Fairness for Stay-at-Home Parents Act
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when HR 2732 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on HR 2732.
You're tracking HR 2732
We'll email you the moment it moves.
HR 2732 — Fairness for Stay-at-Home Parents Act
Last action — Referred to the Committee on Education and Workforce, and in addition to the Committees on Oversight and Government Reform, and House Administration, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill is in committee in the House. Introduced April 08, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Next likely step: a committee vote, then a floor vote in the House.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
LowHow often bills like it became law.
-
In Committee
Current position in the legislative process.
-
2 sponsors
1 primary, 1 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (2 R).
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Bill Text
- Introduced Introduced in House Current html April 08, 2025
Sections of law this bill changes
1 section in 1 lawFrom the bill's own amending language, matched to the official United States Code (current through Public Law 119-124).
Family and medical leave · 29 U.S.C. ch. 28 1 section
-
§ 2614 Employment and benefits protection Amends
29 U.S.C. § 2614 — at 2614(c)(2)(B) and 2614(c)
The law today
(a) Restoration to position (1) In general Except as provided in subsection (b), any eligible employee who takes leave under section 2612 of this title for the intended purpose of the leave shall be entitled, on return from such leave— (A) to be restored by the employer to the position of employment held by the employee when the leave commenced; or (B) to be restored to an equivalent position with equivalent employment benefits, pay, and other terms and conditions of employment. (2) Loss of benefits The taking of leave under section 2612 of this title shall not result in the loss of any employment benefit accrued prior to the date on which the leave commenced. (3) Limitations Nothing in this section shall be construed to entitle any restored employee to— (A) the accrual of any seniority or employment benefits during any period of leave; or (B) any right, benefit, or position of employment other than any right, benefit, or position to which the employee would have been entitled had the employee not taken the leave. (4) Certification As a condition of restoration under paragraph (1) for an employee who has taken leave under section 2612(a)(1)(D) of this title, the employer may have a uniformly applied practice or policy that requires each such employee to receive certification from the health care provider of the employee that the employee is able to resume work, except that nothing in this paragraph shall supersede a valid State or local law or a collective bargaining agreement that governs the return to work of such employees. (5) Construction Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to prohibit an employer from requiring an employee on leave under section 2612 of this title to report periodically to the employer on the status and intention of the employee to return to work. (b) Exemption concerning certain highly compensated employees (1) Denial of restoration An employer may deny restoration under subsection (a) to any eligible employee described in paragraph (2) if— (A) such denial is necessary to prevent substantial and grievous economic injury to the operations of the employer; (B) the employer notifies the employee of the intent of the employer to deny restoration on such basis at the time the employer determines that such injury would occur; and (C) in any case in which the leave has commenced, the employee elects not to return to employment after receiving such notice. (2) Affected employees An eligible employee described in paragraph (1) is a salaried eligible employee who is among the highest paid 10 percent of the employees employed by the employer within 75 miles of the facility at which the employee is employed. (c) Maintenance of health benefits (1) Coverage Except as provided in paragraph (2), during any period that an eligible employee takes leave under section 2612 of this title, the employer shall maintain coverage under any “group health plan” (as defined in section 5000(b)(1) of title 26) for the duration of such leave at the level and under the conditions coverage would have been provided if the employee had continued in employment continuously for the duration of such leave. (2) Failure to return from leave The employer may recover the premium that the employer paid for maintaining coverage for the employee under such group health plan during any period of unpaid leave under section 2612 of this title if— (A) the employee fails to return from leave under section 2612 of this title after the period of leave to which the employee is entitled has expired; and (B) the employee fails to return to work for a reason other than— (i) the continuation, recurrence, or onset of a serious health condition that entitles the employee to leave under subparagraph (C) or (D) of section 2612(a)(1) of this title or under section 2612(a)(3) of this title; or (ii) other circumstances beyond the control of the employee. (3) Certification (A) Issuance An employer may require that a claim that an employee is unable to ret...24 other bills also change this section · Follow it → Official text at uscode.house.gov ↗
Compared against current U.S. Code AI-generated reading aid — verify against the official bill.
The bill prohibits employers from recovering health care premiums paid during leave if the employee does not return due to the birth of a child.
-
29 U.S.C. 2614(c)(2)(B)
(ii) the birth of a son or daughter of the employee; or
This addition specifies that failure to return from leave due to the birth of a child cannot lead to recovery of health care premiums.
-
29 U.S.C. 2614(c)
(4) Notice regarding option to not return from leave.--An employer shall notify any eligible employee that takes leave for the birth of a son or daughter of the employee that the employer may not recover any premium described in paragraph (2) that the employer paid for maintaining coverage for the employee if the employee fails to return due to such birth.
This mandates that employers inform employees about their rights regarding health care premium recovery if they do not return to work due to childbirth.
Action History
-
Introduced in House
-
Introduced in House
-
Referred to the Committee on Education and Workforce, and in addition to the Committees on Oversight and Government Reform, and House Administration, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
-
Referred to the Committee on Education and Workforce, and in addition to the Committees on Oversight and Government Reform, and House Administration, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
-
Referred to the Committee on Education and Workforce, and in addition to the Committees on Oversight and Government Reform, and House Administration, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Sponsors
- Riley M. Moore · Primary
- Mike Kennedy · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 545 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Moore, Riley M. Republican
Co-sponsors (1)
- Kennedy, Mike Republican
Not signed on (545)
545 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 545 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HR 2732?
- HR 2732 is sponsored by Moore, Riley M. (Republican) and Kennedy, Mike (Republican).
- What is the current status of HR 2732?
- This bill is in committee in the House. Introduced April 08, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
- Where can I track HR 2732?
- Track HR 2732 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HR 2732
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HR 2732
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →