Relating to appointment of legal counsel for certain persons in protective proceedings.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 682 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 682.
You're tracking SB 682
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 682 — Relating to appointment of legal counsel for certain persons in protective proceedings.
Last action — In committee upon adjournment.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2019 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Requires court, under certain circumstances, to appoint legal counsel for respondent or protected person in protective proceeding. Requires payment for appointed counsel from guardianship or conservatorship estate of respondent or protected person or at state expense. Provides for phase-in among counties over three-year period beginning in 2020. Directs certain county circuit courts to make annual reports regarding protective proceeding statistics to Judicial Department. Directs Judicial Department to present results of reports in report to interim committees of Legislative Assembly related to judiciary. Sunsets reporting requirement on January 2, 2023.
Bill Text
We don't have the full text on file for this bill yet.
Read SB 682 on the official Oregon source →Action History
-
In committee upon adjournment.
-
Referred to Ways and Means by order of the President.
-
Subsequent referral rescinded by order of the President.
-
Recommendation: Do pass with amendments, be printed A-Engrossed, subsequent referral to Human Services be rescinded by order of the President and be referred to Ways and Means by order of the President.
-
Work Session held.
-
Public Hearing held.
-
Referred to Judiciary, then Human Services.
-
Introduction and first reading. Referred to President's desk.
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →0 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 90 not signed on
Sponsors (0)
None.
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (90)
90 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 90 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Cliff Bentz | — | Yea |
| Dennis Linthicum | — | Yea |
| Sara Gelser | — | Yea |
| Shemia Fagan | — | Yea |
| Floyd Prozanski | Democrat | Yea |
| James Manning Jr. | Democrat | Yea |
| Kim Thatcher | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 682 do?
- Requires court, under certain circumstances, to appoint legal counsel for respondent or protected person in protective proceeding. Requires payment for appointed counsel from guardianship or conservatorship estate of respondent or protected person or at state expense. Provides for phase-in among counties over three-year period beginning in 2020. Directs certain county circuit courts to make annual reports regarding protective proceeding statistics to Judicial Department. Directs Judicial Department to present results of reports in report to interim committees of Legislative Assembly related to judiciary. Sunsets reporting requirement on January 2, 2023.
- What is the current status of SB 682?
- This bill died with 2019 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 682?
- Track SB 682 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 682
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 682
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →