HB 1994 — An Act amending the act of March 4, 1971 (P.L.6, No.2), known as the Tax Reform Code of 1971, in corporate net income tax, further providing for definitions; in procedure and administration, further providing for petition for reassessment and for review by board and providing for settlement conference process, for closing agreements and for report to General Assembly; and, in general provisions, further providing for timely filing.
Last action — Re-committed to Appropriations
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2023-2024 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
396 added · 684 removedPlain-language change summary
In the latest version of Bill HB 1994, significant changes were made to the definitions related to taxable income for medical cannabis businesses. Previously, the bill's text included a broader range of taxation topics and procedures, but now it specifically allows an additional deduction for the ordinary business expenses that these companies incur, aligning with federal income tax rules. This change is important because it can help lighten the financial burden on medical cannabis businesses, potentially promoting growth in this sector within Pennsylvania.
PRIOR PRINTER'S NO.NOS.
25282528, 3691 PRINTER'S NO.
36913743 THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA HOUSE BILL Session of No.
WILLIAMS, GREEN, MAYES, BOROWSKI, MUNROE, D'ORSIE, WATRO, DIAMOND, JOZWIAK, MERCURI, ROWE, FRITZ, GROVE, PICKETT, RADER AND WEBSTER, JANUARY 31, 2024 AS REPORTEDAMENDED FROM COMMITTEE ON FINANCE,SECOND CONSIDERATION, HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, AS AMENDED, OCTOBER 1,8, 2024 AN ACT AmendingAmeact the act of March 4, 1971 (P.L.6, No.2), entitled "An <-- act relating to tax reform and State taxation by codifying and enumerating certain subjects of taxation and imposing taxes thereon;
prescribing crimes, offenses and providingpenalties," forin definitionscorporate andnet forincome reviewtax, byfurther board and providing for settlementdefinitions; conference process.
AMENDINGin THEprocedure ACTand OFadministration, MARCHfurther 4,board 1971and (P.L.6,providing NO.2),for ENTITLEDsettlement "ANconference <--process, ACTfor RELATINGclosing TOagreements TAXand REFORMfor ANDreport STATEto TAXATIONGeneral BYAssembly; CODIFYING AND ENUMERATING CERTAIN SUBJECTS OF TAXATION AND IMPOSING TAXES THEREON;
PROVIDINGand, PROCEDURESin FORgeneral THEprovisions, PAYMENT,further COLLECTION,providing ADMINISTRATIONfor ANDtimely ENFORCEMENTfiling. THEREOF;
PROVIDING FOR TAX CREDITS IN CERTAIN CASES;
CONFERRING POWERS AND IMPOSING DUTIES UPON THE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, CERTAIN EMPLOYERS, FIDUCIARIES, INDIVIDUALS, PERSONS, CORPORATIONS AND OTHER ENTITIES;
PRESCRIBING CRIMES, OFFENSES AND PENALTIES," IN CORPORATE NET INCOME TAX, FURTHER PROVIDING FOR DEFINITIONS;
IN PROCEDURE AND ADMINISTRATION, FURTHER PROVIDING FOR PETITION FOR REASSESSMENT AND FOR REVIEW BY BOARD AND PROVIDING FOR SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE PROCESS, FOR CLOSING AGREEMENTS AND FOR REPORT TO GENERAL ASSEMBLY;
AND, IN GENERAL PROVISIONS, FURTHER PROVIDING FOR TIMELY FILING.
Section 2701401(3)1(b.2) of the act of March 4, 1971 (P.L.6, <-- No.2), known as the Tax Reform Code of 1971, isadded amendedJuly by11, adding2024 a(P.L.674, definitionNo.56), is amended to read:
Section 2701.401.
Definitions.Definitions.--The following words, terms, and phrases, when used in this article, shall have the meaning ascribed to them in this section, except where the context clearly indicates a different meaning:
The* following* words* and(3) phrases"Taxable whenincome." used1. in this article shall have the meanings given to them in this section unless the context clearly indicates otherwise:
* * * "Treasurer."(b.2) TheAn Stateadditional Treasurerdeduction shall be allowed from the taxable income of a medical cannabis business in the Commonwealth.amount of the ordinary and necessary expenses that were paid or incurred by the medical cannabis business during the taxable year that are ordinarily deductible for Federal income tax purposes under section 162 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (Public Law 99- 514, 26 U.S.C.
Section§ 2.162) if no deduction for ordinary and necessary expenses paid or incurred by the medical cannabis business was taken for Federal income tax purposes for the taxable year.
SectionAs 2704(d.7)used in this phrase, the term "medical cannabis business" shall mean a medical marijuana organization as defined in section 103 of the act isof amendedApril and17, 2016 (P.L.84, No.16), known as the section"Medical isMarijuana amendedAct," bythat addinghas aan subsectionactive togrower/processor read:permit or dispensary permit during the taxable year for which the deduction is sought.
* * * Section 2704.2.
Sections 2702(a) and 2704(a) of the act are amended to read:
Section 2702.
Petition for reassessment.
(a) General rule.--[A] (1) Except as provided under paragraph (2), a taxpayer may file a petition for reassessment with the department within 60 days after the mailing date of the notice of assessment.
(2) For an assessment of tax imposed under Article III, a taxpayer may file a petition for reassessment with the 20240HB1994PN3743 - 2 - department within 90 days after the mailing date of the notice of assessment.
An extension of time for filing the petition may be allowed for cause but may not exceed an additional 30 days.
* * * Section 2704.
*(a) *Petition *for (a.1)review Extensionof fora filingdecision petition.--Notwithstandingand anyorder.--[Within] provision(1) toExcept theas contrary,provided under paragraph (2), within 60 days after the mailing date forof filingthe department's notice of decision and order on a petition requiredfiled underwith thisit, articlea withtaxpayer may petition the board mayto bereview extendedthe bydecision theand boardorder upon:of the department.
(1)(2) writtenFor applicationan assessment of tax imposed under Article III, a taxpayer may file a petition for goodreview causewith shown;the board within 90 days after the mailing date of the decision and order of the department.
andAn (2)extension aof findingtime thatfor grantingfiling the applicationpetition willmay be allowed for cause but may not prejudiceexceed thean otheradditional party.30 days.
* * * [(d.7)Section Compromise3. settlement.--The board shall establish procedures to facilitate the compromise settlement of issues on appeal.
AThe compromiseact settlementis shallamended be ordered by theadding boardsections onlyto withread: the agreement of both the petitioner and the department.
The provisions of section 2707(c) shall be applicable to compromise settlements under this section.] * * * Section 3.2704.1.
The act is amended by adding a section to read:
20240HB1994PN3691 - 2 - Section 2704.1.
(a) Settlement officer.--The board shall appoint one or more individuals to serve as a settlement officer for a settlement conference initiated under subsection (b), toand whom the following shall apply:
(1) A settlement officer maymust be either an employee of the board or a third-party contractor retained by the board.
(ii) must be an attorney in good standing before the 20240HB1994PN3743 - 3 - Supreme Court of Pennsylvania or a certified public accountant in good standing before the State Board of Accountancy;
and (iv) may not be employed by the department, board or the treasurer,State Treasurer, other than in the capacity as a settlement officer.
(3) A settlement officerofficer: shall:
Show all 224 changed lines (184 more)
(i) shall be fair and impartial and is not permitted to preside over a settlement conference if the settlement officer cannot conduct it in an impartial manner;
and (ii) shall disclose, as soon as practicable, all actual and potential conflicts of interest that are reasonably known to the settlement officer and could reasonably be seen as raising a question about the officer's interest in the outcome unless the petitioner and the department consent in writing.
(4) The board may remove a settlement officer at its 20240HB1994PN3691 - 3 - sole discretion.
(5) The treasurerState Treasurer shall set the compensation for a settlement officer.
The request for a settlement conference shall be submitted to the board, unless the settlement conference is directed by the board, by filing a written request with the 20240HB1994PN3743 - 4 - petition or within 30 days of the petition being filed.
(1) The board may defer consideration of the petition until after eitherthe partyparties declinesterminate to participate in a settlement conference or the settlement conference is deemed terminated under subsection (e).
The nonrequesting party or parties must file a written response with the board and provide a copy to the requesting party in 20240HB1994PN3691 - 4 - support of or opposition to the settlement conference within 10 business days of the requestor'srequester's submission.
20240HB1994PN3743 - 5 - (c) Settlement conference.--The following shall apply to a settlement conference requested under subsection (b):
Other individuals may attend a settlement conference only 20240HB1994PN3691 - 5 - with the permission of the parties and with the consent of the settlement officer.
(i) A party is not required to retain representation 20240HB1994PN3743 - 6 - for a settlement conference.
(iii) Each party must have a representative attend a <-- settlement conference who has the authority to consummatenegotiate a settlement, which shall include each party who has not retained representation.
(8) Prior to and during the scheduled settlement conferenceconference, the parties and their representatives shall, as appropriate to each party's circumstances, exercise best efforts to prepare for and engage in a meaningful and productive settlement conference.
20240HB1994PN3691 - 6 - (9) The parties are encouraged to exchange all documents pertinent to the relief requested.
(10) Confidential information disclosed to a settlement officer by a party in the course of a settlement conference 20240HB1994PN3743 - 7 - shall not be divulged by the settlement officer.
(11) The settlement officer must return to each respective party all documents containing confidential information presented at the settlement conference within 30 days after the earlier of the date that the board accepts a settlement,settlement or the board mails its order deciding the case.
(13) The settlement officer shall not be compelled to divulge confidential records or to testify in regard to the settlement conference in any administrative, judicial or 20240HB1994PN3691 - 7 - other proceeding.
(14) No confidential or privileged document or other record presented or included in a settlement conference shall be subject to access under the act of February 14, 2008 (P.L.6, No.3), known as the Right-to-Know-Law.Right-to-Know Law.
(15) Each party to a settlement conference shall maintain the confidentiality of the settlement conference and shall not rely on or introduce as evidence in any administrative, judicial or other proceeding the following, unless agreed to by the parties or required by applicable 20240HB1994PN3743 - 8 - law:
(d) Post-settlementPostsettlement conference procedures.-- (1) The settlement officer shall evaluate the merits of a dispute during the settlement conference.
(2) The settlement officer does not have the authority 20240HB1994PN3691 - 8 - to impose a settlement on the parties.
(3) In the event a settlement of all or some of the issues in dispute is not achieved within the scheduled settlement conference, the settlement officer may continue to communicate with the parties for a period of time not to exceed 30 days from the date of the settlement conference, during which time the parties agree to negotiate in earnest 20240HB1994PN3743 - 9 - in an ongoing effort to facilitate a complete settlement.
(2) by a written declaration by the settlement officer that further efforts at a settlement conference would not 20240HB1994PN3691 - 9 - contribute to a resolution of the parties' dispute;
(f) Exclusion of liability.--A settlement officer is not a necessary or proper party in administrative, judicial or other 20240HB1994PN3743 - 10 - proceedings relating to the settlement conference.
(g) Rules and regulations.--The board may adopt rules and promulgate regulations necessary to effectuate this section.
Section 2708.
Closing agreements.
(a) Authorization.--The department is authorized to enter into an agreement in writing with any person relating to the liability of the person, or of the person or estate for whom the person acts, in respect of any tax administered by the department for any taxable period.
(b) Finality.--If the agreement is approved by the department, within a time as may be stated in the agreement or later agreed to, the agreement shall be final and conclusive, and, except upon a showing of fraud, malfeasance or misrepresentation of a material fact:
(1) The case shall not be reopened as to the matters agreed upon or the agreement modified by any officer, employee or agent of the department.
20240HB1994PN3743 - 11 - (2) In a suit, action or proceeding, the agreement, or any determination, assessment, collection, payment, abatement, refund or credit made in accordance with the agreement, shall not be annulled, modified, set aside or disregarded.
(c) Liabilities suspended.--If, pursuant to an agreement authorized by subsection (a), the department agrees to suspend the collection of any amounts of tax, penalties, interest or other additions to tax, the department may reimpose any of the suspended amounts if the person who entered into the agreement fails to comply with the terms of the agreement.
Section 2709.
Report to General Assembly.
No later than June 1 of the second year after the effective date of this section, and each year thereafter, the State Treasurer shall submit a report to the General Assembly summarizing the effectiveness of the settlement conference process implemented under section 2704.1.
A copy of the report shall be delivered to the chairman and minority chairman of the Finance Committee of the Senate and the chairman and minority chairman of the Finance Committee of the House of Representatives.
The report shall, at a minimum, include:
(1) The number of appeals of tax liability resolved through the settlement conference process.
(2) The number of appeals of tax liability that were not resolved through the settlement conference process.
(3) Of the taxpayers whose appeals were resolved through the settlement conference process, how many were individual taxpayers and how many were pass-through entities.
(4) The average amount of tax liability contested in cases that were resolved through the settlement conference 20240HB1994PN3743 - 12 - process.
(5) The average number of days it took for appeals of tax liability to be resolved through the settlement conference process.
(6) Recommendations to improve the effectiveness of the settlement conference process, which may be implemented through administrative procedure, guidelines, rules, regulations or legislation.
(7) Any other information deemed necessary by the State Treasurer.
ThisSection act3003.6 shallof takethe effectact inis 60amended days.to read:
SECTIONSection 1.3003.6.
SECTIONTimely 401(3)1(B.2)Filing.--(a) OFA THEtaxpayer ACTshall OFbe MARCHdeemed 4,to 1971have <--timely (P.L.6,filed NO.2),a KNOWNpetition ASfor THEa TAXrefund, REFORMa CODEpetition OFfor 1971,reassessment ADDEDor JULYany 11,other 2024protest (P.L.674,relating NO.56),to ISthe AMENDEDassessment TOof READ:tax or any other matter relating to any tax imposed by this act if the letter transmitting the petition is received by the Department of Revenue or is postmarked by the United States Postal Service on or prior to the final day on which the petition is required to be filed.
20240HB1994PN3691(b) -For 10purposes -of SECTIONfiling 401.a petition for refund, a petition for reassessment or a petition for redetermination with the Department of Revenue or the Board of Finance and Revenue, the reference in subsection (a) to a postmark by the United States Postal Service shall include any date recorded or marked as described under 26 U.S.C.
DEFINITIONS.--THE§ FOLLOWING7502(f)(2)(C) WORDS,(relating TERMS,to ANDtimely PHRASES,mailing WHENtreated USEDas INtimely THISfiling ARTICLE,and SHALLpaying) HAVEby THEany MEANINGdelivery ASCRIBEDservice TOdesignated THEMby INthe THISSecretary SECTION,of EXCEPTthe WHERETreasury THEof CONTEXTthe CLEARLYUnited INDICATESStates Aunder DIFFERENT26 MEANING:U.S.C.
*§ *7502(f)(2). * (3) "TAXABLE INCOME." 1.
*Section *5. * (B.2) AN ADDITIONAL DEDUCTION SHALL BE ALLOWED FROM THE TAXABLE INCOME OF A MEDICAL CANNABIS BUSINESS IN THE AMOUNT OF THE ORDINARY AND NECESSARY EXPENSES THAT WERE PAID OR INCURRED BY THE MEDICAL CANNABIS BUSINESS DURING THE TAXABLE YEAR THAT ARE ORDINARILY DEDUCTIBLE FOR FEDERAL INCOME TAX PURPOSES UNDER SECTION 162 OF THE INTERNAL REVENUE CODE OF 1986 (PUBLIC LAW 99- 514, 26 U.S.C.
§The 162)amendment IFof NOsection DEDUCTION401(3)1(b.2) FORof ORDINARYthe ANDact NECESSARYshall EXPENSESapply PAIDto ORtaxable INCURREDyears BYbeginning THEafter MEDICALDecember CANNABIS31, BUSINESS2023. WAS TAKEN FOR FEDERAL INCOME TAX PURPOSES FOR THE TAXABLE YEAR.
AS20240HB1994PN3743 USED- IN13 THIS- PHRASE,Section THE6. TERM "MEDICAL CANNABIS BUSINESS" SHALL MEAN A MEDICAL MARIJUANA ORGANIZATION AS DEFINED IN SECTION 103 OF THE ACT OF APRIL 17, 2016 (P.L.84, NO.16), KNOWN AS THE "MEDICAL MARIJUANA ACT," THAT HAS AN ACTIVE GROWER/PROCESSOR PERMIT OR DISPENSARY PERMIT DURING THE TAXABLE YEAR FOR WHICH THE DEDUCTION IS SOUGHT.
*This *act *shall SECTIONtake 2.effect as follows:
SECTIONS(1) 2702(A)The ANDfollowing 2704(A)provisions OFshall THEtake ACTeffect AREimmediately: AMENDED TO READ:
SECTION(i) 2702.The amendment of section 401(3)1(b.2) of the act.
PETITION(ii) FORThis REASSESSMENT.section and section 5 of this act.
(A)(2) GENERALThe RULE.--[A]remainder (1)of EXCEPTthis ASact PROVIDEDshall UNDERtake PARAGRAPHeffect (2),in A90 TAXPAYERdays. MAY FILE A PETITION FOR REASSESSMENT WITH THE DEPARTMENT WITHIN 60 DAYS AFTER THE MAILING DATE OF THE NOTICE OF ASSESSMENT.
20240HB1994PN369120240HB1994PN3743 - 1114 - (2) FOR AN ASSESSMENT OF TAX IMPOSED UNDER ARTICLE III, A TAXPAYER MAY FILE A PETITION FOR REASSESSMENT WITH THE DEPARTMENT WITHIN 90 DAYS AFTER THE MAILING DATE OF THE NOTICE OF ASSESSMENT.
AN EXTENSION OF TIME FOR FILING THE PETITION MAY BE ALLOWED FOR CAUSE BUT MAY NOT EXCEED AN ADDITIONAL 30 DAYS.
* * * SECTION 2704.
REVIEW BY BOARD.
(A) PETITION FOR REVIEW OF A DECISION AND ORDER.--[WITHIN] (1) EXCEPT AS PROVIDED UNDER PARAGRAPH (2), WITHIN 60 DAYS AFTER THE MAILING DATE OF THE DEPARTMENT'S NOTICE OF DECISION AND ORDER ON A PETITION FILED WITH IT, A TAXPAYER MAY PETITION THE BOARD TO REVIEW THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE DEPARTMENT.
(2) FOR AN ASSESSMENT OF TAX IMPOSED UNDER ARTICLE III, A TAXPAYER MAY FILE A PETITION FOR REVIEW WITH THE BOARD WITHIN 90 DAYS AFTER THE MAILING DATE OF THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE DEPARTMENT.
AN EXTENSION OF TIME FOR FILING THE PETITION MAY BE ALLOWED FOR CAUSE BUT MAY NOT EXCEED AN ADDITIONAL 30 DAYS.
* * * SECTION 3.
THE ACT IS AMENDED BY ADDING SECTIONS TO READ:
SECTION 2704.1.
SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE PROCESS.
(A) SETTLEMENT OFFICER.--THE BOARD SHALL APPOINT ONE OR MORE INDIVIDUALS TO SERVE AS A SETTLEMENT OFFICER FOR A SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE INITIATED UNDER SUBSECTION (B), AND THE FOLLOWING SHALL APPLY:
(1) A SETTLEMENT OFFICER MUST BE A THIRD-PARTY CONTRACTOR RETAINED BY THE BOARD.
(2) A SETTLEMENT OFFICER:
20240HB1994PN3691 - 12 - (I) MUST BE A CITIZEN OF THE UNITED STATES;
(II) MUST BE AN ATTORNEY IN GOOD STANDING BEFORE THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA OR A CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT IN GOOD STANDING BEFORE THE STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTANCY;
(III) MUST HAVE SIGNIFICANT EXPERIENCE IN A POSITION REQUIRING SUBSTANTIAL KNOWLEDGE OF PENNSYLVANIA TAX LAW;
AND (IV) MAY NOT BE EMPLOYED BY THE DEPARTMENT, BOARD OR THE STATE TREASURER, OTHER THAN IN THE CAPACITY AS A SETTLEMENT OFFICER.
(3) A SETTLEMENT OFFICER:
(I) SHALL BE FAIR AND IMPARTIAL AND IS NOT PERMITTED TO PRESIDE OVER A SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE IF THE SETTLEMENT OFFICER CANNOT CONDUCT IT IN AN IMPARTIAL MANNER;
AND (II) SHALL DISCLOSE, AS SOON AS PRACTICABLE, ALL ACTUAL AND POTENTIAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST THAT ARE REASONABLY KNOWN TO THE SETTLEMENT OFFICER AND COULD REASONABLY BE SEEN AS RAISING A QUESTION ABOUT THE OFFICER'S INTEREST IN THE OUTCOME UNLESS THE PETITIONER AND THE DEPARTMENT CONSENT IN WRITING.
(4) THE BOARD MAY REMOVE A SETTLEMENT OFFICER AT ITS SOLE DISCRETION.
(5) THE STATE TREASURER SHALL SET THE COMPENSATION FOR A SETTLEMENT OFFICER.
(B) REQUEST FOR SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE.--NOTWITHSTANDING SECTION 2704(F)(1), EITHER PARTY MAY SUBMIT A REQUEST FOR, OR THE BOARD MAY DIRECT, A SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE TO SETTLE A PETITION FOR REVIEW OF A DECISION AND ORDER UNDER THE BOARD'S JURISDICTION.
THE REQUEST FOR A SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE SHALL BE 20240HB1994PN3691 - 13 - SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD, UNLESS THE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE IS DIRECTED BY THE BOARD, BY FILING A WRITTEN REQUEST WITH THE PETITION OR WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE PETITION BEING FILED.
THE BOARD MAY ALLOW SETTLEMENT CONFERENCES AFTER THE DEADLINE IN THE EXERCISE OF DISCRETION OR UPON APPLICATION FOR GOOD CAUSE.
THE FOLLOWING SHALL APPLY:
(1) THE BOARD MAY DEFER CONSIDERATION OF THE PETITION UNTIL AFTER THE PARTIES TERMINATE A SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE OR THE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE IS DEEMED TERMINATED UNDER SUBSECTION (E).
IF THE BOARD DEFERS CONSIDERATION OF THE PETITION, THE BOARD SHALL ISSUE A DECISION AND ORDER DISPOSING OF THE PETITION WITHIN SIX MONTHS OF THE PARTY'S REFUSAL TO PARTICIPATE IN A SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE OR TERMINATION.
(2) THE PARTY REQUESTING A SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE SHALL SIMULTANEOUSLY NOTIFY THE OTHER PARTY OR PARTIES AND THE BOARD OF THE REQUEST, UNLESS THE BOARD INITIATED THE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE.
(3) A REQUEST FOR SETTLEMENT MUST PROVIDE A BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DISPUTE AND THE RELIEF REQUESTED.
THE NONREQUESTING PARTY OR PARTIES MUST FILE A WRITTEN RESPONSE WITH THE BOARD AND PROVIDE A COPY TO THE REQUESTING PARTY IN SUPPORT OF OR OPPOSITION TO THE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE WITHIN 10 BUSINESS DAYS OF THE REQUESTER'S SUBMISSION.
(4) THE BOARD, WITHIN FIVE BUSINESS DAYS OF RECEIPT OF THE RESPONSE IN SUPPORT OF OR OPPOSITION TO THE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE, SHALL NOTIFY THE PARTIES IN WRITING WHETHER THE BOARD WILL REFER AN APPEAL TO A SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE.
(5) A PETITIONER MAY DECLINE TO PARTICIPATE IN A SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE UPON PROVIDING THE BOARD WITH WRITTEN 20240HB1994PN3691 - 14 - NOTICE OF ITS INTENT NOT TO PARTICIPATE WITHIN FIVE BUSINESS DAYS OF RECEIPT OF NOTICE OF THE REFERRAL.
(C) SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE.--THE FOLLOWING SHALL APPLY TO A SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE REQUESTED UNDER SUBSECTION (B):
(1) A SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE SHALL BE HELD NO LATER THAN 60 DAYS FROM THE DATE THE BOARD REFERS A CASE FOR SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE.
(2) THE SETTLEMENT OFFICER SHALL SET THE DATE, TIME AND PLACE FOR EACH CONFERENCE.
THE PARTIES SHALL RESPOND TO REQUESTS FOR CONFERENCE DATES IN A TIMELY MANNER, BE COOPERATIVE IN SCHEDULING THE EARLIEST PRACTICABLE DATE AND ADHERE TO THE ESTABLISHED CONFERENCE SCHEDULE.
THE SETTLEMENT OFFICER, IN THE EXERCISE OF DISCRETION OR UPON APPLICATION FOR GOOD CAUSE, MAY RESCHEDULE A CONFERENCE.
THE SETTLEMENT OFFICER SHALL PROVIDE NOTICE OF THE CONFERENCE TO THE PARTIES IN ADVANCE OF THE CONFERENCE DATE.
(3) A SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE AND RELATED SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE COMMUNICATIONS ARE PRIVATE PROCEEDINGS.
A REPRESENTATIVE OF EACH PARTY MUST ATTEND EACH SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE.
A PARTY IS NOT REQUIRED TO ATTEND EACH SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE UNLESS THE PARTY DOES NOT HAVE REPRESENTATION.
OTHER INDIVIDUALS MAY ATTEND A SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE ONLY WITH THE PERMISSION OF THE PARTIES AND WITH THE CONSENT OF THE SETTLEMENT OFFICER.
(4) A SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE MAY BE CONDUCTED VIRTUALLY OR IN PERSON.
(5) A SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE MAY NOT BE RECORDED ELECTRONICALLY OR IN ANY OTHER MANNER, REGARDLESS OF THE CONSENT OF THE PARTIES.
(6) THE FOLLOWING SHALL APPLY TO REPRESENTATION AT A 20240HB1994PN3691 - 15 - SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE:
(I) A PARTY IS NOT REQUIRED TO RETAIN REPRESENTATION FOR A SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE.
(II) IF A PARTY RETAINS REPRESENTATION, THE PARTY MAY BE REPRESENTED AT A SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE BY ANY INDIVIDUAL OF THE PARTY'S CHOOSING.
(III) EACH PARTY MUST HAVE A REPRESENTATIVE ATTEND A SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE WHO HAS THE AUTHORITY TO NEGOTIATE A SETTLEMENT, WHICH SHALL INCLUDE EACH PARTY WHO HAS NOT RETAINED REPRESENTATION.
(7) THE SETTLEMENT OFFICER SHALL CONDUCT THE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE IN AN INFORMAL MANNER WITH THE PURPOSE OF FACILITATING A SETTLEMENT BETWEEN THE PETITIONER AND THE DEPARTMENT.
THE SETTLEMENT OFFICER IS AUTHORIZED TO CONDUCT SEPARATE OR EX PARTE MEETINGS AND OTHER COMMUNICATIONS WITH THE PARTIES, AND ANY REPRESENTATIVES OF THE PARTIES, BEFORE, DURING AND AFTER ANY SCHEDULED SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE.
(8) PRIOR TO AND DURING THE SCHEDULED SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE, THE PARTIES AND THEIR REPRESENTATIVES SHALL, AS APPROPRIATE TO EACH PARTY'S CIRCUMSTANCES, EXERCISE BEST EFFORTS TO PREPARE FOR AND ENGAGE IN A MEANINGFUL AND PRODUCTIVE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE.
(9) THE PARTIES ARE ENCOURAGED TO EXCHANGE ALL DOCUMENTS PERTINENT TO THE RELIEF REQUESTED.
THE SETTLEMENT OFFICER MAY REQUEST THE EXCHANGE OF MEMORANDA ON ISSUES, INCLUDING THE UNDERLYING INTERESTS AND THE HISTORY OF THE PARTIES' NEGOTIATIONS.
INFORMATION THAT A PARTY WISHES TO KEEP CONFIDENTIAL MAY BE SENT TO THE SETTLEMENT OFFICER, AS NECESSARY, IN A SEPARATE COMMUNICATION WITH THE SETTLEMENT OFFICER.
20240HB1994PN3691 - 16 - (10) CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION DISCLOSED TO A SETTLEMENT OFFICER BY A PARTY IN THE COURSE OF A SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE SHALL NOT BE DIVULGED BY THE SETTLEMENT OFFICER.
THE SETTLEMENT OFFICER SHALL MAINTAIN THE CONFIDENTIALITY OF ALL INFORMATION OBTAINED IN THE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE, AND ALL RECORDS, REPORTS OR OTHER DOCUMENTS RECEIVED BY THE SETTLEMENT OFFICER WHILE SERVING IN THAT CAPACITY SHALL BE CONFIDENTIAL.
THE SETTLEMENT OFFICER SHALL BE SUBJECT TO THE PROVISIONS AND PENALTIES OF SECTION 731 OF THE ACT OF APRIL 9, 1929 (P.L.343, NO.176), KNOWN AS THE FISCAL CODE.
(11) THE SETTLEMENT OFFICER MUST RETURN TO EACH RESPECTIVE PARTY ALL DOCUMENTS CONTAINING CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION PRESENTED AT THE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER THE EARLIER OF THE DATE THAT THE BOARD ACCEPTS A SETTLEMENT OR THE BOARD MAILS ITS ORDER DECIDING THE CASE.
(12) A PARTY MUST SUBMIT TO THE BOARD ANY DOCUMENTS INTENDED TO BE USED IN SUPPORT OF THE PARTY'S APPEAL.
THE DOCUMENTS MUST BE SUBMITTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES AND PROCEDURES OF THE BOARD FOR SUBMITTING ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE.
(13) THE SETTLEMENT OFFICER SHALL NOT BE COMPELLED TO DIVULGE CONFIDENTIAL RECORDS OR TO TESTIFY IN REGARD TO THE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE IN ANY ADMINISTRATIVE, JUDICIAL OR OTHER PROCEEDING.
(14) NO CONFIDENTIAL OR PRIVILEGED DOCUMENT OR OTHER RECORD PRESENTED OR INCLUDED IN A SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE SHALL BE SUBJECT TO ACCESS UNDER THE ACT OF FEBRUARY 14, 2008 (P.L.6, NO.3), KNOWN AS THE RIGHT-TO-KNOW LAW.
(15) EACH PARTY TO A SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE SHALL MAINTAIN THE CONFIDENTIALITY OF THE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE AND SHALL NOT RELY ON OR INTRODUCE AS EVIDENCE IN ANY 20240HB1994PN3691 - 17 - ADMINISTRATIVE, JUDICIAL OR OTHER PROCEEDING THE FOLLOWING, UNLESS AGREED TO BY THE PARTIES OR REQUIRED BY APPLICABLE LAW:
(I) VIEWS EXPRESSED OR SUGGESTIONS MADE BY A PARTY OR OTHER PARTICIPANT WITH RESPECT TO A POSSIBLE SETTLEMENT OF THE DISPUTE.
(II) ADMISSIONS MADE BY A PARTY OR OTHER PARTICIPANT IN THE COURSE OF THE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE.
(III) PROPOSALS MADE OR VIEWS EXPRESSED BY THE SETTLEMENT OFFICER.
(IV) THE FACT THAT A PARTY HAD OR HAD NOT INDICATED WILLINGNESS TO ACCEPT A PROPOSAL FOR SETTLEMENT MADE BY THE SETTLEMENT OFFICER.
(16) A SETTLEMENT OFFICER IS NOT A LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE OF ANY PARTY AND HAS NO FIDUCIARY DUTY TO ANY PARTY.
(D) POSTSETTLEMENT CONFERENCE PROCEDURES.-- (1) THE SETTLEMENT OFFICER SHALL EVALUATE THE MERITS OF A DISPUTE DURING THE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE.
THE EVALUATIONS SHALL BE COMMUNICATED TO EACH PARTY PRIVATELY OR, IF THE PARTIES AGREE, TO ALL PARTIES JOINTLY.
UNLESS PARTIES AGREE OTHERWISE, EVALUATIONS SHALL BE COMMUNICATED ORALLY.
(2) THE SETTLEMENT OFFICER DOES NOT HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO IMPOSE A SETTLEMENT ON THE PARTIES.
SUBJECT TO THE DISCRETION OF THE SETTLEMENT OFFICER, THE OFFICER MAY MAKE ORAL OR WRITTEN RECOMMENDATIONS FOR SETTLEMENT TO A PARTY PRIVATELY OR, IF THE PARTIES AGREE, TO ALL PARTIES JOINTLY.
(3) IN THE EVENT A SETTLEMENT OF ALL OR SOME OF THE ISSUES IN DISPUTE IS NOT ACHIEVED WITHIN THE SCHEDULED SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE, THE SETTLEMENT OFFICER MAY CONTINUE TO COMMUNICATE WITH THE PARTIES FOR A PERIOD OF TIME NOT TO 20240HB1994PN3691 - 18 - EXCEED 30 DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE, DURING WHICH TIME THE PARTIES AGREE TO NEGOTIATE IN EARNEST IN AN ONGOING EFFORT TO FACILITATE A COMPLETE SETTLEMENT.
(4) IF THE PARTIES TO A SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE COME TO AN AGREEMENT, THE PARTIES SHALL PRESENT THE TERMS OF THE SETTLEMENT TO THE BOARD FOR APPROVAL IN WRITING SIGNED BY ALL PARTIES WITHIN 10 BUSINESS DAYS AFTER REACHING THE SETTLEMENT.
THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE BOARD IF THE BOARD DETERMINES THE AGREEMENT IS NOT CONTRARY TO LAW.
(5) IF THE PARTIES TO A SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE CANNOT REACH A SETTLEMENT OF ANY OR ALL OF THE ISSUES, THE BOARD SHALL PROCEED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROCEDURE SPECIFIED IN THIS ACT AND REGULATIONS.
(6) A SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT SHALL NOT BE CONSIDERED AS PRECEDENT AND CANNOT BE APPEALED.
(E) TERMINATION OF A SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE.--THE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE SHALL BE TERMINATED:
(1) BY THE BOARD APPROVING A SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT BY THE PARTIES;
(2) BY A WRITTEN DECLARATION BY THE SETTLEMENT OFFICER THAT FURTHER EFFORTS AT A SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE WOULD NOT CONTRIBUTE TO A RESOLUTION OF THE PARTIES' DISPUTE;
(3) BY A WRITTEN DECLARATION OF ALL PARTIES THAT THE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE IS TERMINATED;
OR (4) WHEN THE SETTLEMENT OFFICER HAS REPRESENTED IN WRITING TO THE BOARD THAT THERE HAS BEEN NO COMMUNICATION BETWEEN THE SETTLEMENT OFFICER AND ANY PARTY OR PARTY'S REPRESENTATIVE FOR 21 DAYS FOLLOWING THE CONCLUSION OF THE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE.
20240HB1994PN3691 - 19 - (F) EXCLUSION OF LIABILITY.--A SETTLEMENT OFFICER IS NOT A NECESSARY OR PROPER PARTY IN ADMINISTRATIVE, JUDICIAL OR OTHER PROCEEDINGS RELATING TO THE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE.
NOTWITHSTANDING ANY PROVISION OF LAW TO THE CONTRARY, PARTIES TO A SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE UNDER THIS SECTION SHALL BE DEEMED TO HAVE CONSENTED THAT THE SETTLEMENT OFFICER SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO ANY PARTY FOR ANY ERROR, ACT OR OMISSION IN CONNECTION WITH ANY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE CONDUCTED UNDER THIS SECTION.
PARTIES TO A SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE UNDER THIS SECTION MAY NOT CALL A SETTLEMENT OFFICER AS A WITNESS IN LITIGATION OR ANY OTHER PROCEEDING RELATING TO THE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE.
THE SETTLEMENT OFFICER IS NOT COMPETENT TO TESTIFY AS A WITNESS IN ANY PROCEEDING RELATED TO THE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE.
(G) RULES AND REGULATIONS.--THE BOARD MAY ADOPT RULES AND PROMULGATE REGULATIONS NECESSARY TO EFFECTUATE THIS SECTION.
(H) LAWS NOT APPLICABLE.--THE PROVISIONS OF 2 PA.C.S.
(RELATING TO ADMINISTRATIVE LAW AND PROCEDURE) SHALL NOT APPLY TO A SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE CONDUCTED UNDER THIS SECTION.
SECTION 2708.
CLOSING AGREEMENTS.
(A) AUTHORIZATION.--THE DEPARTMENT IS AUTHORIZED TO ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT IN WRITING WITH ANY PERSON RELATING TO THE LIABILITY OF THE PERSON, OR OF THE PERSON OR ESTATE FOR WHOM THE PERSON ACTS, IN RESPECT OF ANY TAX ADMINISTERED BY THE DEPARTMENT FOR ANY TAXABLE PERIOD.
(B) FINALITY.--IF THE AGREEMENT IS APPROVED BY THE DEPARTMENT, WITHIN A TIME AS MAY BE STATED IN THE AGREEMENT OR LATER AGREED TO, THE AGREEMENT SHALL BE FINAL AND CONCLUSIVE, AND, EXCEPT UPON A SHOWING OF FRAUD, MALFEASANCE OR MISREPRESENTATION OF A MATERIAL FACT:
(1) THE CASE SHALL NOT BE REOPENED AS TO THE MATTERS 20240HB1994PN3691 - 20 - AGREED UPON OR THE AGREEMENT MODIFIED BY ANY OFFICER, EMPLOYEE OR AGENT OF THE DEPARTMENT.
(2) IN A SUIT, ACTION OR PROCEEDING, THE AGREEMENT, OR ANY DETERMINATION, ASSESSMENT, COLLECTION, PAYMENT, ABATEMENT, REFUND OR CREDIT MADE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE AGREEMENT, SHALL NOT BE ANNULLED, MODIFIED, SET ASIDE OR DISREGARDED.
(C) LIABILITIES SUSPENDED.--IF, PURSUANT TO AN AGREEMENT AUTHORIZED BY SUBSECTION (A), THE DEPARTMENT AGREES TO SUSPEND THE COLLECTION OF ANY AMOUNTS OF TAX, PENALTIES, INTEREST OR OTHER ADDITIONS TO TAX, THE DEPARTMENT MAY REIMPOSE ANY OF THE SUSPENDED AMOUNTS IF THE PERSON WHO ENTERED INTO THE AGREEMENT FAILS TO COMPLY WITH THE TERMS OF THE AGREEMENT.
SECTION 2709.
REPORT TO GENERAL ASSEMBLY.
NO LATER THAN JUNE 1 OF THE SECOND YEAR AFTER THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS SECTION, AND EACH YEAR THEREAFTER, THE STATE TREASURER SHALL SUBMIT A REPORT TO THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY SUMMARIZING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE PROCESS IMPLEMENTED UNDER SECTION 2704.1.
A COPY OF THE REPORT SHALL BE DELIVERED TO THE CHAIRMAN AND MINORITY CHAIRMAN OF THE FINANCE COMMITTEE OF THE SENATE AND THE CHAIRMAN AND MINORITY CHAIRMAN OF THE FINANCE COMMITTEE OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES.
THE REPORT SHALL, AT A MINIMUM, INCLUDE:
(1) THE NUMBER OF APPEALS OF TAX LIABILITY RESOLVED THROUGH THE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE PROCESS.
(2) THE NUMBER OF APPEALS OF TAX LIABILITY THAT WERE NOT RESOLVED THROUGH THE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE PROCESS.
(3) OF THE TAXPAYERS WHOSE APPEALS WERE RESOLVED THROUGH THE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE PROCESS, HOW MANY WERE INDIVIDUAL TAXPAYERS AND HOW MANY WERE PASS-THROUGH ENTITIES.
20240HB1994PN3691 - 21 - (4) THE AVERAGE AMOUNT OF TAX LIABILITY CONTESTED IN CASES THAT WERE RESOLVED THROUGH THE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE PROCESS.
(5) THE AVERAGE NUMBER OF DAYS IT TOOK FOR APPEALS OF TAX LIABILITY TO BE RESOLVED THROUGH THE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE PROCESS.
(6) RECOMMENDATIONS TO IMPROVE THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE PROCESS, WHICH MAY BE IMPLEMENTED THROUGH ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE, GUIDELINES, RULES, REGULATIONS OR LEGISLATION.
(7) ANY OTHER INFORMATION DEEMED NECESSARY BY THE STATE TREASURER.
SECTION 4.
SECTION 3003.6 OF THE ACT IS AMENDED TO READ:
SECTION 3003.6.
TIMELY FILING.--(A) A TAXPAYER SHALL BE DEEMED TO HAVE TIMELY FILED A PETITION FOR A REFUND, A PETITION FOR REASSESSMENT OR ANY OTHER PROTEST RELATING TO THE ASSESSMENT OF TAX OR ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO ANY TAX IMPOSED BY THIS ACT IF THE LETTER TRANSMITTING THE PETITION IS RECEIVED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE OR IS POSTMARKED BY THE UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE ON OR PRIOR TO THE FINAL DAY ON WHICH THE PETITION IS REQUIRED TO BE FILED.
(B) FOR PURPOSES OF FILING A PETITION FOR REFUND, A PETITION FOR REASSESSMENT OR A PETITION FOR REDETERMINATION WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE OR THE BOARD OF FINANCE AND REVENUE, THE REFERENCE IN SUBSECTION (A) TO A POSTMARK BY THE UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE SHALL INCLUDE ANY DATE RECORDED OR MARKED AS DESCRIBED UNDER 26 U.S.C.
§ 7502(F)(2)(C) (RELATING TO TIMELY MAILING TREATED AS TIMELY FILING AND PAYING) BY ANY DELIVERY SERVICE DESIGNATED BY THE SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY OF THE UNITED STATES UNDER 26 U.S.C.
§ 7502(F)(2).
20240HB1994PN3691 - 22 - SECTION 5.
THE AMENDMENT OF SECTION 401(3)1(B.2) OF THE ACT SHALL APPLY TO TAXABLE YEARS BEGINNING AFTER DECEMBER 31, 2023.
SECTION 6.
THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT AS FOLLOWS:
(1) THE FOLLOWING PROVISIONS SHALL TAKE EFFECT IMMEDIATELY:
(I) THE AMENDMENT OF SECTION 401(3)1(B.2) OF THE ACT.
(II) THIS SECTION AND SECTION 5 OF THIS ACT.
(2) THE REMAINDER OF THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT IN 90 DAYS.
20240HB1994PN3691 - 23 -
Show all 224 changed rows (184 more)
Amendments
2 amendmentsClick Show changes on an amendment above to see how it modifies the bill.
Action History
-
Re-committed to Appropriations
-
Second consideration, with amendments
-
Removed from table
-
Laid on the table
-
First consideration
-
Reported as amended
-
Referred to Finance
Sponsors
- Seth Grove · Cosponsor
- Tim Briggs · Primary
- Maureen E. Madden · Cosponsor
- Keith J. Greiner · Cosponsor
- Jeanne McNeill · Cosponsor
- Ryan A. Bizzarro · Cosponsor
- Carol Kazeem · Cosponsor
- Johanny Cepeda-Freytiz · Cosponsor
- Carol Hill-Evans · Cosponsor
- Perry S. Warren · Cosponsor
- Dan K. Williams · Cosponsor
- G. Roni Green · Cosponsor
- La'Tasha D. Mayes · Cosponsor
- Lisa A. Borowski · Cosponsor
- Brian Munroe · Cosponsor
- Joseph D'Orsie · Cosponsor
- Dane Watro · Cosponsor
- Russ Diamond · Cosponsor
- David H. Rowe · Cosponsor
- Jonathan Fritz · Cosponsor
- Tina Pickett · Cosponsor
- Jack Rader · Cosponsor
- Joe Webster · Cosponsor
- Charity Grimm Krupa · Cosponsor
- Benjamin V. Sanchez · Cosponsor
- Robert W. Mercuri · Cosponsor
- Barry Jozwiak · Cosponsor
- Stephen Kinsey · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 27 co-sponsors · 225 not signed on · 11 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Tim Briggs Democratic
Co-sponsors (27)
- Seth Grove
- Maureen E. Madden Democratic
- Keith J. Greiner Republican
- Jeanne McNeill Democratic
- Ryan A. Bizzarro Democratic
- Carol Kazeem Democratic
- Johanny Cepeda-Freytiz Democratic
- Carol Hill-Evans Democratic
- Perry S. Warren Democratic
- Dan K. Williams Democratic
- G. Roni Green Democratic
- La'Tasha D. Mayes Democratic
- Lisa A. Borowski Democratic
- Brian Munroe Democratic
- Joseph D'Orsie Republican
- Dane Watro Republican
- Russ Diamond Republican
- David H. Rowe Republican Voted No
- Jonathan Fritz Republican
- Tina Pickett Republican
- Jack Rader Republican
- Joe Webster Democratic
- Charity Grimm Krupa Republican
- Benjamin V. Sanchez Democratic
- Robert W. Mercuri
- Barry Jozwiak
- Stephen Kinsey
Not signed on (225)
225 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 225 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 96 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 75 | 10 | 0 | 2 |
| Unaffiliated | 18 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 189 | 12 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 93% | 6% | 0% | 1% |
How each member voted (203)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| P. Sturla | — | Yea |
| Aaron Kaufer | — | Yea |
| Barry Jozwiak | — | Yea |
| Dan Miller | — | Yea |
| Donna Oberlander | — | Yea |
| George Dunbar | — | Yea |
| Jim Gregory | — | Yea |
| Jim Marshall | — | Yea |
| Joshua Siegel | — | Yea |
| Kevin Boyle | — | Yea |
| Louis Schmitt | — | Yea |
| MACKENZIE, R | — | Yea |
| Mark Rozzi | — | Yea |
| Matthew Gergely | — | Yea |
| Mike Cabell | — | Yea |
| Paul Schemel | — | Yea |
| Robert W. Mercuri | — | Yea |
| Seth Grove | — | Yea |
| Stephenie Scialabba | — | Nay |
| Torren Ecker | — | Nay |
| Abigail Salisbury | Democratic | Yea |
| Aerion Abney | Democratic | Yea |
| Amen Brown | Democratic | Yea |
| Andre D. Carroll | Democratic | Yea |
| Anita Astorino Kulik | Democratic | Yea |
| Anthony A. Bellmon | Democratic | Yea |
| Arvind Venkat | Democratic | Yea |
| Ben Waxman | Democratic | Yea |
| Benjamin V. Sanchez | Democratic | Yea |
| Brandon J. Markosek | Democratic | Yea |
| Brian Munroe | Democratic | Yea |
| Bridget M. Kosierowski | Democratic | Yea |
| Carol Hill-Evans | Democratic | Yea |
| Carol Kazeem | Democratic | Yea |
| Chris Pielli | Democratic | Yea |
| Christina D. Sappey | Democratic | Yea |
| Christopher M. Rabb | Democratic | Yea |
| Dan Frankel | Democratic | Yea |
| Dan K. Williams | Democratic | Yea |
| Daniel J. Deasy | Democratic | Yea |
| Danielle Friel Otten | Democratic | Yea |
| Danilo Burgos | Democratic | Yea |
| Darisha K. Parker | Democratic | Yea |
| Dave Madsen | Democratic | Yea |
| David M. Delloso | Democratic | Yea |
| Ed Neilson | Democratic | Yea |
| Eddie Day Pashinski | Democratic | Yea |
| Elizabeth Fiedler | Democratic | Yea |
| Emily Kinkead | Democratic | Yea |
| Frank Burns | Democratic | Yea |
| G. Roni Green | Democratic | Yea |
| Gina H. Curry | Democratic | Yea |
| Greg Scott | Democratic | Yea |
| Greg Vitali | Democratic | Yea |
| Heather Boyd | Democratic | Yea |
| Ismail Smith-Wade-El | Democratic | Yea |
| Jared G. Solomon | Democratic | Yea |
| Jason Dawkins | Democratic | Yea |
| Jeanne McNeill | Democratic | Yea |
| Jennifer O'Mara | Democratic | Yea |
| Jessica Benham | Democratic | Yea |
| Jim Haddock | Democratic | Yea |
| Jim Prokopiak | Democratic | Yea |
| Joanna E. McClinton | Democratic | Yea |
| Joe Ciresi | Democratic | Yea |
| Joe McAndrew | Democratic | Yea |
| Joe Webster | Democratic | Yea |
| Johanny Cepeda-Freytiz | Democratic | Yea |
| Jordan A. Harris | Democratic | Yea |
| Jose Giral | Democratic | Yea |
| Joseph C. Hohenstein | Democratic | Yea |
| Justin C. Fleming | Democratic | Yea |
| Keith S. Harris | Democratic | Yea |
| Kristine C. Howard | Democratic | Yea |
| Kyle Donahue | Democratic | Yea |
| Kyle J. Mullins | Democratic | Yea |
| La'Tasha D. Mayes | Democratic | Yea |
| Leanne Krueger | Democratic | Yea |
| Lindsay Powell | Democratic | Yea |
| Lisa A. Borowski | Democratic | Yea |
| Liz Hanbidge | Democratic | Yea |
| Malcolm Kenyatta | Democratic | Yea |
| Mandy Steele | Democratic | Yea |
| Manuel Guzman | Democratic | Yea |
| Mary Jo Daley | Democratic | Yea |
| MaryLouise Isaacson | Democratic | Yea |
| Matthew D. Bradford | Democratic | Yea |
| Maureen E. Madden | Democratic | Yea |
| Melissa Cerrato | Democratic | Yea |
| Melissa L. Shusterman | Democratic | Yea |
| Michael H. Schlossberg | Democratic | Yea |
| Morgan Cephas | Democratic | Yea |
| Nancy Guenst | Democratic | Yea |
| Napoleon J. Nelson | Democratic | Yea |
| Nick Pisciottano | Democratic | Yea |
| Pat Gallagher | Democratic | Yea |
| Patrick J. Harkins | Democratic | Yea |
| Patty Kim | Democratic | Yea |
| Paul Friel | Democratic | Yea |
| Paul Takac | Democratic | Yea |
| Perry S. Warren | Democratic | Yea |
| Peter Schweyer | Democratic | Yea |
| Regina G. Young | Democratic | Yea |
| Rick Krajewski | Democratic | Yea |
| Robert E. Merski | Democratic | Yea |
| Robert F. Matzie | Democratic | Yea |
| Robert Freeman | Democratic | Yea |
| Ryan A. Bizzarro | Democratic | Yea |
| Scott Conklin | Democratic | Yea |
| Steve Samuelson | Democratic | Yea |
| Steven R. Malagari | Democratic | Yea |
| Tarah Probst | Democratic | Yea |
| Tarik Khan | Democratic | Yea |
| Tim Brennan | Democratic | Yea |
| Tim Briggs | Democratic | Yea |
| Tina M. Davis | Democratic | Yea |
| Aaron Bernstine | Republican | Yea |
| Abby Major | Republican | Yea |
| Alec J. Ryncavage | Republican | Yea |
| Andrew Kuzma | Republican | Yea |
| Ann Flood | Republican | Yea |
| Barbara Gleim | Republican | Nay |
| Brad Roae | Republican | Yea |
| Brett R. Miller | Republican | Yea |
| Brian Smith | Republican | Yea |
| Bryan Cutler | Republican | Yea |
| Bud Cook | Republican | Yea |
| Carl Walker Metzgar | Republican | Nay |
| Charity Grimm Krupa | Republican | Yea |
| Clint Owlett | Republican | Yea |
| Craig T. Staats | Republican | Yea |
| Craig Williams | Republican | Yea |
| Dallas Kephart | Republican | Yea |
| Dan Moul | Republican | Yea |
| Dane Watro | Republican | Yea |
| David H. Rowe | Republican | Nay |
| David H. Zimmerman | Republican | Yea |
| David M. Maloney | Republican | Yea |
| Dawn W. Keefer | Republican | Yea |
| Donna Scheuren | Republican | Yea |
| Doyle Heffley | Republican | Nay |
| Eric Davanzo | Republican | Yea |
| Eric R. Nelson | Republican | Yea |
| Jack Rader | Republican | Yea |
| Jacob D. Banta | Republican | Yea |
| James B. Struzzi | Republican | Yea |
| Jamie Barton | Republican | Yea |
| Jamie L. Flick | Republican | Yea |
| Jason Ortitay | Republican | Yea |
| Jeff Olsommer | Republican | Yea |
| Jesse Topper | Republican | Nay |
| Jill N. Cooper | Republican | Yea |
| Jim Rigby | Republican | Yea |
| Joanne Stehr | Republican | Yea |
| Joe Emrick | Republican | Yea |
| Joe Hamm | Republican | Nay |
| Joe Hogan | Republican | Yea |
| Joe Kerwin | Republican | Not Voting |
| John A. Lawrence | Republican | Not Voting |
| John A. Schlegel | Republican | Yea |
| Jonathan Fritz | Republican | Yea |
| Joseph D'Orsie | Republican | Yea |
| Joshua D. Kail | Republican | Yea |
| Kate A. Klunk | Republican | Yea |
| Kathleen C. Tomlinson | Republican | Yea |
| Kathy L. Rapp | Republican | Yea |
| Keith J. Greiner | Republican | Yea |
| Kerry A. Benninghoff | Republican | Yea |
| Kristin Marcell | Republican | Yea |
| Leslie Rossi | Republican | Yea |
| Marci Mustello | Republican | Yea |
| Mark M. Gillen | Republican | Yea |
| Marla Brown | Republican | Yea |
| Martin T. Causer | Republican | Yea |
| Martina A. White | Republican | Yea |
| Michael Stender | Republican | Yea |
| Mike Armanini | Republican | Yea |
| Mike Jones | Republican | Yea |
| Milou Mackenzie | Republican | Yea |
| Mindy Fee | Republican | Yea |
| Natalie Mihalek | Republican | Yea |
| Parke Wentling | Republican | Yea |
| Perry A. Stambaugh | Republican | Yea |
| R. Lee James | Republican | Yea |
| Rich Irvin | Republican | Nay |
| Rob W. Kauffman | Republican | Yea |
| Robert Leadbeter | Republican | Nay |
| Russ Diamond | Republican | Yea |
| Ryan Warner | Republican | Yea |
| Shelby Labs | Republican | Yea |
| Sheryl M. Delozier | Republican | Yea |
| Stephanie Borowicz | Republican | Nay |
| Steven C. Mentzer | Republican | Yea |
| Thomas H. Kutz | Republican | Yea |
| Thomas L. Mehaffie | Republican | Yea |
| Tim Twardzik | Republican | Yea |
| Timothy J. O'Neal | Republican | Yea |
| Timothy R. Bonner | Republican | Yea |
| Tina Pickett | Republican | Yea |
| Tom Jones | Republican | Yea |
| Valerie S. Gaydos | Republican | Yea |
| Wendy Fink | Republican | Nay |
| Zachary Mako | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 25 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (25)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Robert W. Mercuri | — | Yea |
| Ben Waxman | Democratic | Yea |
| Christopher M. Rabb | Democratic | Yea |
| Elizabeth Fiedler | Democratic | Yea |
| Greg Scott | Democratic | Yea |
| Ismail Smith-Wade-El | Democratic | Yea |
| Joe Webster | Democratic | Yea |
| Johanny Cepeda-Freytiz | Democratic | Yea |
| Justin C. Fleming | Democratic | Yea |
| Keith S. Harris | Democratic | Yea |
| Malcolm Kenyatta | Democratic | Yea |
| Pat Gallagher | Democratic | Yea |
| Paul Friel | Democratic | Yea |
| Robert E. Merski | Democratic | Yea |
| Steve Samuelson | Democratic | Yea |
| Aaron Bernstine | Republican | Yea |
| Dallas Kephart | Republican | Yea |
| Jack Rader | Republican | Yea |
| Jonathan Fritz | Republican | Yea |
| Keith J. Greiner | Republican | Yea |
| Leslie Rossi | Republican | Yea |
| Marla Brown | Republican | Yea |
| Mike Jones | Republican | Yea |
| Thomas H. Kutz | Republican | Yea |
| Zachary Mako | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 25 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (25)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Robert W. Mercuri | — | Yea |
| Ben Waxman | Democratic | Yea |
| Christopher M. Rabb | Democratic | Yea |
| Elizabeth Fiedler | Democratic | Yea |
| Greg Scott | Democratic | Yea |
| Ismail Smith-Wade-El | Democratic | Yea |
| Joe Webster | Democratic | Yea |
| Johanny Cepeda-Freytiz | Democratic | Yea |
| Justin C. Fleming | Democratic | Yea |
| Keith S. Harris | Democratic | Yea |
| Malcolm Kenyatta | Democratic | Yea |
| Pat Gallagher | Democratic | Yea |
| Paul Friel | Democratic | Yea |
| Robert E. Merski | Democratic | Yea |
| Steve Samuelson | Democratic | Yea |
| Aaron Bernstine | Republican | Yea |
| Dallas Kephart | Republican | Yea |
| Jack Rader | Republican | Yea |
| Jonathan Fritz | Republican | Yea |
| Keith J. Greiner | Republican | Yea |
| Leslie Rossi | Republican | Yea |
| Marla Brown | Republican | Yea |
| Mike Jones | Republican | Yea |
| Thomas H. Kutz | Republican | Yea |
| Zachary Mako | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HB 1994?
- HB 1994 is sponsored by Seth Grove, Tim Briggs (Democratic), Maureen E. Madden (Democratic), Keith J. Greiner (Republican), Jeanne McNeill (Democratic), Ryan A. Bizzarro (Democratic), Carol Kazeem (Democratic), Johanny Cepeda-Freytiz (Democratic), Carol Hill-Evans (Democratic), Perry S. Warren (Democratic), Dan K. Williams (Democratic), G. Roni Green (Democratic), La'Tasha D. Mayes (Democratic), Lisa A. Borowski (Democratic), Brian Munroe (Democratic), Joseph D'Orsie (Republican), Dane Watro (Republican), Russ Diamond (Republican), David H. Rowe (Republican), Jonathan Fritz (Republican), Tina Pickett (Republican), Jack Rader (Republican), Joe Webster (Democratic), Charity Grimm Krupa (Republican), Benjamin V. Sanchez (Democratic), Robert W. Mercuri, Barry Jozwiak, and Stephen Kinsey.
- What is the current status of HB 1994?
- This bill died with 2023-2024 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track HB 1994?
- Track HB 1994 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 1994
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 1994
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →