HR 1163 — Prove It Act
Last action — Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 552.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill is in committee in the House. Introduced February 10, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Next likely step: a committee vote, then a floor vote in the House.
Odds of enactment
Low chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a low chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
In Committee
Current position in the legislative process.
-
31 sponsors
1 primary, 30 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (31 R).
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
Summary
Prove It Act of 2025This bill expands the requirements for federal agency rulemaking with respect to small businesses, organizations, and governmental jurisdictions.Specifically, when conducting an initial regulatory flexibility analysis, agencies must include, where feasible, any reasonably foreseeable indirect costs the proposed rule may impose on small entities.Further, if an agency certifies that an initial regulatory flexibility analysis is not required because the rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities, the agency must provide such certification within 10 days to the Office of Advocacy of the Small Business Administration. A small entity or group of small entities may petition the Office of Advocacy to review such certification. The petition must include specified information, such as the issues the petitioner believes should be addressed and a proposed solution to the issues raised.If the Office of Advocacy ultimately determines, upon a full review of the petition, that the proposed rule would have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities, the agency promulgating the rule must perform an initial and final regulatory flexibility analysis for the rule. Additionally, if the agency does not participate or assist in the full review process, the finalized rule shall not apply to small entities.The bill also requires agencies to publish, and allow for comments on, all guidance documents with respect to any rule an agency determines is likely to have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
32 added · 4 removedPlain-language change summary
The text of the bill has been updated to change the title from “Prove It Act of 2025” to “Prove It Act.” Additionally, several additional sponsors have been added to the bill. This matters because it may reflect increased support for the legislation, which could influence its consideration and potential passage.
1163 IntroducedReported in House (IH)](RH)] <DOC> 119thUnion CONGRESSCalendar 1stNo. Session H.
552 119th CONGRESS 2d Session H.
1163 To[Report amendNo. title 5, United States Code, to require greater transparency for Federal regulatory decisions that impact small businesses, and for other purposes.
119-108, Parts I and II] To amend title 5, United States Code, to require greater transparency for Federal regulatory decisions that impact small businesses, and for other purposes.
which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Small Business, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned _______________________________________________________________________May A21, BILL2025 ToReported amendfrom titlethe 5,Committee Unitedon StatesSmall Code,Business towith requirean greateramendment transparency[Strike forout Federalall regulatoryafter decisionsthe thatenacting impactclause smalland businesses,insert andthe forpart otherprinted purposes.in italic] May 4, 2026 Additional sponsors:
Mr.
Flood, Mrs.
Fischbach, Mr.
Carey, Mr.
Thompson of Pennsylvania, Mr.
Van Drew, Mr.
Calvert, Mr.
Weber of Texas, Mr.
Bacon, Mr.
Bean of Florida, Mr.
Balderson, Ms.
Van Duyne, Mr.
Carter of Georgia, Mr.
Crank, Mr.
Taylor, Mr.
Ciscomani, Mr.
Mann, Mr.
Kennedy of Utah, Mr.
Schmidt, Mrs.
Miller of West Virginia, Mr.
Valadao, Mrs.
Hinson, and Mr.
Lawler May 4, 2026 Reported from the Committee on the Judiciary, with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed [Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in boldface roman] [For text of introduced bill, see copy of bill as introduced on February 10, 2025] _______________________________________________________________________ A BILL To amend title 5, United States Code, to require greater transparency for Federal regulatory decisions that impact small businesses, and for other purposes.
This Act may be cited as the ``Prove It ActAct''. of 2025''.
<all>SECTION 1.
SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ``Prove It Act''.
SEC.
2.
INITIAL REGULATORY FLEXIBILITY ANALYSIS.
(a) In General.--Chapter 6 of title 5, United States Code, is amended-- (1) in section 603(b)-- (A) in paragraph (5), by striking the period at the end and inserting ``;
and'';
and (B) by adding at the end the following:
``(6) where feasible, any reasonably foreseeable potential indirect costs the proposed rule may impose on small entities, including small entities that-- ``(A) purchase products or services from, sell products or services to, or otherwise conduct business with entities directly regulated by the rule;
``(B) are directly regulated by other governmental entities as a result of the rule;
Show all 111 changed lines (71 more)
or ``(C) are not directly regulated by the agency as a result of the rule but are otherwise subject to other agency rules as a result of the rule.'';
(2) in section 605(b), by striking ``The agency'' and inserting ``Not later than 10 days after completing the certification described in this subsection, the agency'';
and (3) by inserting after section 605 the following:
``Sec.
605A.
Review procedures relating to initial regulatory flexibility analysis certifications ``(a) Filing a Petition To Review Agency Certification of a Proposed Rule.-- ``(1) In general.--Any small entity, group of small entities, or organization representing the interests of small entities may petition the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration (in this section referred to as the `Chief Counsel') to review a certification published under section 605(b) that a proposed rule will not, if promulgated, have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
``(2) Form.--The Chief Counsel shall-- ``(A) determine the method, timing, and form of disseminating a petition described in paragraph (1);
and ``(B) display the information described in subparagraph (A) on the website of the Office of Advocacy of the Small Business Administration in a conspicuous manner.
``(3) Contents.--Each petition described in paragraph (1) with respect to a certification published under section 605(b) for a proposed rule shall clearly and concisely-- ``(A) specify the name of the petitioner and a telephone number, a mailing address, and an email address that the Chief Counsel may use to communicate with the petitioner;
``(B) if the petitioner is an organization, provide additional identifying information, as applicable, including the organizational or corporate status of the petitioner, the State of incorporation of the petitioner, the registered agent of the petitioner, the interest of the petitioner in representing small entities affected by the proposed rule and the certification at issue, and the name and authority of the individual who signed the petition on behalf of the organizational or corporate petitioner;
``(C) present the specific problems or issues that the petitioner believes should be addressed or considered through a review of the certification, such as-- ``(i) any specific circumstances in which the determination of the certification that the proposed rule will not, if promulgated, have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities is incorrect, incomplete, or inadequate;
or ``(ii) why the proposed rule would, if promulgated, have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities;
``(D) cite, enclose, or reference any relevant and non-protected or confidential technical, scientific, or other data or information supporting any assertion of the problems or issues with the certification;
``(E) present a proposed solution to the problems or issues raised in the petition, including potential regulatory or compliance alternatives to the proposed rule;
``(F) provide an analysis, discussion, or argument that explains how the proposed solution described in subparagraph (E) solves the problems or issues raised in the petition;
and ``(G) cite, enclose, or reference any other publicly available data or information supporting the proposed solution described in subparagraph (E).
``(b) Consultation.-- ``(1) In general.--Any entity or organization desiring to file a petition under subsection (a) may request a consultation with the Chief Counsel before or after filing the petition.
``(2) Form.--The Chief Counsel shall-- ``(A) determine the method, timing, and form of requesting a consultation with the Chief Counsel under paragraph (1);
and ``(B) display the information described in subparagraph (A) on the website of the Office of Advocacy of the Small Business Administration in a conspicuous manner.
``(3) Limitations on assistance.--In any consultation regarding a petition under paragraph (1), the Chief Counsel-- ``(A) may only-- ``(i) describe the process for filing, docketing, tracking, closing, amending, withdrawing, and resolving the petition;
and ``(ii) assist the petitioner to clarify the petition so that the Chief Counsel is able to understand the issues of concern to the petitioner;
and ``(B) may not advise a petitioner on whether the petition should be amended or withdrawn.
``(c) Prima Facie Review.-- ``(1) In general.--Upon receipt of a petition filed under this section with respect to the certification of a proposed rule, the Chief Counsel shall make an initial prima facie determination on the merit of the issues raised in the petition as to the properness of the certification and whether the proposed rule in question would, if promulgated, have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
``(2) No further review.--If, following the prima facie review of a petition under paragraph (1), the Chief Counsel determines that the issues raised in the petition do not merit further review by the Chief Counsel, the Chief Counsel shall, not later than 10 days after receipt of the petition, inform the petitioner of that determination and the matter shall be closed.
``(3) Further review.--If, following the prima facie review of a petition under paragraph (1), the Chief Counsel determines that the issues raised in the petition do merit further review by the Chief Counsel, the Chief Counsel shall, not later than days after receipt of the petition, inform the petitioner and the agency that promulgated the proposed rule that the Chief Counsel shall conduct a full review of the certification and proposed rule to which the petition relates under subsection (d).
``(d) Full Review.-- ``(1) Considerations;
meeting.--In conducting a full review under this subsection with respect to the certification made under section 605(b), the Chief Counsel shall-- ``(A) consider-- ``(i) whether the agency that promulgated the proposed rule correctly determined which small entities will be affected by the proposed rule;
``(ii) whether the agency considered adequate economic data to assess whether the proposed rule will have a significant impact on a substantial number of small entities;
and ``(iii) the economic implications of the proposed rule;
and ``(B) convene a virtual or in-person meeting between the Chief Counsel, the petitioner, representatives of the agency that promulgated the proposed rule who are determined appropriate by the Chief Counsel, and the Administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs to-- ``(i) provide positions and support for those positions regarding the certification of the proposed rule;
and ``(ii) allow the Chief Counsel to ask questions as the Chief Counsel determines necessary to make a final determination as to the validity of the certification.
``(2) Publication.--Not later than 30 days after the date on which the Chief Counsel begins a full review of a certification made with respect to a proposed rule under paragraph (1), the Chief Counsel shall submit to the petitioner and the agency that promulgated the proposed rule, and publish in the Federal Register and on the website of the Office of Advocacy of the Small Business Administration, the results of the review conducted under paragraph (1).
``(3) Requirement to perform analyses.--If, after a full review of a certification made with respect to a proposed rule under paragraph (1), the Chief Counsel determines that the proposed rule will, if promulgated, have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities, the agency that promulgated the proposed rule shall perform an initial regulatory flexibility analysis and a final regulatory flexibility analysis for the proposed rule under sections 603 and 604, respectively.
``(4) Penalty.--If an agency fails to attend the required meeting under paragraph (1)(B) or in any other way fails to assist the Chief Counsel in a full review under paragraph (1) with respect to a proposed rule of the agency, as determined by the Chief Counsel, the final rule shall not apply to small entities.
``(5) Judicial review.--For purposes of judicial review under chapter 7 of this title, a certification made by an agency under section 605(b) for which a petition is filed under subsection (a) shall be considered final agency action as of the date on which the Chief Counsel-- ``(A) makes a determination under subsection (c)(2) that the issues raised in the petition do not merit further review;
or ``(B) publishes the results of a full review of the certification under paragraph (1).''.
(b) Technical and Conforming Amendment.--The table of sections for chapter 6 of title 5, United States Code, is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 605 the following:
``605A.
Review procedures relating to initial regulatory flexibility analysis certifications.''.
SEC.
3.
PUBLICATION OF GUIDANCE.
Section 609 of title 5, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:
``(f) With respect to any rule that an agency determines is likely to have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities, the head of the agency shall, on regulations.gov or any similar internet website-- ``(1) publish all guidance documents and other relevant documents, as determined by the agency, including any updated guidance documents that set forth interpretations of the rule;
and ``(2) allow for comments on the documents described in paragraph (1) to ensure that small entities may access and provide feedback on those documents.''.
SEC.
4.
REVIEW PROCEDURES FOR SECTION 610 PERIODIC REVIEW OF RULES.
(a) In General.--Section 610 of title 5, United States Code, is amended-- (1) in subsection (b)-- (A) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking ``the following factors'';
(B) in paragraph (4), by striking ``and'' at the end;
(C) in paragraph (5), by striking the period at the end and inserting ``;
and'';
and (D) by adding at the end the following:
``(6) any indirect costs described in the initial regulatory flexibility analysis under section 603(b)(6), and any other indirect costs that may have arisen during the 10- year period described in subsection (a).'';
and (2) by adding at the end the following:
``(d) If an agency fails to conduct a review of a rule as required under this section within the 10-year period described in subsection (a)-- ``(1) the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration shall notify the agency that the rule has ceased to be effective;
``(2) the agency shall publish in the Federal Register a notification that the rule has ceased to be effective, and solicit comments for why the rule should be reinstated;
and ``(3) if, based on the comments received under paragraph (2), the agency determines that the rule should be reinstated-- ``(A) the agency shall have 180 days beginning on the date of that determination to complete the review of the rule under this section;
and ``(B) upon completion of the review under subparagraph (A), the rule shall be reinstated, notwithstanding the notice and comment rulemaking procedures under section 553 of this title.''.
(b) Application.--The amendment made by subsection (a)(2) shall apply with respect to any final rule issued by an agency-- (1) during the 5-year period preceding the date of enactment of this Act;
or (2) on or after the date of enactment of this Act.
SEC.
5.
NO ADDITIONAL FUNDS.
No additional funds are authorized to be appropriated for the purpose of carrying out this Act or the amendments made by this Act.
Union Calendar No.
552 119th CONGRESS 2d Session H.
R.
1163 [Report No.
119-108, Parts I and II] _______________________________________________________________________ A BILL To amend title 5, United States Code, to require greater transparency for Federal regulatory decisions that impact small businesses, and for other purposes.
_______________________________________________________________________ May 4, 2026 Reported from the Committee on the Judiciary, with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed
Show all 111 changed rows (71 more)
View plain text versions (2)
- Reported Reported in House Current html May 04, 2026
- Introduced Introduced in House html February 10, 2025
AI-generated reading aid from the bill's amendatory text — verify against the official bill.
The bill amends existing law to increase transparency and oversight of federal regulatory decisions impacting small businesses by introducing new review procedures and requirements.
-
5 U.S.C. 603
The period at the end→ ; andThis change modifies a requirement in the initial regulatory flexibility analysis to include consideration of potential indirect costs imposed on small entities.
-
5 U.S.C. 603
(6) where feasible, any reasonably foreseeable potential indirect costs the proposed rule may impose on small entities, including small entities that-- (A) purchase products or services from, sell products or services to, or otherwise conduct business with entities directly regulated by the rule; (B) are directly regulated by other governmental entities as a result of the rule; or (C) are not directly regulated by the agency as a result of the rule but are otherwise subject to other agency rules as a result of the rule.
This addition requires agencies to consider indirect costs that proposed regulations may impose on small entities.
-
5 U.S.C. 605
The agency→ Not later than 10 days after completing the certification described in this subsection, the agencyThis change sets a timeframe within which agencies must notify about their certification of economic impact.
-
Sec. 605A. Review procedures relating to initial regulatory flexibility analysis certifications...
The bill establishes new review procedures for the certification of regulatory impacts on small entities.
-
5 U.S.C. 605A
(1) In general.--Any small entity, group of small entities, or organization representing the interests of small entities may petition the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration...
It allows small entities to petition for review of agency certifications regarding economic impact.
-
5 U.S.C. 605A
(d) Full Review.--(1) Considerations; meeting.--In conducting a full review under this subsection...
It requires agencies to conduct a comprehensive review of the regulatory impact if a petition is filed.
-
5 U.S.C. 605A
(4) Penalty.--If an agency fails to attend the required meeting under paragraph (1)(B)...
It establishes consequences for agencies that do not comply with the full review process.
-
5 U.S.C. 605A
(5) Judicial review.--For purposes of judicial review under chapter 7 of this title...
It clarifies that agency certifications are considered final actions for the purposes of judicial review under certain conditions.
Action History
-
Introduced in House
-
Introduced in House
-
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Small Business, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
-
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Small Business, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
-
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
-
Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 15 - 11.
-
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
-
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Small Business. H. Rept. 119-108, Part I.
-
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Small Business. H. Rept. 119-108, Part I.
-
Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute by the Yeas and Nays: 14 - 12.
-
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 119-108, Part II.
-
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 119-108, Part II.
-
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 552.
Sponsors
- Brad Finstad · Primary
- Harriet M. Hageman · Cosponsor
- Nathaniel Moran · Cosponsor
- Maria Elvira Salazar · Cosponsor
- Daniel Meuser · Cosponsor
- Zachary Nunn · Cosponsor
- Bryan Steil · Cosponsor
- Pete Stauber · Cosponsor
- Mike Flood · Cosponsor
- Michelle Fischbach · Cosponsor
- Mike Carey · Cosponsor
- Glenn Thompson · Cosponsor
- Jefferson Van Drew · Cosponsor
- Ken Calvert · Cosponsor
- Randy K. Sr. Weber · Cosponsor
- Don Bacon · Cosponsor
- Aaron Bean · Cosponsor
- Troy Balderson · Cosponsor
- Beth Van Duyne · Cosponsor
- Earl L. "Buddy" Carter · Cosponsor
- Jeff Crank · Cosponsor
- David J. Taylor · Cosponsor
- Juan Ciscomani · Cosponsor
- Tracey Mann · Cosponsor
- Mike Kennedy · Cosponsor
- Derek Schmidt · Cosponsor
- Carol D. Miller · Cosponsor
- David G. Valadao · Cosponsor
- Ashley Hinson · Cosponsor
- Michael Lawler · Cosponsor
- Pete Sessions · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 30 co-sponsors · 516 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Finstad, Brad Republican
Co-sponsors (30)
- Hageman, Harriet M. Republican
- Moran, Nathaniel Republican
- Salazar, Maria Elvira Republican
- Meuser, Daniel Republican
- Nunn, Zachary Republican
- Steil, Bryan Republican
- Stauber, Pete Republican
- Flood, Mike Republican
- Fischbach, Michelle Republican
- Carey, Mike Republican
- Thompson, Glenn Republican
- Van Drew, Jefferson Republican
- Calvert, Ken Republican
- Weber, Randy K. Sr. Republican
- Bacon, Don Republican
- Bean, Aaron Republican
- Balderson, Troy Republican
- Van Duyne, Beth Republican
- Carter, Earl L. "Buddy" Republican
- Crank, Jeff Republican
- Taylor, David J. Republican
- Ciscomani, Juan Republican
- Mann, Tracey Republican
- Kennedy, Mike Republican
- Schmidt, Derek Republican
- Miller, Carol D. Republican
- Valadao, David G. Republican
- Hinson, Ashley Republican
- Lawler, Michael Republican
- Sessions, Pete Republican
Not signed on (516)
516 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 516 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does HR 1163 do?
- Prove It Act of 2025This bill expands the requirements for federal agency rulemaking with respect to small businesses, organizations, and governmental jurisdictions.Specifically, when conducting an initial regulatory flexibility analysis, agencies must include, where feasible, any reasonably foreseeable indirect costs the proposed rule may impose on small entities.Further, if an agency certifies that an initial regulatory flexibility analysis is not required because the rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities, the agency must provide such certification within 10 days to the Office of Advocacy of the Small Business Administration. A small entity or group of small entities may petition the Office of Advocacy to review such certification. The petition must include specified information, such as the issues the petitioner believes should be addressed and a proposed solution to the issues raised.If the Office of Advocacy ultimately determines, upon a full review of the petition, that the proposed rule would have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities, the agency promulgating the rule must perform an initial and final regulatory flexibility analysis for the rule. Additionally, if the agency does not participate or assist in the full review process, the finalized rule shall not apply to small entities.The bill also requires agencies to publish, and allow for comments on, all guidance documents with respect to any rule an agency determines is likely to have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
- Who sponsors HR 1163?
- HR 1163 is sponsored by Finstad, Brad (Republican), Hageman, Harriet M. (Republican), Moran, Nathaniel (Republican), Salazar, Maria Elvira (Republican), Meuser, Daniel (Republican), Nunn, Zachary (Republican), Steil, Bryan (Republican), Stauber, Pete (Republican), Flood, Mike (Republican), Fischbach, Michelle (Republican), Carey, Mike (Republican), Thompson, Glenn (Republican), Van Drew, Jefferson (Republican), Calvert, Ken (Republican), Weber, Randy K. Sr. (Republican), Bacon, Don (Republican), Bean, Aaron (Republican), Balderson, Troy (Republican), Van Duyne, Beth (Republican), Carter, Earl L. "Buddy" (Republican), Crank, Jeff (Republican), Taylor, David J. (Republican), Ciscomani, Juan (Republican), Mann, Tracey (Republican), Kennedy, Mike (Republican), Schmidt, Derek (Republican), Miller, Carol D. (Republican), Valadao, David G. (Republican), Hinson, Ashley (Republican), Lawler, Michael (Republican), and Sessions, Pete (Republican).
- What is the current status of HR 1163?
- This bill is in committee in the House. Introduced February 10, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
- Where can I track HR 1163?
- Track HR 1163 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HR 1163
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HR 1163
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →