Washington 2021-2022 Regular Session Status: Enacted 15 D cosponsors

HB 1747 — Supporting relative placements in child welfare proceedings.

Last action — Effective date 6/9/2022.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed House
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 04, 2022. Enacted.

Odds of enactment

High chance

Based on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.

Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.

A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 82% · moderate confidence
  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 19 sponsors

    1 primary, 18 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (15 D).

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 2 recorded votes so far.

Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

220 added · 219 removed

Plain-language change summary

The amendments to House Bill 1747 primarily involve changing the format of numbers for clarity, converting words like "twelve" and "fifteen" to their numeric forms (12 and 15). Additionally, the bill emphasizes the timeline for child welfare proceedings, ensuring that certain hearings and adoption processes occur within specified time frames. These adjustments are significant because they aim to make the legislation clearer and more accessible, which could help in better understanding and implementing the law for those involved in child welfare services.

→
Previous
Latest
H-2310.1 SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 1747 State of Washington 67th Legislature 2022 Regular Session By House Children, Youth & Families (originally sponsored by Representatives Ortiz-Self, Taylor, Davis, Peterson, Ryu, Orwall, Dolan, Simmons, Ramos, Wicks, Valdez, Fitzgibbon, Morgan, Stonier, Goodman, Ormsby, Macri, Harris-Talley, and Frame) READ FIRST TIME 01/31/22.
H-1720.3 HOUSE BILL 1747 State of Washington 67th Legislature 2022 Regular Session By Representatives Ortiz-Self, Taylor, Davis, Peterson, Ryu, Orwall, Dolan, Simmons, Ramos, Wicks, Valdez, Fitzgibbon, Morgan, Stonier, Goodman, Ormsby, Macri, Harris-Talley, and Frame Prefiled 01/04/22.
Read first time 01/10/22.
Referred to Committee on Children, Youth & Families.
The hearing shall take place no later than ((twelve)) 12 months following commencement of the current placement episode.
The hearing shall take place no later than twelve months following commencement of the current placement episode.
(b) Whenever a child is removed from the home of a dependency guardian or long-term relative or foster care provider, and the child is not returned to the home of the parent, guardian, or legal custodian but is placed in out-of-home care, a permanency planning hearing shall take place no later than ((twelve)) 12 months, as p.
(b) Whenever a child is removed from the home of a dependency guardian or long-term relative or foster care provider, and the child is not returned to the home of the parent, guardian, or legal custodian but is placed in out-of-home care, a permanency planning hearing shall take place no later than twelve months, as provided in p.
1 SHB 1747 provided in this section, following the date of removal unless, prior to the hearing, the child returns to the home of the dependency guardian or long-term care provider, the child is placed in the home of the parent, guardian, or legal custodian, an adoption decree, guardianship order, or a permanent custody order is entered, or the dependency is dismissed.
1 HB 1747 this section, following the date of removal unless, prior to the hearing, the child returns to the home of the dependency guardian or long-term care provider, the child is placed in the home of the parent, guardian, or legal custodian, an adoption decree, guardianship order, or a permanent custody order is entered, or the dependency is dismissed.
(c) Permanency planning goals should be achieved at the earliest possible date, preferably before the child has been in out-of-home care for ((fifteen)) 15 months.
(c) Permanency planning goals should be achieved at the earliest possible date, preferably before the child has been in out-of-home care for fifteen months.
(2) No later than ((ten)) 10 working days prior to the permanency planning hearing, the agency having custody of the child shall submit a written permanency plan to the court and shall mail a copy of the plan to all parties and their legal counsel, if any.
(2) No later than ten working days prior to the permanency planning hearing, the agency having custody of the child shall submit a written permanency plan to the court and shall mail a copy of the plan to all parties and their legal counsel, if any.
(3) When the youth is at least age ((seventeen)) 17 years but not older than ((seventeen)) 17 years and six months, the department shall provide the youth with written documentation which explains the availability of extended foster care services and detailed instructions regarding how the youth may access such services after he or she reaches age ((eighteen)) 18 years.
(3) When the youth is at least age seventeen years but not older than seventeen years and six months, the department shall provide the youth with written documentation which explains the availability of extended foster care services and detailed instructions regarding how the youth may access such services after he or she reaches age eighteen years.
2 SHB 1747 (b) In cases where the primary permanency planning goal has not been achieved, the court shall inquire regarding the reasons why the primary goal has not been achieved and determine what needs to be done to make it possible to achieve the primary goal.
2 HB 1747 (b) In cases where the primary permanency planning goal has not been achieved, the court shall inquire regarding the reasons why the primary goal has not been achieved and determine what needs to be done to make it possible to achieve the primary goal.
and (vi) If the child has been placed outside of his or her home for ((fifteen)) 15 of the most recent ((twenty-two)) 22 months, not including any period during which the child was a runaway from the out-of-home placement or the first six months of any period during which the child was returned to his or her home for a trial home visit, the appropriateness of the permanency plan, whether reasonable efforts were made by the department to achieve the goal of the permanency plan, and the circumstances which prevent the child from any of the following:
and (vi) If the child has been placed outside of his or her home for fifteen of the most recent twenty-two months, not including any period during which the child was a runaway from the out-of-home placement or the first six months of any period during which the child was returned to his or her home for a trial home visit, the appropriateness of the permanency plan, whether reasonable efforts were made by the department to achieve the goal of the permanency plan, and the circumstances which prevent the child from any of the following:
3 SHB 1747 (c) Regardless of whether the primary permanency planning goal has been achieved, for a child who remains placed in a qualified residential treatment program as defined in this chapter for at least ((sixty)) 60 days, and remains placed there at subsequent permanency planning hearings, the court shall establish in writing:
3 HB 1747 (c) Regardless of whether the primary permanency planning goal has been achieved, for a child who remains placed in a qualified residential treatment program as defined in this chapter for at least sixty days, and remains placed there at subsequent permanency planning hearings, the court shall establish in writing:
(5) Following this inquiry, at the permanency planning hearing, the court shall order the department to file a petition seeking termination of parental rights if the child has been in out-of-home care for ((fifteen)) 15 of the last ((twenty-two)) 22 months since the date the dependency petition was filed unless the court makes a good cause exception as to why the filing of a termination of parental rights petition is not appropriate.
(5) Following this inquiry, at the permanency planning hearing, the court shall order the department to file a petition seeking termination of parental rights if the child has been in out-of-home care for fifteen of the last twenty-two months since the date the dependency petition was filed unless the court makes a good cause exception as to why the filing of a termination of parental rights petition is not appropriate.
(iv) The parent is incarcerated, or the parent's prior incarceration is a significant factor in why the child has been in foster care for ((fifteen)) 15 of the last ((twenty-two)) 22 months, the parent maintains a meaningful role in the child's life, and the p.
(iv) The parent is incarcerated, or the parent's prior incarceration is a significant factor in why the child has been in foster care for fifteen of the last twenty-two months, the parent maintains a meaningful role in the child's life, and the department p.
4 SHB 1747 department has not documented another reason why it would be otherwise appropriate to file a petition pursuant to this section;
4 HB 1747 has not documented another reason why it would be otherwise appropriate to file a petition pursuant to this section;
5 SHB 1747 (c) The constraints of a parent's current or prior incarceration and associated delays or barriers to accessing court-mandated services may be considered in rebuttal to a claim of aggravated circumstances under RCW 13.34.132(4)(h) for a parent's failure to complete available treatment.
5 HB 1747 (c) The constraints of a parent's current or prior incarceration and associated delays or barriers to accessing court-mandated services may be considered in rebuttal to a claim of aggravated circumstances under RCW 13.34.132(4)(h) for a parent's failure to complete available treatment.
6 SHB 1747 (ii) Modify the permanency plan, and order implementation of the modified plan;
6 HB 1747 (ii) Modify the permanency plan, and order implementation of the modified plan;
(9) Following the first permanency planning hearing, the court shall hold a further permanency planning hearing in accordance with this section at least once every ((twelve)) 12 months until a permanency planning goal is achieved or the dependency is dismissed, whichever occurs first.
(9) Following the first permanency planning hearing, the court shall hold a further permanency planning hearing in accordance with this section at least once every twelve months until a permanency planning goal is achieved or the dependency is dismissed, whichever occurs first.
(14) Nothing in this chapter may be construed to limit the ability of the agency that has custody of the child to file a petition for termination of parental rights or a guardianship p.
(14) Nothing in this chapter may be construed to limit the ability of the agency that has custody of the child to file ((a petition for termination of parental rights or)) a guardianship p.
7 SHB 1747 petition at any time following the establishment of dependency.
7 HB 1747 petition at any time following the establishment of dependency.
Upon the filing of such a petition, a fact-finding hearing shall be scheduled and held in accordance with this chapter unless the department requests dismissal of the petition prior to the hearing or unless the parties enter an agreed order terminating parental rights, establishing guardianship, or otherwise resolving the matter.
((Upon the filing of such a petition, a fact-finding hearing shall be scheduled and held in accordance with this chapter unless the department requests dismissal of the petition prior to the hearing or unless the parties enter an agreed order terminating parental rights, establishing guardianship, or otherwise resolving the matter.)) The department shall not file a petition for termination of parental rights when the court has entered a finding of good cause that a termination of parental rights petition is not appropriate under subsection (5) of this section.
(e) That there is little likelihood that conditions will be remedied so that the child can be returned to the parent in the near future.
p.
A parent's failure to substantially improve parental deficiencies within ((twelve)) 12 months following entry of the p.
8 HB 1747 (e) That there is little likelihood that conditions will be remedied so that the child can be returned to the parent in the near future.
8 SHB 1747 dispositional order shall give rise to a rebuttable presumption that there is little likelihood that conditions will be remedied so that the child can be returned to the parent in the near future.
A parent's failure to substantially improve parental deficiencies within twelve months following entry of the dispositional order shall give rise to a rebuttable presumption that there is little likelihood that conditions will be remedied so that the child can be returned to the parent in the near future.
In making this determination, the court must consider the efforts taken by the department to support a guardianship and whether a guardianship is available as a permanent option for the child.
The petitioner must demonstrate that a p.
If the parent is incarcerated, the court shall consider whether a parent maintains a meaningful role in his or her p.
9 HB 1747 guardianship is not sufficient to protect the health, safety, and welfare of the child.
9 SHB 1747 child's life based on factors identified in RCW 13.34.145(5)(b);
If the parent is incarcerated, the court shall consider whether a parent maintains a meaningful role in his or her child's life based on factors identified in RCW 13.34.145(5)(b);
(5) When a parent has been sentenced to a long-term incarceration and has maintained a meaningful role in the child's life considering the factors provided in RCW 13.34.145(5)(b), and it is in the best interest of the child, the department should consider a permanent placement that allows the parent to maintain a relationship with his or her child, such as, but not limited to, a guardianship pursuant to chapter 13.36 RCW.
(5) When a parent has been sentenced to a long-term incarceration and has maintained a meaningful role in the child's life considering the factors provided in RCW 13.34.145(5)(b), and it is in the best interest of the child, the department should consider a permanent placement that allows the parent to maintain a relationship with his p.
p.
10 HB 1747 or her child, such as, but not limited to, a guardianship pursuant to chapter 13.36 RCW.
10 SHB 1747 (6) Notice of rights shall be served upon the parent, guardian, or legal custodian with the petition and shall be in substantially the following form:
(6) Notice of rights shall be served upon the parent, guardian, or legal custodian with the petition and shall be in substantially the following form:
If, upon entering an order terminating the parental rights of a parent, there remains no parent having parental rights, the court shall commit the child to the custody of the department willing to accept custody for the purpose of placing the child for adoption.
If, upon entering an order terminating the parental rights of a parent, there remains no parent having parental rights, the court shall commit the child to the custody of the department willing to accept custody ((for the purpose of placing the child for adoption.
If an adoptive home has not been identified, the department shall place the child in a licensed foster home, or take other suitable measures for the care and welfare of the child.
If an adoptive home has not been identified, the department shall place the child in a licensed foster home, or take other suitable measures for the care and welfare of the child)) of the child to take further action consistent with this chapter.
The placement standards provided in RCW 13.34.130 continue to apply throughout the life of the case, except that the court need not consider whether reunification with the parent will be hindered when evaluating p.
The custodian shall have p.
11 SHB 1747 relative placements.
11 HB 1747 authority to consent to the adoption of the child consistent with chapter 26.33 RCW, the marriage of the child, the enlistment of the child in the armed forces of the United States, necessary surgical and other medical treatment for the child, and to consent to such other matters as might normally be required of the parent of the child.
The custodian shall have authority to consent to the adoption of the child consistent with chapter 26.33 RCW, the marriage of the child, the enlistment of the child in the armed forces of the United States, necessary surgical and other medical treatment for the child, and to consent to such other matters as might normally be required of the parent of the child.
12 SHB 1747
12 HB 1747
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. Effective date 6/9/2022.

  2. Chapter 127, 2022 Laws.

  3. Governor signed.

  4. Delivered to Governor.

  5. President signed.

  6. Speaker signed.

  7. Third reading, passed; yeas, 46; nays, 0; absent, 0; excused, 3.

  8. Rules suspended. Placed on Third Reading.

  9. Placed on second reading consent calendar.

  10. Scheduled for public hearing in the Senate Committee on Ways & Means at 10:00 AM

  11. Passed to Rules Committee for second reading.

  12. WM - Majority; do pass.

  13. Executive action taken in the Senate Committee on Ways & Means at 10:00 AM.

  14. Scheduled for public hearing in the Senate Committee on Ways & Means at 09:00 AM

  15. Public hearing in the Senate Committee on Ways & Means at 9:00 AM.

  16. Referred to Ways & Means.

  17. Scheduled for public hearing in the Senate Committee on Human Services, Reentry & Rehabilitation at 10:30 AM

  18. And refer to Ways & Means.

  19. HSRR - Majority; do pass.

  20. Executive action taken in the Senate Committee on Human Services, Reentry & Rehabilitation at 10:30 AM.

  21. Scheduled for public hearing in the Senate Committee on Human Services, Reentry & Rehabilitation at 06:00 PM

  22. Public hearing in the Senate Committee on Human Services, Reentry & Rehabilitation at 6:00 PM.

  23. First reading, referred to Human Services, Reentry & Rehabilitation.

  24. Third reading, passed; yeas, 96; nays, 0; absent, 0; excused, 2.

  25. Rules suspended. Placed on Third Reading.

  26. 1st substitute bill substituted (CYF 22).

  27. Rules Committee relieved of further consideration. Placed on second reading.

  28. Referred to Rules 2 Review.

  29. Scheduled for public hearing in the House Committee on Children, Youth & Families at 10:00 AM

  30. Minority; without recommendation.

  31. CYF - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.

  32. Executive action taken in the House Committee on Children, Youth & Families at 10:00 AM.

  33. Scheduled for public hearing in the House Committee on Children, Youth & Families at 01:30 PM

  34. Public hearing in the House Committee on Children, Youth & Families at 1:30 PM.

  35. First reading, referred to Children, Youth & Families.

  36. Prefiled for introduction.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 18 co-sponsors · 132 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (18)

Not signed on (132)

132 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 132 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 46 Yea · 0 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 18000
Republican 12001
Democrat 16002
Total 46003
% of votes cast 94%0%0%6%
How each member voted (49)
Member Party Vote
Billig — Yea
Brown — Yea
Carlyle — Yea
Das — Yea
Frockt — Yea
Hawkins — Yea
Honeyford — Yea
Keiser — Yea
Kuderer — Yea
Mullet — Yea
Padden — Yea
Randall — Yea
Rivers — Yea
Rolfes — Yea
Sefzik — Yea
Sheldon — Yea
Van De Wege — Yea
Wilson, L. — Yea
Annette Cleveland Democrat Yea
Bob Hasegawa Democrat Yea
Claire Wilson Democrat Yea
Derek Stanford Democrat Yea
Jamie Pedersen Democrat Yea
Jesse Salomon Democrat Yea
Joe Nguyen Democrat Yea
John Lovick Democrat Yea
June Robinson Democrat Not Voting
Lisa Wellman Democrat Yea
Liz Lovelett Democrat Yea
Manka Dhingra Democrat Yea
Marko Liias Democrat Yea
Rebecca Saldaña Democrat Yea
Steve Conway Democrat Not Voting
T'wina Nobles Democrat Yea
Victoria Hunt Democrat Yea
Yasmin Trudeau Democrat Yea
Chris Gildon Republican Yea
Curtis King Republican Yea
Jeff Holy Republican Yea
Jeff Wilson Republican Yea
Jim McCune Republican Not Voting
John Braun Republican Yea
Judy Warnick Republican Yea
Keith Wagoner Republican Yea
Mark Schoesler Republican Yea
Perry Dozier Republican Yea
Phil Fortunato Republican Yea
Ron Muzzall Republican Yea
Shelly Short Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 96 Yea · 0 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 26000
Democrat 48000
Unaffiliated 22002
Total 96002
% of votes cast 98%0%0%2%
How each member voted (98)
Member Party Vote
Chambers — Yea
Chandler — Yea
Chopp — Yea
Cody — Yea
Dolan — Yea
Gilday — Yea
Harris-Talley — Yea
Hoff — Yea
Kirby — Yea
Klippert — Yea
Kraft — Yea
Kretz — Not Voting
Maycumber — Yea
McCaslin — Yea
Mosbrucker — Yea
Robertson — Yea
Sells — Yea
Sullivan — Yea
Sutherland — Not Voting
Vick — Yea
Wicks — Yea
Wilcox — Yea
Young — Yea
Johnson, J. — Yea
Alex Ramel Democrat Yea
Alicia Rule Democrat Yea
Amy Walen Democrat Yea
April Berg Democrat Yea
Bill Ramos Democrat Yea
Brandy Donaghy Democrat Yea
Cindy Ryu Democrat Yea
Dan Bronoske Democrat Yea
Dave Paul Democrat Yea
David Hackney Democrat Yea
Davina Duerr Democrat Yea
Debra Entenman Democrat Yea
Debra Lekanoff Democrat Yea
Drew Hansen Democrat Yea
Gerry Pollet Democrat Yea
Jake Fey Democrat Yea
Jamila Taylor Democrat Yea
Javier Valdez Democrat Yea
Jessica Bateman Democrat Yea
Joe Fitzgibbon Democrat Yea
Larry Springer Democrat Yea
Lauren Davis Democrat Yea
Laurie Jinkins Democrat Yea
Lillian Ortiz-Self Democrat Yea
Lisa Callan Democrat Yea
Liz Berry Democrat Yea
Marcus Riccelli Democrat Yea
Mari Leavitt Democrat Yea
Melanie Morgan Democrat Yea
Mia Gregerson Democrat Yea
Mike Chapman Democrat Yea
Monica Jurado Stonier Democrat Yea
My-Linh Thai Democrat Yea
Nicole Macri Democrat Yea
Noel Frame Democrat Yea
Roger Goodman Democrat Yea
Sharon Shewmake Democrat Yea
Sharon Tomiko Santos Democrat Yea
Sharon Wylie Democrat Yea
Shelley Kloba Democrat Yea
Steve Bergquist Democrat Yea
Steve Tharinger Democrat Yea
Strom Peterson Democrat Yea
Tana Senn Democrat Yea
Tarra Simmons Democrat Yea
Timm Ormsby Democrat Yea
Tina Orwall Democrat Yea
Vandana Slatter Democrat Yea
Alex Ybarra Republican Yea
Andrew Barkis Republican Yea
Carolyn Eslick Republican Yea
Chris Corry Republican Yea
Cyndy Jacobsen Republican Yea
Dan Griffey Republican Yea
Drew MacEwen Republican Yea
Drew Stokesbary Republican Yea
Ed Orcutt Republican Yea
Jenny Graham Republican Yea
Jeremie Dufault Republican Yea
Jim Walsh Republican Yea
Joe Schmick Republican Yea
Joel McEntire Republican Yea
Keith Goehner Republican Yea
Mark Klicker Republican Yea
Mary Dye Republican Yea
Matt Boehnke Republican Yea
Michelle Valdez Republican Yea
Mike Steele Republican Yea
Mike Volz Republican Yea
Paul Harris Republican Yea
Peter Abbarno Republican Yea
Rob Chase Republican Yea
Skyler Rude Republican Yea
Tom Dent Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors HB 1747?
HB 1747 is sponsored by Noel Frame (Democrat), Harris-Talley, Nicole Macri (Democrat), Timm Ormsby (Democrat), Roger Goodman (Democrat), Monica Jurado Stonier (Democrat), Melanie Morgan (Democrat), Joe Fitzgibbon (Democrat), Javier Valdez (Democrat), Wicks, Ramos, Tarra Simmons (Democrat), Dolan, Tina Orwall (Democrat), Cindy Ryu (Democrat), Strom Peterson (Democrat), Lauren Davis (Democrat), Jamila Taylor (Democrat), and Lillian Ortiz-Self (Democrat).
What is the current status of HB 1747?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 04, 2022. Enacted.
Where can I track HB 1747?
Track HB 1747 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HB 1747

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of HB 1747

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →