S 230 — Unborn Child Support Act
Last action — Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill is in committee in the Senate. Introduced January 23, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Next likely step: a committee vote, then a floor vote in the Senate.
Odds of enactment
Low chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a low chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
In Committee
Current position in the legislative process.
-
10 sponsors
1 primary, 9 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (10 R).
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
Summary
Unborn Child Support Act This bill requires states to apply child support obligations to the time period during pregnancy. This requirement is applicable retroactively based on a court order at the request of the pregnant parent and a determination by a physician of the month during which the child was conceived. Existing state requirements are applicable to these obligations, such as proof of parenthood.
Bill Text
- Introduced Introduced in Senate Current html January 23, 2025
Action History
-
Introduced in Senate
-
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Sponsors
- Kevin Cramer · Primary
- Jim Banks · Cosponsor
- Marsha Blackburn · Cosponsor
- Katie Boyd Britt · Cosponsor
- Steve Daines · Cosponsor
- John Hoeven · Cosponsor
- Cindy Hyde-Smith · Cosponsor
- James Lankford · Cosponsor
- Roger Marshall · Cosponsor
- Roger F. Wicker · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 9 co-sponsors · 537 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Cramer, Kevin Republican
Co-sponsors (9)
- Banks, Jim Republican
- Blackburn, Marsha Republican
- Britt, Katie Boyd Republican
- Daines, Steve Republican
- Hoeven, John Republican
- Hyde-Smith, Cindy Republican
- Lankford, James Republican
- Marshall, Roger Republican
- Wicker, Roger F. Republican
Not signed on (537)
537 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 537 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does S 230 do?
- Unborn Child Support Act This bill requires states to apply child support obligations to the time period during pregnancy. This requirement is applicable retroactively based on a court order at the request of the pregnant parent and a determination by a physician of the month during which the child was conceived. Existing state requirements are applicable to these obligations, such as proof of parenthood.
- Who sponsors S 230?
- S 230 is sponsored by Cramer, Kevin (Republican), Banks, Jim (Republican), Blackburn, Marsha (Republican), Britt, Katie Boyd (Republican), Daines, Steve (Republican), Hoeven, John (Republican), Hyde-Smith, Cindy (Republican), Lankford, James (Republican), Marshall, Roger (Republican), and Wicker, Roger F. (Republican).
- What is the current status of S 230?
- This bill is in committee in the Senate. Introduced January 23, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
- Where can I track S 230?
- Track S 230 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on S 230
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of S 230
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →