Illinois 99th Regular Session Status: Passed House

HB 2919 — CRIM PRO - BAIL RECOGNIZANCE

Last action — Session Sine Die

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed House
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 99th Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Amends the Code of Criminal Procedure of 1963. Provides if the court is of the opinion that the defendant will appear as required either before or after conviction and the defendant will not pose a danger to any person or the community and that the defendant will comply with all conditions of bond the defendant must be released on his or her recognizance (rather than may be released on his or her recognizance). Requires the court to consider several release factors in reaching its opinion on release of the defendant on his or her recognizance and before considering monetary bail.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

268 added · 85 removed

Plain-language change summary

The recent amendments to HB 2919 change how courts decide on bail and release conditions for defendants. Previously, if a court believed a defendant would appear in court, it "may" release them on their own recognizance; now, it "must" do so, provided certain factors support that belief. This change is significant because it aims to reduce unnecessary incarceration, particularly for those who pose minimal risk, while still ensuring public safety.

→
Previous
Latest
*LRB09908143MRW28293b* HB2919 99TH GENERAL ASSEMBLY State of Illinois and 2016 HB2919 by Rep.
HB2919 Engrossed LRB099 08143 MRW 28293 b AN ACT concerning criminal law.
Michael J.
Zalewski SYNOPSIS AS INTRODUCED:
ILCS 5/110-2 from Ch.
38, par.
110-2 Amends the Code of Criminal Procedure of 1963.
Provides if the court is of the opinion that the defendant will appear as required either before or the community and that the defendant will comply with all conditions of bond the defendant must be released on his or her recognizance (rather than may be released on his or her recognizance).
Requires the court to consider several release factors in reaching its opinion on release of the defendant on his or her recognizance and before considering monetary bail.
LRB099 08143 MRW 28293 b A BILL FOR HB2919 LRB099 08143 MRW 28293 b AN ACT concerning criminal law.
The Code of Criminal Procedure of 1963 is amended by changing Section 110-2 as follows:
The Code of Criminal Procedure of 1963 is amended by changing Section 110-5 as follows:
(725 ILCS 5/110-2) (from Ch.
(725 ILCS 5/110-5) (from Ch.
110-2) Sec.
110-5) Sec.
110-2.
110-5.
Release on own recognizance.
Determining the amount of bail and conditions of release.
(a) When from all the circumstances the court is of the opinion that the defendant will appear as required either before or after conviction and the defendant will not pose a danger to any person or the community and that the defendant will comply with all conditions of bond, which shall include the defendant's current address with a written admonishment to the defendant that he or she must comply with the provisions of Section 110-12 of this Code regarding any change in his or her address, the defendant must may be released on his or her own recognizance.
(a) In determining the amount of monetary bail or conditions of release, if any, which will reasonably assure the appearance of a defendant as required or the safety of any other person or the community and the likelihood of compliance by the defendant with all the conditions of bail, the court shall, on the basis of available information, take into account such matters as the nature and circumstances of the offense charged, whether the evidence shows that as part of the offense there was a use of violence or threatened use of violence, whether the offense involved corruption of public officials or employees, whether there was physical harm or threats of physical harm to any public official, public employee, judge, prosecutor, juror or witness, senior citizen, child or handicapped person, whether evidence shows that during the offense or during the arrest the defendant possessed or used a HB2919 Engrossed - 2 - LRB099 08143 MRW 28293 b firearm, machine gun, explosive or metal piercing ammunition or explosive bomb device or any military or paramilitary armament, whether the evidence shows that the offense committed was related to or in furtherance of the criminal activities of an organized gang or was motivated by the defendant's membership in or allegiance to an organized gang, the condition of the victim, any written statement submitted by the victim or proffer or representation by the State regarding the impact which the alleged criminal conduct has had on the victim and the victim's concern, if any, with further contact with the defendant if released on bail, whether the offense was based on racial, religious, sexual orientation or ethnic hatred, the likelihood of the filing of a greater charge, the likelihood of conviction, the sentence applicable upon conviction, the weight of the evidence against such defendant, whether there exists motivation or ability to flee, whether there is any verification as to prior residence, education, or family ties in the local jurisdiction, in another county, state or foreign country, the defendant's employment, financial resources, character and mental condition, past conduct, prior use of alias names or dates of birth, and length of residence in the community, the consent of the defendant to periodic drug testing in accordance with Section 110-6.5, whether a foreign national defendant is lawfully admitted in the United States of America, whether the government of the foreign national maintains an extradition treaty with the United States by which HB2919 Engrossed - 3 - LRB099 08143 MRW 28293 b the foreign government will extradite to the United States its national for a trial for a crime allegedly committed in the United States, whether the defendant is currently subject to deportation or exclusion under the immigration laws of the United States, whether the defendant, although a United States citizen, is considered under the law of any foreign state a national of that state for the purposes of extradition or non-extradition to the United States, the amount of unrecovered proceeds lost as a result of the alleged offense, the source of bail funds tendered or sought to be tendered for bail, whether from the totality of the court's consideration, the loss of funds posted or sought to be posted for bail will not deter the defendant from flight, whether the evidence shows that the defendant is engaged in significant possession, manufacture, or delivery of a controlled substance or cannabis, either individually or in consort with others, whether at the time of the offense charged he or she was on bond or pre-trial release pending trial, probation, periodic imprisonment or conditional discharge pursuant to this Code or the comparable Code of any other state or federal jurisdiction, whether the defendant is on bond or pre-trial release pending the imposition or execution of sentence or appeal of sentence for any offense under the laws of Illinois or any other state or federal jurisdiction, whether the defendant is under parole, aftercare release, mandatory supervised release, or work release from the Illinois Department of Corrections or Illinois Department of HB2919 Engrossed - 4 - LRB099 08143 MRW 28293 b Juvenile Justice or any penal institution or corrections department of any state or federal jurisdiction, the defendant's record of convictions, whether the defendant has been convicted of a misdemeanor or ordinance offense in Illinois or similar offense in other state or federal jurisdiction within the 10 years preceding the current charge or convicted of a felony in Illinois, whether the defendant was convicted of an offense in another state or federal jurisdiction that would be a felony if committed in Illinois within the 20 years preceding the current charge or has been convicted of such felony and released from the penitentiary within 20 years preceding the current charge if a penitentiary sentence was imposed in Illinois or other state or federal jurisdiction, the defendant's records of juvenile adjudication of delinquency in any jurisdiction, any record of appearance or failure to appear by the defendant at court proceedings, whether there was flight to avoid arrest or prosecution, whether the defendant escaped or attempted to escape to avoid arrest, whether the defendant refused to identify himself or herself, or whether there was a refusal by the defendant to be fingerprinted as required by law.
In making the opinion, the court shall consider the following factors:
Information used by the court in its findings or stated in or offered in connection with this Section may be by way of proffer based upon reliable information offered by the State or defendant.
(1) whether the defendant is at least 18 years of age;
All evidence shall be admissible if it is relevant and reliable regardless of whether it would be admissible under the rules of evidence HB2919 Engrossed - 5 - LRB099 08143 MRW 28293 b applicable at criminal trials.
(2) any recommendations of release or conditions, evaluations, or risk assessments of the defendant by pretrial services;
If the State presents evidence that the offense committed by the defendant was related to or in furtherance of the criminal activities of an organized gang or was motivated by the defendant's membership in or allegiance to an organized gang, and if the court determines that the evidence may be substantiated, the court shall prohibit the defendant from associating with other members of the organized gang as a condition of bail or release.
(3) whether release would reasonably assure his or her HB2919 - 2 - LRB099 08143 MRW 28293 b appearance in court when required;
For the purposes of this Section, "organized gang" has the meaning ascribed to it in Section 10 of the Illinois Streetgang Terrorism Omnibus Prevention Act.
(4) that the safety of any other person or the community does not require the detention of the defendant;
(b) The amount of bail shall be:
(5) whether the defendant will obstruct or attempt to obstruct the criminal justice process;
(1) Sufficient to assure compliance with the conditions set forth in the bail bond, which shall include the defendant's current address with a written admonishment to the defendant that he or she must comply with the provisions of Section 110-12 regarding any change in his or her address.
(6) whether the defendant produced satisfactory evidence of his or her identity;
The defendant's address shall at all times remain a matter of public record with the clerk of the court.
(7) whether the defendant exhibited behavior which required exertion of physical force to effectuate the arrest or control of the defendant by the arresting officer, a correctional officer, or a correctional employee;
(2) Not oppressive.
(8) whether the defendant demonstrated behavior that would pose a danger to any person or the community;
(3) Considerate of the financial ability of the accused.
(9) whether the defendant has been convicted or found guilty in any jurisdiction as an adult or juvenile for a violation involving the use or threat of physical force or violence;
(4) When a person is charged with a drug related offense involving possession or delivery of cannabis or possession or delivery of a controlled substance as defined HB2919 Engrossed - 6 - LRB099 08143 MRW 28293 b in the Cannabis Control Act, the Illinois Controlled Substances Act, or the Methamphetamine Control and Community Protection Act, the full street value of the drugs seized shall be considered.
and (10) whether the defendant is the subject of a pending arrest warrant, prosecution, order of protection, or other criminal proceeding.
"Street value" shall be determined by the court on the basis of a proffer by the State based upon reliable information of a law enforcement official contained in a written report as to the amount seized and such proffer may be used by the court as to the current street value of the smallest unit of the drug seized.
(b) The defendant's address shall at all times remain a matter of public record with the clerk of the court.
(b-5) Upon the filing of a written request demonstrating reasonable cause, the State's Attorney may request a source of bail hearing either before or after the posting of any funds.
A failure to appear as required by such recognizance shall constitute an offense subject to the penalty provided in Section 32-10 of the Criminal Code of 2012 for violation of the bail bond, and any HB2919 - 3 - LRB099 08143 MRW 28293 b obligated sum fixed in the recognizance shall be forfeited and collected in accordance with subsection (g) of Section 110-7 of this Code.
If the hearing is granted, before the posting of any bail, the accused must file a written notice requesting that the court conduct a source of bail hearing.
(c) This Section shall be liberally construed to effectuate the purpose of relying upon contempt of court proceedings or criminal sanctions instead of financial loss to assure the appearance of the defendant, and that the defendant will not pose a danger to any person or the community and that the defendant will comply with all conditions of bond.
The notice must be accompanied by justifying affidavits stating the legitimate and lawful source of funds for bail.
(d) Monetary bail should be set only after consideration of release factors under subsection (a) of this Section and when it is determined that no other conditions of release will reasonably assure the defendant's appearance in court, that the defendant does not present a danger to any person or the community and that the defendant will comply with all conditions of bond.
At the hearing, the court shall inquire into any matters stated in any justifying affidavits, and may also inquire into matters appropriate to the determination which shall include, but are not limited to, the following:
(e) The State may appeal any order permitting release by personal recognizance.
(1) the background, character, reputation, and relationship to the accused of any surety;
and (2) the source of any money or property deposited by any surety, and whether any such money or property HB2919 Engrossed - 7 - LRB099 08143 MRW 28293 b constitutes the fruits of criminal or unlawful conduct;
and (3) the source of any money posted as cash bail, and whether any such money constitutes the fruits of criminal or unlawful conduct;
and (4) the background, character, reputation, and relationship to the accused of the person posting cash bail.
Upon setting the hearing, the court shall examine, under oath, any persons who may possess material information.
The State's Attorney has a right to attend the hearing, to call witnesses and to examine any witness in the proceeding.
The court shall, upon request of the State's Attorney, continue the proceedings for a reasonable period to allow the State's Attorney to investigate the matter raised in any testimony or affidavit.
If the hearing is granted after the accused has posted bail, the court shall conduct a hearing consistent with this subsection (b-5).
At the conclusion of the hearing, the court must issue an order either approving of disapproving the bail.
(c) When a person is charged with an offense punishable by fine only the amount of the bail shall not exceed double the amount of the maximum penalty.
Show all 66 changed rows (26 more)
Previous
Latest
(d) When a person has been convicted of an offense and only a fine has been imposed the amount of the bail shall not exceed double the amount of the fine.
(e) The State may appeal any order granting bail or setting HB2919 Engrossed - 8 - LRB099 08143 MRW 28293 b a given amount for bail.
(f) When a person is charged with a violation of an order of protection under Section 12-3.4 or 12-30 of the Criminal Code of 1961 or the Criminal Code of 2012 or when a person is charged with domestic battery, aggravated domestic battery, kidnapping, aggravated kidnaping, unlawful restraint, aggravated unlawful restraint, stalking, aggravated stalking, cyberstalking, harassment by telephone, harassment through electronic communications, or an attempt to commit first degree murder committed against an intimate partner regardless whether an order of protection has been issued against the person, (1) whether the alleged incident involved harassment or abuse, as defined in the Illinois Domestic Violence Act of 1986;
(2) whether the person has a history of domestic violence, as defined in the Illinois Domestic Violence Act, or a history of other criminal acts;
(3) based on the mental health of the person;
(4) whether the person has a history of violating the orders of any court or governmental entity;
(5) whether the person has been, or is, potentially a threat to any other person;
(6) whether the person has access to deadly weapons or a history of using deadly weapons;
(7) whether the person has a history of abusing alcohol HB2919 Engrossed - 9 - LRB099 08143 MRW 28293 b or any controlled substance;
(8) based on the severity of the alleged incident that is the basis of the alleged offense, including, but not limited to, the duration of the current incident, and whether the alleged incident involved the use of a weapon, physical injury, sexual assault, strangulation, abuse during the alleged victim's pregnancy, abuse of pets, or forcible entry to gain access to the alleged victim;
(9) whether a separation of the person from the alleged victim or a termination of the relationship between the person and the alleged victim has recently occurred or is pending;
(10) whether the person has exhibited obsessive or controlling behaviors toward the alleged victim, including, but not limited to, stalking, surveillance, or isolation of the alleged victim or victim's family member or members;
(11) whether the person has expressed suicidal or homicidal ideations;
(12) based on any information contained in the complaint and any police reports, affidavits, or other documents accompanying the complaint, the court may, in its discretion, order the respondent to undergo a risk assessment evaluation using a recognized, evidence-based instrument conducted by an Illinois Department of Human Services approved partner abuse intervention program HB2919 Engrossed - 10 - LRB099 08143 MRW 28293 b provider, pretrial service, probation, or parole agency.
These agencies shall have access to summaries of the defendant's criminal history, which shall not include victim interviews or information, for the risk evaluation.
Based on the information collected from the 12 points to be considered at a bail hearing under this subsection (f), the results of any risk evaluation conducted and the other circumstances of the violation, the court may order that the person, as a condition of bail, be placed under electronic surveillance as provided in Section 5-8A-7 of the Unified Code of Corrections.
Upon making a determination whether or not to order the respondent to undergo a risk assessment evaluation or to be placed under electronic surveillance and risk assessment, the court shall document in the record the court's reasons for making those determinations.
The cost of the electronic surveillance and risk assessment shall be paid by, or on behalf, of the defendant.
As used in this subsection (f), "intimate partner" means a spouse or a current or former partner in a cohabitation or dating relationship.
(g) When a person is charged with a Class A misdemeanor or Class 4 felony retail theft violation under Section 16-25 of the Criminal Code of 2012 and the person is in custody and is not tried within 30 days of his or her arrest, the defendant or the court on its own motion may initiate a hearing to alter his or her conditions of bond under Section 110-6.
At the hearing, the court shall discharge the person from custody if the court HB2919 Engrossed - 11 - LRB099 08143 MRW 28293 b finds that his or her discharge is in the interest of justice and would not endanger public safety.
1-25-13.)
1-25-13;
98-558, eff.
1-1-14;
98-1012, eff.
1-1-15.)
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. Session Sine Die

  2. Pursuant to Senate Rule 3-9(b) / Referred to Assignments

  3. Placed on Calendar Order of Non-Concurrence Senate Amendment(s) 1 - May 31, 2015

  4. Secretary's Desk - Non-Concurrence Senate Amendment(s) 1

  5. House Non-Concurs

  6. Senate Committee Amendment No. 1 Motion Filed Non-Concur Rep. Michael J. Zalewski

  7. Placed on Calendar Order of Concurrence Senate Amendment(s) 1

  8. Arrived in House

  9. Third Reading - Passed; 056-000-000

  10. Added as Alternate Chief Co-Sponsor Sen. Donne E. Trotter

  11. Placed on Calendar Order of 3rd Reading May 29, 2015

  12. Second Reading

  13. Placed on Calendar Order of 2nd Reading May 28, 2015

  14. Do Pass as Amended Criminal Law; 007-000-000

  15. Senate Committee Amendment No. 1 Adopted

  16. Waive Posting Notice

  17. Senate Committee Amendment No. 1 Assignments Refers to Criminal Law

  18. Added as Alternate Chief Co-Sponsor Sen. Michael Connelly

  19. Added as Alternate Co-Sponsor Sen. Michael Noland

  20. Alternate Chief Sponsor Changed to Sen. Kwame Raoul

  21. Senate Committee Amendment No. 1 Referred to Assignments

  22. Senate Committee Amendment No. 1 Filed with Secretary by Sen. Kwame Raoul

  23. Rule 2-10 Third Reading Deadline Established As May 31, 2015

  24. Postponed - Criminal Law

  25. Added as Alternate Chief Co-Sponsor Sen. Jacqueline Y. Collins

  26. Waive Posting Notice

  27. Rule 2-10 Committee Deadline Established As May 31, 2015

  28. Added as Alternate Chief Co-Sponsor Sen. Patricia Van Pelt

  29. Postponed - Criminal Law

  30. Postponed - Criminal Law

  31. Assigned to Criminal Law

  32. Referred to Assignments

  33. First Reading

  34. Chief Senate Sponsor Sen. Bill Cunningham

  35. Placed on Calendar Order of First Reading

  36. Arrive in Senate

  37. Added Co-Sponsor Rep. La Shawn K. Ford

  38. Added Co-Sponsor Rep. Will Guzzardi

  39. Added Co-Sponsor Rep. Kenneth Dunkin

  40. Added Co-Sponsor Rep. Rita Mayfield

  41. Added Co-Sponsor Rep. Mary E. Flowers

  42. Added Co-Sponsor Rep. Monique D. Davis

  43. Third Reading - Short Debate - Passed 066-047-000

  44. Placed on Calendar Order of 3rd Reading - Short Debate

  45. House Floor Amendment No. 1 Adopted

  46. Second Reading - Short Debate

  47. House Floor Amendment No. 1 Recommends Be Adopted Judiciary - Criminal Committee; 010-000-000

  48. House Floor Amendment No. 1 Rules Refers to Judiciary - Criminal Committee

  49. House Floor Amendment No. 1 Referred to Rules Committee

  50. House Floor Amendment No. 1 Filed with Clerk by Rep. Michael J. Zalewski

  51. Placed on Calendar 2nd Reading - Short Debate

  52. Do Pass / Short Debate Judiciary - Criminal Committee; 015-000-000

  53. Assigned to Judiciary - Criminal Committee

  54. Referred to Rules Committee

  55. First Reading

  56. Filed with the Clerk by Rep. Michael J. Zalewski

Sponsors

  • Michael J. Zalewski · Cosponsor
  • Michael Noland · Cosponsor

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

0 sponsors · 2 co-sponsors · 181 not signed on · 11 voted No

Sponsors (0)

None.

Co-sponsors (2)

  • Michael J. Zalewski
  • Michael Noland

Not signed on (181)

181 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 181 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Third Reading

Passed 56 Yea · 0 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 39003
Democrat 13000
Republican 4000
Total 56003
% of votes cast 95%0%0%5%
How each member voted (59)
Member Party Vote
Sandoval — Yea
LaHood — Yea
Manar — Yea
Althoff — Yea
Martinez — Yea
Barickman — Yea
Bertino-Tarrant — Yea
Biss — Yea
Bivins — Yea
Kotowski — Yea
Landek — Yea
Link — Yea
Bennett — Yea
Harris — Yea
Luechtefeld — Yea
McCann — Yea
McCarter — Not Voting
McConnaughay — Yea
Mulroe — Yea
McGuire — Yea
Muñoz — Yea
Brady — Yea
Nybo — Yea
Sullivan — Yea
Radogno — Yea
Cullerton, T. — Yea
Cullerton — Yea
Silverstein — Not Voting
Steans — Yea
Trotter — Yea
Bush — Yea
Clayborne — Yea
Connelly — Yea
Duffy — Not Voting
Forby — Yea
Haine — Yea
Hutchinson — Yea
Noland — Yea
Oberweis — Yea
Raoul — Yea
Righter — Yea
Van Pelt — Yea
Bill Cunningham Democrat Yea
David Koehler Democrat Yea
Don Harmon Democrat Yea
Emil Jones, III Democrat Yea
Eva-Dina Delgado Democrat Yea
Julie A. Morrison Democrat Yea
Kimberly A. Lightford Democrat Yea
Lakesia Collins Democrat Yea
Laura M. Murphy Democrat Yea
Linda Holmes Democrat Yea
Mattie Hunter Democrat Yea
Michael E. Hastings Democrat Yea
Steve Stadelman Democrat Yea
Chapin Rose Republican Yea
Dave Syverson Republican Yea
Neil Anderson Republican Yea
Sue Rezin Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Third Reading

Passed 66 Yea · 47 Nay · 5 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 453603
Democrat 20602
Republican 1500
Total 664705
% of votes cast 56%40%0%4%
How each member voted (118)
Member Party Vote
Sandack — Yea
Sommer — Yea
Acevedo — Yea
Andersson — Nay
Anthony — Nay
Arroyo — Not Voting
Batinick — Nay
Beiser — Nay
Bellock — Nay
Mautino — Yea
Bourne — Nay
Breen — Yea
Brown — Nay
Butler — Nay
McAsey — Yea
Durkin — Yea
Dunkin — Yea
Fortner — Yea
Lang — Yea
McAuliffe — Yea
McDermed — Yea
Moffitt — Yea
Nekritz — Yea
Phelps — Yea
Poe — Yea
Bennett — Yea
Harris, Greg — Yea
Bradley — Yea
Smiddy — Yea
Brady — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Soto — Yea
Burke, Daniel — Yea
Jones — Yea
Stewart — Yea
Sullivan — Yea
Tabares — Yea
Turner — Yea
Verschoore — Yea
Davis, Monique — Yea
Williams — Yea
Zalewski — Yea
Mitchell, Christian — Yea
Currie — Yea
D'Amico — Yea
Demmer — Yea
Drury — Yea
Flowers — Yea
Golar — Yea
Hays — Yea
Jackson — Yea
Leitch — Nay
Madigan — Not Voting
Harris, David — Nay
McSweeney — Nay
Burke, Kelly — Nay
Sente — Nay
Thapedi — Nay
Tryon — Nay
Unes — Nay
Wheeler, Barbara — Nay
Wheeler, Keith — Nay
Mitchell, Bill — Nay
Wallace — Nay
Wehrli — Nay
Willis — Nay
Winger — Nay
Yingling — Nay
Cavaletto — Nay
Cloonen — Nay
Conroy — Nay
Costello — Nay
Franks — Nay
Frese — Nay
Hurley — Nay
Ives — Nay
Jesiel — Nay
Kay — Nay
Phillips — Nay
Pritchard — Not Voting
Reaves-Harris — Yea
Reis — Nay
Riley — Yea
Chapa LaVia — Yea
Anna Moeller Democrat Nay
Anthony DeLuca Democrat Not Voting
Camille Y. Lilly Democrat Yea
Carol Ammons Democrat Yea
Elgie R. Sims, Jr. Democrat Yea
Emanuel "Chris" Welch Democrat Yea
Fred Crespo Democrat Yea
Jaime M. Andrade, Jr. Democrat Yea
Jay Hoffman Democrat Yea
Jehan Gordon-Booth Democrat Yea
Julie A. Morrison Democrat Nay
Kelly M. Cassidy Democrat Yea
La Shawn K. Ford Democrat Yea
Laura Fine Democrat Yea
Lawrence "Larry" Walsh, Jr. Democrat Yea
Marcus C. Evans, Jr. Democrat Yea
Martin J. Moylan Democrat Nay
Michelle Mussman Democrat Nay
Natalie A. Manley Democrat Not Voting
Rita Mayfield Democrat Yea
Robert "Bob" Rita Democrat Yea
Robert F. Martwick Democrat Yea
Robyn Gabel Democrat Yea
Sara Feigenholtz Democrat Yea
Stephanie A. Kifowit Democrat Nay
Sue Scherer Democrat Nay
Will Guzzardi Democrat Yea
William "Will" Davis Democrat Yea
Charles Meier Republican Nay
Christopher "C.D." Davidsmeyer Republican Nay
Joe C. Sosnowski Republican Nay
John M. Cabello Republican Yea
Norine K. Hammond Republican Nay
Terri Bryant Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does HB 2919 do?
Amends the Code of Criminal Procedure of 1963. Provides if the court is of the opinion that the defendant will appear as required either before or after conviction and the defendant will not pose a danger to any person or the community and that the defendant will comply with all conditions of bond the defendant must be released on his or her recognizance (rather than may be released on his or her recognizance). Requires the court to consider several release factors in reaching its opinion on release of the defendant on his or her recognizance and before considering monetary bail.
Who sponsors HB 2919?
HB 2919 is sponsored by Michael J. Zalewski and Michael Noland.
What is the current status of HB 2919?
This bill died with 99th Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track HB 2919?
Track HB 2919 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HB 2919

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of HB 2919

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →