Virginia 2019 Regular Session Status: In Committee

SB 1302 — Rights of persons with disabilities; procedures for certain actions, website accessibility.

Last action — Referred to Committee for Courts of Justice

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed House of Delegates
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2019 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

33 added · 67 removed

Plain-language change summary

The amendment to Bill SB 1302 changes how complaints about website accessibility for people with disabilities are handled. Instead of requiring complainants to send a written notice to the entity before filing a lawsuit, the new version allows the entity 120 days after being served a complaint to fix accessibility issues before the case moves forward. This change aims to provide organizations a chance to remedy problems while still ensuring that individuals with disabilities have a means of addressing compliance issues effectively.

→
Previous
Latest
SESSION history | hilite | pdf | print version 19104075D SENATE BILL NO.
SESSION history | hilite | pdf | print version 19105500D SENATE BILL NO.
1302 Offered January 9, 2019 Prefiled January 7, 2019 A BILL to amend the Code of Virginia by adding in Chapter 9 of Title 51.5 a section numbered 51.5-46.1, relating to rights of persons with disabilities;
1302 AMENDMENT IN THE NATURE OF A SUBSTITUTE (Proposed by the Senate Committee for Courts of Justice on January 30, 2019) (Patron Prior to Substitute--Senator Barker) A BILL to amend the Code of Virginia by adding in Chapter 9 of Title 51.5 a section numbered 51.5-46.1, relating to rights of persons with disabilities;
---------- Patron-- Barker ---------- Referred to Committee for Courts of Justice ---------- Be it enacted by the General Assembly of Virginia:
Be it enacted by the General Assembly of Virginia:
Before bringing a civil action alleging that an entity's website does not comply with applicable law regarding its accessibility by persons with vision or hearing impairment, the person alleging the violation shall provide written notice to the entity.
When a complaint is filed alleging that an entity's website does not comply with applicable law regarding its accessibility by persons with vision or hearing impairment, the responsive pleading deadline in Rule 3:8 of the Rules of Supreme Court of Virginia shall be extended to 120 days after service of the summons and complaint upon the defendant to give such entity an opportunity to cure any defect regarding its website's accessibility.
Such notice shall be sent by certified mail, return receipt requested, at least 120 days prior to filing the civil action, and shall include:
The complaint shall include an explanation regarding the manner in which the website fails to comply with applicable law regulating website accessibility to accommodate individuals with disabilities.
1.
At any time before the 120-day time period has expired, the defendant may request and the court may grant a reasonable extension of time for good cause shown.
An explanation regarding the manner in which the website fails to comply with applicable law regulating website accessibility to accommodate individuals with disabilities;
and 2.
Specific alleged violations, including screen shots of the entity's website as evidence of the alleged violations.
A petition filed for a civil action based on a claim that an entity's website does not comply with applicable law regarding its accessibility by persons with vision or hearing impairment shall include a copy of the notice required in subsection B and proof of service.
If the defendant files a responsive pleading stating that it has cured the defect alleged in the plaintiff's complaint, the court shall hold an evidentiary hearing on the issue.
If the court finds that the defendant has cured the defect, it shall dismiss the action.
The court may award the plaintiff reasonable attorney fees in this circumstance.
Upon motion of the defendant, the court shall dismiss without prejudice a civil action that is filed pursuant to this section if the action is filed less than 120 days after the date notice is provided pursuant to subsection B.
An entity's website is in compliance with applicable law regarding its accessibility by persons with vision or hearing impairment, until such time that the federal government adopts standards governing website accessibility, if it meets the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 Level AA as developed by the Web Accessibility Initiative.
E.
2.
If the entity has made a reasonable effort to cure the defect but has not completed the correction within 120 days of the notice required by subsection B or prior to the filing of the petition, the court may grant the entity a reasonable extension of time to cure the deficiency.
That the provisions of this act adding subsections B and C of § 51.5-46.1 to the Code of Virginia shall expire on July 1, 2020.
If the correction is made within such extended time, the court shall dismiss the action.
F.
An entity that has cured an alleged violation shall provide a written notice of the correction to the person alleging the violation describing each correction and the manner in which the correction addresses the alleged violation.
If the entity cures the alleged website defect prior to the filing of the action and notifies the person alleging the violation of such correction and the person proceeds with filing the action, the court shall dismiss the action and award costs and reasonable attorney fees to the defendant.
G.
An entity's website is presumed to be in compliance if it meets the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0 as developed by the Web Accessibility Initiative.
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. Referred to Committee for Courts of Justice

  2. Prefiled and ordered printed; offered 01/09/19 19104075D

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 147 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (147)

147 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 147 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SB 1302?
SB 1302 is sponsored by Barker, George L..
What is the current status of SB 1302?
This bill died with 2019 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 1302?
Track SB 1302 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 1302

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 1302

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →