United States 119th Congress Status: In Committee 1 R cosponsors

HR 1789 — Promptly Ending Political Prosecutions and Executive Retaliation Act of 2025

Last action — Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 18.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed House
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill is in committee in the House. Introduced March 03, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.

Next likely step: a committee vote, then a floor vote in the House.

Odds of enactment

Low chance

Based on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a low chance of becoming law.

Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.

A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.

Prognosis

Stalled 16% · moderate confidence
  • In Committee

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 R).

Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.

Summary

Promptly Ending Political Prosecutions and Executive Retaliation Act of 2025This bill expands the types of federal officials who may remove (i.e., transfer) state cases brought against them to federal court. It also establishes a presumption of immunity for federal officials in these cases.The federal officer removal statute authorizes certain defendants (e.g., federal officers) to remove to federal court a civil action or criminal prosecution brought against them in state court if the claims or charges relate to official duties. Often, defendants who invoke the federal officer removal statute raise claims of official immunity.In recent years, the statute received public attention when then-former President Donald Trump and former officials sought to invoke the statute. For example, in Georgia v. Meadows, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit held that former White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows could not remove Georgia’s criminal prosecution of him to federal court based on the federal officer removal statute because it does not apply to former federal officers, and even if it did, the charges were not related to Meadows’s official duties.This bill allows a defendant who is a former federal officer or current or former President or Vice President to remove state cases brought against them to federal court based on the federal officer removal statute. It also establishes a presumption that federal officials have immunity in cases that are removable, which may only be rebutted by a showing that their actions were not related to official duties.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

19 added · 4 removed

Plain-language change summary

The bill has been amended to include the full title "Prosecutions and Executive Retaliation Act of 2025" instead of just "Prosecutions and Executive Retaliation Act." Additionally, it specifies a table of sections that includes "1456. Official immunity." These changes clarify the title of the bill and outline a specific section related to official immunity, which could affect how laws are interpreted in relation to official actions.

→
Previous
Latest
1789 Introduced in House (IH)] <DOC> 119th CONGRESS 1st Session H.
1789 Reported in House (RH)] <DOC> Union Calendar No.
18 119th CONGRESS 1st Session H.
1789 To amend title 28, United States Code, to clarify the removability of certain actions against current and former Presidents and other senior Executive officials, and for other purposes.
1789 [Report No.
119-28] To amend title 28, United States Code, to clarify the removability of certain actions against current and former Presidents and other senior Executive officials, and for other purposes.
which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary _______________________________________________________________________ A BILL To amend title 28, United States Code, to clarify the removability of certain actions against current and former Presidents and other senior Executive officials, and for other purposes.
which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary March 21, 2025 Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed [Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic] [For text of introduced bill, see copy of bill as introduced on March 3, 2025] _______________________________________________________________________ A BILL To amend title 28, United States Code, to clarify the removability of certain actions against current and former Presidents and other senior Executive officials, and for other purposes.
This Act may be cited as the ``Promptly Ending Political Prosecutions and Executive Retaliation Act''.
This Act may be cited as the ``Promptly Ending Political Prosecutions and Executive Retaliation Act of 2025''.
(b) Application.--The amendments made by this section shall apply to civil actions or criminal prosecutions pending on the date of enactment of this Act or commenced on or after such date.
(b) Table of Sections.--The table of sections for such chapter is amended by adding at the end the following:
<all>
``1456.
Official immunity.''.
(c) Application.--The amendments made by this section shall apply to civil actions or criminal prosecutions pending on the date of enactment of this Act or commenced on or after such date.
Union Calendar No.
18 119th CONGRESS 1st Session H.
R.
1789 [Report No.
119-28] _______________________________________________________________________ A BILL To amend title 28, United States Code, to clarify the removability of certain actions against current and former Presidents and other senior Executive officials, and for other purposes.
_______________________________________________________________________ March 21, 2025 Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed
View plain text versions (2)

What Congress says this changes

H. Rept. 119-28

Published by the reporting committee Not generated — this is the committee's own “Changes in Existing Law Made by the Bill, as Reported”.

Text to be removed appears in [brackets]. Newly inserted text is italicised in the official report and cannot be marked in this plain-text rendition — read the official PDF ↗ for the authoritative formatting.

changes in existing law made by 
the bill, as reported, are shown as follows (existing law 
proposed to be omitted is enclosed in black brackets, new 
matter is printed in italics, and existing law in which no 
change is proposed is shown in roman):

 TITLE 28, UNITED STATES CODE

 * * * * * * *
PART IV--JURISDICTION AND VENUE

 * * * * * * *

 CHAPTER 89--DISTRICT COURTS; REMOVAL OF CASES FROM STATE COURTS

Sec.
 * * * * * * *
1456. Official immunity.

 * * * * * * *

Sec. 1442. Federal officers or agencies sued or prosecuted

 (a) A civil action or criminal prosecution that is commenced 
in a State court and that is against or directed to any of the 
following may be removed by them, upon a prima facie showing by 
the removing party that the standards for removal are met, to 
the district court of the United States for the district and 
division embracing the place wherein it is pending:
 (1) The United States or any agency thereof [or any 
 officer (or any person acting under that officer) of 
 the United States or of any agency thereof,] or any 
 person who, at the time of removal, is an officer of 
 the United States (or any person acting under that 
 officer) or of any agency thereof, or was previously 
 such an officer, in an official or individual capacity, 
 for or relating to any act under color of such office 
 (including a discretionary exercise of any authority of 
 such office) or on account of any right, title or 
 authority claimed under any Act of Congress for the 
 apprehension or punishment of criminals or the 
 collection of the revenue.
 (2) A property holder whose title is derived from any 
 such officer, where such action or prosecution affects 
 the validity of any law of the United States.
 (3) Any officer of the courts of the United States, 
 for or relating to any act under color of office or in 
 the performance of his duties;
 (4) Any officer of either House of Congress, for or 
 relating to any act in the discharge of his official 
 duty under an order of such House.
 (5) The President or Vice President for or relating 
 to any act while in office or where the State court's 
 consideration of the claim or charge may interfere 
 with, hinder, burden, or delay the execution of the 
 duties of the President or the Vice President.
 (6) A former President or Vice President for or 
 relating to any act while in office.
 (b) A personal action commenced in any State court by an 
alien against any citizen of a State who is, or at the time the 
alleged action accrued was, a civil officer of the United 
States and is a nonresident of such State, wherein jurisdiction 
is obtained by the State court by personal service of process, 
may be removed by the defendant to the district court of the 
United States for the district and division in which the 
defendant was served with process.
 (c) Solely for purposes of determining the propriety of 
removal under subsection (a), a law enforcement officer, who is 
the defendant in a criminal prosecution, shall be deemed to 
have been acting under the color of his office if the officer--
 (1) protected an individual in the presence of the 
 officer from a crime of violence;
 (2) provided immediate assistance to an individual 
 who suffered, or who was threatened with, bodily harm; 
 or
 (3) prevented the escape of any individual who the 
 officer reasonably believed to have committed, or was 
 about to commit, in the presence of the officer, a 
 crime of violence that resulted in, or was likely to 
 result in, death or serious bodily injury.
 (d) In this section, the following definitions apply:
 (1) The terms ``civil action'' and ``criminal 
 prosecution'' include any proceeding (whether or not 
 ancillary to another proceeding) to the extent that in 
 such proceeding a judicial order, including a subpoena 
 for testimony or documents, is sought or issued. If 
 removal is sought for a proceeding described in the 
 previous sentence, and there is no other basis for 
 removal, only that proceeding may be removed to the 
 district court.
 (2) The term ``crime of violence'' has the meaning 
 given that term in section 16 of title 18.
 (3) The term ``law enforcement officer'' means any 
 employee described in subparagraph (A), (B), or (C) of 
 section 8401(17) of title 5 and any special agent in 
 the Diplomatic Security Service of the Department of 
 State.
 (4) The term ``serious bodily injury'' has the 
 meaning given that term in section 1365 of title 18.
 (5) The term ``State'' includes the District of 
 Columbia, United States territories and insular 
 possessions, and Indian country (as defined in section 
 1151 of title 18).
 (6) The term ``State court'' includes the Superior 
 Court of the District of Columbia, a court of a United 
 States territory or insular possession, and a tribal 
 court.

 * * * * * * *

Sec. 1455. Procedure for removal of criminal prosecutions

 (a) Notice of Removal.--A defendant or defendants desiring to 
remove any criminal prosecution from a State court shall file 
in the district court of the United States for the district and 
division within which such prosecution is pending a notice of 
removal signed pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of 
Civil Procedure and containing a short and plain statement of 
the grounds for removal, together with a copy of all process, 
pleadings, and orders served upon such defendant or defendants 
in such action.
 (b) Requirements.--(1) A notice of removal of a criminal 
prosecution shall be filed not later than 30 days after the 
arraignment in the State court, or at any time before trial, 
whichever is earlier, except that for good cause shown the 
United States district court may enter an order granting the 
defendant or defendants leave to file the notice at a later 
time.
 (2) A notice of removal of a criminal prosecution shall 
include all grounds for such removal. A failure to state 
grounds that exist at the time of the filing of the notice 
shall constitute a waiver of such grounds, and a second notice 
may be filed only on grounds not existing at the time of the 
original notice. For good cause shown, the United States 
district court may grant relief from the limitations of this 
paragraph.
 (3) The filing of a notice of removal of a criminal 
prosecution [shall not] shall prevent the State court in which 
such prosecution is pending from proceeding further, [except 
that a judgment of conviction shall not be entered unless the 
prosecution is first remanded] and no judgment of conviction 
shall be entered unless the prosecution is remanded.
 (4) The United States district court in which such notice is 
filed shall examine the notice [promptly. If] promptly and 
where a prima facie showing demonstrating the basis for removal 
is made, the matter shall be removed. Only if it clearly 
appears on the face of the notice and any exhibits annexed 
thereto that removal should not be permitted, the court shall 
make an order for summary remand.
 (5) If the United States district court does not order the 
summary dismissal or the summary remand of such prosecution, it 
shall order [an evidentiary hearing] a hearing to be held 
promptly and, after such hearing, shall make such disposition 
of the prosecution as justice shall require including dismissal 
under section 1456. If the United States district court 
determines that removal shall be permitted or dismissal 
ordered, it shall so notify the State court in which 
prosecution is pending, which shall proceed no further.
 (c) Writ of Habeas Corpus.--If the defendant or defendants 
are in actual custody on process issued by the State court, the 
district court shall issue its writ of habeas corpus, and the 
marshal shall thereupon take such defendant or defendants into 
the marshal's custody and deliver a copy of the writ to the 
clerk of such State court.

Sec. 1456. Official Immunity

 (a) Immunity.--In any case that is subject to removal under 
section 1442(a), a Federal official shall be presumed to have 
immunity under article VI, clause 2 of the Constitution of the 
United States from any charge or claim made by or under 
authority of State law which may only be rebutted by clear and 
convincing evidence that the official was not acting under the 
color of such office or on account of any right, title or 
authority claimed under any Act of Congress for the 
apprehension or punishment of criminals or the collection of 
the revenue.
 (b) Determination of Immunity.--For purposes of making a 
determination of immunity under subsection (a), the following 
may not be admitted into evidence:
 (1) The nature, elements or any other aspect of the 
 charge or claim made by or under authority of State 
 law.
 (2) An act alleged to be official that is not the 
 subject of the charge or claim made by or under 
 authority of State law.
 (c) Representation.--In any case that is subject to removal 
under section 1442(a) that names a Federal official as a party, 
the Attorney General may--
 (1) represent such Federal official for any charge or 
 claim made by or under authority of State law; or
 (2) compensate private counsel retained by such 
 official at a reasonable prevailing rate for any such 
 charge or claim.
 (d) Prohibition on Limitation of Scope.--No court may define 
or limit the scope of the duties of an official of the 
Executive Office of the President.
 (e) Dismissal.--In any action subject to removal under 
paragraph (5) or (6) of section 1442(a), such case shall be 
dismissed unless rebutted by clear and convincing evidence 
establishing that the continued pendency of the State claim or 
charge would not in any way interfere, hinder, burden, or delay 
the execution of the duties of the President or Vice President.

 * * * * * * *

Source: H. Rept. 119-28 · govinfo

Action History

  1. Introduced in House

  2. Introduced in House

  3. Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

  4. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held

  5. Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 14 - 11.

  6. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 119-28.

  7. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 119-28.

  8. Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 18.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 546 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (546)

546 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 546 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does HR 1789 do?
Promptly Ending Political Prosecutions and Executive Retaliation Act of 2025This bill expands the types of federal officials who may remove (i.e., transfer) state cases brought against them to federal court. It also establishes a presumption of immunity for federal officials in these cases.The federal officer removal statute authorizes certain defendants (e.g., federal officers) to remove to federal court a civil action or criminal prosecution brought against them in state court if the claims or charges relate to official duties. Often, defendants who invoke the federal officer removal statute raise claims of official immunity.In recent years, the statute received public attention when then-former President Donald Trump and former officials sought to invoke the statute. For example, in Georgia v. Meadows, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit held that former White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows could not remove Georgia’s criminal prosecution of him to federal court based on the federal officer removal statute because it does not apply to former federal officers, and even if it did, the charges were not related to Meadows’s official duties.This bill allows a defendant who is a former federal officer or current or former President or Vice President to remove state cases brought against them to federal court based on the federal officer removal statute. It also establishes a presumption that federal officials have immunity in cases that are removable, which may only be rebutted by a showing that their actions were not related to official duties.
Who sponsors HR 1789?
HR 1789 is sponsored by Fry, Russell (Republican).
What is the current status of HR 1789?
This bill is in committee in the House. Introduced March 03, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Where can I track HR 1789?
Track HR 1789 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HR 1789

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of HR 1789

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →