Relating to: state preemption of local employment regulations. (FE)
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 484 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 484.
You're tracking AB 484
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 484 — Relating to: state preemption of local employment regulations. (FE)
Last action — Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2023-2024 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
- Bill Text View text Current pdf
Compared against current U.S. Code AI-generated reading aid — verify against the official bill.
The bill repeals state preemption laws, allowing local governments to regulate employee hours, overtime, and wage claims.
-
103.007
103.007 Local regulation of hours of labor and overtime; statewide concern; uniformity. 103.007(1)(1) The legislature finds that employee hour and overtime requirements that are uniform throughout the state is a matter of statewide concern and that the enactment of an ordinance by a city, village, town, or county regulating employee hours or overtime would be logically inconsistent with, would defeat the purpose of, and would go against the spirit of the employee hour and overtime requirements. Therefore, the employee hour and overtime requirements shall be construed as an enactment of statewide concern for the purpose of providing employee hour and overtime requirements that are uniform throughout the state. 103.007(2)(2) In this section, “employee hour and overtime requirements” means the requirements set forth in ss. 103.01 to 103.03, 103.24, 103.38, 103.65 (2), 103.66 (2), 103.67 (1), 103.68, 103.85, 103.915 (4) (b), 103.93 (4), 103.935, and 104.045 (3) and in the rules promulgated under those sections. 103.007(3)(3) 103.007(3)(a)(a) Subject to par. (c), no city, village, town, or county may enact or enforce an ordinance that regulates employee hours or overtime, including scheduling employee work hours or shifts. 103.007(3)(b)(b) Subject to par. (c), if a city, village, town, or county has in effect on April 18, 2018, an ordinance that regulates employee hours or overtime, including scheduling employee work hours or shifts, the ordinance does not apply and may not be enforced. 103.007(3)(c)(c) Nothing in this section prohibits a city, village, town, or county from enacting or enforcing any of the following ordinances: 103.007(3)(c)1.1. An ordinance that limits the hours that a business may operate. 103.007(3)(c)2.2. An ordinance described in s. 103.34 (14) (b) that regulates hours or overtime of a traveling sales crew worker, as defined in s. 103.34 (1) (f).Local governments are now allowed to enact and enforce their own regulations on employee hours and overtime.
-
109.09(3)
109.09(3)(3)Local governments can create their own ordinances regarding wage claims and collections.
Action History
-
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1
-
Representative Billings added as a coauthor
-
Representative Madison added as a coauthor
-
Fiscal estimate received
-
Representative Jacobson added as a coauthor
-
Representative Shankland added as a coauthor
-
Read first time and referred to Committee on Government Accountability and Oversight
-
Introduced by Representatives Ohnstad, Haywood, Conley, Joers, Hong, Stubbs, Emerson, Cabrera, Doyle, Snodgrass, Shelton, Ratcliff, Ortiz-Velez, J. Anderson, Considine, C. Anderson, Drake, Subeck, Bare, Palmeri and Moore Omokunde; cosponsored by Senators Smith, Carpenter, Hesselbein, Spreitzer and Agard
Sponsors
- Ohnstad · Primary
- Kalan Haywood · Primary
- Conley · Primary
- Alex Joers · Primary
- Francesca Hong · Primary
- Shelia Stubbs · Primary
- Jodi Emerson · Primary
- Cabrera · Primary
- Steve Doyle · Primary
- Lee Snodgrass · Primary
- Shelton · Primary
- Melissa Ratcliff · Primary
- Sylvia Ortiz-Velez · Primary
- Considine · Primary
- Clinton Anderson · Primary
- Dora Drake · Primary
- Lisa Subeck · Primary
- Mike Bare · Primary
- Lori Palmeri · Primary
- Supreme Moore Omokunde · Primary
- Clinton Anderson · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →21 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 111 not signed on
Sponsors (21)
- Ohnstad
- Haywood, Kalan Democrat
- Conley
- Joers, Alex Democrat
- Hong, Francesca Democrat
- Stubbs, Shelia Democrat
- Emerson, Jodi Democrat
- Cabrera
- Doyle, Steve Democrat
- Snodgrass, Lee Democrat
- Shelton
- Ratcliff, Melissa Democrat
- Ortiz-Velez, Sylvia Democrat
- Considine
- Anderson, Clinton Democrat
- Drake, Dora Democrat
- Subeck, Lisa Democrat
- Bare, Mike Democrat
- Palmeri, Lori Democrat
- Moore Omokunde, Supreme Democrat
- Anderson, Clinton Democrat
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (111)
111 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 111 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors AB 484?
- AB 484 is sponsored by Ohnstad, Haywood, Kalan (Democrat), Conley, Joers, Alex (Democrat), Hong, Francesca (Democrat), Stubbs, Shelia (Democrat), Emerson, Jodi (Democrat), Cabrera, Doyle, Steve (Democrat), Snodgrass, Lee (Democrat), Shelton, Ratcliff, Melissa (Democrat), Ortiz-Velez, Sylvia (Democrat), Considine, Anderson, Clinton (Democrat), Drake, Dora (Democrat), Subeck, Lisa (Democrat), Bare, Mike (Democrat), Palmeri, Lori (Democrat), and Moore Omokunde, Supreme (Democrat).
- What is the current status of AB 484?
- This bill died with 2023-2024 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 484?
- Track AB 484 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 484
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 484
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →