HR 1789 — Promptly Ending Political Prosecutions and Executive Retaliation Act of 2025
Last action — Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 18.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill is in committee in the House. Introduced March 03, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Next likely step: a committee vote, then a floor vote in the House.
Odds of enactment
Low chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a low chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
In Committee
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 R).
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
Summary
Promptly Ending Political Prosecutions and Executive Retaliation Act of 2025This bill expands the types of federal officials who may remove (i.e., transfer) state cases brought against them to federal court. It also establishes a presumption of immunity for federal officials in these cases.The federal officer removal statute authorizes certain defendants (e.g., federal officers) to remove to federal court a civil action or criminal prosecution brought against them in state court if the claims or charges relate to official duties. Often, defendants who invoke the federal officer removal statute raise claims of official immunity.In recent years, the statute received public attention when then-former President Donald Trump and former officials sought to invoke the statute. For example, in Georgia v. Meadows, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit held that former White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows could not remove Georgia’s criminal prosecution of him to federal court based on the federal officer removal statute because it does not apply to former federal officers, and even if it did, the charges were not related to Meadows’s official duties.This bill allows a defendant who is a former federal officer or current or former President or Vice President to remove state cases brought against them to federal court based on the federal officer removal statute. It also establishes a presumption that federal officials have immunity in cases that are removable, which may only be rebutted by a showing that their actions were not related to official duties.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
19 added · 4 removedPlain-language change summary
The bill has been amended to include the full title "Prosecutions and Executive Retaliation Act of 2025" instead of just "Prosecutions and Executive Retaliation Act." Additionally, it specifies a table of sections that includes "1456. Official immunity." These changes clarify the title of the bill and outline a specific section related to official immunity, which could affect how laws are interpreted in relation to official actions.
1789 IntroducedReported in House (IH)](RH)] <DOC> 119thUnion CONGRESSCalendar 1stNo. Session H.
18 119th CONGRESS 1st Session H.
1789 To[Report amendNo. title 28, United States Code, to clarify the removability of certain actions against current and former Presidents and other senior Executive officials, and for other purposes.
119-28] To amend title 28, United States Code, to clarify the removability of certain actions against current and former Presidents and other senior Executive officials, and for other purposes.
which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary March 21, 2025 Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed [Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic] [For text of introduced bill, see copy of bill as introduced on March 3, 2025] _______________________________________________________________________ A BILL To amend title 28, United States Code, to clarify the removability of certain actions against current and former Presidents and other senior Executive officials, and for other purposes.
This Act may be cited as the ``Promptly Ending Political Prosecutions and Executive Retaliation Act''.Act of 2025''.
(b) Application.--TheTable amendmentsof madeSections.--The bytable thisof sectionsections shallfor applysuch tochapter civilis actionsamended orby criminaladding prosecutionsat pendingthe onend the datefollowing: of enactment of this Act or commenced on or after such date.
<all>``1456.
Official immunity.''.
(c) Application.--The amendments made by this section shall apply to civil actions or criminal prosecutions pending on the date of enactment of this Act or commenced on or after such date.
Union Calendar No.
18 119th CONGRESS 1st Session H.
R.
1789 [Report No.
119-28] _______________________________________________________________________ A BILL To amend title 28, United States Code, to clarify the removability of certain actions against current and former Presidents and other senior Executive officials, and for other purposes.
_______________________________________________________________________ March 21, 2025 Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed
View plain text versions (2)
- Reported Reported in House Current html March 21, 2025
- Introduced Introduced in House html March 03, 2025
What Congress says this changes
H. Rept. 119-28Published by the reporting committee Not generated — this is the committee's own “Changes in Existing Law Made by the Bill, as Reported”.
Text to be removed appears in [brackets]. Newly inserted text is italicised in the official report and cannot be marked in this plain-text rendition — read the official PDF ↗ for the authoritative formatting.
changes in existing law made by the bill, as reported, are shown as follows (existing law proposed to be omitted is enclosed in black brackets, new matter is printed in italics, and existing law in which no change is proposed is shown in roman): TITLE 28, UNITED STATES CODE * * * * * * * PART IV--JURISDICTION AND VENUE * * * * * * * CHAPTER 89--DISTRICT COURTS; REMOVAL OF CASES FROM STATE COURTS Sec. * * * * * * * 1456. Official immunity. * * * * * * * Sec. 1442. Federal officers or agencies sued or prosecuted (a) A civil action or criminal prosecution that is commenced in a State court and that is against or directed to any of the following may be removed by them, upon a prima facie showing by the removing party that the standards for removal are met, to the district court of the United States for the district and division embracing the place wherein it is pending: (1) The United States or any agency thereof [or any officer (or any person acting under that officer) of the United States or of any agency thereof,] or any person who, at the time of removal, is an officer of the United States (or any person acting under that officer) or of any agency thereof, or was previously such an officer, in an official or individual capacity, for or relating to any act under color of such office (including a discretionary exercise of any authority of such office) or on account of any right, title or authority claimed under any Act of Congress for the apprehension or punishment of criminals or the collection of the revenue. (2) A property holder whose title is derived from any such officer, where such action or prosecution affects the validity of any law of the United States. (3) Any officer of the courts of the United States, for or relating to any act under color of office or in the performance of his duties; (4) Any officer of either House of Congress, for or relating to any act in the discharge of his official duty under an order of such House. (5) The President or Vice President for or relating to any act while in office or where the State court's consideration of the claim or charge may interfere with, hinder, burden, or delay the execution of the duties of the President or the Vice President. (6) A former President or Vice President for or relating to any act while in office. (b) A personal action commenced in any State court by an alien against any citizen of a State who is, or at the time the alleged action accrued was, a civil officer of the United States and is a nonresident of such State, wherein jurisdiction is obtained by the State court by personal service of process, may be removed by the defendant to the district court of the United States for the district and division in which the defendant was served with process. (c) Solely for purposes of determining the propriety of removal under subsection (a), a law enforcement officer, who is the defendant in a criminal prosecution, shall be deemed to have been acting under the color of his office if the officer-- (1) protected an individual in the presence of the officer from a crime of violence; (2) provided immediate assistance to an individual who suffered, or who was threatened with, bodily harm; or (3) prevented the escape of any individual who the officer reasonably believed to have committed, or was about to commit, in the presence of the officer, a crime of violence that resulted in, or was likely to result in, death or serious bodily injury. (d) In this section, the following definitions apply: (1) The terms ``civil action'' and ``criminal prosecution'' include any proceeding (whether or not ancillary to another proceeding) to the extent that in such proceeding a judicial order, including a subpoena for testimony or documents, is sought or issued. If removal is sought for a proceeding described in the previous sentence, and there is no other basis for removal, only that proceeding may be removed to the district court. (2) The term ``crime of violence'' has the meaning given that term in section 16 of title 18. (3) The term ``law enforcement officer'' means any employee described in subparagraph (A), (B), or (C) of section 8401(17) of title 5 and any special agent in the Diplomatic Security Service of the Department of State. (4) The term ``serious bodily injury'' has the meaning given that term in section 1365 of title 18. (5) The term ``State'' includes the District of Columbia, United States territories and insular possessions, and Indian country (as defined in section 1151 of title 18). (6) The term ``State court'' includes the Superior Court of the District of Columbia, a court of a United States territory or insular possession, and a tribal court. * * * * * * * Sec. 1455. Procedure for removal of criminal prosecutions (a) Notice of Removal.--A defendant or defendants desiring to remove any criminal prosecution from a State court shall file in the district court of the United States for the district and division within which such prosecution is pending a notice of removal signed pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and containing a short and plain statement of the grounds for removal, together with a copy of all process, pleadings, and orders served upon such defendant or defendants in such action. (b) Requirements.--(1) A notice of removal of a criminal prosecution shall be filed not later than 30 days after the arraignment in the State court, or at any time before trial, whichever is earlier, except that for good cause shown the United States district court may enter an order granting the defendant or defendants leave to file the notice at a later time. (2) A notice of removal of a criminal prosecution shall include all grounds for such removal. A failure to state grounds that exist at the time of the filing of the notice shall constitute a waiver of such grounds, and a second notice may be filed only on grounds not existing at the time of the original notice. For good cause shown, the United States district court may grant relief from the limitations of this paragraph. (3) The filing of a notice of removal of a criminal prosecution [shall not] shall prevent the State court in which such prosecution is pending from proceeding further, [except that a judgment of conviction shall not be entered unless the prosecution is first remanded] and no judgment of conviction shall be entered unless the prosecution is remanded. (4) The United States district court in which such notice is filed shall examine the notice [promptly. If] promptly and where a prima facie showing demonstrating the basis for removal is made, the matter shall be removed. Only if it clearly appears on the face of the notice and any exhibits annexed thereto that removal should not be permitted, the court shall make an order for summary remand. (5) If the United States district court does not order the summary dismissal or the summary remand of such prosecution, it shall order [an evidentiary hearing] a hearing to be held promptly and, after such hearing, shall make such disposition of the prosecution as justice shall require including dismissal under section 1456. If the United States district court determines that removal shall be permitted or dismissal ordered, it shall so notify the State court in which prosecution is pending, which shall proceed no further. (c) Writ of Habeas Corpus.--If the defendant or defendants are in actual custody on process issued by the State court, the district court shall issue its writ of habeas corpus, and the marshal shall thereupon take such defendant or defendants into the marshal's custody and deliver a copy of the writ to the clerk of such State court. Sec. 1456. Official Immunity (a) Immunity.--In any case that is subject to removal under section 1442(a), a Federal official shall be presumed to have immunity under article VI, clause 2 of the Constitution of the United States from any charge or claim made by or under authority of State law which may only be rebutted by clear and convincing evidence that the official was not acting under the color of such office or on account of any right, title or authority claimed under any Act of Congress for the apprehension or punishment of criminals or the collection of the revenue. (b) Determination of Immunity.--For purposes of making a determination of immunity under subsection (a), the following may not be admitted into evidence: (1) The nature, elements or any other aspect of the charge or claim made by or under authority of State law. (2) An act alleged to be official that is not the subject of the charge or claim made by or under authority of State law. (c) Representation.--In any case that is subject to removal under section 1442(a) that names a Federal official as a party, the Attorney General may-- (1) represent such Federal official for any charge or claim made by or under authority of State law; or (2) compensate private counsel retained by such official at a reasonable prevailing rate for any such charge or claim. (d) Prohibition on Limitation of Scope.--No court may define or limit the scope of the duties of an official of the Executive Office of the President. (e) Dismissal.--In any action subject to removal under paragraph (5) or (6) of section 1442(a), such case shall be dismissed unless rebutted by clear and convincing evidence establishing that the continued pendency of the State claim or charge would not in any way interfere, hinder, burden, or delay the execution of the duties of the President or Vice President. * * * * * * *
Source: H. Rept. 119-28 · govinfo
Action History
-
Introduced in House
-
Introduced in House
-
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
-
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
-
Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 14 - 11.
-
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 119-28.
-
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 119-28.
-
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 18.
Sponsors
- Russell Fry · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 546 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Fry, Russell Republican
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (546)
546 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 546 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does HR 1789 do?
- Promptly Ending Political Prosecutions and Executive Retaliation Act of 2025This bill expands the types of federal officials who may remove (i.e., transfer) state cases brought against them to federal court. It also establishes a presumption of immunity for federal officials in these cases.The federal officer removal statute authorizes certain defendants (e.g., federal officers) to remove to federal court a civil action or criminal prosecution brought against them in state court if the claims or charges relate to official duties. Often, defendants who invoke the federal officer removal statute raise claims of official immunity.In recent years, the statute received public attention when then-former President Donald Trump and former officials sought to invoke the statute. For example, in Georgia v. Meadows, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit held that former White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows could not remove Georgia’s criminal prosecution of him to federal court based on the federal officer removal statute because it does not apply to former federal officers, and even if it did, the charges were not related to Meadows’s official duties.This bill allows a defendant who is a former federal officer or current or former President or Vice President to remove state cases brought against them to federal court based on the federal officer removal statute. It also establishes a presumption that federal officials have immunity in cases that are removable, which may only be rebutted by a showing that their actions were not related to official duties.
- Who sponsors HR 1789?
- HR 1789 is sponsored by Fry, Russell (Republican).
- What is the current status of HR 1789?
- This bill is in committee in the House. Introduced March 03, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
- Where can I track HR 1789?
- Track HR 1789 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HR 1789
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HR 1789
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →