HR 2795 — End Judge Shopping Act
Last action — Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill is in committee in the House. Introduced April 09, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Next likely step: a committee vote, then a floor vote in the House.
Odds of enactment
Low chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a low chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
In Committee
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 D).
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
Summary
End Judge Shopping ActThis bill requires a civil action that seeks a widely enforceable order to be brought in a division of a judicial district with two or more active judges.
Bill Text
- Introduced Introduced in House Current html April 09, 2025
AI-generated reading aid from the bill's amendatory text — verify against the official bill.
The bill prohibits nationwide injunctions from being issued by single-judge divisions of U.S. District Courts.
-
28 U.S.C. 1414
"Sec. 1414. Civil actions seeking nationwide injunctions\n "A civil action which seeks an order enforceable in each district and division of the United States shall be brought only in a division of a judicial district which has two or more active judges assigned."
This change ensures that nationwide injunctions can only be issued in divisions with multiple active judges.
-
28 U.S.C. 87
"1414. Civil actions seeking nationwide injunctions."
This clerical amendment adds a new section to the table of sections in Chapter 87.
Action History
-
Introduced in House
-
Introduced in House
-
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Sponsors
- Mikie Sherrill · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 546 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Sherrill, Mikie Democratic
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (546)
546 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 546 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does HR 2795 do?
- End Judge Shopping ActThis bill requires a civil action that seeks a widely enforceable order to be brought in a division of a judicial district with two or more active judges.
- Who sponsors HR 2795?
- HR 2795 is sponsored by Sherrill, Mikie (Democratic).
- What is the current status of HR 2795?
- This bill is in committee in the House. Introduced April 09, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
- Where can I track HR 2795?
- Track HR 2795 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HR 2795
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HR 2795
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →