Pennsylvania 2023-2024 Regular Session Status: In Committee 34 D cosponsors

HB 1769 — An Act amending Title 42 (Judiciary and Judicial Procedure) of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes, in dockets, indices and other records, providing for limited access to eviction information.

Last action — Removed from table

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed House
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2023-2024 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

179 added · 140 removed

Plain-language change summary

The recent amendments to Bill HB 1769 include changes that clarify who can access court files related to eviction cases. The term "court file" was revised to specify that it includes eviction information that should be limited in its dissemination. This change is important because it aims to protect the privacy of individuals involved in eviction cases, ensuring that sensitive information is not broadly available to the public. By restricting access to this information, the bill seeks to mitigate the potential negative impacts that public knowledge of eviction proceedings can have on individuals' lives and reputations.

→
Previous
Latest
PRINTER'S NO.
PRIOR PRINTER'S NO.
2769 THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA HOUSE BILL Session of No.
2769 PRINTER'S NO.
1769 2024 INTRODUCED BY SMITH-WADE-EL, FIEDLER, HARRIS, KRAJEWSKI, WAXMAN, HILL-EVANS, KENYATTA, BURGOS, SANCHEZ, MADDEN, KHAN, HOHENSTEIN, N.
3673 THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA HOUSE BILL Session of No.
1769 2024 INTRODUCED BY SMITH-WADE-EL, FIEDLER, J.HARRIS, KRAJEWSKI, WAXMAN, HILL-EVANS, KENYATTA, BURGOS, SANCHEZ, MADDEN, KHAN, HOHENSTEIN, N.
BROWN, ABNEY, CEPHAS, KAZEEM, OTTEN, BOYD, SALISBURY, ROZZI, MAYES, KINKEAD, BULLOCK, GIRAL AND WARREN, MARCH 25, 2024 REFERRED TO COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY, MARCH 25, 2024 AN ACT AmePennsylvania Consolidated Statutes, in dockets, indices and other records, providing for limited access to eviction information.
BROWN, ABNEY, CEPHAS, KAZEEM, OTTEN, BOYD, SALISBURY, ROZZI, MAYES, KINKEAD, BULLOCK, GIRAL, WARREN, FRANKEL AND O'MARA, MARCH 25, 2024 AS REPORTED FROM COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY, HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, AS AMENDED, SEPTEMBER 30, 2024 AN ACT Amending Title 42 (Judiciary and Judicial Procedure) of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes, in dockets, indices and other records, providing for limited access to eviction information.
"Disseminate." The oral or written transmission or disclosure of a court file to individuals or agencies other than the court that retains the information.
"Disseminate." The oral or written transmission or disclosure of a court file OR ANY PORTION OF A COURT FILE to <-- individuals or agencies other than the court that retains the information.
(2) an occupant of the premises who provides the clerk 20240HB1769PN2769 - 2 - of court with the names of one of the parties or the case number and presents documentation to support a claim of occupancy;
20240HB1769PN3673 - 2 - (2) an occupant of the premises who provides the clerk <-- of court APPROPRIATE COUNTY OFFICE with the names of one of <-- the parties or the case number and presents documentation to support a claim of occupancy;
(4) an attorney, law firm or legal organization seeking to review a court file for purposes of evaluating possible legal advice or considering providing legal representation to a party to the eviction case or an occupant of the premises at issue in the eviction case, but in no case for an alternative commercial or business purpose under this paragraph;
(4) an attorney, law firm or legal organization OR <-- PERSON ACTING ON BEHALF OF AN ATTORNEY seeking to review a court file for purposes of evaluating possible legal advice or considering providing legal representation to a party to the eviction case or an occupant of the premises at issue in the eviction case, but in no case for an alternative commercial or business purpose under this paragraph;
or (6) other parties or entities if the parties to the eviction case agree that the limited access eviction file may be disseminated.
or (6) other parties or entities if the parties to the eviction case agree IN WRITING TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE <-- COURT that the limited access eviction file may be disseminated.
(c) Limited access eviction file.--Within 180 days of the effective date of this subsection, and on a monthly basis thereafter, courts shall automatically place under limited access all eviction information:
(c) Limited access eviction file.--Within 180 days of the <-- effective date of this subsection, and on a monthly basis 20240HB1769PN3673 - 3 - thereafter, courts shall automatically place under limited access all eviction information:
20240HB1769PN2769 - 3 - (1) When seven or more years have elapsed since the filing date of the eviction case.
(1) When seven or more years have elapsed since the filing date of the eviction case.
(e) Disclosure.--An individual may not be required or asked to disclose information about a limited access eviction file.
(C) LIMITED ACCESS EVICTION FILE.--SUBJECT TO SECTION 4334 <-- (RELATING TO PROCEDURES), EVICTION CASE INFORMATION IN ALL CASES SHALL BE PLACED UNDER LIMITED ACCESS AFTER SEVEN YEARS HAVE ELAPSED SINCE THE FILING DATE OF THE EVICTION CASE.
(e) (D) Disclosure.--An individual may not be required or <-- asked to disclose information about a limited access eviction file.
This subsection shall not apply if Federal law, including rules and regulations, requires the consideration of information contained in a limited access eviction file.
This subsection shall not apply if Federal law, including rules and regulations, requires the consideration of information contained in a limited access 20240HB1769PN3673 - 4 - eviction file.
(f) Applicability.--Except as provided under subsection (c), this section applies to eviction cases filed on or after the effective date of this subsection.
(f) (E) Applicability.--Except as provided under subsection <-- (c), this section applies to eviction cases filed on or after the effective date of this subsection.
(a) General rule.--A person may not disseminate any 20240HB1769PN2769 - 4 - information contained in a limited access eviction file.
(a) General rule.--A person may not disseminate any information contained in a limited access eviction file.
(d) Violation.--A violation of subsection (b) or (c) constitutes an unlawful practice under the act of December 17, 1968 (P.L.1224, No.387), known as the Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law.
(d) Violation.--A violation of subsection (b) or (c) <-- constitutes an unlawful practice under the act of December 17, 1968 (P.L.1224, No.387), known as the Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law.
(f) Recovery.--If a person violates this section, the tenant or occupant has the right to recover an amount equal to and not more than two months' rent or twice the damages sustained, whichever is greater, and reasonable attorney fees.
(f) Recovery.--If a person violates this section, the tenant 20240HB1769PN3673 - 5 - or occupant has the right to recover an amount equal to and not more than two months' rent or twice the damages sustained, whichever is greater, and reasonable attorney fees.
(g) Construction.--Nothing in this section shall prohibit the dissemination of information regarding a money judgment for the sole purpose of collection.
(D) PRIVATE CAUSE OF ACTION.--A TENANT OR RESIDENT MAY BRING <-- A PRIVATE CAUSE OF ACTION SEEKING COMPLIANCE WITH THIS SECTION, IN WHICH THE TENANT OR RESIDENT HAS THE RIGHT TO RECOVER AN AMOUNT EQUAL TO AND NOT MORE THAN TWO MONTHS' RENT OR $5,000, WHICHEVER IS GREATER, AND REASONABLE ATTORNEY FEES.
(h) Applicability.--This section applies to an eviction case 20240HB1769PN2769 - 5 - filed on or after the effective date of this subsection.
(g) (E) Construction.--Nothing in this section shall <-- prohibit the dissemination of information regarding a money judgment for the sole purpose of collection.
(h) (F) Applicability.--This section applies to an eviction <-- case filed on or after the effective date of this subsection.
(G) WAIVER.--THE RIGHTS AND DUTIES ENUMERATED IN THIS <-- SECTION MAY NOT BE WAIVED BY ANY PROVISIONS OF A WRITTEN OR ORAL AGREEMENT.
ANY AGREEMENT ATTEMPTING TO LIMIT RIGHTS UNDER THIS SECTION SHALL BE VOID AND UNENFORCEABLE IN THE COURTS OF THIS COMMONWEALTH.
Each court shall issue monthly, and provide to the Administrative Office, a list of all court files to which the court has limited access within the previous 31 days in accordance with section 4332(c) (relating to eviction case limited access).
Each court shall issue monthly, and provide to the <-- Administrative Office, a list of all court files to which the court has limited access within the previous 31 days in accordance with section 4332(c) (relating to eviction case limited access).
(A) CASE IDENTIFICATION.--ON A MONTHLY BASIS, THE <-- 20240HB1769PN3673 - 6 - MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT COURT AND PROTHONOTARY SHALL IDENTIFY ALL EVICTION CASE COURT FILES ELIGIBLE FOR LIMITED ACCESS IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 4332(C) (RELATING TO EVICTION CASE LIMITED ACCESS).
WITHIN 20 DAYS, EACH COURT OF COMMON PLEAS SHALL ISSUE AN ORDER FOR LIMITED ACCESS TO ANY EVICTION CASE FILE IN ITS JUDICIAL DISTRICT FOR WHICH LIMITED ACCESS SHALL BE GIVEN UNDER SECTION 4332(C).
(B) TRANSMISSION.--THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF PENNSYLVANIA COURTS SHALL QUARTERLY TRANSMIT TO AN ENTITY THAT REGULARLY COLLECTS AND DISSEMINATES COURT RECORDS A LIST OF ANY EVICTION CASE FILE FOR WHICH LIMITED ACCESS HAS BEEN GIVEN AND TO WHICH THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE HAS ACCESS.
THIS SUBSECTION SHALL NOT BE INTERPRETED TO REQUIRE THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF PENNSYLVANIA COURTS TO PROVIDE OR UPDATE EVICTION CASE FILE INFORMATION FOR CASES FOR WHICH AN APPEAL HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS.
20240HB1769PN2769 - 6 -
20240HB1769PN3673 - 7 -
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. Removed from table

  2. Laid on the table

  3. First consideration

  4. Reported as amended

  5. Referred to Judiciary

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 37 co-sponsors · 215 not signed on · 11 voted No

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (37)

Not signed on (215)

215 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 215 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 14 Yea · 11 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 14000
Republican 0800
Unaffiliated 0300
Total 141100
% of votes cast 56%44%0%0%
How each member voted (25)
Member Party Vote
Paul Schemel — Nay
Stephenie Scialabba — Nay
Torren Ecker — Nay
Benjamin V. Sanchez Democratic Yea
Chris Pielli Democratic Yea
Christopher M. Rabb Democratic Yea
Dan K. Williams Democratic Yea
Emily Kinkead Democratic Yea
Joseph C. Hohenstein Democratic Yea
Kristine C. Howard Democratic Yea
Kyle Donahue Democratic Yea
La'Tasha D. Mayes Democratic Yea
Liz Hanbidge Democratic Yea
Malcolm Kenyatta Democratic Yea
Melissa L. Shusterman Democratic Yea
Perry S. Warren Democratic Yea
Tim Briggs Democratic Yea
Clint Owlett Republican Nay
David H. Rowe Republican Nay
Jim Rigby Republican Nay
Joe Hamm Republican Nay
Kate A. Klunk Republican Nay
Rob W. Kauffman Republican Nay
Robert Leadbeter Republican Nay
Timothy R. Bonner Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 14 Yea · 11 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 14000
Republican 0800
Unaffiliated 0300
Total 141100
% of votes cast 56%44%0%0%
How each member voted (25)
Member Party Vote
Paul Schemel — Nay
Stephenie Scialabba — Nay
Torren Ecker — Nay
Benjamin V. Sanchez Democratic Yea
Chris Pielli Democratic Yea
Christopher M. Rabb Democratic Yea
Dan K. Williams Democratic Yea
Emily Kinkead Democratic Yea
Joseph C. Hohenstein Democratic Yea
Kristine C. Howard Democratic Yea
Kyle Donahue Democratic Yea
La'Tasha D. Mayes Democratic Yea
Liz Hanbidge Democratic Yea
Malcolm Kenyatta Democratic Yea
Melissa L. Shusterman Democratic Yea
Perry S. Warren Democratic Yea
Tim Briggs Democratic Yea
Clint Owlett Republican Nay
David H. Rowe Republican Nay
Jim Rigby Republican Nay
Joe Hamm Republican Nay
Kate A. Klunk Republican Nay
Rob W. Kauffman Republican Nay
Robert Leadbeter Republican Nay
Timothy R. Bonner Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors HB 1769?
HB 1769 is sponsored by Joshua Siegel, Ismail Smith-Wade-El (Democratic), Elizabeth Fiedler (Democratic), Jordan A. Harris (Democratic), Rick Krajewski (Democratic), Ben Waxman (Democratic), Carol Hill-Evans (Democratic), Malcolm Kenyatta (Democratic), Danilo Burgos (Democratic), Maureen E. Madden (Democratic), Tarik Khan (Democratic), Napoleon J. Nelson (Democratic), Lindsay Powell (Democratic), Greg Scott (Democratic), Johanny Cepeda-Freytiz (Democratic), Lisa A. Borowski (Democratic), P. Sturla, Mary Jo Daley (Democratic), Dan K. Williams (Democratic), Mandy Steele (Democratic), G. Roni Green (Democratic), Amen Brown (Democratic), Aerion Abney (Democratic), Morgan Cephas (Democratic), Carol Kazeem (Democratic), Danielle Friel Otten (Democratic), Heather Boyd (Democratic), Abigail Salisbury (Democratic), La'Tasha D. Mayes (Democratic), Emily Kinkead (Democratic), Jose Giral (Democratic), Perry S. Warren (Democratic), Dan Frankel (Democratic), Jennifer O'Mara (Democratic), Joseph C. Hohenstein (Democratic), Benjamin V. Sanchez (Democratic), Donna Bullock, and Mark Rozzi.
What is the current status of HB 1769?
This bill died with 2023-2024 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track HB 1769?
Track HB 1769 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HB 1769

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of HB 1769

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →