Political Subdivision Labor Regulatory Limitation Act
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 590 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 590.
You're tracking SB 590
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 590 — Political Subdivision Labor Regulatory Limitation Act
Last action — To House Judiciary
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House of Delegates
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has passed the Senate. Introduced January 29, 2024. It now moves to the second chamber.
Next likely step: consideration and a floor vote in the House of Delegates.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Passed Senate
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 1 recorded vote so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
1 added · 65 removedPlain-language change summary
The amendment to SB 590 has removed the references to the "county board of education" from the bill, which currently seeks to limit the ability of local governments to set employee wage levels or work conditions that exceed state or federal standards. This change is significant because it focuses the bill on private employers and excludes any impact on the education sector, potentially easing concerns about how the legislation might affect local schools and their staff. By clarifying this aspect, the amendment aims to streamline the legislative intent and make it clearer for both employers and employees.
WESTSB590 VIRGINIASFA LEGISLATURETrump REGULAR#1 SESSION2-8Smith Engrossed 7883 Senator CommitteeTrump Substitutemoved forto Senateamend Billthe 590bill BYSENATOSWOPEon [Originatingpage in1, section 2, lines 2 and 3, by striking out the Committeecomma onand the Judiciary;words “and county board of education”. AdoptedRejected
reported February 9, 2024] Eng CS for SB 590 A BILL to amend the Code of West Virginia, 1931, as amended, by adding thereto a new article, designated §1-8-1, §1-8-2, §1-8-3, and §1-8-4, all relating to prohibiting political subdivisions from requiring private employers to pay employees a wage higher than that set by applicable state or federal law, establishing a locally based wage or employee benefit rate, or establishing work hours or scheduling requirements;
defining terms;
creating exceptions;
voiding any prior actions of political subdivisions enacted prior to the effective date of this article;
clarifying that the provisions of the article are inapplicable to the employees of a political subdivision;
clarifying that nothing in the article prohibits political subdivisions from enforcing agreements voluntarily entered into by the parties prior to the effective date of this article;
and clarifying that provisions of the article do not limit the ability of the political subdivisions to comply with statutes and policies related to drug and alcohol testing.
Be it enacted by the Legislature of West Virginia:
ARTICLE 8.
LIMITATIONS ON LABOR REGULATIONS BY POLITICAL SUBDIVISIONS.
§1-8-1.
Short title.
This article may be known and cited as the Political Subdivision Labor Regulatory Limitation Act.
§1-8-2.
Definitions.
For purposes of this article:
"Political subdivision" means any county commission, municipality;
any separate corporation or instrumentality established by one or more counties or municipalities, as permitted by law;
any instrumentality supported in most part by municipalities;
any public body charged by law with the performance of a government function and whose jurisdiction is coextensive with one or more counties, cities, or towns;
a combined city-county health department created pursuant to §16-2-1 et seq.
of this code;
public service districts;
and other instrumentalities including, but not limited to, volunteer fire departments and emergency services organizations as recognized by an Eng CS for SB 590 appropriate public body and authorized by law to perform a government function:
Provided, That hospitals of a political subdivision and their employees are excluded from the provisions of this article.
§1-8-3.
Prohibited areas of regulation.
A political subdivision may not adopt, enforce, or administer any ordinance, regulation, local policy, local resolution, or other legal requirement regarding any of the following specific areas:
(1) Requiring a private employer to pay to an employee a wage higher than any applicable state or federal law;
(2) Requiring a private employer to pay to an employee a wage or fringe benefit based on wage and fringe benefit rates prevailing in the locality;
(3) Requiring a private employer to provide to a private employee paid or unpaid leave time;
or (4) Regulating hours and scheduling that an employer is required to provide to employees.
§1-8-4.
Exceptions;
applicability.
(a)The provisions of this article do not prohibit a political subdivision from enforcing a written agreement voluntarily entered into and in effect prior to the effective date of this article.
(b) Any ordinance, regulation, local policy, or other legal requirement enacted or adopted prior to the effective date of this article, including those enacted or adopted pursuant to §8-1-5a of this code, that would be prohibited under §1-8-3 of this code is void upon the effective date of this article.
(c) The provisions of §1-8-3 of this code do not apply to the employees of a political subdivision.
(d) This article does not prohibit or limit a political subdivision from complying with the West Virginia Alcohol and Drug-Free Workplace Act, set forth in §21-1D-1 et seq.
Show all 41 changed lines (1 more)
of this code, or otherwise require similar drug and alcohol policies and testing of a political subdivision’s vendors.
Show all 41 changed rows (1 more)
View plain text versions (4)
- sb590 sfa trump _1 2-8 adopted.htm View text Current html
- Committee Substitute Engrossed Committee Substitute pdf
- Committee Substitute View text pdf
- Introduced Introduced Version pdf
Action History
-
To House Judiciary
-
Introduced in House
-
Ordered to House
-
Passed Senate (Roll No. 119)
-
Read 3rd time
-
On 3rd reading
-
Floor amendment adopted (Voice vote)
-
Read 2nd time
-
On 2nd reading
-
Read 1st time
-
On 1st reading
-
Committee substitute reported
-
To Judiciary
-
Introduced in Senate
-
To Judiciary
-
Filed for introduction
Sponsors
- Swope · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 151 not signed on · 2 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Swope
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (151)
151 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 151 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 15 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 13 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| Democrat | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 28 | 5 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 82% | 15% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (34)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| MARONEY | — | Yea |
| STOVER | — | Not Voting |
| MARTIN | — | Yea |
| STUART | — | Yea |
| BOLEY | — | Yea |
| SWOPE | — | Yea |
| CAPUTO | — | Nay |
| NELSON | — | Yea |
| PHILLIPS | — | Yea |
| PLYMALE | — | Nay |
| TRUMP | — | Yea |
| HAMILTON | — | Nay |
| HUNT | — | Yea |
| JEFFRIES | — | Yea |
| SMITH | — | Yea |
| MR PRESIDENT | — | Yea |
| KARNES | — | Yea |
| Mike Woelfel | Democrat | Nay |
| Amy Grady | Republican | Yea |
| Ben Queen | Republican | Yea |
| Charles H. Clements | Republican | Yea |
| Eric Tarr | Republican | Yea |
| Jack Woodrum | Republican | Yea |
| Jason Barrett | Republican | Yea |
| Jay Taylor | Republican | Yea |
| Laura Wakim Chapman | Republican | Nay |
| Mark R. Maynard | Republican | Yea |
| Mike Azinger | Republican | Yea |
| Mike Oliverio | Republican | Yea |
| Patricia Rucker | Republican | Yea |
| Rollan A. Roberts | Republican | Yea |
| Ryan Weld | Republican | Yea |
| Tom Takubo | Republican | Yea |
| Vince Deeds | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 590?
- SB 590 is sponsored by Swope.
- What is the current status of SB 590?
- This bill has passed the Senate. Introduced January 29, 2024. It now moves to the second chamber.
- Where can I track SB 590?
- Track SB 590 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 590
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 590
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →