Relating to: information contained in the Consolidated Court Automation Programs Internet site related to d...
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 660 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 660.
You're tracking SB 660
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 660 — Relating to: information contained in the Consolidated Court Automation Programs Internet site related to dismissed eviction actions. (FE)
Last action — Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2023-2024 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
- Bill Text View text Current pdf
Compared against current U.S. Code AI-generated reading aid — verify against the official bill.
The bill eliminates the two-year retention requirement for case management information related to dismissed eviction actions.
-
Wis. Stat. § 758.20 (2) (b)
If an eviction action has been dismissed and no money judgment has been docketed, a period of at least 2 years.This change removes the requirement to retain information for two years after a dismissed eviction action.
-
Wis. Stat. § 758.20 (2) (intro.) and (a)
The director of state courts may not remove case management information from the Wisconsin Circuit Court Access Internet site for a civil case that is not a closed, confidential, or sealed case for the following periods: If a writ of restitution has been granted in an eviction action, a period of at least 10 years.→ TheIf a writ of restitution is granted in a civil action of eviction, the director of state courts may not remove case management information from the Wisconsin Circuit Court Access Internet site for a civil case thation action if it is not a closed, confidential, or sealed case for the following periods: (a) If a writ of restitution has been granted in an eviction action, a period of at least 10 years following the grant of the writ.This consolidates and clarifies the language regarding the retention period for case management information when a writ of restitution is granted.
-
Wis. Stat. § 758.20 (2m)
Notwithstanding sub. (2), if a civil action of eviction is dismissed, the director of state courts shall promptly redact the defendants' names from the case management information for the eviction action from the Wisconsin Circuit Court Access Internet site.
This addition requires the removal of defendants' names from case management records of dismissed eviction actions.
Action History
-
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1
-
Representative Haywood added as a cosponsor
-
Read first time and referred to Committee on Housing, Rural Issues and Forestry
-
Introduced by Senators Larson, L. Johnson, Hesselbein, Spreitzer and Taylor; cosponsored by Representatives Clancy, Madison, Ratcliff, Palmeri, Baldeh, Bare, Cabrera, Drake, Emerson, Shelton, Sinicki, Snodgrass, Stubbs, Hong, Ortiz-Velez, Considine, Joers, C. Anderson, Jacobson, Subeck, Moore Omokunde and J. Anderson
Sponsors
- Chris Larson · Primary
- LaTonya Johnson · Primary
- Dianne Hesselbein · Primary
- Mark Spreitzer · Primary
- Taylor · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →5 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 127 not signed on
Sponsors (5)
- Larson, Chris Democrat
- Johnson, LaTonya Democrat
- Hesselbein, Dianne Democrat
- Spreitzer, Mark Democrat
- Taylor
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (127)
127 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 127 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 660?
- SB 660 is sponsored by Larson, Chris (Democrat), Johnson, LaTonya (Democrat), Hesselbein, Dianne (Democrat), Spreitzer, Mark (Democrat), and Taylor.
- What is the current status of SB 660?
- This bill died with 2023-2024 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 660?
- Track SB 660 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 660
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 660
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →