Caring for All Families Act
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when S 437 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on S 437.
You're tracking S 437
We'll email you the moment it moves.
S 437 — Caring for All Families Act
Last action — Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. (text: CR S668-671)
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill is in committee in the Senate. Introduced February 05, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Next likely step: a committee vote, then a floor vote in the Senate.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
LowHow often bills like it became law.
-
In Committee
Current position in the legislative process.
-
11 sponsors
1 primary, 10 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (11 D).
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Bill Text
- Introduced Introduced in Senate Current html February 05, 2025
Compared against current U.S. Code AI-generated reading aid — verify against the official bill.
This bill expands the Family and Medical Leave Act to include domestic partners, in-laws, and additional family-related leave provisions.
-
29 U.S.C. 2611
(20) Any other individual whose close association is the equivalent of a family relationship.--The term `any other individual whose close association is the equivalent of a family relationship', used with respect to an employee or a covered servicemember, means any person with whom the employee or covered servicemember, as the case may be, has a significant personal bond that is or is like a family relationship, regardless of biological or legal relationship.
Defines 'any other individual' to include those who have a significant personal bond like a family relationship.
-
29 U.S.C. 2611
who is--→ and includes an adult child.Expands the definition of 'son or daughter' to expressly include adult children.
-
29 U.S.C. 2611
(21) Domestic partner.--The term `domestic partner', used with respect to an employee or a covered servicemember, means-- (A) the person recognized as the domestic partner of the employee or covered servicemember under any domestic partnership or civil union law of a State or political subdivision of a State; or (B) in the case of an unmarried employee or covered servicemember, an unmarried adult person who is in a committed, personal relationship with the employee or covered servicemember, is not a domestic partner as described in subparagraph (A) to or in such a relationship with any other person, and who is designated to the employer by such employee or covered servicemember as the domestic partner of that employee or covered servicemember.
Defines what constitutes a domestic partner for the purposes of family and medical leave.
-
29 U.S.C. 2612
spouse, or a son, daughter, or parent, of the employee, if such spouse, son, daughter, or parent→ spouse or domestic partner, or a son or daughter, son-in-law or daughter-in-law, parent, parent-in-law, grandparent, grandchild, sibling, uncle or aunt, or nephew or niece of the employee, or any other individual whose close association is the equivalent of a family relationship with the employee, if such spouse, domestic partner, son or daughter, son-in-law or daughter-in-law, parent, parent-in-law, grandparent, grandchild, sibling, uncle or aunt, or nephew or niece, or such other individualExpands the categories of family members for which employees can take leave.
-
29 U.S.C. 2612
spouse, or a son, daughter, or parent of the employee→ spouse or domestic partner, or a son or daughter, son-in-law or daughter-in-law, parent, parent-in-law, grandchild, sibling, uncle or aunt, or nephew or niece of the employee, or any other individual whose close association is the equivalent of a family relationship with the employeeAdds domestic partners and more family relationships to those eligible for leave.
-
29 U.S.C. 2613
son, daughter, spouse, or parent of the employee, or of the next of kin of an individual in the case of leave taken under such paragraph (3), as appropriate→ son or daughter, son-in-law or daughter-in-law, spouse or domestic partner, parent, parent-in-law, grandparent, grandchild, sibling, uncle or aunt, or nephew or niece of the employee, or the next of kin of an individual, or any other individual whose close association is the equivalent of a family relationship with the employee, as appropriateUpdates the certification requirements to reflect the expanded definitions of eligible family members.
Action History
-
Introduced in Senate
-
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. (text: CR S668-671)
Sponsors
- Richard J. Durbin · Primary
- John W. Hickenlooper · Cosponsor
- Kirsten E. Gillibrand · Cosponsor
- Jeff Merkley · Cosponsor
- Richard Blumenthal · Cosponsor
- Peter Welch · Cosponsor
- Tina Smith · Cosponsor
- Patty Murray · Cosponsor
- Alex Padilla · Cosponsor
- Tammy Duckworth · Cosponsor
- Andy Kim · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 10 co-sponsors · 536 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Durbin, Richard J. Democratic
Co-sponsors (10)
- Hickenlooper, John W. Democratic
- Gillibrand, Kirsten E. Democratic
- Merkley, Jeff Democratic
- Blumenthal, Richard Democratic
- Welch, Peter Democratic
- Smith, Tina Democratic
- Murray, Patty Democratic
- Padilla, Alex Democratic
- Duckworth, Tammy Democratic
- Kim, Andy Democratic
Not signed on (536)
536 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 536 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors S 437?
- S 437 is sponsored by Durbin, Richard J. (Democratic), Hickenlooper, John W. (Democratic), Gillibrand, Kirsten E. (Democratic), Merkley, Jeff (Democratic), Blumenthal, Richard (Democratic), Welch, Peter (Democratic), Smith, Tina (Democratic), Murray, Patty (Democratic), Padilla, Alex (Democratic), Duckworth, Tammy (Democratic), and Kim, Andy (Democratic).
- What is the current status of S 437?
- This bill is in committee in the Senate. Introduced February 05, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
- Where can I track S 437?
- Track S 437 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on S 437
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of S 437
Last checked for changes 4 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →