United States 119th Congress Status: In Committee Bipartisan · 14 R · 9 D cosponsors

S 691 — Leveling the Playing Field 2.0 Act

Last action — Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed House
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill is in committee in the Senate. Introduced February 24, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.

Next likely step: a committee vote, then a floor vote in the Senate.

Odds of enactment

Low chance

Based on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a low chance of becoming law.

Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.

A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.

Prognosis

Advancing 42% · moderate confidence
  • In Committee

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 23 sponsors

    1 primary, 22 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Bipartisan support

    Sponsored across 2 parties (14 R · 9 D) — cross-party backing.

Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.

Summary

Leveling the Playing Field 2.0 ActThis bill addresses unfair trade practices by making various changes to U.S. antidumping and countervailing duty laws. Antidumping laws provide relief to U.S industries and workers that are materially injured or threatened with injury due to imports of like products sold in the U.S. market at less than fair value, while countervailing duty laws provide such relief from imports of products subsidized by a foreign government or public entity.Specifically, the bill establishes a process for successive antidumping and countervailing duty investigations. Successive investigations may be concurrent (an ongoing investigation of the same product) or recently completed (not more than two years before the date of the initiation of the successive investigation). Further, the bill establishes a timeline for the Department of Commerce to issue determinations in successive investigations.Among other provisions, the bill authorizes Commerce toapply countervailing duty law to subsidies provided by a foreign government or public entity to a company operating in a different country,use another method for calculating the cost of production in specific circumstances, andrequire importers to certify that the imported merchandise is not subject to an antidumping or countervailing duty order.Additionally, the bill statutorily establishes procedures for Commerce to conduct circumvention inquiries, including by specifying the deadlines for preliminary and final determinations.The bill also provides statutory authority for Commerce to investigate currency undervaluation as a countervailable subsidy.

Bill Text

How this bill changes current law

11 changes Share ↗

Compared against current U.S. Code AI-generated reading aid — verify against the official bill.

The bill establishes new rules for determining material injury in successive antidumping and countervailing duty investigations and modifies the initiation and issuance procedures for these investigations.

  • 19 U.S.C. 1677(7)

    (E) Special rules for successive investigations.--

    Introduces special rules for evaluating material injury in successive investigations.

  • 19 U.S.C. 1671a

    (f) Initiation by Administering Authority of Successive Countervailing Duty Investigation.--A successive investigation shall be initiated--

    Allows for the initiation of successive countervailing duty investigations under specified conditions.

  • 19 U.S.C. 1673a

    (f) Initiation by Administering Authority of Successive Antidumping Duty Investigation.--A successive investigation shall be initiated--

    Allows for the initiation of successive antidumping duty investigations under specified conditions.

  • 19 U.S.C. 1677 et seq.

    SEC. 784. DETERMINATIONS RELATING TO SUCCESSIVE INVESTIGATIONS.

    Adds a new section that outlines determinations related to successive investigations.

  • 19 U.S.C. 1673a

    shall be initiated whenever the administering authority determines, from information available to it, that a formal investigation is warranted → A successive investigation shall be initiated--

    Modifies the initiation process for antidumping investigations to include provisions for successive investigations.

  • 19 U.S.C. 1671a

    shall be initiated whenever the administering authority determines, from information available to it, that a formal investigation is warranted → A successive investigation shall be initiated--

    Modifies the initiation process for countervailing duty investigations to include provisions for successive investigations.

  • 19 U.S.C. 1673a

    may extend the date of the final determination under section 735(a)(2) if requested by the petitioner.

    Allows for the extension of the final determination date in successive antidumping investigations if requested.

  • 19 U.S.C. 1671a

    may extend the date of the final determination under section 705(a) if requested by the petitioner; and

    Allows for the extension of the final determination date in successive countervailing duty investigations if requested.

  • 19 U.S.C. 1677

    (37) Treatment of successive investigations.--For purposes of paragraph (7)(E) and sections 702(f), 732(f), and 784:

    Defines terms related to successive investigations for clarity in the bill.

  • 19 U.S.C. 1677(7)

    (C)(iii), the Commission shall-- consider the condition of the domestic industry as found in a recently completed investigation;

    Requires the Commission to consider recent investigations when evaluating material injury.

  • 19 U.S.C. 1677(7)

    the Commission may not find that there is no material injury or threat of material injury to a domestic industry solely based on recent improvements in the industry's performance,

    Prevents dismissing injury claims based solely on recent improvements in industry performance.

Action History

  1. Introduced in Senate

  2. Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 22 co-sponsors · 524 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (22)

Not signed on (524)

524 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 524 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does S 691 do?
Leveling the Playing Field 2.0 ActThis bill addresses unfair trade practices by making various changes to U.S. antidumping and countervailing duty laws. Antidumping laws provide relief to U.S industries and workers that are materially injured or threatened with injury due to imports of like products sold in the U.S. market at less than fair value, while countervailing duty laws provide such relief from imports of products subsidized by a foreign government or public entity.Specifically, the bill establishes a process for successive antidumping and countervailing duty investigations. Successive investigations may be concurrent (an ongoing investigation of the same product) or recently completed (not more than two years before the date of the initiation of the successive investigation). Further, the bill establishes a timeline for the Department of Commerce to issue determinations in successive investigations.Among other provisions, the bill authorizes Commerce toapply countervailing duty law to subsidies provided by a foreign government or public entity to a company operating in a different country,use another method for calculating the cost of production in specific circumstances, andrequire importers to certify that the imported merchandise is not subject to an antidumping or countervailing duty order.Additionally, the bill statutorily establishes procedures for Commerce to conduct circumvention inquiries, including by specifying the deadlines for preliminary and final determinations.The bill also provides statutory authority for Commerce to investigate currency undervaluation as a countervailable subsidy.
Who sponsors S 691?
S 691 is sponsored by Young, Todd (Republican), Smith, Tina (Democratic), Tuberville, Tommy (Republican), Klobuchar, Amy (Democratic), Graham, Lindsey (Republican), Baldwin, Tammy (Democratic), Cotton, Tom (Republican), Fetterman, John (Democratic), Wicker, Roger F. (Republican), Gallego, Ruben (Democratic), Banks, Jim (Republican), Warren, Elizabeth (Democratic), Schmitt, Eric (Republican), Gillibrand, Kirsten E. (Democratic), Moreno, Bernie (Republican), Britt, Katie Boyd (Republican), Slotkin, Elissa (Democratic), Capito, Shelley Moore (Republican), Hyde-Smith, Cindy (Republican), Shaheen, Jeanne (Democratic), Justice, James C. (Republican), McCormick, David (Republican), and Blackburn, Marsha (Republican).
What is the current status of S 691?
This bill is in committee in the Senate. Introduced February 24, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Where can I track S 691?
Track S 691 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on S 691

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of S 691

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →