershowitz Democrat
- Sara Feigenholtz Democrat
- Robyn Gabel Democrat
- Ann M. Williams Democrat
- Theresa Mah Democrat
- Kelly M. Cassidy Democrat
- Jonathan "Yoni" Pizer
Not signed on (176)
176 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 176 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does HB 2839 do?
- Amends the Code of Civil Procedure. Provides that unless the action is governed by the procedures or provisions of another statute, a person suffering legal wrong because of a final administrative decision, or adversely affected or aggrieved by a final administrative decision, is entitled to judicial review of the final administrative decision to the same extent, with the same rights and the same responsibilities, as a person who is a party, except that a person seeking judicial review is not entitled to relief if there was a previous public hearing at which the person failed to present his or her position. Provides that to the extent necessary, such a person may provide new or additional evidence to the court for the limited purpose of demonstrating the legal wrong or adverse effect or impairment that he or she has experienced or may experience as a result of the final administrative decision. Provides that the right to judicial review under the new provisions is limited to final administrative permitting decisions made by the Department of Agriculture, Environmental Protection Agency, Department of Natural Resources, Department of Public Health, or Department of Transportation that impact the public trust in the waters and lands of this State, State parks or natural areas, threatened or endangered species, surface or ground water quality, air quality, or other matters affecting the right to a healthful environment under the Illinois Constitution. Makes a corresponding change in a Section concerning scope of review. Effective immediately.
- Who sponsors HB 2839?
- HB 2839 is sponsored by Jennifer Gong-Gershowitz (Democrat), Sara Feigenholtz (Democrat), Robyn Gabel (Democrat), Ann M. Williams (Democrat), Theresa Mah (Democrat), Kelly M. Cassidy (Democrat), and Jonathan "Yoni" Pizer.
- What is the current status of HB 2839?
- This bill died with 101st Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track HB 2839?
- Track HB 2839 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 2839
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 2839
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →