HB 508 — Animal care; cruelty, dangerous dogs.
Last action — Left in Agriculture, Chesapeake and Natural Resources
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed House of Delegates
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2020 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Animal care; cruelty; dangerous dogs. Extensively reorganizes, clarifies, and makes substantive changes to provisions related to dangerous dogs. Substantive changes include (i) a requirement that a law-enforcement officer or animal control officer who has reason to believe that a dog within his jurisdiction is a dangerous dog must apply for a district court summons, a requirement that is discretionary under current law; (ii) a prohibition on disposing of a dog prior to a dangerous dog adjudication; (iii) additional requirements for owners during and after a dangerous dog adjudication, including notice upon transfer, signage, fencing, muzzling, and registration; (iv) court discretion on prohibiting ownership of or residence with a dog following a dangerous dog adjudication; and (v) additional recordkeeping for officers in certain situations. The bill also increases from a Class 1 misdemeanor to a Class 6 felony the penalty for a first offense of killing a domestic dog or cat for the purpose of obtaining its hide, fur, or pelt. Current law imposes a Class 6 felony charge only for a second or subsequent offense.
Bill Text
- Impact statement from VCSC (HB508) View text Current html January 04, 2020
Action History
-
Left in Agriculture, Chesapeake and Natural Resources
-
Subcommittee recommends striking from docket (8-Y 0-N)
-
Assigned ACNR sub: Agriculture
-
Impact statement from DPB (HB508)
-
Impact statement from VCSC (HB508)
-
Referred to Committee on Agriculture, Chesapeake and Natural Resources
-
Prefiled and ordered printed; offered 01/08/20 20103962D
Sponsors
- Rodney T. Willett · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 147 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (147)
147 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 147 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 89% | 0% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Gooditis, Wendy W. | — | Yea |
| Hudson, Sally L. | — | Yea |
| Joshua G. Cole | — | Yea |
| Keam, Mark L. | — | Yea |
| Marshall, Daniel W., III | — | Yea |
| Plum, Kenneth R. | — | Not Voting |
| Poindexter, Charles D. | — | Yea |
| Tony O. Wilt | — | Yea |
| Tyler, Roslyn C. | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does HB 508 do?
- Animal care; cruelty; dangerous dogs. Extensively reorganizes, clarifies, and makes substantive changes to provisions related to dangerous dogs. Substantive changes include (i) a requirement that a law-enforcement officer or animal control officer who has reason to believe that a dog within his jurisdiction is a dangerous dog must apply for a district court summons, a requirement that is discretionary under current law; (ii) a prohibition on disposing of a dog prior to a dangerous dog adjudication; (iii) additional requirements for owners during and after a dangerous dog adjudication, including notice upon transfer, signage, fencing, muzzling, and registration; (iv) court discretion on prohibiting ownership of or residence with a dog following a dangerous dog adjudication; and (v) additional recordkeeping for officers in certain situations. The bill also increases from a Class 1 misdemeanor to a Class 6 felony the penalty for a first offense of killing a domestic dog or cat for the purpose of obtaining its hide, fur, or pelt. Current law imposes a Class 6 felony charge only for a second or subsequent offense.
- Who sponsors HB 508?
- HB 508 is sponsored by Rodney T. Willett.
- What is the current status of HB 508?
- This bill died with 2020 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track HB 508?
- Track HB 508 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 508
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 508
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →