SB 2995 — CRIM PRO-DNA TESTING-MOTIONS
Last action — Public Act . . . . . . . . . 98-0948
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed House
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 04, 2014. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
0 primary, 1 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 2 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
Amends the Code of Criminal Procedure of 1963. Permits inclusion in a defendant's prima facie case for forensic DNA testing of evidence that was not subject to testing at the time of his or her trial or guilty plea that identity was an issue in the investigation that resulted in his or her conviction, even if he or she confessed or admitted to the crime. Provides that upon receipt of a motion for post-conviction DNA testing, the court shall order the State to prepare an inventory of the evidence related to the case and issue a copy of the inventory to the prosecution, the petitioner, and the court. Provides that when a motion is filed to vacate based on favorable post-conviction DNA testing results, the State may, upon request, reactivate victim services for the victim of the crime during the pendency of the proceedings, and, as determined by the court after consultation with the victim or victim advocate, or both, following final adjudication of the case. Effective immediately.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
3 added · 3 removedPlain-language change summary
The changes to Bill SB 2995 include the addition of new lines and the removal of others. This likely signifies updates or corrections made to the text, which can be important for clarity and accuracy. Such amendments can help ensure the legislation is well understood and effectively addresses the issues it aims to resolve. In essence, these modifications can make the bill stronger and more straightforward for those it affects.
SB2995 EngrossedEnrolled LRB098 18301 RLC 54878 b AN ACT concerning criminal law.
or (2) although previously subjected to testing, can be SB2995 EngrossedEnrolled - 2 - LRB098 18301 RLC 54878 b subjected to additional testing utilizing a method that was not scientifically available at the time of trial that provides a reasonable likelihood of more probative results.
(1) the result of the testing has the scientific potential to produce new, noncumulative evidence (i) materially relevant to the defendant's assertion of actual innocence when the defendant's conviction was the result of a trial, even though the results may not completely exonerate the defendant, or (ii) that would raise a reasonable probability that the defendant would have been acquitted if the results of the evidence to be tested had been available prior to the defendant's guilty plea and the petitioner had proceeded to trial instead of pleading SB2995 EngrossedEnrolled - 3 - LRB098 18301 RLC 54878 b guilty, even though the results may not completely exonerate the defendant;
Action History
-
Public Act . . . . . . . . . 98-0948
-
Effective Date August 15, 2014
-
Governor Approved
-
Sent to the Governor
-
Passed Both Houses
-
Third Reading - Short Debate - Passed 084-033-000
-
Placed on Calendar Order of 3rd Reading - Short Debate
-
Second Reading - Short Debate
-
Placed on Calendar 2nd Reading - Short Debate
-
Do Pass / Short Debate Judiciary; 016-000-000
-
Assigned to Judiciary
-
Referred to Rules Committee
-
First Reading
-
Chief House Sponsor Rep. Arthur Turner
-
Arrived in House
-
Third Reading - Passed; 058-000-000
-
Added as Co-Sponsor Sen. Napoleon Harris, III
-
Placed on Calendar Order of 3rd Reading April 9, 2014
-
Senate Floor Amendment No. 1 Adopted; Raoul
-
Second Reading
-
Senate Floor Amendment No. 1 Recommend Do Adopt Criminal Law; 008-000-000
-
Senate Floor Amendment No. 1 Assignments Refers to Criminal Law
-
Senate Floor Amendment No. 1 Referred to Assignments
-
Senate Floor Amendment No. 1 Filed with Secretary by Sen. Kwame Raoul
-
Placed on Calendar Order of 2nd Reading March 27, 2014
-
Do Pass Criminal Law; 007-000-000
-
Postponed - Criminal Law
-
Added as Chief Co-Sponsor Sen. Donne E. Trotter
-
Postponed - Criminal Law
-
Postponed - Criminal Law
-
Assigned to Criminal Law
-
Referred to Assignments
-
First Reading
-
Filed with Secretary by Sen. Kwame Raoul
Sponsors
- Kwame Raoul · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →0 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 182 not signed on · 12 voted No
Sponsors (0)
None.
Co-sponsors (1)
- Kwame Raoul
Not signed on (182)
182 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 182 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 20 | 7 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 61 | 21 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 3 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 84 | 33 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 28% | 0% | 1% |
How each member voted (118)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Acevedo | — | Yea |
| Anthony | — | Nay |
| Arroyo | — | Yea |
| Beiser | — | Yea |
| Bellock | — | Yea |
| Berrios | — | Yea |
| Mautino | — | Yea |
| Bost | — | Yea |
| Brauer | — | Nay |
| Brown | — | Nay |
| Costello | — | Nay |
| McAsey | — | Yea |
| Fortner | — | Yea |
| Hurley | — | Yea |
| Jakobsson | — | Yea |
| Jefferson | — | Yea |
| Nekritz | — | Yea |
| Lang | — | Yea |
| McAuliffe | — | Yea |
| McSweeney | — | Yea |
| Sandack | — | Yea |
| Soto | — | Yea |
| Stewart | — | Yea |
| Tabares | — | Yea |
| Bradley | — | Yea |
| Brady | — | Yea |
| Burke, Daniel | — | Yea |
| Sullivan | — | Yea |
| Mitchell, Christian | — | Yea |
| Burke, Kelly | — | Yea |
| Drury | — | Yea |
| Dunkin | — | Yea |
| Durkin | — | Yea |
| Flowers | — | Yea |
| Golar | — | Yea |
| Leitch | — | Nay |
| Madigan | — | Yea |
| Harris, David | — | Yea |
| Harris, Greg | — | Yea |
| Moffitt | — | Nay |
| Phelps | — | Yea |
| Sente | — | Nay |
| Sommer | — | Nay |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Davis, Monique | — | Yea |
| Jones | — | Yea |
| Thapedi | — | Yea |
| Tryon | — | Yea |
| Turner | — | Yea |
| Unes | — | Nay |
| Mitchell, Bill | — | Nay |
| Verschoore | — | Yea |
| Willis | — | Nay |
| Yingling | — | Nay |
| Zalewski | — | Yea |
| Wheeler | — | Nay |
| Hernandez | — | Not Voting |
| Cavaletto | — | Nay |
| Cloonen | — | Nay |
| Conroy | — | Nay |
| Cross | — | Yea |
| Currie | — | Yea |
| D'Amico | — | Yea |
| Demmer | — | Nay |
| Franks | — | Nay |
| Harms | — | Yea |
| Hatcher | — | Yea |
| Hays | — | Yea |
| Ives | — | Yea |
| Jackson | — | Yea |
| Kay | — | Nay |
| Kosel | — | Yea |
| Osmond | — | Yea |
| Pihos | — | Yea |
| Poe | — | Nay |
| Pritchard | — | Yea |
| Reboletti | — | Yea |
| Reis | — | Nay |
| Riley | — | Yea |
| Schmitz | — | Yea |
| Senger | — | Yea |
| Smiddy | — | Yea |
| Chapa LaVia | — | Yea |
| Anna Moeller | Democrat | Nay |
| Anthony DeLuca | Democrat | Yea |
| Camille Y. Lilly | Democrat | Yea |
| Elgie R. Sims, Jr. | Democrat | Yea |
| Emanuel "Chris" Welch | Democrat | Yea |
| Fred Crespo | Democrat | Yea |
| Jaime M. Andrade, Jr. | Democrat | Yea |
| Jay Hoffman | Democrat | Yea |
| Jehan Gordon-Booth | Democrat | Yea |
| Julie A. Morrison | Democrat | Nay |
| Kelly M. Cassidy | Democrat | Yea |
| La Shawn K. Ford | Democrat | Yea |
| Laura Fine | Democrat | Yea |
| Lawrence "Larry" Walsh, Jr. | Democrat | Yea |
| Marcus C. Evans, Jr. | Democrat | Yea |
| Martin J. Moylan | Democrat | Nay |
| Michelle Mussman | Democrat | Nay |
| Natalie A. Manley | Democrat | Nay |
| Nicholas K. Smith | Democrat | Yea |
| Rita Mayfield | Democrat | Yea |
| Robert "Bob" Rita | Democrat | Yea |
| Robert F. Martwick | Democrat | Yea |
| Robyn Gabel | Democrat | Yea |
| Sara Feigenholtz | Democrat | Yea |
| Stephanie A. Kifowit | Democrat | Nay |
| Sue Scherer | Democrat | Nay |
| William "Will" Davis | Democrat | Yea |
| Brad Halbrook | Republican | Nay |
| Charles Meier | Republican | Nay |
| Christopher "C.D." Davidsmeyer | Republican | Nay |
| Jil Tracy | Republican | Yea |
| Joe C. Sosnowski | Republican | Nay |
| John M. Cabello | Republican | Yea |
| Norine K. Hammond | Republican | Nay |
| Wayne A. Rosenthal | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 42 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democrat | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 58 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 98% | 0% | 0% | 2% |
How each member voted (59)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Landek | — | Yea |
| Link | — | Yea |
| Manar | — | Yea |
| Althoff | — | Yea |
| Martinez | — | Yea |
| Barickman | — | Yea |
| Bertino-Tarrant | — | Yea |
| Biss | — | Yea |
| Bivins | — | Yea |
| Bush | — | Yea |
| Muñoz | — | Yea |
| LaHood | — | Yea |
| Luechtefeld | — | Yea |
| McCann | — | Yea |
| McCarter | — | Yea |
| McConnaughay | — | Yea |
| Mulroe | — | Yea |
| Noland | — | Yea |
| Oberweis | — | Yea |
| Radogno | — | Yea |
| Silverstein | — | Yea |
| Harris | — | Yea |
| Steans | — | Yea |
| Brady | — | Yea |
| Trotter | — | Yea |
| McGuire | — | Yea |
| Sullivan | — | Yea |
| Jacobs | — | Yea |
| Cullerton, T. | — | Yea |
| Cullerton | — | Yea |
| Clayborne | — | Yea |
| Connelly | — | Yea |
| Dillard | — | Yea |
| Forby | — | Yea |
| Frerichs | — | Yea |
| Haine | — | Yea |
| Hutchinson | — | Yea |
| Kotowski | — | Not Voting |
| Duffy | — | Yea |
| Raoul | — | Yea |
| Righter | — | Yea |
| Sandoval | — | Yea |
| Van Pelt | — | Yea |
| Bill Cunningham | Democrat | Yea |
| David Koehler | Democrat | Yea |
| Don Harmon | Democrat | Yea |
| Emil Jones, III | Democrat | Yea |
| Eva-Dina Delgado | Democrat | Yea |
| Julie A. Morrison | Democrat | Yea |
| Kimberly A. Lightford | Democrat | Yea |
| Lakesia Collins | Democrat | Yea |
| Laura M. Murphy | Democrat | Yea |
| Linda Holmes | Democrat | Yea |
| Mattie Hunter | Democrat | Yea |
| Michael E. Hastings | Democrat | Yea |
| Steve Stadelman | Democrat | Yea |
| Chapin Rose | Republican | Yea |
| Dave Syverson | Republican | Yea |
| Sue Rezin | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 2995 do?
- Amends the Code of Criminal Procedure of 1963. Permits inclusion in a defendant's prima facie case for forensic DNA testing of evidence that was not subject to testing at the time of his or her trial or guilty plea that identity was an issue in the investigation that resulted in his or her conviction, even if he or she confessed or admitted to the crime. Provides that upon receipt of a motion for post-conviction DNA testing, the court shall order the State to prepare an inventory of the evidence related to the case and issue a copy of the inventory to the prosecution, the petitioner, and the court. Provides that when a motion is filed to vacate based on favorable post-conviction DNA testing results, the State may, upon request, reactivate victim services for the victim of the crime during the pendency of the proceedings, and, as determined by the court after consultation with the victim or victim advocate, or both, following final adjudication of the case. Effective immediately.
- Who sponsors SB 2995?
- SB 2995 is sponsored by Kwame Raoul.
- What is the current status of SB 2995?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 04, 2014. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 2995?
- Track SB 2995 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 2995
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 2995
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →