HB 920 — State-Funded Kinship Guardianship Assistance program; created.
Last action — Left in Appropriations
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed House of Delegates
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2020 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
State-Funded Kinship Guardianship Assistanceprogram. Creates the State-Funded Kinship Guardianship Assistanceprogram (the program) to facilitate child placements with relatives,including fictive kin, and ensure permanency for children in fostercare. The bill sets forth eligibility criteria for the program, paymentallowances to kinship guardians, and requirements for kinship guardianshipassistance agreements. The bill also expands eligibility for theFederal-Funded Kinship Guardianship Assistance program by allowingpayments to be made to fictive kin who receive custody of a childof whom they have been the foster parent.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
516 added · 265 removedPlain-language change summary
The amendment to HB 920 introduces a new requirement for permanency planning hearings for children in foster care, ensuring that these hearings occur within 10 months of the initial court hearing if certain conditions are met. This change is significant because it aims to provide a more timely decision-making process for children in foster care, which can lead to greater stability and permanency in their lives. In contrast, the previous version of the bill was more focused on medical decision-making for minors and did not include provisions specifically addressing the timelines for foster care hearings. This shift highlights a renewed emphasis on the well-being of children in the foster care system.
Code of Virginia Administrative Code Bills & Resolutions Summaries OTHER SESSIONS - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Session Session Special Session I Session Special Session I Session Special Session I Special Session II Session Session Session Special Session I Session Special Session I Session Special Session I Session Special Session I Session Special Session I Session Session Special Session I Session Special Session I Special Session II Session Session Special Session I Session Session Special Session I Special Session II Session Session Session Special Session I Session Session Session Special Session I Session Session Session Session Special Session I Special Session II VIRGINIA LAW PORTALCode of VirginiaVirginia Administrative Code Constitution of VirginiaChartersAuthoritiesCompacts Uncodified ActsRIS Users (account required) SEARCHABLE DATABASESBills & Resolutionssession legislationBill Summariessession summaries Reports to the General AssemblyHouse and Senate documents Legislative LiaisonsState agency contactsACROSS SESSIONS Subject Index:
SESSION history | hilite | pdf | print version 20100621D20106447D HOUSE BILL NO.
920 OfferedAMENDMENT JanuaryIN 8,THE 2020NATURE PrefiledOF A SUBSTITUTE (Proposed by the House Committee on Health, Welfare and Institutions on January 7,28, 20202020) (Patron Prior to Substitute--Delegate Brewer) A BILL to amend and reenact §§ 16.1-282.1, 63.2-100, 63.2-900.1, 63.2-905, 63.2-906, and 63.2-1305 of the Code of Virginia and to amend the Code of Virginia by adding in Chapter 13 of Title 63.2 a section numbered 63.2-1306, relating to State-Funded Kinship Guardianship Assistance program.
---------- Patrons-- Brewer and Keam ---------- Referred to Committee on Health, Welfare and Institutions ---------- Be it enacted by the General Assembly of Virginia:
That §§ 16.1-282.1, 63.2-100, 63.2-900.1, 63.2-905, 63.2-906, and 63.2-1305 of the Code of Virginia are amended and reenacted and that the Code of Virginia is amended by adding in Chapter 13 of Title 63.2 a section numbered 63.2-1306 as follows:
§ 16.1-282.1.
Permanency planning hearing for children in foster care.
A.
In the case of a child who was the subject of a foster care plan filed with the court pursuant to § 16.1-281, a permanency planning hearing shall be held within 10 months of the dispositional hearing at which the foster care plan pursuant to § 16.1-281 was reviewed if the child (a) was placed through an agreement between the parents or guardians and the local board of social services where legal custody remains with the parents or guardians and such agreement has not been dissolved by court order;
or (b) is under the legal custody of a local board of social services or a child welfare agency and has not had a petition to terminate parental rights filed on the child's behalf, has not been placed in permanent foster care, or is age 16 or over and the plan for the child is not independent living.
The board or child welfare agency shall file a petition for a permanency planning hearing 30 days prior to the date of the permanency planning hearing scheduled by the court.
The purpose of this hearing is to establish a permanent goal for the child and either to achieve the permanent goal or to defer such action through the approval of an interim plan for the child.
To achieve the permanent goal, the petition for a permanency planning hearing shall seek to (i) transfer the custody of the child to his prior family, or dissolve the board's placement agreement and return the child to his prior family;
(ii) transfer custody of the child to a relative other than the child's prior family or to fictive kin for the purpose of establishing eligibility for the Federal-Funded Kinship Guardianship Assistance program pursuant to § 63.2-1305 or the State-Funded Kinship Guardianship Assistance program pursuant to § 63.2-1306, subject to the provisions of subsection A1;
(iii) terminate residual parental rights pursuant to § 16.1-277.01 or 16.1-283;
(iv) place a child who is 16 years of age or older in permanent foster care pursuant to § 63.2-908;
(v) if the child has been admitted to the United States as a refugee or asylee and has attained the age of 16 years or older and the plan is independent living, direct the board or agency to provide the child with services to transition from foster care;
or (vi) place a child who is 16 years of age or older in another planned permanent living arrangement in accordance with the provisions of subsection A2.
In cases in which a foster care plan approved prior to July 1, 2011, includes independent living as the goal for a child who is not admitted to the United States as an asylee or refugee, the petition shall direct the board or agency to provide the child with services to transition from foster care.
For approval of an interim plan, the petition for a permanency planning hearing shall seek to continue custody with the board or agency, or continue placement with the board through a parental agreement;
or transfer custody to the board or child welfare agency from the parents or guardian of a child who has been in foster care through an agreement where the parents or guardian retains custody.
Upon receipt of the petition, if a permanency planning hearing has not already been scheduled, the court shall schedule such a hearing to be held within 30 days.
The permanency planning hearing shall be held within 10 months of the dispositional hearing at which the foster care plan was reviewed pursuant to § 16.1-281.
The provisions of subsection B of § 16.1-282 shall apply to this petition.
The procedures of subsection C of § 16.1-282 and the provisions of subsection G of § 16.1-282 shall apply to the scheduling and notice of proceedings under this section.
A1.
The following requirements shall apply to the transfer of custody of the child to a relative other than the child's prior family or to fictive kin for the purpose of establishing eligibility for the Federal-Funded Kinship Guardianship Assistance program pursuant to § 63.2-1305 or the State-Funded Kinship Guardianship Assistance program pursuant to § 63.2-1306 in accordance with the provisions of clause (ii) of subsection A.
Any order transferring custody of the child to a relative other than the child's prior family shall be entered only upon a finding, based upon a preponderance of the evidence, that the relative is one who, after an investigation as directed by the court, (i) is found by the court to be willing and qualified to receive and care for the child;
(ii) is willing to have a positive, continuous relationship with the child;
(iii) is committed to providing a permanent, suitable home for the child;
and (iv) is willing and has the ability to protect the child from abuse and neglect;
and the order shall so state.
The court's order transferring custody to a relative should further provide, as appropriate, for any terms or conditions which would promote the child's interest and welfare.
A2.
The following requirements shall apply to the selection and approval of placement in another planned permanent living arrangement as the permanent goal for the child in accordance with clause (vi) of subsection A:
1.
The board or child welfare agency shall petition for alternative (vi) of subsection A only if the child has a severe and chronic emotional, physical or neurological disabling condition for which the child requires long-term residential treatment;
and the board or child welfare agency has thoroughly investigated the feasibility of the alternatives listed in clauses (i) through (v) of subsection A and determined that none of those alternatives is in the best interests of the child.
In a foster care plan filed with the petition pursuant to this section, the board or agency shall document the following:
(i) the investigation conducted of the placement alternatives listed in clauses (i) through (v) of subsection A and why each of these is not currently in the best interest of the child;
Show all 144 changed lines (104 more)
(ii) at least one compelling reason why none of the alternatives listed in clauses (i) through (v) is achievable for the child at the time placement in another planned permanent living arrangement is selected as the permanent goal for the child;
(iii) the identity of the long-term residential treatment service provider;
(iv) the nature of the child's disability;
(v) the anticipated length of time required for the child's treatment;
and (vi) the status of the child's eligibility for admission and long-term treatment.
The court shall ensure that the local department has documentation of the intensive, ongoing, and, as of the date of the hearing, unsuccessful efforts made to return the child home or secure a placement for the child with a fit and willing relative, including adult siblings, or an adoptive parent, including through efforts that utilize search technology, including social media, to find the child's biological family members.
The court shall ask the child about the child's desired permanency outcome and make a judicial determination, accompanied by an explanation of the reasons that the alternatives listed in clauses (i) through (iii) of subsection A continue to not be in the best interest of the child.
2.
Before approving alternative (vi) of subsection A as the plan for the child, the court shall find (i) that the child has a severe and chronic emotional, physical or neurological disabling condition;
(ii) that the child requires long-term residential treatment for the disabling condition;
and (iii) that none of the alternatives listed in clauses (i) through (v) of subsection A is achievable for the child at the time placement in another planned permanent living arrangement is approved as the permanent goal for the child.
If the board or agency petitions for alternative (vi), alternative (vi) may be approved by the court for a period of six months at a time.
3.
At the conclusion of the permanency planning hearing, if alternative (vi) of subsection A is the permanent plan, the court shall schedule a hearing to be held within six months to review the child's placement in another planned permanent living arrangement in accordance with subdivision A2 4.
All parties present at the hearing at which clause (vi) of subsection A is approved as the permanent plan for the child shall be given notice of the date scheduled for the foster care review hearing.
Parties not present shall be summoned to appear as provided in § 16.1-263.
Otherwise, this subsection A2 shall govern the scheduling and notice for such hearings.
4.
The court shall review a foster care plan for any child who is placed in another planned permanent living arrangement every six months from the date of the permanency planning hearing held pursuant to this subsection, so long as the child remains in the legal custody of the board or child welfare agency.
The board or child welfare agency shall file such petitions for review pursuant to the provisions of § 16.1-282 and shall, in addition, include in the petition the information required by subdivision A2 1.
The petition for foster care review shall be filed no later than 30 days prior to the hearing scheduled in accordance with subdivision A2 3.
At the conclusion of the foster care review hearing, if alternative (vi) of subsection A remains the permanent plan, the court shall enter an order that states whether reasonable efforts have been made to place the child in a timely manner in accordance with the permanency plan and to monitor the child's status in another planned permanent living arrangement.
However, if at any time during the six-month approval periods permitted by this subsection, a determination is made by treatment providers that the child's need for long-term residential treatment for the child's disabling condition is eliminated, the board or agency shall immediately begin to plan for post-discharge services and shall, within 30 days of making such a determination, file a petition for a permanency planning hearing pursuant to subsection A.
Upon receipt of the petition, the court shall schedule a permanency planning hearing to be held within 30 days.
The provisions of subsection B of § 16.1-282 shall apply to this petition.
The procedures of subsection C of § 16.1-282 and the provisions of subsection G of § 16.1-282 shall apply to proceedings under this section.
A3.
The following requirements shall apply to the selection and approval of permanent foster care pursuant to clause (iv) of subsection A:
1.
The court shall ensure that the local department has documentation of the intensive, ongoing, and, as of the date of the hearing, unsuccessful efforts made to return the child home or secure a placement for the child with a fit and willing relative, including adult siblings, or an adoptive parent, including through efforts that utilize search technology, including social media, to find the child's biological family members.
2.
The court shall ask the child about the child's desired permanency outcome and make a judicial determination, accompanied by an explanation of the reasons that the alternatives listed in clauses (i) through (iii) of subsection A continue to not be in the best interest of the child.
B.
The following requirements shall apply to the selection and approval of an interim plan for the child in accordance with subsection A:
1.
The board or child welfare agency shall petition for approval of an interim plan only if the board or child welfare agency has thoroughly investigated the feasibility of the alternatives listed in clauses (i) through (v) of subsection A and determined that none of those alternatives is in the best interest of the child.
If the board or agency petitions for approval of an interim plan, such plan may be approved by the court for a maximum period of six months.
The board or agency shall also file a foster care plan that (i) identifies a permanent goal for the child that corresponds with one of the alternatives specified in clauses (i) through (v) of subsection A;
(ii) includes provisions for accomplishing the permanent goal within six months;
and (iii) summarizes the investigation conducted of the alternatives listed in clauses (i) through (v) of subsection A and why achieving each of these is not in the best interest of the child at this time.
The foster care plan shall describe the child's placement, including the in-state and out-of-state placement options and whether the child's placement is in state or out of state.
If the child's placement is out of state, the foster care plan shall provide the reason why the out-of-state placement is appropriate and in the best interests of the child.
2.
Before approving an interim plan for the child, the court shall find:
a.
When returning home remains the plan for the child, that the parent has made marked progress toward reunification with the child, the parent has maintained a close and positive relationship with the child, and the child is likely to return home within the near future, although it is premature to set an exact date for return at the time of this hearing;
or b.
When returning home is not the plan for the child, that marked progress is being made to achieve the permanent goal identified by the board or child welfare agency and that it is premature to set an exact date for accomplishing the goal at the time of this hearing.
The court shall consider the in-state and out-of-state placement options, and if the child has been placed out of state, determine whether the out-of-state placement is appropriate and in the best interests of the child.
3.
Upon approval of an interim plan, the court shall schedule a hearing to be held within six months to determine that the permanent goal is accomplished and to enter an order consistent with alternative (i), (ii), (iii), (iv), or (v) of subsection A.
All parties present at the initial permanency planning hearing shall be given notice of the date scheduled for the second permanency planning hearing.
Parties not present shall be summoned to appear as provided in § 16.1-263.
Otherwise, subsection A shall govern the scheduling and notice for such hearings.
C.
In each permanency planning hearing and in any hearing regarding the transition of the child from foster care to independent living, the court shall consult with the child in an age-appropriate manner regarding the proposed permanency plan or transition plan for the child, unless the court finds that such consultation is not in the best interests of the child.
D.
In cases in which a child is placed by the local board of social services or a licensed child-placing agency in a qualified residential treatment program as defined in § 16.1-228, the provisions of subsection E of § 16.1-281 shall apply to any hearing held pursuant to this section.
E.
At the conclusion of the permanency planning hearing held pursuant to this section, whether action is taken or deferred to achieve the permanent goal for the child, the court shall enter an order that states whether reasonable efforts have been made to reunite the child with the child's prior family, if returning home is the permanent goal for the child;
or whether reasonable efforts have been made to achieve the permanent goal identified by the board or agency, if the goal is other than returning the child home.
In making this determination, the court shall give consideration to whether the board or agency has placed the child in a timely manner in accordance with the foster care plan and completed the steps necessary to finalize the permanent placement of the child.
(ii) the child has reached 14 years of age and is sufficiently mature to have an informed opinion on the subject of his medical treatment;
(iii) a facility or portion of a facility serving infirm or disabled persons between the ages of 18 and 21, or 22 if enrolled in an educational program for the handicapped pursuant to § 22.1-214, when such facility is licensed by the Department as a children's residential facility under Chapter 17 (§ 63.2-1700 et seq.), but including any portion of the facility not so licensed;
For purposes of this section, "relative" means an adult who is (a)(i) related to the child by blood, marriage, or adoption or (ii) fictive kin of the child.
Foster care services also include the provision and restoration of independent living services to a person who is over the age of 18 years but who has not yet reached the age of 21 years, in accordance with § 63.2-905.1.
§ 63.2-906.
Foster care plans;
permissible plan goals;
court review of foster children.
A.
Each child who is committed or entrusted to the care of a local board or to a licensed child-placing agency or who is placed through an agreement between a local board and the parent, parents or guardians, where legal custody remains with the parent, parents or guardians, shall have a foster care plan prepared by the local department, the child welfare agency, or the family assessment and planning team established pursuant to § 2.2-5207, as specified in § 16.1-281.
The representatives of such local department, child welfare agency, or team shall (i) involve the child's parent(s) in the development of the plan, except when parental rights have been terminated or the local department or child welfare agency has made diligent efforts to locate the parent(s) and such parent(s) cannot be located, and any other person or persons standing in loco parentis at the time the board or child welfare agency obtained custody or the board or the child welfare agency placed the child and (ii) for any child for whom reunification remains the goal, meet and consult with the child's parent(s) or other person standing in loco parentis, provided that the parent(s) or other person has been located and parental rights have not been terminated, no less than once every two months and at all critical decision-making points throughout the child's foster care case.
The representatives of such department, child welfare agency, or team shall involve the child in the development of the plan, if such involvement is consistent with the best interests of the child.
In cases where either the parent(s) or child is not involved in the development of the plan, the department, child welfare agency, or team shall include in the plan a full description of the reasons therefor in accordance with § 16.1-281.
A court may place a child in the care and custody of (a) a public agency in accordance with § 16.1-251 or 16.1-252, and (b) a public or licensed private child-placing agency in accordance with § 16.1-278.2, 16.1-278.4, 16.1-278.5, 16.1-278.6, or 16.1-278.8.
Children may be placed by voluntary relinquishment in the care and custody of a public or private agency in accordance with § 16.1-277.01 or §§ 16.1-277.02 and 16.1-278.3.
Children may be placed through an agreement where legal custody remains with the parent, parents or guardians in accordance with §§ 63.2-900 and 63.2-903, or § 2.2-5208.
B.
Each child in foster care shall be assigned a permanent plan goal to be reviewed and approved by the juvenile and domestic relations district court having jurisdiction of the child's case.
Permissible plan goals are to:
1.
Transfer custody of the child to his prior family;
2.
Transfer custody of the child to a relative other than his prior family or to fictive kin for the purpose of establishing eligibility for the Federal-Funded Kinship Guardianship Assistance program pursuant to § 63.2-1305 or the State-Funded Kinship Guardianship Assistance program pursuant to § 63.2-1306;
3.
Finalize an adoption of the child;
4.
Place a child who is 16 years of age or older in permanent foster care;
5.
Transition to independent living if, and only if, the child is admitted to the United States as a refugee or asylee;
or 6.
Place a child who is 16 years of age or older in another planned permanent living arrangement in accordance with subsection A2 of § 16.1-282.1.
C.
Each child in foster care shall be subject to the permanency planning and review procedures established in §§ 16.1-281, 16.1-282, and 16.1-282.1.
For purposes of this section, "relative" means an adult who is (a)(i) related to the child by blood, marriage, or adoption or (ii) fictive kin of the child.
and 5.
Reasonable efforts have been made to reunite the child with the child's parents or prior custodian, unless such reasonable efforts are not required pursuant to § 16.1-281;
and 6.
TheFor Boardpurposes shallof promulgatethis regulationssection, for"relative" means an adult who is (i) related to the State-Fundedchild Kinshipby Guardianshipblood, Assistancemarriage, programor thatadoption areor necessary(ii) tofictive complykin withof thisthe section.child.
The2. regulations may set forth qualifications for kinship guardians, the conditions under which a kinship guardianship may be established, the requirements for the development and amendment of a kinship guardianship assistance agreement, and the manner of payments on behalf of siblings placed in the same household.
G.That the Board of Social Services (the Board) shall promulgate regulations to implement the provisions of this act.
ForThe purposesBoard's ofinitial thisadoption section,of "relative"regulations meansnecessary anto adultimplement whothe isprovisions (a)of relatedthis toact theshall childbe byexempt blood,from marriage,the orAdministrative adoptionProcess orAct (ii)(§ fictive2.2-4000 kinet ofseq. the child.
of the Code of Virginia), except that the Board shall provide an opportunity for public comment on the regulations prior to adoption.
Show all 144 changed rows (104 more)
Action History
-
Left in Appropriations
-
Subcommittee recommends laying on the table (5-Y 3-N)
-
Impact statement from DPB (HB920H1)
-
Committee substitute printed 20106447D-H1
-
Assigned App. sub: Health & Human Resources
-
Referred to Committee on Appropriations
-
Reported from Health, Welfare and Institutions with substitute (22-Y 0-N)
-
Subcommittee recommends referring to Committee on Appropriations
-
Subcommittee recommends reporting with substitute (6-Y 0-N)
-
House subcommittee amendments and substitutes offered
-
Impact statement from DPB (HB920)
-
Assigned HWI sub: Social Services
-
Referred to Committee on Health, Welfare and Institutions
-
Prefiled and ordered printed; offered 01/08/20 20100621D
Sponsors
- Emily M. Jordan · Primary
- Mark L. Keam · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 146 not signed on · 2 voted No
Sponsors (1)
Co-sponsors (1)
Not signed on (146)
146 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 146 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 5 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 56% | 33% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Brewer, Emily M. | — | Nay |
| Betsy B. Carr | — | Yea |
| C.E. Cliff Hayes, Jr. | — | Yea |
| Cox, M. Kirkland | — | Yea |
| Fariss, C. Matthew | — | Nay |
| Jones, Jerrauld C. "Jay" | — | Nay |
| Luke E. Torian | — | Not Voting |
| Paul E. Krizek | — | Yea |
| Sickles, Mark D. | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 22 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 22 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (22)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Adams, Dawn M. | — | Yea |
| Aird, Lashrecse D. | — | Yea |
| Avoli, G. "John" | — | Yea |
| Bell, Robert B. | — | Yea |
| C.E. Cliff Hayes, Jr. | — | Yea |
| Christopher T. Head | — | Yea |
| Edmunds, James E., II | — | Yea |
| Fowler, Hyland F."Buddy," Jr. | — | Yea |
| Guzman, Elizabeth R. | — | Yea |
| Karrie K. Delaney | — | Yea |
| Kathy K.L. Tran | — | Yea |
| Levine, Mark H. | — | Yea |
| M. Keith Hodges | — | Yea |
| Marcia S. "Cia" Price | — | Yea |
| Orrock, Robert D., Sr. | — | Yea |
| Patrick A. Hope | — | Yea |
| Robinson, Roxann L. | — | Yea |
| Rodney T. Willett | — | Yea |
| Sam Rasoul | — | Yea |
| Samirah, Ibraheem S. | — | Yea |
| Sickles, Mark D. | — | Yea |
| Wendell S. Walker | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 86% | 0% | 0% | 14% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Avoli, G. "John" | — | Yea |
| Elizabeth R. Guzman | — | Yea |
| Karrie K. Delaney | — | Yea |
| Kathy K.L. Tran | — | Yea |
| Lashrecse D. Aird | — | Yea |
| Mark D. Sickles | — | Not Voting |
| Wendell S. Walker | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does HB 920 do?
- State-Funded Kinship Guardianship Assistanceprogram. Creates the State-Funded Kinship Guardianship Assistanceprogram (the program) to facilitate child placements with relatives,including fictive kin, and ensure permanency for children in fostercare. The bill sets forth eligibility criteria for the program, paymentallowances to kinship guardians, and requirements for kinship guardianshipassistance agreements. The bill also expands eligibility for theFederal-Funded Kinship Guardianship Assistance program by allowingpayments to be made to fictive kin who receive custody of a childof whom they have been the foster parent.
- Who sponsors HB 920?
- HB 920 is sponsored by Emily M. Jordan and Keam, Mark L..
- What is the current status of HB 920?
- This bill died with 2020 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track HB 920?
- Track HB 920 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 920
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 920
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →