Relating to: interest on claims of excessive assessment and for recovery of unlawful property taxes. (FE)
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 396 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 396.
You're tracking SB 396
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 396 — Relating to: interest on claims of excessive assessment and for recovery of unlawful property taxes. (FE)
Last action — Published 3-12-2022
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced June 10, 2021. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
5 sponsors
5 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 2 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
77 added · 10 removedPlain-language change summary
The amendments made to SB 396 clarified the specific conditions under which a person can claim a refund for excessive property taxes, expanding the grounds for eligibility. Additionally, the bill now includes a clear effective date, stating that the changes will take effect on January 1, 2023. This matters because it ensures that property owners know when they can start using the new provisions to address tax issues, providing them with clearer guidelines for filing claims.
- 2022 LEGISLATURE LRBa1072/1LRB-3654/1 JK:cjsJK:amn SENATE AMENDMENTBILL 2,396 TOJune SENATE10, BILL2021 396- JanuaryIntroduced 6,by 2022Senators -P OfferedETROWSKI , BALLWEG , COWLES , RINGHAND and L .T AYLOR , cosponsored by SenatorRepresentatives ETROWSKI.B ROOKS , GUNDRUM , SCHRAA , A RMSTRONG , UBECK , BRANDTJEN , EDMING , NOVAK, SPIROS, ALLEN , KUGLITSCH , T ITTL, KNODL , AMES , VANDER M EER and T USLER .
AtReferred theto locationsCommittee indicated,on amendFinancial theInstitutions billand asRevenue. follows:
A N A CT to amend 74.35 (4) and 74.41 (4) of the statutes;
relating to:
interest on claims of excessive assessment and for recovery of unlawful property taxes.
Analysis by the Legislative Reference Bureau Under current law, a person may file a claim with the taxation district where the property is located to recover unlawful property taxes.
A person who files a claim must allege at least one of the following as the basis for the claim:
PageThe 3,taxation linedistrict 7:made a clerical error regarding the description of the property or the computation of the tax.
after2. that line insert:
“SECTIONThe 3m.assessment included real property improvements that did not exist on the date of the assessment.
0Effective3. date.
(1)The Thisproperty actis takesexempt effectfrom ontaxation. January 1, 2023.”.
4.
The property is not located in the taxation district.
5.
The taxation district made a double assessment of the property.
If the taxation district allows the claim, it pays the claimant the amount of property taxes collected and may include interest at the rate of 0.8 percent a month, computed from the date on which the person filed the claim.
Under current law, a person may also file a claim with the taxation district where the property is located alleging that the assessment of the person's property is excessive.
If the taxation district allows the claim, it pays the claimant the amount of the excess and may include interest at the average annual discount rate determined by the last auction of six-month U.S.
treasury bills before the filing of the claim per day for the period between the time when the tax was due and the date that the claim was paid.
This rate is generally lower than the rate of interest paid on claims to recover unlawful property taxes.
- 2022 Legislature - 2 - LRB-3654/1 JK:amn SENATE BILL 396 This bill changes the interest rate for payments made on a claim to recover unlawful taxes so that it is the same as the payments made on a claim of excessive assessment.
Under current law, when a taxation district rescinds or refunds property taxes paid by a taxpayer in the district, the district may submit a form to the Department of Revenue to collect from each underlying taxing jurisdiction its proportionate share of the rescinded or refunded amount.
However, that amount does not include interest paid by the taxation district on claims for excessive assessment or to recover unlawful property taxes.
This bill allows the taxation district to collect from each underlying taxing jurisdiction its proportionate share of the interest paid on claims for excessive assessment or to recover unlawful property taxes.
For further information see the local fiscal estimate, which will be printed as an appendix to this bill.
The people of the state of Wisconsin, represented in senate and assembly, do enact as follows:
SECTION 1.
74.35 (4) of the statutes is amended to read:
74.35 (4) INTEREST.
The amount of a claim filed under sub.
(2) or an action commenced under sub.
(3) may include interest computed from the date of filing the claim against the taxation district, at the rate of 0.8 percent per month at the average annual discount rate determined by the last auction of 6-month U.S.
treasury bills before the date of filing the claim per day for the period between the time when the tax was due and the date that the claim was paid.
SECTION 2.
74.41 (4) of the statutes is amended to read:
74.41 (4) CHARGE-BACK AMOUNT DETERMINED.
The department of revenue shall, by the November 15 following submission of the form under sub.
(1), determine the amount of rescinded or refunded taxes to be charged back to, and collected from, each taxing jurisdiction for which taxes were collected by the taxation district and determine the amount of taxes collected under s.
74.33 to be shared with each taxing jurisdiction for which taxes were collected by the taxation district.
Show all 49 changed lines (9 more)
Except for interest on refunds under s.
70.511 (2) (b) that is paid with respect to property that LRB-3654/1 - 2022 Legislature - 3 - JK:amn SECTION 2 SENATE BILL 396 was assessed under s.
70.995 and that is not paid by the department of administration under s.
70.511 (2) (bm), and except for interest on refunds under ss.
74.35 and 74.37, the amount determined may not include any interest.
The determination of the department of revenue under this subsection is reviewable only under s.
227.53.
SECTION 3.Initial applicability.
(1) This act first applies to claims paid on the effective date of this subsection.
Show all 49 changed rows (9 more)
View plain text versions (2)
- Bill Text View text pdf
- Amended Senate Amendment 2 Current pdf
Action History
-
Published 3-12-2022
-
Report approved by the Governor on 3-11-2022. 2021 Wisconsin Act 162
-
Presented to the Governor on 3-10-2022
-
Report correctly enrolled
-
Received from Assembly concurred in
-
Ordered immediately messaged
-
Representative Skowronski added as a cosponsor
-
Read a third time and concurred in
-
Rules suspended
-
Ordered to a third reading
-
Read a second time
-
Made a special order of business at 9:47 AM on 2-23-2022 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 29
-
Read first time and referred to committee on Rules
-
Received from Senate
-
Ordered immediately messaged
-
Read a third time and passed
-
Rules suspended
-
Ordered to a third reading
-
Senate Amendment 2 adopted
-
Read a second time
-
Placed on calendar 1-25-2022 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
-
Available for scheduling
-
Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Financial Institutions and Revenue, Ayes 5, Noes 0
-
Report adoption of Senate Amendment 2 recommended by Committee on Financial Institutions and Revenue, Ayes 5, Noes 0
-
Executive action taken
-
Public hearing held
-
Senate Amendment 2 offered by Senator Petrowski
-
Representative Steffen added as a cosponsor
-
Fiscal estimate received
-
Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senator Petrowski
-
Representative Dittrich added as a cosponsor
-
Read first time and referred to Committee on Financial Institutions and Revenue
-
Introduced by Senators Petrowski, Ballweg, Cowles, Ringhand and L. Taylor; cosponsored by Representatives Brooks, Gundrum, Schraa, Armstrong, Subeck, Brandtjen, Edming, Novak, Spiros, Allen, Kuglitsch, Tittl, Knodl, James, VanderMeer and Tusler
Sponsors
- L. Taylor · Primary
- Ringhand · Primary
- Cowles · Primary
- Ballweg · Primary
- Petrowski · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →5 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 127 not signed on
Sponsors (5)
- L. Taylor
- Ringhand
- Cowles
- Ballweg
- Petrowski
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (127)
127 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 127 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 396?
- SB 396 is sponsored by L. Taylor, Ringhand, Cowles, Ballweg, and Petrowski.
- What is the current status of SB 396?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced June 10, 2021. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 396?
- Track SB 396 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 396
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 396
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →