HR 9262 — Local Control Protection Act
Last action — Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill is in committee in the House. Introduced June 11, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Next likely step: a committee vote, then a floor vote in the House.
Odds of enactment
Low chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a low chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
In Committee
Current position in the legislative process.
-
2 sponsors
1 primary, 1 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (2 R).
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
In plain language
The bill addresses local governance issues regarding control and decision-making.
This bill seeks to protect local control in governance, emphasizing the importance of local decision-making. It is aimed at ensuring that local authorities have the authority to manage their own affairs without undue interference.
Bill Text
- Introduced Introduced in House Current html June 11, 2026
Compared against current U.S. Code AI-generated reading aid — verify against the official bill.
The bill introduces new regulations affecting local governance and tax incentives for data centers while defining a covered data center.
-
42 U.S.C. 17112
the term "covered data center" means-- (1) a data center (as defined in section 453(a) of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (42 U.S.C. 17112(a))) with a power demand of 20 megawatts or more; or (2) any group of facilities-- (A) under common ownership or control; (B) the majority of which primarily contain electronic equipment used to process, store, and transmit digital information; (C) located on a contiguous or proximate site within the same municipality or county; and (D) that, in the aggregate, have a power demand of 20 or more megawatts.
Defines a new category of 'covered data center' based on power demand and group characteristics.
-
Internal Revenue Code
No credit against the tax imposed by this chapter for any taxable year shall be allowed under this part to a taxpayer developing a covered data center... that includes terms related to local tax liabilities, infrastructure mitigation measures addressing road, water, stormwater, and utility impacts, environmental and noise monitoring protocols, and that is accompanied by a Local Workforce Utilization Plan...
Establishes requirements for community benefit agreements as a condition for receiving federal tax incentives for data centers.
-
Internal Revenue Code
The Local Workforce Utilization Plan shall be publicly filed as part of the agreement required under this subsection and shall be updated annually for the duration of the construction period.
Mandates annual updates and public filing of Local Workforce Utilization Plans associated with community benefit agreements.
-
A court of the United States shall not have jurisdiction to hear any challenge to the determination of a unit of local government to preclude the development of a covered data center...
Protects local government zoning decisions from federal court challenges regarding covered data centers.
-
No Federal agency may approve permits related to the construction or operation of a covered data center if the owner, operator, or developer of such covered data center has initiated or is maintaining a legal action... seeking to challenge, overturn, or otherwise override a zoning denial...
Prohibits federal agencies from approving permits for covered data centers involved in legal disputes over zoning denials.
Action History
-
Introduced in House
-
Introduced in House
-
Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
-
Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Sponsors
- Robert P. Bresnahan · Primary
- Thomas H. Kean · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 545 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Bresnahan, Robert P. Republican
Co-sponsors (1)
- Kean, Thomas H. Republican
Not signed on (545)
545 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 545 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HR 9262?
- HR 9262 is sponsored by Bresnahan, Robert P. (Republican) and Kean, Thomas H. (Republican).
- What is the current status of HR 9262?
- This bill is in committee in the House. Introduced June 11, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
- Where can I track HR 9262?
- Track HR 9262 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HR 9262
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HR 9262
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →