Washington 2021-2022 Regular Session Status: Passed Senate 5 D cosponsors

SB 5663 — Establishing streamlined procedures for compliance with the State v. Blake decision in order to improve criminal justice system coordination, create efficiencies, and reduce costs.

Last action — Senate Rules "X" file.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed House
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2021-2022 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

440 added · 555 removed

Plain-language change summary

The recent changes to SB 5663 include the removal of a section that discussed refunds for legal financial obligations related to individuals who participated in deferred prosecution or diversion programs. The definition of "convictions for simple drug possession" was adjusted to clarify it encompasses both convictions and juvenile adjudications. These amendments are significant as they refine the bill's focus on drug possession laws and address how past convictions are classified, while also eliminating the provision for financial relief for certain offenders. This could impact how individuals affected by past drug charges seek restitution or financial relief.

→
Previous
Latest
S-3710.4 SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 5663 State of Washington 67th Legislature 2022 Regular Session By Senate Law & Justice (originally sponsored by Senators Dhingra, Hasegawa, Saldaña, Stanford, and C.
S-3208.2 SENATE BILL 5663 State of Washington 67th Legislature 2022 Regular Session By Senators Dhingra, Hasegawa, Saldaña, Stanford, and C.
Wilson) READ FIRST TIME 01/28/22.
Wilson Prefiled 01/05/22.
Read first time 01/10/22.
Referred to Committee on Ways & Means.
1 SSB 5663 exceed 150,000.
1 SB 5663 exceed 150,000.
Additionally, many individuals entered into a deferred prosecution, diversion, or similar program, the successful completion of which resulted in dismissal or nonfiling of an offense that would be constitutionally void under State v.
Blake.
Under due process, these individuals require a refund of legal financial obligations and collection costs.
(1) "Convictions for simple drug possession" includes all convictions or juvenile adjudications since adoption of the uniform controlled substances act of 1971 for possession of any controlled substance, attempted possession of any controlled substance, conspiracy to possess any controlled substance, or solicitation to possess any controlled substance, under the authority of statute, or an ordinance authorized by statute, where the statute or ordinance did not require proof of intentional possession of the controlled substance.
(1) "Convictions for simple drug possession" includes all convictions since adoption of the uniform controlled substances act of 1971 for possession of any controlled substance, attempted possession of any controlled substance, conspiracy to possess any controlled substance, or solicitation to possess any controlled substance, under the authority of statute, or an ordinance authorized by statute, where the statute or ordinance did not require proof of intentional possession of the controlled substance.
(3) "Legal financial obligations and collection costs" means a sum of money that is ordered by court in connection with a conviction for a crime, or assessed as part of a diversion program, deferred sentence, or similar program, and actually paid by the defendant or on the defendant's behalf, which may include restitution to the victim, statutorily imposed crime victims' compensation fees, court p.
(3) "Legal financial obligations and collection costs" means a sum of money that is ordered by court in connection with a conviction for a crime and actually paid by the defendant or on the defendant's behalf, which may include restitution to the victim, statutorily imposed crime victims' compensation fees, court costs, county or interlocal drug funds, court-appointed attorneys' fees, and costs of defense, fines, and any other financial obligation that is assessed to the offender as a result of the conviction.
2 SSB 5663 costs, county or interlocal drug funds, court-appointed attorneys' fees, and costs of defense, fines, and any other financial obligation that is assessed to the offender as a result of the conviction, or assessed as part of a diversion program, deferred sentence, or similar program which resulted in dismissal or nonfiling of a charge.
(4) "Nonconviction" includes all adult and juvenile charges for simple drug possession offenses that were dismissed or not filed following successful completion of a diversion program, deferred sentence, or similar program.
(1) In coordination with the superior court clerk or district court administrator within each county, the administrator of the administrative office of the courts shall develop comprehensive, line-item reports for each court of all persons with existing convictions for simple drug possession since 1971.
(1) In coordination with the superior court clerk or district court p.
The report will be based on available court records and list convictions and nonconvictions chronologically by cause number in a readily searchable and sortable format.
2 SB 5663 administrator within each county, the administrator of the administrative office of the courts shall develop comprehensive, line-item reports for each court of all persons convicted of simple drug possession since 1971.
For each cause number subject to the Blake decision, the report shall include the person's name, birth date, last known address, date of the judgment and sentence or dismissals pursuant to successful completion of a diversion program, a listing of all conviction counts for simple drug possession in the judgment and sentence or order of dismissal pursuant to successful completion of a diversion program, and a listing of all conviction counts for other offenses in the judgment and sentence.
The report will be based on available court records and list convictions chronologically by cause number in a readily searchable and sortable format.
For each cause number that includes a conviction subject to vacation under the Blake decision, the report shall include the person's name, birth date, last known address, date of the judgment and sentence, a listing of all conviction counts for simple drug possession in the judgment and sentence, and a listing of all conviction counts for other offenses in the judgment and sentence.
The superior court clerk or district court administrator shall develop a similar report of all sealed cases of persons with convictions and nonconvictions of simple drug possession since 1971.
The superior court clerk or district court administrator shall develop a similar report of all sealed cases of persons convicted of simple drug possession since 1971.
(b) the person is incarcerated with a qualifying p.
(b) the person is incarcerated with a qualifying conviction in the person's criminal history score;
3 SSB 5663 conviction in the person's criminal history score;
and (d) the person has a past conviction or nonconviction for a qualifying offense.
and (d) the person has a past conviction for a qualifying offense.
Within six months of the effective date of this section, the administrator shall complete the report for persons under (a), (b), or (c) of this subsection.
Within three months of the effective date of this section, the administrator shall complete the report for persons under (a), (b), or (c) of this subsection.
Reports compiled under this section are exempt from public disclosure.
(3) Upon availability, the administrator shall provide completed installments of the report of convictions to the county prosecutor and the superior court clerk or district court administrator.
(3) Upon availability, the administrator shall provide completed installments of the report of convictions and nonconvictions to local public defense offices, the Washington state office of public defense, county prosecutors, and the superior court clerk or district court administrator.
The county prosecutor shall review each cause number on the report to determine whether a person's conviction is properly subject to vacation under the Blake decision.
Local public defense offices shall provide initial review of cause numbers compiled under subsection (2)(a) through (c) of this section to determine whether a person's conviction is subject to vacation under the Blake decision and to provide an initial assessment as to case priority, unless the local jurisdiction requests such review from the Washington state office of public defense.
Following such review, the local office of public defense or the Washington state office of public defense will provide the appropriate local prosecutor with a list of cause numbers compiled under subsection (2)(a) through (c) of this section to be prioritized for Blake relief.
Individuals currently under the jurisdiction of the department of corrections, whose possession vacations would result in a shortened sentence, are to be prioritized for resentencing.
The county prosecutor shall review each cause number on the report compiled under subsection (2)(d) of this section to determine whether a person's conviction or nonconviction data is subject to vacation under the Blake decision.
A conviction or nonconviction record is subject to vacation under the Blake decision if it was a conviction or charge for simple drug possession.
The prosecutor shall also prioritize cause numbers compiled under reports provided by local public defense offices or the Washington state office of public defense.
When the prosecutor determines that a conviction is subject to vacation, the prosecutor shall prepare an ex parte motion on behalf of the state p.
When the prosecutor determines that a conviction or nonconviction data is subject to vacation, the prosecutor shall prepare an ex parte motion on behalf of the state under CrR 7.8 or CrRLJ 7.8 that asks the court to vacate p.
3 SB 5663 under CrR 7.8 or CrRLJ 7.8 that asks the court to vacate the person's prior convictions for simple drug possession.
4 SSB 5663 the person's prior convictions for simple drug possession.
If the prosecutor determines that a conviction or nonconviction data is improperly included on the report due to a clerical error because the actual conviction on the judgment and sentence is not a conviction for simple drug possession, the prosecutor shall file a "Notice of Blake Correction" with the superior court clerk or the district court administrator and send notice to the affected person at the person's last known address.
If the prosecutor determines that a conviction is improperly included on the report because the conviction is not a conviction for simple drug possession, the prosecutor shall file a "Notice of Blake Disposition" that contains a short written explanation with the superior court clerk or the district court administrator and send notice to the affected individual at his or her last known address.
A copy shall also be sent to the local office of public defense or local defense administrator, or where no local office or local administrator exists, notice shall be sent to the Washington state office of public defense.
A copy shall also be sent to the local office of public defense or proper appointing authority, or, where no defense office is listed for the jurisdiction, notice shall be sent to the Washington state office of public defense.
Defense counsel shall be appointed to a person who has been precluded from obtaining a vacation to assist the person in understanding the person's options for challenging the decision, and to assist the person in bringing a good faith challenge to the decision.
Defense counsel shall be appointed to a person who has been precluded from obtaining vacation to assist the person in challenging the decision if the person so elects.
If the person is indigent as defined in RCW 10.101.010, the court or the responsible local public defense authority shall appoint counsel.
For the purposes of this chapter, incarcerated persons are presumed indigent.
Nothing in this section affects the requirements for restoring a right to possess a firearm under RCW 9.41.040.
(5)(a) A court vacating a conviction for simple drug possession shall address whether legal financial obligations must be refunded to the person.
5 SSB 5663 (5)(a) A court vacating a conviction for simple drug possession shall address whether legal financial obligations must be refunded to the person.
4 SB 5663 (i) When the sole crime of conviction under a cause number is simple drug possession, the court shall order a refund of all legal financial obligations and collection costs paid under that cause number.
(i) When the sole crime of conviction under a cause number is simple drug possession, the court shall order a refund of all legal financial obligations and collection costs paid under that cause number.
(ii) Where a cause number includes both convictions for simple drug possession and other offenses not subject to vacation under the Blake decision, the court shall determine whether any nonvacated convictions independently support the court's imposition of legal financial obligations.
Show all 132 changed rows (92 more)
Previous
Latest
Nothing in this act limits the ability of an affected person to challenge the refund amount as insufficient upon actual notice of the refund amount.
When legal financial obligations previously imposed are independently supported by a nonvacated conviction, no refund of legal financial obligations and collection costs may be ordered by the court.
The affected person will have a right to the assistance of counsel in reviewing the determination and in bringing a good faith challenge in the court that issued the order.
(iii) Where a cause number includes both convictions for simple drug possession and other offenses not subject to vacation, but imposition of legal financial obligations for those offenses is discretionary with the court, the court shall set a hearing with notice to the defendant and an opportunity to be heard on whether any nonvacated conviction supports imposition of legal financial obligations.
(ii) Where a cause number includes both convictions for simple drug possession and other offenses not subject to vacation under the Blake decision, legal financial obligations and collection costs paid under that cause number shall not be refunded except where it is clear on the face of the judgment and sentence that a legal financial obligation arose solely from a vacated simple possession conviction.
In the interests of justice, the prosecutor may waive this hearing, and, if so, the court shall order a refund of all legal financial obligations and collection costs paid under that cause number.
Nothing in this act limits the ability of an affected person to challenge the refund amount as insufficient upon actual notice of the refund amount.
The affected person will have a right to the assistance of counsel in reviewing the determination and in bringing a good faith challenge in the court that issued the order.
(iii) Where a cause number includes a nonconviction record, the court shall order a refund of the legal financial obligations assessed to the defendant as part of a diversion program, deferred sentence, or similar program, including drug or other therapeutic court, and actually paid by the defendant or on the defendant's behalf.
The order shall further direct the superior court clerk or district court administrator to compute all legal financial obligations and collection costs paid by the person that arise from the vacated counts or nonconviction record, which amounts shall be certified by the superior court clerk or the district court administrator, to the refund bureau created in section 5 of this act.
The order shall further direct the superior court clerk or district court administrator to compute all legal financial obligations and collection costs paid by the person that arise from the vacated counts, which amounts shall be certified by the superior court clerk or the district court administrator, to the refund bureau created in section 5 of this act.
Following issuance of a refund under a cause p.
Following issuance of a refund under a cause number, the refund bureau shall file notice of the amounts paid with the superior or district court.
6 SSB 5663 number, the refund bureau shall file notice of the amounts paid with the superior or district court.
If the person is indigent as defined in RCW 10.101.010, the court or the responsible local public defense authority shall appoint counsel.
The court shall notify the local office of public defense or proper appointing p.
For the purposes of this chapter, incarcerated persons are presumed indigent.
5 SB 5663 authority, appoint local defense counsel from the list published by the Washington state office of public defense, or, where no defense counsel is listed for the jurisdiction, contact the Washington state office of public defense.
The court shall notify the local office of public defense or local defense administrator, or where no local office or local administrator exists, notice shall be sent to the Washington state office of public defense.
Within nine months of the effective date of this section, the prosecutor shall certify to the administrator of the administrative office of the courts that all such warrants have been submitted to a judicial officer for action quashing the warrant.
Within six months of the effective date of this section, the prosecutor shall certify to the director that all such warrants have been submitted to a judicial officer for action quashing the warrant.
If exceptional circumstances apply, and a prosecutor cannot meet the six-month deadline, the prosecutor shall provide an estimate for a reasonable extension to the administrator of the administrative office of the courts.
If exceptional circumstances apply, and a prosecutor cannot meet the six-month deadline, the prosecutor shall provide an estimate for a reasonable extension to the director.
(8) Within appropriated funds, the administrator of the administrative office of the courts shall contract with each county to ensure sufficient availability of clerks, prosecutors, defenders, judicial officers, and courtroom space.
(8) Within appropriated funds, the director shall contract with each county to ensure sufficient availability of clerks, prosecutors, defenders, judicial officers, and courtroom space to complete all work required by this section within three years of the effective date of this section.
The director of the state office of public defense shall contract with each county to ensure sufficient availability of defenders to complete all work required by this section within five years of the effective date of this section.
The work required by this section is deemed complete when all warrants have been quashed and all cause numbers on the report have been dismissed, vacated, resentenced, or otherwise addressed through a "Notice of Blake Correction." The superior court clerk or district court administrator shall track resolution of all cause numbers on the report.
The work required by this section is deemed complete when all warrants have been quashed and all cause numbers on the report have been dismissed, vacated, resentenced, or otherwise addressed through a "Notice of Blake Disposition." The superior court clerk or district court administrator shall track resolution of all cause numbers on the report.
On a quarterly basis, p.
On a quarterly basis, the superior court clerk and the district court administrator shall report the following to the director:
7 SSB 5663 the superior court clerk and the district court administrator shall report the following to the administrator of the administrative office of the courts:
(c) cases where the prosecutor has filed a "Notice of Blake Correction";
(c) cases where the prosecutor has filed a "Notice of Blake Disposition";
If the person is indigent as defined in RCW 10.101.010, the court or the responsible local public defense authority shall appoint counsel.
The court shall notify the local office of public defense or proper appointing authority, appoint local defense counsel from the list published by the Washington state office of public defense, or, where no defense counsel is listed for the jurisdiction, contact the p.
For the purposes of this chapter, incarcerated persons are presumed indigent.
6 SB 5663 Washington state office of public defense.
The court shall notify the local office of public defense or local defense administrator, or where no local office or local administrator exists, notice shall be sent to the Washington state office of public defense.
A motion for resentencing or vacation under Blake does not constitute a collateral attack as set forth in chapter 10.73 RCW.
A motion for resentencing or vacation under Blake is not subject to the restrictions in chapter 10.73 RCW and does not adversely impact the defendant's ability to bring subsequent collateral attacks on different grounds.
Nothing in this section precludes a person from appealing any order entered under this section.
(1) Within six months of the effective date of this section, each city with a municipal court shall determine whether the Blake decision applies to any municipal convictions for simple drug possession since 1971.
(1) Within three months of the effective date of this section, each city with a municipal court shall determine whether the Blake decision applies to any municipal convictions for simple drug possession since 1971.
If requested by the city, the administrator of the administrative office of the courts shall coordinate with the municipal court administrator to develop a comprehensive report for each city of all persons with existing convictions for simple drug possession since 1971.
If requested by the city, the administrator of the administrative office of the courts shall coordinate with the municipal court administrator to develop a comprehensive report for each city of all persons convicted of simple drug possession.
The report will be based on available court records and list convictions and nonconvictions chronologically by cause number in a readily searchable and sortable format.
The report will be based on available court records and list convictions chronologically by cause number in a readily searchable and sortable format.
For each cause number subject to the Blake decision, the report shall include the person's name, birth date, last known address, date of the judgment and sentence or dismissals pursuant to successful completion of a diversion program, a listing of all conviction counts for simple drug possession in the judgment and sentence or dismissal, and a listing of all counts for other offenses in the judgment and sentence.
For each cause number that includes a conviction subject to vacation under the Blake decision, the report shall include the person's name, birth date, last known address, date of the judgment and sentence, a listing of all conviction counts for simple drug possession in the judgment and sentence, and a listing of all conviction counts for other offenses in the judgment and sentence.
The administrator will p.
The administrator will indicate any period of time where court records are unavailable.
8 SSB 5663 indicate any period of time where court records are unavailable.
The municipal court administrator shall develop a similar report of all sealed cases of persons convicted of simple drug possession since 1971.
and (d) the person has a past conviction or nonconviction for a qualifying offense.
and (d) the person has a past conviction for a qualifying offense.
Within six months of the city's request under subsection (1) of this section, the administrator shall complete the report for persons under (a), (b), or (c) of this subsection.
Within three months of the city's request under subsection (1) of this section, the administrator shall complete the report for persons under (a), (b), or (c) of this subsection.
For persons under (d) of this subsection, the administrator shall complete the report within nine months of the city's request under subsection (1) of this section.
For persons under (d) of this subsection, the administrator shall complete the report within six months of the city's request under subsection (1) of this section.
Reports compiled under this section are exempt from public disclosure.
(3) Upon availability, the administrator shall provide completed installments of the report of convictions to the city prosecutor and the municipal court administrator.
(3) Upon availability, the administrator shall provide completed installments of the report of convictions and nonconvictions to the local public defense offices, the Washington state office of public defense, city prosecutors, and the municipal court administrator.
The city prosecutor shall review each cause number on the report to determine whether a person's convictions for simple drug possession are properly subject to vacation under the Blake decision.
Local public defense offices shall provide initial review of cause numbers compiled under subsection (2)(a) through (c) of this section to determine whether a person's conviction is subject to vacation under the Blake decision and to provide an initial assessment as to case priority, unless the local jurisdiction requests such review from the Washington state office of public defense.
When the city prosecutor p.
Following such review, the local office of public defense or the Washington state office of public defense will provide the appropriate local prosecutor with a list of cause numbers compiled under subsection (2)(a) through (c) of this section to be prioritized for Blake relief.
7 SB 5663 determines that a conviction is subject to vacation, the prosecutor shall prepare an ex parte motion under CrRLJ 7.8 asking the court to vacate the person's prior conviction or convictions for simple drug possession.
Individuals currently under the jurisdiction of the department of corrections, whose possession vacations would result in a shortened sentence, are to be prioritized for resentencing.
The city prosecutor shall review each cause number on the report compiled under subsection (2)(d) of this section to determine whether a person's convictions or nonconviction data is subject to vacation under the Blake decision.
A conviction or nonconviction is subject to vacation under the Blake decision if it was a conviction or charge p.
9 SSB 5663 for simple drug possession.
When a person, or the person's legal representative, informs the prosecutor that the person is facing immigration consequences, such as deportation or bars to obtaining lawful status, the prosecutor shall prioritize the case.
The prosecutor shall also prioritize cause numbers compiled under reports provided by local public defense offices or the Washington state office of public defense.
When the city prosecutor determines that a conviction or nonconviction data is subject to vacation, the prosecutor shall prepare an ex parte motion under CrRLJ 7.8 asking the court to vacate the person's prior conviction or convictions for simple drug possession.
If the prosecutor determines that a conviction or nonconviction data is improperly included on the report due to a clerical error because the actual conviction on the judgment and sentence is not a conviction for simple drug possession, the prosecutor shall file a "Notice of Blake Correction" with the municipal court administrator and send notice to the affected person at the person's last known address.
If the prosecutor determines that a conviction is improperly included on the report, the prosecutor shall file a "Notice of Blake Disposition" that contains a short written explanation with the municipal court administrator.
A copy shall also be sent to the local office of public defense or local defense administrator, or where no local office or local administrator exists, notice shall be sent to the Washington state office of public defense.
Defense counsel shall be appointed to a person who has been precluded from obtaining a vacation to assist the person in understanding the person's options for challenging the decision, and to assist the person in bringing a good faith challenge to the decision.
If the person is indigent as defined in RCW 10.101.010, the court or the responsible local public defense authority shall appoint counsel.
For the purposes of this chapter, incarcerated persons are presumed indigent.
For all purposes, including responding to questions on employment applications, a person whose conviction has been vacated may state p.
For all purposes, including responding to questions on employment applications, a person whose conviction has been vacated may state that the person has never been convicted of that crime.
10 SSB 5663 that the person has never been convicted of that crime.
Nothing in this act limits the ability of an affected person to challenge the refund amount as insufficient upon actual notice of the refund amount.
(ii) Where a cause number includes both convictions for simple drug possession and other offenses not subject to vacation under the Blake decision, the court shall determine whether any nonvacated convictions independently support the court's imposition of legal financial obligations.
The affected person will have a right to the assistance of counsel in reviewing the determination and in bringing a good faith challenge in the court that issued the order.
When legal financial obligations previously imposed are independently supported by a nonvacated conviction, no p.
(ii) Where a cause number includes both convictions for simple drug possession and other offenses not subject to vacation under the Blake decision, legal financial obligations and collection costs paid under that cause number shall not be refunded except where it is clear on the face of the judgment and sentence that a legal financial obligation arises solely from a vacated simple possession conviction.
8 SB 5663 refund of legal financial obligations and collection costs may be ordered by the court.
Nothing in this act limits the ability of an affected person to challenge the refund amount as insufficient upon actual notice of the refund amount.
(iii) Where a cause number includes both convictions for simple drug possession and other offenses not subject to vacation, but imposition of legal financial obligations for those offenses is discretionary with the court, the court shall set a hearing with notice to the defendant and an opportunity to be heard on whether any nonvacated conviction supports imposition of legal financial obligations.
The affected person will have a right to the assistance of counsel in reviewing the determination and in bringing a good faith challenge in the court that issued the order.
In the interests of justice, the prosecutor may waive this hearing, and, if so, the court shall order a refund of all legal financial obligations and collection costs paid under that cause number.
(iii) Where a cause number includes a nonconviction record, the court shall order a refund of the fees assessed to the defendant as part of a diversion program, deferred sentence, or similar program, and actually paid by the defendant or on the defendant's behalf.
The order shall further direct the municipal court administrator to compute all legal financial obligations and collection costs paid by the person that arise from the vacated counts or nonconviction record, which amounts shall be certified by the municipal court administrator, to p.
The order shall further direct the municipal court administrator to compute all legal financial obligations and collection costs paid by the person that arise from the vacated counts, which amounts shall be certified by the municipal court administrator, to the refund bureau created in section 5 of this act.
11 SSB 5663 the refund bureau created in section 5 of this act.
If the person is indigent as defined in RCW 10.101.010, the court or the responsible local public defense authority shall appoint counsel.
The court shall notify the local office of public defense or proper appointing authority, appoint local defense counsel from the list published by the Washington state office of public defense, or, where no defense counsel is listed for the jurisdiction, contact the Washington state office of public defense.
For the purposes of this chapter, incarcerated persons are presumed indigent.
The court shall notify the local office of public defense or local defense administrator, or where no local office or local administrator exists, notice shall be sent to the Washington state office of public defense.
Within nine months of the effective date of this section, the prosecutor shall certify to the administrator of the administrative office of the courts that all such warrants have been submitted to a judicial officer for action quashing the warrant.
Within six months of the effective date of this section, the prosecutor shall certify to the director that all such warrants have been submitted to a judicial p.
If exceptional circumstances apply, and a prosecutor cannot meet the nine-month deadline, the prosecutor shall provide an estimate for a reasonable extension to the administrator of the administrative office of the courts.
9 SB 5663 officer for action quashing the warrant.
(8) Within appropriated funds, the administrator of the administrative office of the courts shall contract with each city to ensure sufficient availability of clerks, prosecutors, defenders, judicial officers, and courtroom space to complete all work required by this section within five years of the effective date of this section.
If exceptional circumstances apply, and a prosecutor cannot meet the six-month deadline, the prosecutor shall provide an estimate for a reasonable extension to the director.
(8) Within appropriated funds, the director shall contract with each city to ensure sufficient availability of clerks, prosecutors, defenders, judicial officers, and courtroom space to complete all work required by this section within three years of the effective date of this section.
The work required by this section is deemed complete when all warrants have been quashed and all cause numbers on the report have been dismissed, vacated, resentenced, or otherwise addressed through a "Notice of Blake Correction." The municipal court administrator shall track resolution of all cause p.
The work required by this section is deemed complete when all warrants have been quashed and all cause numbers on the report have been dismissed, vacated, resentenced, or otherwise addressed through a "Notice of Blake Disposition." The municipal court administrator shall track resolution of all cause numbers on the report.
12 SSB 5663 numbers on the report.
On a quarterly basis, the municipal court administrator shall report the following to the director:
On a quarterly basis, the municipal court administrator shall report the following to the administrator of the administrative office of the courts:
(c) cases where the prosecutor has filed a "Notice of Blake Correction";
(c) cases where the prosecutor has filed a "Notice of Blake Disposition";
If the person is indigent as defined in RCW 10.101.010, the court or the responsible local public defense authority shall appoint counsel.
The court shall notify the local office of public defense or proper appointing authority, appoint local defense counsel from the list published by the Washington state office of public defense, or, where no defense counsel is listed for the jurisdiction, contact the Washington state office of public defense.
For the purposes of this chapter, incarcerated persons are presumed indigent.
The court shall notify the local office of public defense or local defense administrator, or where no local office or local administrator exists, notice shall be sent to the Washington state office of public defense.
A motion for resentencing or vacation under Blake is not subject to the restrictions in chapter 10.73 RCW and does not adversely impact the defendant's ability to bring a subsequent collateral attack on different grounds.
Nothing in this section precludes a person from appealing any order entered under this section.
Prior to establishment of the refund bureau, the superior court clerk, the district court administrator, or the municipal court administrator may initiate payment of legal financial obligations out of funds appropriated by the state for this purpose.
Prior to establishment of the refund bureau, the superior court clerk, the district court administrator, or the municipal court administrator may initiate payment of legal financial obligations out of funds p.
10 SB 5663 appropriated by the state for this purpose.
(2) Within appropriated funds, the refund bureau shall issue refunds of legal financial obligations and collection costs to eligible persons with vacated convictions for simple drug possession in the amounts certified by the superior court clerk, the district p.
(2) Within appropriated funds, the refund bureau shall issue refunds of legal financial obligations and collection costs to eligible persons with vacated convictions for simple drug possession in the amounts certified by the superior court clerk, the district court administrator, or the municipal court administrator pursuant to a court vacation order.
13 SSB 5663 court administrator, or the municipal court administrator pursuant to a court vacation order.
No civil action may be filed against the state, counties, or cities that have requested assistance under section 4 (1) of this act, nor may such an action be filed against any officials, employees, or agents of those entities seeking a refund of legal financial obligations and collection costs, other damages, or any other type of relief in connection with a prior or vacated conviction for simple drug possession.
No civil action may be filed against the state, counties, or cities that have requested assistance under subsection (1) of this section, nor may such an action be filed against any officials, employees, or agents of those entities seeking a refund of legal financial obligations and collection costs, other damages, or any other type of relief in connection with a prior or vacated conviction for simple drug possession.
(5) Any person seeking a refund of legal financial obligations and collection costs arising from a vacated conviction for simple drug possession shall have seven years from the effective date of this section to complete his or her application to the refund bureau.
(5) Any person seeking a refund of legal financial obligations and collection costs arising from a vacated conviction for simple drug possession shall have 10 years from the effective date of this section to complete his or her application to the refund bureau.
Any legal financial obligations and collection costs that have not been claimed within this seven-year period will escheat to the state.
Any legal financial obligations and collection costs that have not been claimed within this 10-year period will escheat to the state.
The refund bureau established in this section will terminate operation seven years and one month after the effective date of this section.
The refund bureau established in this section will terminate operation 10 years and one month after the effective date of this section.
NEW SECTION.
p.
11 SB 5663 NEW SECTION.
(2) A person seeking vacation of a conviction within the time period where court records are unavailable may prove the existence of p.
(2) A person seeking vacation of a conviction within the time period where court records are unavailable may prove the existence of the conviction through a declaration accompanied by copies of a judgment and sentence, or official records reporting the conviction.
14 SSB 5663 the conviction through a declaration accompanied by copies of a judgment and sentence, or official records reporting the conviction.
This act is necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety, or support of the state government and its existing public institutions, and takes effect immediately.
This act is necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or p.
12 SB 5663 safety, or support of the state government and its existing public institutions, and takes effect immediately.
15 SSB 5663
13 SB 5663
View plain text versions (3)

Action History

  1. Senate Rules "X" file.

  2. Placed on second reading by Rules Committee.

  3. Scheduled for public hearing in the Senate Committee on Ways & Means at 10:00 AM

  4. Passed to Rules Committee for second reading.

  5. Minority; without recommendation.

  6. WM - Majority; 2nd substitute bill be substituted, do pass.

  7. Executive action taken in the Senate Committee on Ways & Means at 10:00 AM.

  8. Scheduled for public hearing in the Senate Committee on Ways & Means at 09:00 AM

  9. Public hearing in the Senate Committee on Ways & Means at 9:00 AM.

  10. Referred to Ways & Means.

  11. Scheduled for public hearing in the Senate Committee on Law & Justice at 10:30 AM

  12. And refer to Ways & Means.

  13. LAW - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.

  14. Executive action taken in the Senate Committee on Law & Justice at 10:30 AM.

  15. Scheduled for public hearing in the Senate Committee on Law & Justice at 10:30 AM

  16. Public hearing in the Senate Committee on Law & Justice at 10:30 AM.

  17. Referred to Law & Justice.

  18. Scheduled for public hearing in the Senate Committee on Ways & Means at 04:00 PM

  19. And refer to Law & Justice.

  20. WM - Majority; without recommendation.

  21. Executive action taken in the Senate Committee on Ways & Means at 4:00 PM.

  22. First reading, referred to Ways & Means.

  23. Prefiled for introduction.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 4 co-sponsors · 146 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (4)

Not signed on (146)

146 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 146 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SB 5663?
SB 5663 is sponsored by Claire Wilson (Democrat), Derek Stanford (Democrat), Rebecca Saldaña (Democrat), Bob Hasegawa (Democrat), and Manka Dhingra (Democrat).
What is the current status of SB 5663?
This bill died with 2021-2022 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 5663?
Track SB 5663 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 5663

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 5663

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →