AB 370 — Relating to: guaranteed admission to University of Wisconsin System institutions and technical colleges and requiring high schools to prepare class rankings for certain pupils. (FE)
Last action — Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2023-2024 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
203 added · 211 removedPlain-language change summary
The recent changes to Bill AB 370 clarify the criteria for guaranteed admission to the University of Wisconsin System for high school students. The updated version specifies that students must be in the top 5 percent of their class to qualify for the program, and it establishes a simpler ranking framework that focuses on grade point averages and ACT scores. This matters because it standardizes how high schools report class rankings and could impact college admissions by making it easier for students to understand their standing and opportunities.
- 2024 LEGISLATURE LRBs0109/1LRB-3122/1 ARG:cjs ASSEMBLY SUBSTITUTE AMENDMENT 1, TO ASSEMBLY BILL 370 OctoberJuly 10,27, 2023 - OfferedIntroduced by RepresentativeRepresentatives O C ONNOR ., MURPHY, VOS, MAXEY, N EDWESKI, KITCHENS, A RMSTRONG, G USTAFSON, M ACCO, BODDEN , BEHNKE , G UNDRUM , OZAR, WICHGERS, BRANDTJEN, GOEBEN and GREEN , cosponsored by Senator C ABRAL-G UEVARA.
Referred to Committee on Colleges and Universities.
and to create 36.11 (3m)(3m), 38.22 (2) and 118.58 of the statutes;
guaranteed admission to University of Wisconsin System institutions and technical colleges and requiring high schools to prepare class rankings for certain pupils.
Analysis by the Legislative Reference Bureau This bill requires the Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System and technical college district boards to establish a guaranteed admission program for applicants whoranked rank in the top 5 percent of their high school class and requires an annual class ranking of some high school pupils at the end of 11th and 12th grade.
The bill requires school boards, charter school operators, and governing bodies of private schools and tribal schools that operate high schools to 1) establish a method for ranking pupils on the basis of academic achievement;achievement, which may take into account the pupil's grade point average, ACT examination score, course work, and other measures of academic achievement or scholastic merit;
The class ranking method must useidentify aspupils criteriawho forrank thein ranking only the pupil'stop grade5 pointpercent average,of thetheir pupil'shigh scoreschool onclass aand collegemay entranceinclude examination such as the ACT,class orranking a combination of GPAother andpupils examinationas score.well.
IfThe applicationschool ofboard, thesecharter criteriaschool producesoperator, aor tiegoverning amongbody pupils,must additionalprovide tiebreakernotice criteriaof mayranking includeto theeach rigorpupil ofranked in the pupil'stop course5 workpercent and other measures of academicthe achievementpupil's orhigh scholasticschool merit.class.
TheIf classa rankinghigh mustschool's identifyclass pupilsenrollment whois rankless inthan the20 toppupils, 5the percenthighest andranked pupil in LRBs0109/1the -class 2024is Legislatureconsidered -to 2be -in ARG:cjs the top 105 percent,percent. respectively, of their high school class, and may include the class ranking of other pupils as well.
However,- if2024 theLegislature criteria- used2 for- LRB-3122/1 ARG:cjs ASSEMBLY BILL 370 The bill provides that, under the classUW rankingSystem includesand GPA,technical acollege pupilguaranteed mayadmission notprograms, bean rankedapplicant inis eligible for guaranteed admission to the topUW 5System percentinstitution or 10technical percentcollege unlessof the pupilapplicant's haschoice aif GPAthe ofapplicant atsatisfies leastany 3.85of orthe 3.5,following respectively.criteria:
If1) the criteriaapplicant usedgraduated forfrom, theor classexpects rankingto includesgraduate from, a collegepublic, entranceprivate, examinationor score,tribal ahigh pupilschool mayin notWisconsin beand is ranked in the top 5 percent orof 10 percent unless the pupilapplicant's hashigh achievedschool aclass composite score on the examination that places the pupil in at least the nationaltime 90thof percentileapplication; ranking or 85th percentile ranking, respectively.
The2) schoolthe board,applicant charteris schoolhomeschooled, operator,has been or governingexpects body must provide notice of ranking to eachbe pupilgranted rankeda in the top 10 percent of the pupil's high school classdiploma, thatand theachieves pupilan isACT ranked,examination asscore applicable, in the top 5 percent or in the top 10 percent of theall class.scores statewide.
IfFor aUW highSystem school'sinstitutions, class enrollment is less than 20 pupils, the highestprogram rankedapplies pupilonly in the class is considered to beapplicants infor theadmission topas 5first-year percentundergraduate andstudents. the 2nd highest ranked pupil is considered to be in the top 10 percent.
The bill provides that, under the UW System guaranteed admission program, an applicant is eligible for guaranteed admission to the UW System institution of the applicant's choice, with one exception, if the applicant satisfies any of the following criteria:
1) the applicant graduated from, or expects to graduate from, a public, private, or tribal high school in Wisconsin and is ranked in the top 10 percent of the applicant's high school class at the time of application;
2) the applicant is homeschooled, has been or expects to be granted a high school diploma, and achieves a composite score on a college entrance examination that places the applicant in the national 85th percentile ranking or higher.
Under the exception, an applicant is eligible for guaranteed admission to UW-Madison as provided in 1), above, only if the applicant is ranked in the top 5 percent of the class or as provided in 2), above, only if the applicant has achieved a composite score in the 90th percentile or higher.
The program applies only to applicants for admission as first-year undergraduate students.
A UW System institution or technical college may revoke an offer of admission if the applicant later fails to graduate from high school, fails in the final year of high school to maintain a level of academic achievement similar to the applicant's level of academic achievement at the time of application, or misrepresents the applicant's class rank or collegeACT entrance examination results.score.
For further information see the state and local fiscal estimate, which will be printed as an appendix to this bill.
No LRBs0109/1 - 2024 Legislature - 3 - ARG:cjs SECTION 1 sectarian or partisan tests or any tests based upon race, religion, national origin of U.S.
SSECTION ECTION 2.
(a) In this subsection:subsection, “home-based private educational program” has the meaning given in s.
1.
“College entrance examination” means the ACT examination or a similar examination designed to test a person's qualification or preparedness for college admission.
2.
“Home-based private educational program” has the meaning given in s.
(b) The board shall establish a guaranteed admission program under which an applicant for undergraduate admission shall be admitted to the institution of the applicant's choice if theall requirements under par.
(c) and,are ifsatisfied. applicable, under par.
(d)LRB-3122/1 are- satisfied.2024 Legislature - 3 - ARG:cjs SECTION 2 ASSEMBLY BILL 370 (c) An applicant is eligible for guaranteed admission to an institution if all of the following apply:
(c) An applicant is eligible for guaranteed admission to an institution if all of the following apply:
ExceptThe asapplicant providedsatisfies inany par.of the following criteria:
(d), the applicant satisfies any of the following criteria:
The applicant graduated from, or at the time of application expects to graduate from, a public, private, or tribal high school in this state and, at the time of application, the applicant is ranked in the top 105 percent of the applicant's high school class, as determined under s.
LRBs0109/1 - 2024 Legislature - 4 - ARG:cjs SECTION 2 b.
The applicant has been or expects to be granted a high school diploma by the administrator of a home-based private educational program in this state and the applicant achieves aan compositeACT score on a college entrance examination thatscore placesin the applicanttop in5 thepercent nationalof 85thACT percentileexaminations rankinggiven orstatewide. higher.
(d) AnIf an applicant applies for admission to more than one institution, the applicant is eligible for guaranteed admission tounder thethis Universitysubsection of Wisconsin-Madison only ifto theone applicantinstitution, satisfiesas anydesignated ofby the followingapplicant. criteria:
1.(e) An institution may rely on information supplied by a school board, charter school operator, or governing body of a private school or tribal school, the ACT examination administrator, an applicant's high school transcript if class rank is noted on the transcript, an applicant's self-reported information, or other reliable information in determining an applicant's class rank or ACT examination score for purposes of par.
The applicant graduated from, or at the time of application expects to graduate from, a public, private, or tribal high school in this state and, at the time of application, the applicant is ranked in the top 5 percent of the applicant's high school class, as determined under s.
118.58, in the most recent class ranking for that class.
Show all 117 changed lines (77 more)
2.
The applicant has been or expects to be granted a high school diploma by the administrator of a home-based private educational program in this state and the applicant achieves a composite score on a college entrance examination that places the applicant in the national 90th percentile ranking or higher.
(e) If an applicant applies for admission to more than one institution, the applicant is eligible for guaranteed admission under this subsection only to one institution, as designated by the applicant but subject to par.
(d).
(f) An institution may rely on information supplied by a school board, charter school operator, or governing body of a private school or tribal school, college entrance examination administrator, an applicant's high school transcript if class rank is noted on the transcript, an applicant's self-reported information, or other reliable LRBs0109/1 - 2024 Legislature - 5 - ARG:cjs SECTION 2 information in determining an applicant's class rank or college entrance examination results for purposes of pars.
and- (d).2024 Legislature - 4 - LRB-3122/1 ARG:cjs ASSEMBLY BILL 370 SECTION 2 (f) An institution may revoke an applicant's offer of admission extended under this subsection if any of the following applies:
(g) An institution may revoke an applicant's offer of admission extended under this subsection if any of the following applies:
The applicant misrepresented to the institution the applicant's class rank or collegeACT entrance examination results.score.
(h)(g) This subsection does not guarantee an applicant admission to any specific program offered by an institution.
SSECTION ECTION 3.
118.5838.22 (2) of the statutes is created to read:
118.5838.22(2) Class(a) rankings.In this subsection, “home-based private educational program” has the meaning given in s.
(1)115.001 In(3g). this section, “college entrance examination” means the ACT examination or a similar examination designed to test a person's qualification or preparedness for college admission.
(2)(b) IfEach district board shall establish a schoolguaranteed board,admission operatorprogram ofunder which an applicant for admission to a chartertechnical schoolcollege governed by the district board shall be admitted to the technical college if all requirements under s.par.
118.40(c) (2r)are orsatisfied. (2x), or governing body of a private school or tribal school operates a high school that LRBs0109/1 - 2024 Legislature - 6 - ARG:cjs SECTION 3 includes grades 11 and 12, the school board, charter school operator, or governing body shall do all of the following:
(a)(c) EstablishAn aapplicant methodis eligible for rankingguaranteed pupilsadmission onto thea basistechnical ofcollege academicif achievement that satisfies all of the following requirements:apply:
LRB-3122/1 - 2024 Legislature - 5 - ARG:cjs SECTION 3 ASSEMBLY BILL 370 1.
SubjectThe toapplicant subd.satisfies any of the following criteria:
2.
and sub.
(3) (c), the criteria for ranking pupils may only be any of the following:
The pupil'sapplicant gradegraduated pointfrom, average.or at the time of application expects to graduate from, a public, private, or tribal high school in this state and, at the time of application, the applicant is ranked in the top 5 percent of the applicant's high school class, as determined under s.
118.58, in the most recent class ranking for that class.
The pupil'sapplicant scorehas onbeen or expects to be granted a collegehigh entranceschool examination.diploma by the administrator of a home-based private educational program in this state and the applicant achieves an ACT examination score in the top 5 percent of ACT examinations given statewide.
c.
A combination of the criteria in subd.
1.
a.
and 1.
b., using a weighting formula determined by the school board, charter school operator, or governing body.
ForThe pupilsapplicant forhas whomsubmitted a complete application ofby the criteriaapplication underdeadline. subd.
(d) If an applicant applies for admission to more than one technical college, the applicant is eligible for guaranteed admission under this subsection only to one technical college, as designated by the applicant.
(e) A district board may rely on information supplied by a school board, charter school operator, or governing body of a private school or tribal school, the ACT examination administrator, an applicant's high school transcript if class rank is noted on the transcript, an applicant's self-reported information, or other reliable information in determining an applicant's class rank or ACT examination score for purposes of par.
(c) 1.
(f) A district board may revoke an applicant's offer of admission extended under this subsection if any of the following applies:
producesThe anapplicant identicalapplied ranking,for admission before completing high school and the rankingapplicant methodfailed shallto establishgraduate additionalfrom tiebreakerhigh criteriaschool prior to bethe considered,technical whichcollege's may- take2024 intoLegislature account- 6 - LRB-3122/1 ARG:cjs ASSEMBLY BILL 370 SECTION 3 scheduled enrollment date or, if the degreeapplicant ofis academicenrolled rigorin a home-based private educational program, the applicant is not granted a high school diploma by the administrator of the pupil'shome-based courseprivate work,educational anyprogram criteriaprior underto subd.the technical college's scheduled enrollment date.
1.2.
notThe previouslyapplicant considered,applied andfor admission before completing high school and, in any othersemester measureof the applicant's final year of academichigh achievementschool, orthe scholasticapplicant merit,failed butto maymaintain nota considerlevel factorsof thatacademic areachievement notsimilar to the applicant's level of academic orachievement scholasticat inthe nature.time of application.
3.
The applicant misrepresented to the district board the applicant's class rank or ACT examination score.
(g) This subsection does not guarantee an applicant admission to any specific program offered by a technical college.
S ECTION 4.
118.58 of the statutes is created to read:
118.58 Class rankings.
(1) If a school board, operator of a charter school under s.
118.40 (2r) or (2x), or governing body of a private school or tribal school operates a high school that includes grades 11 and 12, the school board, charter school operator, or governing body shall do all of the following:
(a) Establish a method for ranking pupils on the basis of academic achievement.
This ranking method may take into account the pupil's grade point average, the pupil's score on the ACT examination or similar examinations, the degree of academic rigor of the pupil's course work, and any other measure of academic achievement or scholastic merit, but may not consider factors that are not academic or scholastic in nature.
(a), for each high school that includes grades 11 and 12, prepare a class ranking of pupils enrolled in the high LRB-3122/1 - 2024 Legislature - 7 - ARG:cjs SECTION 4 ASSEMBLY BILL 370 school as of the class's completion of grade 11 and as of the class's completion of grade 12.
(3)(2) (a) Subject to pars.par.
(b)(b), and (c), each class ranking under sub.
(2)(1) (b) shall identify those pupils who rank in the top 5 percent of their high school class and those pupils who rank in the top 10 percent of their high school class.
The class ranking LRBs0109/1 - 2024 Legislature - 7 - ARG:cjs S ECTION 3 may also identify the class rank of pupils who do not rank in the top 105 percent of their high school class.
118.40 (2r) or (2x), or governing body of the private school or tribal school shall identify the highest ranked andpupil 2nd highest ranked pupils in the class using the ranking method established under sub.
(2)(1) (a).
(4)(3) and s.ss.
36.11 (3m),(3m) butand subject38.22 (2), the highest ranked pupil shall be considered to par.be in the top 5 percent of the pupil's high school class.
(c),(3) theAfter highestcompleting ranked pupil shall be considered to be in the topgrade 511 percentand ofgrade the12 pupil's high school class andrankings therequired 2ndunder highestsub. ranked pupil shall be considered to be in the top 10 percent of the pupil's high school class.
(c)(1) 1.(b) and any mid-year class ranking allowed under sub.
If(1) the(b), rankinga methodschool establishedboard, operator of a charter school under sub.s.
(2)118.40 (a)(2r) usesor (2x), or governing body of a private school or tribal school shall notify each pupil ranked in the top 5 percent of the pupil's gradehigh pointschool averageclass asof athe criteriapupil's underranking sub.in the top 5 percent.
(2)SECTION (a)5. 1., a pupil may not be ranked in the top 5 percent of the pupil's high school class unless the pupil has achieved a grade point average of 3.85 or higher and may not be ranked in the top 10 percent of the pupil's high school class unless the pupil has achieved a grade point average of 3.5 or higher.
2.
If the ranking method established under sub.
(2) (a) uses the pupil's score on a college entrance examination as a criteria under sub.
(2) (a) 1., a pupil may not be ranked in the top 5 percent of the pupil's high school class unless the pupil has achieved a composite score on the examination that places the pupil in the national 90th percentile ranking or higher and may not be ranked in the top 10 percent of the pupil's high school class unless the pupil has achieved a composite score on the examination that places the pupil in the national 85th percentile ranking or higher.
(4) After completing the grade 11 and grade 12 class rankings required under sub.
(2) (b) and any mid-year class ranking allowed under sub.
(2) (b), a school board, operator of a charter school under s.
118.40 (2r) or (2x), or governing body of a private LRBs0109/1 - 2024 Legislature - 8 - ARG:cjs SECTION 3 school or tribal school shall notify each pupil ranked in the top 10 percent of the pupil's high school class that the pupil is ranked, as applicable, in the top 5 percent or in the top 10 percent of the pupil's high school class.
SECTION 4.
66.0235 (3) (c), 66.0603 (1m) to (3), 115.01 (1) and (2), 115.28, 115.31, 115.33, 115.34, 115.343, 115.345, 115.363, 115.364, 115.365 (3), 115.366, 115.367, 115.38 (2), 115.415, 115.445, 118.001 to 118.04, 118.045, 118.06, 118.07, 118.075, 118.076, 118.10, 118.12, 118.124, 118.125 to 118.14, 118.145 (4), 118.15, 118.153, 118.16, 118.162, 118.163, 118.164, - 2024 Legislature - 8 - LRB-3122/1 ARG:cjs ASSEMBLY BILL 370 SECTION 5 118.18, 118.19, 118.196, 118.20, 118.223, 118.225, 118.24 (1), (2) (c) to (f), (6), (8), and (10), 118.245, 118.25, 118.255, 118.258, 118.291, 118.292, 118.293, 118.2935, 118.30 to 118.43, 118.46, 118.50, 118.51, 118.52, 118.53, 118.55, 118.56, 1120.12118.58, 120.12 (2m), (4m), (5), and (15) to (27), 120.125, 120.13 (1), (2) (b) to (g), (3), (14), (17) to (19), (26), (34), (35), (37), (37m), and (38), 120.137, 120.14, 120.20, 120.21 (3), and 120.25 are applicable to a 1st class city school district and board but not, unless explicitly provided in this chapter or in the terms of a contract, to the commissioner or to any school transferred to an opportunity schools and partnership program.
SECTIONS 5.InitialECTION 6.Initial applicability.
(1) HIGH SCHOOL CLASS RANKINGS.TheRANKINGS. treatment of ss.
The treatment of ss.
The treatment of s.ss.
36.11 (3) (a) and (3m) and 38.22 (2) first applies to applications for admission for the 2025-26 academic year.
Show all 117 changed rows (77 more)
View plain text versions (2)
- Bill Text View text pdf
- Substitute Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 Current pdf
Action History
-
Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1
-
Public hearing held
-
Read first time and referred to committee on Universities and Revenue
-
Received from Assembly
-
Ordered immediately messaged
-
Read a third time and passed, Ayes 63, Noes 34
-
Rules suspended
-
Ordered to a third reading
-
Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adopted
-
Read a second time
-
Placed on calendar 11-7-2023 by Committee on Rules
-
Referred to committee on Rules
-
Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Colleges and Universities, Ayes 9, Noes 5
-
Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Colleges and Universities, Ayes 9, Noes 5
-
Executive action taken
-
Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Representative O'Connor
-
Public hearing held
-
Fiscal estimate received
-
Fiscal estimate received
-
Read first time and referred to Committee on Colleges and Universities
-
Introduced by Representatives O'Connor, Murphy, Vos, Maxey, Nedweski, Kitchens, Armstrong, Gustafson, Macco, Bodden, Behnke, Gundrum, Rozar, Wichgers, Brandtjen, Goeben and Green; cosponsored by Senator Cabral-Guevara
Sponsors
- Jerry O'Connor · Primary
- David Murphy · Primary
- Robin Vos · Primary
- Dave Maxey · Primary
- Amanda Nedweski · Primary
- Joel Kitchens · Primary
- David Armstrong · Primary
- Nate Gustafson · Primary
- Macco · Primary
- Bodden · Primary
- Elijah Behnke · Primary
- Rick Gundrum · Primary
- Rozar · Primary
- Chuck Wichgers · Primary
- Brandtjen · Primary
- Joy Goeben · Primary
- Chanz Green · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →17 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 115 not signed on · 25 voted No
Sponsors (17)
- O'Connor, Jerry Republican
- Murphy, David Republican
- Vos, Robin Republican
- Maxey, Dave Republican
- Nedweski, Amanda Republican
- Kitchens, Joel Republican
- Armstrong, David Republican
- Gustafson, Nate Republican
- Macco
- Bodden
- Behnke, Elijah Republican
- Gundrum, Rick Republican
- Rozar
- Wichgers, Chuck Republican
- Brandtjen
- Goeben, Joy Republican
- Green, Chanz Republican
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (115)
115 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 115 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 45 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 0 | 24 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 18 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 63 | 34 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 65% | 35% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (97)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| BALDEH | — | Nay |
| BINSFELD | — | Yea |
| BODDEN | — | Yea |
| BRANDTJEN | — | Yea |
| CABRERA | — | Nay |
| CONLEY | — | Nay |
| CONSIDINE | — | Nay |
| EDMING | — | Yea |
| GOYKE | — | Nay |
| JOHNSON | — | Yea |
| KATSMA | — | Yea |
| MACCO | — | Yea |
| MAGNAFICI | — | Yea |
| MICHALSKI | — | Yea |
| OHNSTAD | — | Nay |
| OLDENBURG | — | Yea |
| PETRYK | — | Yea |
| PLUMER | — | Yea |
| RETTINGER | — | Yea |
| RIEMER | — | Nay |
| ROZAR | — | Yea |
| SAPIK | — | Yea |
| SCHMIDT | — | Yea |
| SCHUTT | — | Yea |
| SHANKLAND | — | Nay |
| SHELTON | — | Nay |
| SPEAKER | — | Yea |
| ANDERSON, J | — | Nay |
| Anderson, Clinton | Democrat | Nay |
| Andraca, Deb | Democrat | Nay |
| Bare, Mike | Democrat | Nay |
| Billings, Jill | Democrat | Nay |
| Clancy, Ryan | Democrat | Nay |
| Doyle, Steve | Democrat | Nay |
| Drake, Dora | Democrat | Nay |
| Emerson, Jodi | Democrat | Nay |
| Haywood, Kalan | Democrat | Nay |
| Hong, Francesca | Democrat | Nay |
| Jacobson, Jenna | Democrat | Nay |
| Joers, Alex | Democrat | Nay |
| Madison, Darrin | Democrat | Nay |
| McGuire, Tip | Democrat | Nay |
| Moore Omokunde, Supreme | Democrat | Nay |
| Neubauer, Greta | Democrat | Nay |
| Ortiz-Velez, Sylvia | Democrat | Nay |
| Palmeri, Lori | Democrat | Nay |
| Ratcliff, Melissa | Democrat | Nay |
| Sinicki, Christine | Democrat | Nay |
| Snodgrass, Lee | Democrat | Nay |
| Stubbs, Shelia | Democrat | Nay |
| Subeck, Lisa | Democrat | Nay |
| Vining, Robyn | Democrat | Nay |
| Allen, Scott | Republican | Yea |
| Armstrong, David | Republican | Yea |
| August, Tyler | Republican | Yea |
| Behnke, Elijah | Republican | Yea |
| Born, Mark | Republican | Yea |
| Brooks, Robert | Republican | Yea |
| Callahan, Calvin | Republican | Yea |
| Dallman, Alex | Republican | Yea |
| Dittrich, Barbara | Republican | Yea |
| Donovan, Bob | Republican | Yea |
| Duchow, Cindi | Republican | Yea |
| Goeben, Joy | Republican | Yea |
| Green, Chanz | Republican | Yea |
| Gundrum, Rick | Republican | Yea |
| Gustafson, Nate | Republican | Yea |
| Hurd, Karen | Republican | Yea |
| Kitchens, Joel | Republican | Yea |
| Krug, Scott | Republican | Yea |
| Kurtz, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Maxey, Dave | Republican | Yea |
| Melotik, Paul | Republican | Yea |
| Moses, Clint | Republican | Yea |
| Murphy, David | Republican | Yea |
| Mursau, Jeffrey | Republican | Yea |
| Nedweski, Amanda | Republican | Yea |
| Neylon, Adam | Republican | Yea |
| Novak, Todd | Republican | Yea |
| O'Connor, Jerry | Republican | Yea |
| Penterman, William | Republican | Yea |
| Petersen, Kevin | Republican | Yea |
| Pronschinske, Treig | Republican | Yea |
| Rodriguez, Jessie | Republican | Yea |
| Snyder, Patrick | Republican | Yea |
| Sortwell, Shae | Republican | Yea |
| Spiros, John | Republican | Yea |
| Steffen, David | Republican | Yea |
| Summerfield, Rob | Republican | Yea |
| Swearingen, Rob | Republican | Yea |
| Tittl, Paul | Republican | Yea |
| Tranel, Travis | Republican | Yea |
| Tusler, Ron | Republican | Yea |
| VanderMeer, Nancy | Republican | Yea |
| Wichgers, Chuck | Republican | Yea |
| Wittke, Robert | Republican | Yea |
| Zimmerman, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors AB 370?
- AB 370 is sponsored by O'Connor, Jerry (Republican), Murphy, David (Republican), Vos, Robin (Republican), Maxey, Dave (Republican), Nedweski, Amanda (Republican), Kitchens, Joel (Republican), Armstrong, David (Republican), Gustafson, Nate (Republican), Macco, Bodden, Behnke, Elijah (Republican), Gundrum, Rick (Republican), Rozar, Wichgers, Chuck (Republican), Brandtjen, Goeben, Joy (Republican), and Green, Chanz (Republican).
- What is the current status of AB 370?
- This bill died with 2023-2024 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 370?
- Track AB 370 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 370
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 370
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →