SB 618 — Allowing reduced property valuation for certain farmland
Last action — To Finance
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House of Delegates
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2025 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
24 added · 23 removedPlain-language change summary
The latest version of SB 618 has been revised to clarify that corporations engaged in farming can qualify for reduced property appraisals even if farming is not their principal activity, as long as they generate at least $20,000 in agricultural product sales annually. Additionally, all parcels of farm property owned by the corporation can be assessed together to meet this $20,000 requirement. This change matters because it expands eligibility for property tax reductions, potentially benefiting more corporate farmers and encouraging agricultural production.
WEST VIRGINIA LEGISLATURE REGULAR SESSION IntroducedCommittee Substitute for Senate Bill 618 By Senators ThorneThorne, Willis, Rose, and WillisRucker [Introduced[Reported FebruaryMarch 27,13, 2025;2025, from the Committee on Agriculture] CS for SB 618 A BILL to amend and reenact §11-1A-10 of the Code of West Virginia, 1931, as amended, relating to allowing for reduced property valuation for certain farmland.
referred to the Committee on Agriculture;
and then to the Committee on Finance] Intr SB 618 2025R3448 A BILL to amend and reenact §11-1A-10 of the Code of West Virginia, 1931, as amended, relating to allowing for a reduction in property tax for certain farmland in this state.
Additionally, notwithstanding the provisions of subsection (c) of this section, a corporation is not engaged in farming unless its principal activity is the business of farming, and in the event that the controlling stock interest in the corporation is owned by another corporation, the corporation owning the controlling interest must also be primarily engaged in the business of farming.
(c) FarmNotwithstanding propertythe ownedprovisions byof subsection (b) of this section, a corporation that doesis not meetengaged in the 50%business thresholdof tofarming claimas aits reductionprincipal inactivity, propertybut taxwhich appraisal,owns butfarm whichproperty hasthat atis leastannually $20,000utilized into sales,produce use,for sale, consumption, or consumptionuse at least $20,000 of agricultural productsproducts, onas that farmterm property,is defined in §11-1A-3(g) of this code, shall be eligible forto ahave reductionsuch infarm property taxappraised appraisalsby forthe allcommissioner qualifiedin farmlandthe manner prescribed by thesubsection corporation.(a) of this section.
TheAll Taxparcels Commissionerof farm property owned by the corporation, regardless of whether contiguous or not, shall promulgatebe rulesconsidered totogether ensurein thatdetermining whether the provisionscorporation's offarm thisproperty subsectionproduces areat availableleast to$20,000 eligibleof personsagricultural andproducts. corporations.
The purpose of this bill relatesis to allowingauthorize for a reductionreduced in property taxappraisal forto certain farmland1 CS for SB 618 corporate owners of farm property in thisthe state.
Intr SB 618 2025R3448 Strike-throughs indicate language that would be stricken from a heading or the present law and underscoring indicates new language that would be added.
View plain text versions (2)
- Committee Substitute View text pdf
- Introduced Introduced Version Current pdf
Action History
-
To Finance
-
Committee substitute reported, but first to Finance
-
To Agriculture
-
Introduced in Senate
-
To Agriculture then Finance
-
Filed for introduction
Sponsors
- Darren Thorne · Primary
- Willis · Cosponsor
- Chris Rose · Cosponsor
- Patricia Rucker · Cosponsor
- Craig A. Hart · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 4 co-sponsors · 147 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Darren Thorne Republican
Co-sponsors (4)
- Willis
- Chris Rose Republican
- Patricia Rucker Republican
- Craig A. Hart Republican
Not signed on (147)
147 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 147 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 618?
- SB 618 is sponsored by Darren Thorne (Republican), Willis, Chris Rose (Republican), Patricia Rucker (Republican), and Craig A. Hart (Republican).
- What is the current status of SB 618?
- This bill died with 2025 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 618?
- Track SB 618 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 618
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 618
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →