S 408 — Job Protection Act
Last action — Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill is in committee in the Senate. Introduced February 05, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Next likely step: a committee vote, then a floor vote in the Senate.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
LowHow often bills like it became law.
-
In Committee
Current position in the legislative process.
-
8 sponsors
1 primary, 7 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Bipartisan support
Sponsored across 2 parties (7 D · 1 I) — cross-party backing.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Bill Text
- Introduced Introduced in Senate Current html February 05, 2025
Compared against current U.S. Code AI-generated reading aid — verify against the official bill.
The bill significantly expands eligibility for family and medical leave by reducing the employment duration requirement and the number of employees employers must have to be covered by the law.
-
29 U.S.C. 2611(2)(A)
employed--\n(i) for at least 12 months by the employer with respect to whom leave is requested under section 2612 of this title; and\n(ii) for at least 1,250 hours of service with such employer during the previous 12-month period.→ employed for not less than 90 days by the employer with respect to whom leave is requested under section 102.This change lowers the duration of required employment from 12 months to 90 days for eligibility.
-
29 U.S.C. 2611(2)(B)
does not include--\n(i) any Federal officer or employee covered under subchapter V of chapter 63 of title 5; or\n(ii) any employee of an employer who is employed at a worksite at which such employer employs less than 50 employees if the total number of employees employed by that employer within 75 miles of that worksite is less than 50.→ does not include any Federal officer or employee covered under subchapter V of chapter 63 of title 5, United States Code (as added by title II of this Act).This change removes the requirement that employees must not be at less than 50 employees to qualify for leave.
-
29 U.S.C. 2611(2)
subparagraph (C) and (D)This change eliminates the subparagraphs that described additional rules for determining eligible employees.
-
29 U.S.C. 2611(4)(A)(i)
50 or more employees for each working day during each of 20 or more calendar workweeks in the current or preceding calendar year;→ 1 or more employeesThis change broadens the definition of 'employer' to include any employer with at least one employee, significantly expanding the scope of the law.
-
5 U.S.C. 6381(1)(B)
12 months→ 90 daysThis change reduces the required employment duration for federal employees to be eligible for leave from 12 months to 90 days.
-
5 U.S.C. 6382(d)(2)(E)
12 months→ 90 daysThis change applies the new 90-day eligibility to additional federal leave calculations.
-
3 U.S.C. 412(a)(2)(B)
12 months and for at least 1,250 hours of employment during the previous 12 months→ 90 daysThis change simplifies the eligibility requirement for presidential employees to 90 days of employment.
-
2 U.S.C. 1312(a)(2)(B)
12 months and for at least 1,250 hours of employment during the previous 12 months→ 90 daysThis change simplifies the eligibility requirement for congressional employees to 90 days of employment.
Action History
-
Introduced in Senate
-
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Sponsors
- Tina Smith · Primary
- Elizabeth Warren · Cosponsor
- Richard J. Durbin · Cosponsor
- Richard Blumenthal · Cosponsor
- Alex Padilla · Cosponsor
- Patty Murray · Cosponsor
- Kirsten E. Gillibrand · Cosponsor
- Bernard Sanders · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 7 co-sponsors · 539 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Smith, Tina Democratic
Co-sponsors (7)
- Warren, Elizabeth Democratic
- Durbin, Richard J. Democratic
- Blumenthal, Richard Democratic
- Padilla, Alex Democratic
- Murray, Patty Democratic
- Gillibrand, Kirsten E. Democratic
- Sanders, Bernard Independent
Not signed on (539)
539 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 539 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors S 408?
- S 408 is sponsored by Smith, Tina (Democratic), Warren, Elizabeth (Democratic), Durbin, Richard J. (Democratic), Blumenthal, Richard (Democratic), Padilla, Alex (Democratic), Murray, Patty (Democratic), Gillibrand, Kirsten E. (Democratic), and Sanders, Bernard (Independent).
- What is the current status of S 408?
- This bill is in committee in the Senate. Introduced February 05, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
- Where can I track S 408?
- Track S 408 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on S 408
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of S 408
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →