Court-appointed counsel; raises the limitation of fees.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when HB 102 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on HB 102.
You're tracking HB 102
We'll email you the moment it moves.
HB 102 — Court-appointed counsel; raises the limitation of fees.
Last action — Acts of Assembly Chapter text (CHAP0714)
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed House of Delegates
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced December 30, 2023. Enacted.
Signed by Governor Glenn Youngkin (Republican) on April 08, 2024.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
33 sponsors
1 primary, 32 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Mixed recorded votes
12 passed, 1 failed in recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
Compensation of court-appointed counsel. Raises the limitation of fees that court-appointed counsel can receive for representation on various offenses in district and circuit courts. The bill also limits the fees charged for the cost of court-appointed counsel or public defender representation to persons determined to be indigent to an amount no greater than the amount such person would have owed if such fees had been assessed on or before June 30, 2024. The bill has a delayed effective date of January 1, 2025. This bill is identical to SB 356.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
156 added · 149 removedPlain-language change summary
The recent amendment to HB 102 increases the compensation rates for court-appointed counsel representing indigent individuals in Virginia. Specifically, the maximum fee for handling a single charge in district court has been raised from $120 to $330, and the limit for violation of probation cases has been set at $180. This change is significant as it acknowledges the essential role of legal representation and ensures that attorneys are fairly compensated for their work, which may lead to better legal services for those who cannot afford a private attorney.
SESSION ENROLLED VIRGINIA ACTS OF ASSEMBLY ––-- 2024 SESSION CHAPTER E714 An Act to amend and reenact § 19.2-163 of the Code of Virginia, relating to compensation of N court-appointed counsel.
R O [H 102] Approved LApril L8, 2024 Be it enacted by the General Assembly of Virginia:
E § 19.2-163.
DUpon submission to the court, for which appointed representation is provided, of a detailed accounting of the time expended for that representation, made within 30 days of the completion of all proceedings in that court, counsel appointed to represent an indigent accused in a criminal case shall be compensated for his services on an hourly basis at a rate set by the Supreme Court of Virginia in a total amount not to exceed the amounts specified in the following schedule this section, or other such amount as may be provided by law.
Such amounts shall be allowed in any case wherein counsel conducts thetheamount defense of a single charge against the indigent accused through to its conclusion or a charge of violation of probation at any hearing conducted under § 19.2-306;
thereafter, compensation for H additional charges against the same accused also conducted by the same counsel shall be allowed1onallowed the1.on the basis of additional time expended as to such additional charges:
In1. a district court, except as provided in subdivisions 2 and 3, (i) a sum not to exceed $120 $330 or (ii) for a charge of violation of probation for any misdemeanor offense, a sum not to exceed $180, provided that, notwithstanding the foregoing limitation, the court in its discretion, and subject to guidelines issued by the Executive Secretary of the Supreme Court of Virginia, may waive the limitation of fees provided under clause (i) or (ii) up to (i) an additional $120 when the effort expended, the time reasonably necessary for the particular representation, the novelty and difficulty of the issues, or other circumstances warrant such a waiver or (ii) an amount up to $650 to defend, in the case of a juvenile, an offense that would be a felony if committed by an adult that may be punishable by confinement in for such offense, when the effort expended, the time reasonably necessary for the particular of probation representation, the novelty and difficulty of the issues, or other circumstances warrant such a waiver;
In a district court, except as provided in subdivisions 2 and 3, (i) a sum not to exceed $120 $330 or (ii) for a charge of violation of probation for any misdemeanor offense, a sum not to exceed $180, provided that, notwithstanding the foregoing limitation, the court in its discretion, and subject to guidelines issued by the Executive Secretary of the Supreme Court of Virginia, may waive the limitation of fees provided under clause (i) or (ii) up to (i) an additional $120 when the effort expended, the time reasonably necessary for the particular representation, the novelty and difficulty of the issues, or other circumstances warrant such a waiver or (ii) an amount up to $650 to defend, in the case of a juvenile, an offense that would be a felony if committed by an adult that may be punishable by confinement in the state correctional facility for a period of more than 20 years, or a charge of violation of probation for such offense, when the effort expended, the time reasonably necessary for the particular representation, the novelty and difficulty of the issues, or other circumstances warrant such a waiver;
For a misdemeanor charge in a district court for a violation of § 18.2-266, 18.2-266.1, 18.2-270, or 46.2-341.24, (i) a sum not to exceed $448 or (ii) for a charge of violation of probation for such a misdemeanor offense, a sum not to exceed $180, provided that, notwithstanding the foregoing limitation, the court in its discretion and subject to guidelines issued by the Executive Secretary of the Supreme Court of Virginia may waive the limitation of fees provided under clause (i) or (ii) up to an additional $120 when the effort expended, the time reasonably necessary for the particular representation, the novelty and difficulty of the issues, or other circumstances warrant such a waiver;
For a juvenile charge in a district court, (i) a sum not to exceed $680 or (ii) for a charge of violation of probation for any offense, a sum not to exceed $180, provided that, notwithstanding the foregoing limitation, the court in its discretion and subject to guidelines issued by the Executive Secretary of the Supreme Court of Virginia may waive the limitation of fees provided under clause (i) or (ii) up to (a) an additional $120 or (b) an additional $650 for an offense that would be a felony if)if or committed by an adult that may be punishable by confinement in the state correctional facility for a period of more than 20 years or a charge of violation of probation for such offense when the effort expended, the time reasonably necessary for the particular representation, the novelty and difficulty of the issues, or other circumstances warrant such a waiver;
(ii) to defend a felony charge that may be punishable by confinement in the state correctional facility for a period of more than 20 years, or a charge of violation of probation for such offense, a sum not to exceed $1,235 any felony violation of § 18.2-35, 18.2-36, 18.2-36.1, 18.2-41, 18.2-51, 18.2-67.3, 18.2-79, 18.2-80, 18.2-370, 18.2-370.1, or 18.2-371.1, a sum not to exceed $1,692, provided that, notwithstanding the foregoing limitation, the court in its discretion, and of 3 subject to guidelines issued by the Executive Secretary of the Supreme Court of Virginia, may waive the limitation of fees up to an additional $850 when the effort expended, the time reasonably necessary for of 3 the particular representation, the novelty and difficulty of the issues, or other circumstances warrant such a waiver;
In the event counsel is appointed to defend an indigent charged with a felony that is punishable as a Class 1 felony, each attorney appointed shall continue to receive compensation as provided in this paragraph for defending such a felony, regardless of whether the charge is reduced or amended to a lesser felony, prior to final disposition of the case.
The circuit or district court shall direct that the foregoing payments shall be paid out by the Commonwealth, if the defendant is charged with a violation of a statute, or by the county, city, or town, of 3 if the defendant is charged with a violation of a county, city, or town ordinance, to the attorney so appointed to defend such person as compensation for such defense.
ECounsel representing a defendant charged with a Class 1 felony may submit to the court, on a monthly basis, a statement of all costs incurred and fees charged by him in the case during that month.
Whenever the total charges as are deemed reasonable by the court for which payment has not previously of 3 been made or requested exceed $1,000, the court may direct that payment be made as otherwise R provided in this section.
O When such directive is entered upon the order book of the court, the Commonwealth, county, cLty,city, or town, as the case may be, shall provide for the payment out of its treasury of the sum of money so defendspecified. him shall be taxed against the defendant as a part of the costs of prosecution and, if collected, the same shall be paid to the Commonwealth, or the county, city, or town, as the case may be.
IEIf the eventdefendant thatis counselconvicted, for the defendantamount requestsallowed aby waiverthe ofcourt to the limitationsattorney onappointed compensation,to thedefend courthim shall assessbe taxed against the defendant anas amounta equalpart toof the pre-waivercosts compensationof limitprosecution specifiedand, inif thiscollected, sectionthe forsame eachshall chargebe forpaid whichto the defendantCommonwealth, wasor convicted.the county, city, or town, as the case may be.
In the event that counsel for the defendant requests a waiver of the limitations on compensation, the court shall assess against the defendant an amount equal to the pre-waiver compensation limit specified in this section for each charge for which the defendant was convicted.
Notwithstanding any provision to the contrary, no person found indigent pursuant to § 19.2-159 shall have fees assessed against him for any amount paid for his legal representation pursuant to this article in an amountdamount greater than the amount such defendant would have owed if the assessment took place on or before June 30, 2024.
Any statement submitted by an attorney for payments due him for indigent representation or fHrfor representation of a child pursuant to § 16.1-266 shall, after the submission of the statement, 1ebe forwarded forthwith by the clerk to the Commonwealth, county, city, or town, as the case may be2be, child's parents or other persons responsible for hispayment. care to be indigent pursuant to § 19.2-159, no feeh shall be taxed by the clerk against any such child in an amount greater than the amount the clerk would have taxed against such child if the assessment took place on or before June 30, 2024.
ForNotwithstanding theany purposesprovision ofto this section, the defensecontrary, ofif athe casecourt mayhas bedetermined consideredsuch conductedchild's throughparents toor itsother conclusionpersons andresponsible an appointed counsel entitled to compensation for his servicescare into thebe event an indigent accusedpursuant fails to appear§ in19.2-159, courtno subjectfee toshall abe capiastaxed forby histhe arrestclerk oragainst aany showsuch causechild summonsin foran hisamount failuregreater tothan appearthe andamount remainsthe aclerk fugitivewould fromhave justicetaxed foragainst onesuch yearchild followingif the issuanceassessment oftook theplace capiason or theEffectivebefore JulyJune 1,30, 2007,2024. the Executive Secretary of the Supreme Court of Virginia shall track and.
reportFor the numberpurposes andof categorythis section, the defense of offensesa chargedcase involvingmay adultbe considered conducted through to its conclusion and juvenilean offendersappointed counsel entitled to compensation for his services in casesthe event an indigent accused fails to appear in whichcourt court-appointedsubject to a capias for his arrest or a show cause summons for his failure to appear and remains a fugitive from justice for one year following the issuance of the capias or the summons to show cause, and appointed counsel ishas assigned.appeared at a hearing on behalf of the accused.
Effective July 1, 2007, the Executive Secretary of the Supreme Court of Virginia shall track and report the number and category of offenses charged involving adult and juvenile offenders in cases in which court-appointed counsel is assigned.
View plain text versions (6)
- CHAP0714 View text Current pdf April 08, 2024
- HB102ER View text pdf March 25, 2024
- Conference Substitute Conference substitute printed 24108971D-H3 pdf March 08, 2024
- Committee Substitute Committee substitute printed 24108419D-S2 pdf February 28, 2024
- Committee Substitute Committee substitute printed 24108049D-S1 pdf February 21, 2024
- Committee Substitute Committee substitute printed 24107554D-H2 pdf February 09, 2024
Action History
-
Acts of Assembly Chapter text (CHAP0714)
-
Approved by Governor-Chapter 714 (effective 1/1/25)
-
Impact statement from DPB (HB102ER)
-
Governor's Action Deadline 11:59 p.m., April 8, 2024
-
Enrolled Bill communicated to Governor on March 27, 2024
-
Signed by Speaker
-
Signed by President
-
Bill text as passed House and Senate (HB102ER)
-
Enrolled
-
Impact statement from DPB (HB102H3)
-
VOTE: Adoption (97-Y 0-N 2-A)
-
Conference report agreed to by House (97-Y 0-N 2-A)
-
Conference report agreed to by Senate (40-Y 0-N)
-
Conference substitute printed 24108971D-H3
-
Amended by conference committee
-
Senators: Perry, Salim, Stanley
-
Conferees appointed by Senate
-
Delegates: Reaser, Maldonado, Kilgore
-
Conferees appointed by House
-
House acceded to request
-
Senate requested conference committee
-
Senate insisted on substitute (40-Y 0-N)
-
VOTE: REJECTED (4-Y 94-N)
-
Senate substitute rejected by House 24108419D-S2 (4-Y 94-N)
-
Impact statement from DPB (HB102S2)
-
Passed Senate with substitute (40-Y 0-N)
-
Engrossed by Senate - committee substitute HB102S2
-
Committee substitute agreed to 24108419D-S2
-
Reading of substitute waived
-
Courts of Justice Committee substitute rejected 24108049D-S1
-
Read third time
-
Constitutional reading dispensed (39-Y 0-N)
-
Committee substitute printed 24108419D-S2
-
Reported from Finance and Appropriations with substitute (15-Y 0-N)
-
Senate subcommittee amendments and substitutes offered
-
Impact statement from DPB (HB102S1)
-
Rereferred to Finance and Appropriations
-
Committee substitute printed 24108049D-S1
-
Reported from Courts of Justice with substitute (10-Y 0-N)
-
Referred to Committee for Courts of Justice
-
Constitutional reading dispensed
-
Impact statement from DPB (HB102H2)
-
VOTE: Block Vote Passage (99-Y 0-N)
-
Read third time and passed House BLOCK VOTE (99-Y 0-N)
-
Engrossed by House - committee substitute HB102H2
-
Committee on Appropriations substitute agreed to 24107554D-H2
-
Committee on Courts of Justice substitute rejected 24106714D-H1
-
Read second time
-
Read first time
-
Committee substitute printed 24107554D-H2
-
Reported from Appropriations with substitute (20-Y 0-N)
-
Subcommittee recommends reporting with substitute (7-Y 0-N)
-
Impact statement from DPB (HB102H1)
-
Assigned App. sub: General Government and Capital Outlay
-
Committee substitute printed 24106714D-H1
-
Referred to Committee on Appropriations
-
Reported from Courts of Justice with substitute (21-Y 0-N)
-
Subcommittee recommends referring to Committee on Appropriations
-
Subcommittee recommends reporting with substitute (8-Y 0-N)
-
House subcommittee amendments and substitutes offered
-
Assigned Courts sub: Criminal
-
Referred to Committee for Courts of Justice
-
Prefiled and ordered printed; offered 01/10/24 24102620D
Sponsors
- Michelle Lopes Maldonado · Cosponsor
- Destiny LeVere Bolling · Cosponsor
- Atoosa R. Reaser · Primary
- Jason S. Ballard · Cosponsor
- Sam Rasoul · Cosponsor
- Patrick A. Hope · Cosponsor
- Bonita G. Anthony · Cosponsor
- Alex Q. Askew · Cosponsor
- Elizabeth B. Bennett-Parker · Cosponsor
- Katrina Callsen · Cosponsor
- Nadarius E. Clark · Cosponsor
- Laura Jane Cohen · Cosponsor
- Joshua G. Cole · Cosponsor
- Rae Cousins · Cosponsor
- Michael B. Feggans · Cosponsor
- Debra D. Gardner · Cosponsor
- Jr. Rozia A. Henson · Cosponsor
- Michael J. Jones · Cosponsor
- Karen Keys-Gamarra · Cosponsor
- Terry G. Kilgore · Cosponsor
- Amy J. Laufer · Cosponsor
- Marty Martinez · Cosponsor
- Adele Y. McClure · Cosponsor
- Marcia S. "Cia" Price · Cosponsor
- Holly M. Seibold · Cosponsor
- Irene Shin · Cosponsor
- Marcus B. Simon · Cosponsor
- Shelly A. Simonds · Cosponsor
- Kannan Srinivasan · Cosponsor
- Joshua E. Thomas · Cosponsor
- Kathy K.L. Tran · Cosponsor
- Vivian E. Watts · Cosponsor
- Rodney T. Willett · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 32 co-sponsors · 115 not signed on · 65 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Atoosa R. Reaser Voted No
Co-sponsors (32)
- Michelle Lopes Maldonado
- Destiny LeVere Bolling
- Jason S. Ballard Voted No
- Sam Rasoul Voted No
- Patrick A. Hope Voted No
- Bonita G. Anthony Voted No
- Alex Q. Askew Voted No
- Elizabeth B. Bennett-Parker
- Katrina Callsen Voted No
- Nadarius E. Clark Voted No
- Laura Jane Cohen Voted No
- Joshua G. Cole Voted No
- Rae Cousins Voted No
- Michael B. Feggans Voted No
- Debra D. Gardner Voted No
- Rozia A. Henson, Jr. Voted No
- Michael J. Jones
- Karen Keys-Gamarra Voted No
- Terry G. Kilgore Voted No
- Amy J. Laufer Voted No
- Marty Martinez Voted No
- Adele Y. McClure Voted No
- Marcia S. "Cia" Price Voted No
- Holly M. Seibold Voted No
- Irene Shin Voted No
- Marcus B. Simon Voted No
- Shelly A. Simonds Voted No
- Kannan Srinivasan Voted No
- Joshua E. Thomas
- Kathy K.L. Tran Voted No
- Vivian E. Watts Voted No
- Rodney T. Willett Voted No
Not signed on (115)
115 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 115 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 96 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Total | 96 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 97% | 0% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (99)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Aaron R. Rouse | — | Yea |
| Angelia Williams Graves | — | Yea |
| Barbara A. Favola | — | Yea |
| Bill DeSteph | — | Yea |
| Bryce E. Reeves | — | Yea |
| Carroll Foy, Jennifer D. | — | Yea |
| Christie New Craig | — | Yea |
| Christopher T. Head | — | Yea |
| Danica A. Roem | — | Yea |
| David R. Suetterlein | — | Yea |
| David W. Marsden | — | Yea |
| Ebbin, Adam P. | — | Yea |
| Emily M. Jordan | — | Yea |
| Glen H. Sturtevant, Jr. | — | Yea |
| Hashmi, Ghazala F. | — | Yea |
| J.D. "Danny" Diggs | — | Yea |
| Jennifer B. Boysko | — | Yea |
| Jeremy S. McPike | — | Yea |
| L. Louise Lucas | — | Yea |
| Lamont Bagby | — | Yea |
| Lashrecse D. Aird | — | Yea |
| Mamie E. Locke | — | Yea |
| Mark D. Obenshain | — | Yea |
| Mark J. Peake | — | Yea |
| McGuire, John J., III | — | Yea |
| R. Creigh Deeds | — | Yea |
| Richard H. Stuart | — | Yea |
| Russet Perry | — | Yea |
| Ryan T. McDougle | — | Yea |
| Saddam Azlan Salim | — | Yea |
| Schuyler T. VanValkenburg | — | Yea |
| Scott A. Surovell | — | Yea |
| Stella G. Pekarsky | — | Yea |
| Subramanyam, Suhas | — | Yea |
| T. Travis Hackworth | — | Yea |
| Tammy Brankley Mulchi | — | Yea |
| Tara A. Durant | — | Yea |
| Timmy French | — | Yea |
| Todd E. Pillion | — | Yea |
| William M. Stanley, Jr. | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Aaron R. Rouse | — | Yea |
| Angelia Williams Graves | — | Yea |
| Barbara A. Favola | — | Yea |
| Bill DeSteph | — | Yea |
| Bryce E. Reeves | — | Yea |
| Carroll Foy, Jennifer D. | — | Yea |
| Christie New Craig | — | Yea |
| Christopher T. Head | — | Yea |
| Danica A. Roem | — | Yea |
| David R. Suetterlein | — | Yea |
| David W. Marsden | — | Yea |
| Ebbin, Adam P. | — | Yea |
| Emily M. Jordan | — | Yea |
| Glen H. Sturtevant, Jr. | — | Yea |
| Hashmi, Ghazala F. | — | Yea |
| J.D. "Danny" Diggs | — | Yea |
| Jennifer B. Boysko | — | Yea |
| Jeremy S. McPike | — | Yea |
| L. Louise Lucas | — | Yea |
| Lamont Bagby | — | Yea |
| Lashrecse D. Aird | — | Yea |
| Mamie E. Locke | — | Yea |
| Mark D. Obenshain | — | Yea |
| Mark J. Peake | — | Yea |
| McGuire, John J., III | — | Yea |
| R. Creigh Deeds | — | Yea |
| Richard H. Stuart | — | Yea |
| Russet Perry | — | Yea |
| Ryan T. McDougle | — | Yea |
| Saddam Azlan Salim | — | Yea |
| Schuyler T. VanValkenburg | — | Yea |
| Scott A. Surovell | — | Yea |
| Stella G. Pekarsky | — | Yea |
| Subramanyam, Suhas | — | Yea |
| T. Travis Hackworth | — | Yea |
| Tammy Brankley Mulchi | — | Yea |
| Tara A. Durant | — | Yea |
| Timmy French | — | Yea |
| Todd E. Pillion | — | Yea |
| William M. Stanley, Jr. | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 93 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 4 | 93 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 4% | 94% | 0% | 2% |
How each member voted (99)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Aaron R. Rouse | — | Yea |
| Angelia Williams Graves | — | Yea |
| Barbara A. Favola | — | Yea |
| Bill DeSteph | — | Yea |
| Bryce E. Reeves | — | Yea |
| Carroll Foy, Jennifer D. | — | Yea |
| Christie New Craig | — | Yea |
| Christopher T. Head | — | Yea |
| Danica A. Roem | — | Yea |
| David R. Suetterlein | — | Yea |
| David W. Marsden | — | Yea |
| Ebbin, Adam P. | — | Yea |
| Emily M. Jordan | — | Yea |
| Glen H. Sturtevant, Jr. | — | Yea |
| Hashmi, Ghazala F. | — | Yea |
| J.D. "Danny" Diggs | — | Yea |
| Jennifer B. Boysko | — | Yea |
| Jeremy S. McPike | — | Yea |
| L. Louise Lucas | — | Yea |
| Lamont Bagby | — | Yea |
| Lashrecse D. Aird | — | Yea |
| Mamie E. Locke | — | Yea |
| Mark D. Obenshain | — | Yea |
| Mark J. Peake | — | Yea |
| McGuire, John J., III | — | Yea |
| R. Creigh Deeds | — | Yea |
| Richard H. Stuart | — | Yea |
| Russet Perry | — | Yea |
| Ryan T. McDougle | — | Yea |
| Saddam Azlan Salim | — | Yea |
| Schuyler T. VanValkenburg | — | Yea |
| Scott A. Surovell | — | Yea |
| Stella G. Pekarsky | — | Yea |
| Subramanyam, Suhas | — | Yea |
| T. Travis Hackworth | — | Yea |
| Tammy Brankley Mulchi | — | Yea |
| Tara A. Durant | — | Yea |
| Timmy French | — | Yea |
| Todd E. Pillion | — | Yea |
| William M. Stanley, Jr. | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 39 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 39 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 98% | 0% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Aaron R. Rouse | — | Yea |
| Angelia Williams Graves | — | Not Voting |
| Barbara A. Favola | — | Yea |
| Bill DeSteph | — | Yea |
| Bryce E. Reeves | — | Yea |
| Carroll Foy, Jennifer D. | — | Yea |
| Christie New Craig | — | Yea |
| Christopher T. Head | — | Yea |
| Danica A. Roem | — | Yea |
| David R. Suetterlein | — | Yea |
| David W. Marsden | — | Yea |
| Ebbin, Adam P. | — | Yea |
| Emily M. Jordan | — | Yea |
| Glen H. Sturtevant, Jr. | — | Yea |
| Hashmi, Ghazala F. | — | Yea |
| J.D. "Danny" Diggs | — | Yea |
| Jennifer B. Boysko | — | Yea |
| Jeremy S. McPike | — | Yea |
| L. Louise Lucas | — | Yea |
| Lamont Bagby | — | Yea |
| Lashrecse D. Aird | — | Yea |
| Mamie E. Locke | — | Yea |
| Mark D. Obenshain | — | Yea |
| Mark J. Peake | — | Yea |
| McGuire, John J., III | — | Yea |
| R. Creigh Deeds | — | Yea |
| Richard H. Stuart | — | Yea |
| Russet Perry | — | Yea |
| Ryan T. McDougle | — | Yea |
| Saddam Azlan Salim | — | Yea |
| Schuyler T. VanValkenburg | — | Yea |
| Scott A. Surovell | — | Yea |
| Stella G. Pekarsky | — | Yea |
| Subramanyam, Suhas | — | Yea |
| T. Travis Hackworth | — | Yea |
| Tammy Brankley Mulchi | — | Yea |
| Tara A. Durant | — | Yea |
| Timmy French | — | Yea |
| Todd E. Pillion | — | Yea |
| William M. Stanley, Jr. | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (15)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Barbara A. Favola | — | Yea |
| Bryce E. Reeves | — | Yea |
| David W. Marsden | — | Yea |
| Ebbin, Adam P. | — | Yea |
| Hashmi, Ghazala F. | — | Yea |
| Jennifer B. Boysko | — | Yea |
| Jeremy S. McPike | — | Yea |
| L. Louise Lucas | — | Yea |
| Mamie E. Locke | — | Yea |
| Mark D. Obenshain | — | Yea |
| R. Creigh Deeds | — | Yea |
| Richard H. Stuart | — | Yea |
| Ryan T. McDougle | — | Yea |
| Scott A. Surovell | — | Yea |
| Todd E. Pillion | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 10 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Total | 10 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| % of votes cast | 67% | 0% | 0% | 33% |
How each member voted (15)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Carroll Foy, Jennifer D. | — | Yea |
| Emily M. Jordan | — | Not Voting |
| Jennifer B. Boysko | — | Yea |
| Lamont Bagby | — | Yea |
| Lashrecse D. Aird | — | Yea |
| Mark D. Obenshain | — | Not Voting |
| Mark J. Peake | — | Not Voting |
| R. Creigh Deeds | — | Yea |
| Richard H. Stuart | — | Not Voting |
| Russet Perry | — | Yea |
| Ryan T. McDougle | — | Not Voting |
| Saddam Azlan Salim | — | Yea |
| Scott A. Surovell | — | Yea |
| Subramanyam, Suhas | — | Yea |
| William M. Stanley, Jr. | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 98 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 98 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 99% | 0% | 0% | 1% |
How each member voted (99)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 20 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 20 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 91% | 0% | 0% | 9% |
How each member voted (22)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Alex Q. Askew | — | Yea |
| Betsy B. Carr | — | Yea |
| Bill Wiley | — | Yea |
| Briana D. Sewell | — | Yea |
| Bulova, David L. | — | Yea |
| C.E. Cliff Hayes, Jr. | — | Yea |
| Coyner, Carrie E. | — | Yea |
| David A. Reid | — | Yea |
| Delores L. McQuinn | — | Not Voting |
| Ellen H. McLaughlin | — | Not Voting |
| James W. Morefield | — | Yea |
| Knight, Barry D. | — | Yea |
| Luke E. Torian | — | Yea |
| M. Keith Hodges | — | Yea |
| Marshall, Daniel W., III | — | Yea |
| Paul E. Krizek | — | Yea |
| Robert S. Bloxom, Jr. | — | Yea |
| Rodney T. Willett | — | Yea |
| Sam Rasoul | — | Yea |
| Scott A. Wyatt | — | Yea |
| Sickles, Mark D. | — | Yea |
| Terry L. Austin | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 78% | 0% | 0% | 22% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Briana D. Sewell | — | Yea |
| C.E. Cliff Hayes, Jr. | — | Yea |
| David A. Reid | — | Yea |
| Delores L. McQuinn | — | Not Voting |
| James W. Morefield | — | Yea |
| Knight, Barry D. | — | Yea |
| Luke E. Torian | — | Not Voting |
| Robert S. Bloxom, Jr. | — | Yea |
| Sam Rasoul | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 21 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 21 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 95% | 0% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (22)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Arnold, Jonathan, E. P. | — | Yea |
| Atoosa R. Reaser | — | Yea |
| Batten, Amanda E. | — | Yea |
| Cordoza, A.C. | — | Yea |
| Earley, Mark L., Jr. | — | Yea |
| James A. "Jay" Leftwich | — | Not Voting |
| Jason S. Ballard | — | Yea |
| Joshua E. Thomas | — | Yea |
| Karen Keys-Gamarra | — | Yea |
| Karrie K. Delaney | — | Yea |
| Katrina Callsen | — | Yea |
| Maldonado, Michelle Lopes | — | Yea |
| Marcus B. Simon | — | Yea |
| Obenshain, Chris | — | Yea |
| Patrick A. Hope | — | Yea |
| Phil M. Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Rae Cousins | — | Yea |
| Richard C. "Rip" Sullivan, Jr. | — | Yea |
| Terry G. Kilgore | — | Yea |
| Vivian E. Watts | — | Yea |
| Will Davis | — | Yea |
| Wren M. Williams | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 89% | 0% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Batten, Amanda E. | — | Yea |
| Cordoza, A.C. | — | Yea |
| Karrie K. Delaney | — | Yea |
| Katrina Callsen | — | Yea |
| Patrick A. Hope | — | Not Voting |
| Phil M. Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Rae Cousins | — | Yea |
| Vivian E. Watts | — | Yea |
| Wren M. Williams | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does HB 102 do?
- Compensation of court-appointed counsel. Raises the limitation of fees that court-appointed counsel can receive for representation on various offenses in district and circuit courts. The bill also limits the fees charged for the cost of court-appointed counsel or public defender representation to persons determined to be indigent to an amount no greater than the amount such person would have owed if such fees had been assessed on or before June 30, 2024. The bill has a delayed effective date of January 1, 2025. This bill is identical to SB 356.
- Who sponsors HB 102?
- HB 102 is sponsored by Michelle Lopes Maldonado, Destiny LeVere Bolling, Atoosa R. Reaser, Jason S. Ballard, Sam Rasoul, Patrick A. Hope, Bonita G. Anthony, Alex Q. Askew, Elizabeth B. Bennett-Parker, Katrina Callsen, Nadarius E. Clark, Laura Jane Cohen, Joshua G. Cole, Rae Cousins, Michael B. Feggans, Debra D. Gardner, Rozia A. Henson, Jr., Michael J. Jones, Karen Keys-Gamarra, Terry G. Kilgore, Amy J. Laufer, Marty Martinez, Adele Y. McClure, Marcia S. "Cia" Price, Holly M. Seibold, Irene Shin, Marcus B. Simon, Shelly A. Simonds, Kannan Srinivasan, Joshua E. Thomas, Kathy K.L. Tran, Vivian E. Watts, and Rodney T. Willett.
- What is the current status of HB 102?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced December 30, 2023. Enacted.
- Where can I track HB 102?
- Track HB 102 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 102
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 102
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →