SJ 276 — Interstate 95 Corridor Improvement Plan; Commonwealth Transportation Board to study.
Last action — Referred to Committee on Rules
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House of Delegates
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2019 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Requests the Commonwealth Transportation Board to study the portion of the Interstate 95 corridor between Exit 118 and the Springfield Interchange and financing options for improvements to the corridor.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
173 added · 7 removedPlain-language change summary
The recent amendments to Bill SJ 276 included adding a section for "Bill Tracking - 2019 session" to help users navigate legislative progress and information. Additionally, some technical error message lines were removed to improve clarity and user experience. These changes are important because they streamline access to legislative information, making it easier for the public to track bills and understand their progress.
Bill Tracking - 2019 session > Legislation Virginia General AssemblyLIS HomeLIS HelpPrivacy StatementLive Help LIS Sorry,ClassicLoginSEARCH yourSITE queryQUICK couldLINKS not- be- completed.- - - - - - - - - - - - Log in LIS Home General Assembly Home - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Session Tracking:
PleaseBills reload/refresh& thisResolutions pageMembers toCommittees retryMeetings yourCalendars lastCommunications request.House Minutes Senate Minutes Statistics Lobbyist-in-a-Box Personal lists - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Search:
IfCode thisof conditionVirginia persists,Administrative pleaseCode emailBills us,& withResolutions theSummaries errorOTHER codesSESSIONS listed below,- so- that- we- may- fix- - - - - - - - - Session Session Special Session I Session Special Session I Special Session II Session Special Session I Session Special Session I Session Special Session I Special Session II Session Session Session Special Session I Session Special Session I Session Special Session I Session Special Session I Session Special Session I Session Session Special Session I Session Special Session I Special Session II Session Session Special Session I Session Session Special Session I Special Session II Session Session Session Special Session I Session Session Session Special Session I Session Session Session Session Special Session I Special Session II VIRGINIA LAW PORTALCode of VirginiaVirginia Administrative Code Constitution of VirginiaChartersAuthoritiesCompacts Uncodified ActsRIS Users (account required) SEARCHABLE DATABASESBills & Resolutionssession legislationBill Summariessession summaries Reports to the problem.General AssemblyHouse and Senate documents Legislative LiaisonsState agency contactsACROSS SESSIONS Subject Index:
IfSince you1995Bills feel& youResolutions: need more immediate attention, please call our help desk at (804) 786-9631.
74.220.50.216Since 1994Summaries:
Since 1994 Developed and maintained by the Division of Legislative Automated Systems.
SESSION history | hilite | pdf | print version 19102700D SENATE JOINT RESOLUTION NO.
276 Senate Amendments in [ ] -- February 5, 2019 Requesting the Commonwealth Transportation Board to study the portion of the Interstate 95 corridor between Exit 118 and the Springfield Interchange and financing options for improvements to the corridor.
Report.
---------- Patrons Prior to Engrossment--Senator Reeves;
Delegate:
Cole ---------- Referred to Committee on Rules ---------- WHEREAS, an adequate, efficient, and safe Interstate 95 corridor is important to the economic well-being of the communities located along the corridor;
and WHEREAS, a 2017 nationwide study conducted by INRIX Research ranked the nation's worst single traffic hotspot as Interstate 95 southbound at Exit 133A in Fredericksburg, with 1,394 traffic jams over the two-month study period, with an average duration of 33 minutes.
This hotspot is projected to cost drivers $2.3 billion from 2017 through 2026 in time lost, fuel wasted, and carbon emitted;
and WHEREAS, the portion of Interstate 95 northbound between Massaponax and State Route 610 in North Stafford was ranked as the seventh worst traffic hotspot in the nation, with 936 traffic jams over the two-month study period, with an average duration of 33 minutes.
This hotspot is projected to cost drivers $1.1 billion from 2017 through 2026 in time lost, fuel wasted, and carbon emitted;
and WHEREAS, the existing transportation infrastructure in this corridor is inadequate and must be updated to meet the needs of the growing population along this corridor;
and WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments reported that the Interstate 95 corridor in Fairfax and Prince William Counties contained 566,000 residents and 187,000 jobs in 2010 and forecasts that 126,000 residents and 85,000 jobs will be added by 2030;
and WHEREAS, continued congestion in this corridor threatens the prosperity and economic development of the entire region and creates economic hardship for the residents;
now, therefore, be it RESOLVED by the [ House of Delegates, the Senate Senate, the House of Delegates ] concurring, That the Commonwealth Transportation Board be requested to study the portion of the Interstate 95 corridor between Exit and the Springfield Interchange and financing options for improvements to the corridor.
In conducting its study, the Commonwealth Transportation Board (the Board) shall develop and adopt an Interstate 95 Corridor Improvement Plan (Plan).
The Plan shall include the examination of potential improvements to the portion of Interstate 95 between Exit 118 and the Springfield Interchange and the methods of financing such improvements.
At a minimum, in the development of the Plan, the Board shall:
1.
Designate specific segments of the Interstate 95 corridor between Exit 118 and the Springfield Interchange for improvement;
2.
Identify a targeted set of improvements for each segment that may be financed or funded in such segment and evaluated using the statewide prioritization process pursuant to § 33.2-214.1 of the Code of Virginia;
3.
Ensure that, in the overall plan of expenditure and distribution of any toll revenues or other evaluated financing means, each segment's total long-term benefit shall be approximately equal to the proportion of the toll revenues attributable to and other funds allocated to such segment divided by the total toll revenues and other revenues allocated to the Plan;
4.
Study truck travel patterns along the Interstate 95 corridor and analyze policies that minimize the impact of the Plan on local truck traffic;
5.
Identify incident management strategies corridor-wide;
6.
Ensure that any revenues collected on the Interstate 95 corridor be used only for the benefit of that corridor;
and 7.
Determine potential solutions to address region-specific needs along this Interstate 95 corridor.
Technical assistance shall be provided to the Board by the Department of Transportation, the Department of Motor Vehicles, and the Department of State Police.
All agencies of the Commonwealth shall provide assistance to the Board for this study, upon request.
The Board shall complete its meetings by November 30, 2019, and shall submit to the Governor and the General Assembly an executive summary and a report of its findings and recommendations for publication as a House or Senate document.
Show all 41 changed lines (1 more)
The executive summary and report shall be submitted as provided in the procedures of the Division of Legislative Automated Systems for the processing of legislative documents and reports no later than the first day of the 2020 Regular Session of the General Assembly and shall be posted on the General Assembly's website.
Show all 41 changed rows (1 more)
View plain text versions (2)
- Engrossed Senate: Printed as engrossed 19102700D-E Current html February 05, 2019
- Prefiled Senate: Prefiled and ordered printed; offered 01/09/19 19102700D html January 05, 2019
Action History
-
Referred to Committee on Rules
-
Placed on Calendar
-
Agreed to by Senate by voice vote
-
Printed as engrossed 19102700D-E
-
Engrossed by Senate as amended SJ276E
-
Committee amendment agreed to
-
Reading of amendment waived
-
Read second time
-
Reported from Rules with amendment by voice vote
-
Referred to Committee on Rules
-
Prefiled and ordered printed; offered 01/09/19 19102700D
Sponsors
- Bryce E. Reeves · Primary
- Mark L. Cole · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 146 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
Co-sponsors (1)
Not signed on (146)
146 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 146 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Barker | — | Yea |
| Black | — | Yea |
| Carrico | — | Yea |
| Cosgrove | — | Yea |
| Dance | — | Yea |
| Dunnavant | — | Yea |
| Lewis | — | Yea |
| Norment | — | Yea |
| Petersen | — | Yea |
| Saslaw | — | Yea |
| Chafin | — | Yea |
| Chase | — | Yea |
| Howell | — | Yea |
| Mason | — | Yea |
| McClellan | — | Yea |
| Spruill | — | Yea |
| Edwards | — | Yea |
| Hanger | — | Yea |
| Newman | — | Yea |
| Ruff | — | Yea |
| Vogel | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Adam P. Ebbin | — | Yea |
| Barbara A. Favola | — | Yea |
| Bill DeSteph | — | Yea |
| Bryce E. Reeves | — | Yea |
| David R. Suetterlein | — | Yea |
| David W. Marsden | — | Yea |
| Glen H. Sturtevant, Jr. | — | Yea |
| Jennifer B. Boysko | — | Yea |
| Jeremy S. McPike | — | Yea |
| L. Louise Lucas | — | Yea |
| Mamie E. Locke | — | Yea |
| Mark D. Obenshain | — | Yea |
| Mark J. Peake | — | Yea |
| R. Creigh Deeds | — | Yea |
| Richard H. Stuart | — | Yea |
| Ryan T. McDougle | — | Yea |
| Scott A. Surovell | — | Yea |
| William M. Stanley, Jr. | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Barker | — | Yea |
| Chase | — | Yea |
| Dance | — | Yea |
| Lewis | — | Yea |
| Norment | — | Yea |
| Petersen | — | Yea |
| Black | — | Yea |
| Carrico | — | Yea |
| Chafin | — | Yea |
| Cosgrove | — | Yea |
| Dunnavant | — | Yea |
| Howell | — | Yea |
| Mason | — | Yea |
| McClellan | — | Yea |
| Spruill | — | Yea |
| Edwards | — | Yea |
| Hanger | — | Yea |
| Newman | — | Yea |
| Ruff | — | Yea |
| Saslaw | — | Yea |
| Vogel | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Adam P. Ebbin | — | Yea |
| Barbara A. Favola | — | Yea |
| Bill DeSteph | — | Yea |
| Bryce E. Reeves | — | Yea |
| David R. Suetterlein | — | Yea |
| David W. Marsden | — | Yea |
| Glen H. Sturtevant, Jr. | — | Yea |
| Jennifer B. Boysko | — | Yea |
| Jeremy S. McPike | — | Yea |
| L. Louise Lucas | — | Yea |
| Mamie E. Locke | — | Yea |
| Mark D. Obenshain | — | Yea |
| Mark J. Peake | — | Yea |
| R. Creigh Deeds | — | Yea |
| Richard H. Stuart | — | Yea |
| Ryan T. McDougle | — | Yea |
| Scott A. Surovell | — | Yea |
| William M. Stanley, Jr. | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SJ 276 do?
- Requests the Commonwealth Transportation Board to study the portion of the Interstate 95 corridor between Exit 118 and the Springfield Interchange and financing options for improvements to the corridor.
- Who sponsors SJ 276?
- SJ 276 is sponsored by Bryce E. Reeves and Cole, Mark L..
- What is the current status of SJ 276?
- This bill died with 2019 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SJ 276?
- Track SJ 276 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SJ 276
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SJ 276
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →