Wisconsin 2021-2022 Regular Session Status: To Executive 5 R cosponsors

SB 494 — Relating to: aquatic plant management plans and permit exemptions.

Last action — Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2021-2022 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

49 added · 105 removed

Plain-language change summary

The recent changes to Senate Bill 494 focus on managing aquatic plant life in Wisconsin's waters. Key updates include defining "private ponds" and ensuring that management plans for invasive plants are based on scientific methods. Additionally, the bill clarifies that permit fees should not place an undue financial burden on property owners, making it easier and more affordable for them to manage aquatic plants on their land. These changes aim to balance environmental protection with property rights and ease of access for pond owners.

→
Previous
Latest
- 2022 LEGISLATURE LRB-3540/1 ZDW:skw SENATE BILL 494 August 5, 2021 - Introduced by Senators FEYEN , ALLWEG , COWLES, FELZKOWSKI, JACQUE , MARKLEIN, TAFSHOLT and STROEBEL , cosponsored by Representatives STEINEKE , KITCHENS, K NODL, KUGLITSCH , LOUDENBECK , M URPHY, M URSAU, R OZAR, SCHRAA , TITTL and T USLER.
Date of enactment:
Referred to Committee on Natural Resources and Energy.
Senate Bill 494 Date of publication*:
A N A CT to amend 23.24 (2) (a) 1., 23.24 (2) (a) 2., 23.24 (2) (c) 7., 23.24 (3) (b) and 23.24 (3) (c);
WISCONSIN ACT A N A CT to amend 23.24 (2) (a) 1., 23.24 (2) (a) 2., 23.24 (2) (c) 7., 23.24 (3) (b) and 23.24 (3) (c);
Analysis by the Legislative Reference Bureau This bill makes numerous changes relating to the control of aquatic plants using chemicals or biological agents.
The people of the state of Wisconsin, represented in mentsmaynotimposeanunduefinancialburdenonper- senate and assembly, do enact as follows:
Current law requires the Department of Natural Resources to establish a program for the waters of this state that meet several goals, including implementing efforts to protect and develop native aquatic plants and regulate how aquatic plants are managed.
mit applicants or property owners.
The bill requires that DNR efforts to protect native aquatic plants rely on widely accepted methods supported by peer-reviewed science to suppress or eradicate invasive or nuisance aquatic plants.
SECTION 5.
The bill also requires that DNR plans to regulate aquatic plants ensure invasive and nuisance aquatic plants are suppressed or eradicated to the greatest extent possible.
23.24 (3) (b) of the statutes is amended SECTION 1.
Under current law, subject to exceptions, a person may not control aquatic plants in waters of the state by the use of chemicals or the introduction of biological agents without a valid aquatic plant management permit issued by DNR.
23.24 (1) (je) of the statutes is created to to read:
As a condition of receiving an aquatic plant management permit, DNR may require the applicant to submit a plan for how aquatic plants will be introduced, removed, or controlled.
read:
The bill provides that DNR must give equal consideration to plans that will suppress or eradicate invasive or nuisance aquatic plants by use of chemicals - 2022 Legislature - 2 - LRB-3540/1 ZDW:skw SENATE BILL 494 and provides that the plan requirements may not impose an undue financial burden on permit applicants or property owners.
23.24 (3) (b) The department may require that an 23.24 (1) (je) “Private pond” means a surface water application for an aquatic plant management permit con- less than 10 acres in size that is surrounded by the private tain a plan for the department’s approval as to how the property of one or more owners, with no public access to aquatic plants will be introduced, removed, or controlled.
The bill also creates exemptions from the permit requirement for the introduction of chemicals or biological agents to a private pond, which the bill defines as “a surface water less than 10 acres in size that is surrounded by the private property of one or more owners, with no public access to the water, and that has either no surface water discharge or surface water discharge that can be controlled.” Under the bill, a person who applies a chemical treatment to a private pond to suppress or eradicate invasive or nuisance aquatic plants is exempt if the person is certified as a commercial applicator by the Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection in the aquatic and mosquito pest control category and follows U.S.
the water, and that has either no surface water discharge The department shall give equal consideration to plans or surface water discharge that can be controlled.
Environmental Protection Agency standards for chemical type and use.
that will suppress or eradicate invasive or nuisance SECTION 2.
The bill also exempts a person who applies to a private pond a biological agent to improve water quality at a concentration that does not cause acute or chronic toxicity for aquatic organisms or a dye that is not labeled for herbicide use.
The people of the state of Wisconsin, represented in senate and assembly, do enact as follows:
S ECTION 1.
23.24 (1) (je) of the statutes is created to read:
23.24 (1) (je) “Private pond” means a surface water less than 10 acres in size that is surrounded by the private property of one or more owners, with no public access to the water, and that has either no surface water discharge or surface water discharge that can be controlled.
S ECTION 2.
of the statutes is amended to read:
of the statutes is amended aquatic plants by use of chemicals that have been labeled to read:
23.24 (2) (a) 1.
and registered for aquatic plant control by the U.S.
Implement efforts to protect and develop diverse and stable communities of native aquatic plants using widely accepted methods that are supported by peer-reviewed science to suppress or eradicate invasive or nuisance aquatic plants.
envi- 23.24 (2) (a) 1.
S ECTION 3.
Implement efforts to protect and ronmental protection agency.
develop diverse and stable communities of native aquatic SECTION 6.
23.24 (3) (c) of the statutes is amended plants using widely accepted methods that are supported to read:
by peer−reviewed science to suppress or eradicate inva- 23.24 (3) (c) The department may promulgate a rule sive or nuisance aquatic plants.
to establish fees for aquatic plant management permits.
SECTION 3.
of the statutes is amended to read:
of the statutes is amended Under the rule, the department may establish a different to read:
23.24 (2) (a) 2.
fee for an aquatic plant management permit to manage 23.24(2) (a) 2.
Regulate how aquatic plants are managed to ensure invasive or nuisance aquatic plants are suppressed or eradicated to the greatest extent possible.
Regulate how aquatic plants are man- aquatic plants that are located in a body of water that is aged to ensure invasive or nuisance aquatic plants are entirely confined on the property of one private property suppressed or eradicated to the greatest extent possible.
LRB-3540/1 - 2022 Legislature - 3 - ZDW:skw SECTION 4 SENATE BILL 494 SECTION 4.
owner owners.
SECTION 4.
of the statutes is amended to read:
of the statutes is amended SECTION 7.
23.24 (2) (c) 7.
The requirements for plans that the department may require under sub.
(3) (b).
Plan requirements may not impose an undue financial burden on permit applicants or property owners.
SECTION 5.
23.24 (3) (b) of the statutes is amended to read:
23.24 (3) (b) The department may require that an application for an aquatic plant management permit contain a plan for the department's approval as to how the aquatic plants will be introduced, removed, or controlled.
Show all 74 changed rows (34 more)
Previous
Latest
The department shall give equal consideration to plans that will suppress or eradicate invasive or nuisance aquatic plants by use of chemicals that have been labeled and registered for aquatic plant control by the U.S.
environmental protection agency.
SECTION 6.
23.24 (3) (c) of the statutes is amended to read:
23.24 (3) (c) The department may promulgate a rule to establish fees for aquatic plant management permits.
Under the rule, the department may establish a different fee for an aquatic plant management permit to manage aquatic plants that are located in a body of water that is entirely confined on the property of one private property owner owners.
SECTION 7.
23.24 (4) (b) 5.
to read:
A person who applies a chemical treatment to a private pond to suppress or eradicate invasive or nuisance aquatic plants if all of the following apply:
23.24 (2) (c) 7.
The requirements for plans that the 23.24 (4) (b) 5.
A person who applies a chemical departmentmayrequireundersub.(3)(b).
Planrequire- treatment to a private pond to suppress or eradicate inva- * Section 991.11,ISCONSISTATUTES:
Effective date of acts.
“Every act and every portion of an act enacted by the legislature over the governor’s partial veto which does not expressly prescribe the time when it takes effect shall take effect on the day after its date of publication.” Wisconsin Act − 2 − 2021 Senate Bill 494 sive or nuisance aquatic plants if all of the following notified of the application of the chemical treatment to apply:
the private pond.
The person is certified as a commercial applicator by the department of agriculture, trade and consumer protection in the aquatic and mosquito pest control category.
The person is certified as a commercial applicator e.
- 2022 Legislature - 4 - LRB-3540/1 ZDW:skw SENATE BILL 494 SECTION 7 b.
The person retains for a period of not less than 2 by the department of agriculture, trade and consumer years a record of any pesticide the person applies to the protection in the aquatic and mosquito pest control cate- private pond.
The person uses only those chemicals that have been labeled and registered for aquatic plant control by the U.S.
All records retained under this subd.
5.
e.
gory.
shall be made available to the department for inspection b.
The person uses only those chemicals that have upon request.
been labeled and registered for aquatic plant control by SECTION 8.
23.24 (4) (b) 6.
of the statutes is created the U.S.
to read:
environmental protection agency label directions for appropriate application methods and rates.
environmental protection 23.24 (4) (b) 6.
SECTION 8.
A person who applies to a private agency label directions for appropriate application meth- pond a biological agent to improve water quality at a con- ods and rates.
23.24 (4) (b) 6.
centration that does not cause acute or chronic toxicity d.
of the statutes is created to read:
If the private pond abuts multiple parcels, the own- for aquatic organisms or a dye that is not labeled for her- ers of all parcels that abut the private pond have been bicide use.
23.24 (4) (b) 6.
A person who applies to a private pond a biological agent to improve water quality at a concentration that does not cause acute or chronic toxicity for aquatic organisms or a dye that is not labeled for herbicide use.
(END)
View plain text versions (3)

Action History

  1. Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82

  2. Placed on calendar 5-17-2022 pursuant to Joint Rule 82 (2)(a)

  3. Report vetoed by the Governor on 4-15-2022

  4. Presented to the Governor on 4-14-2022

  5. Report correctly enrolled

  6. Received from Assembly concurred in

  7. Ordered immediately messaged

  8. Read a third time and concurred in

  9. Rules suspended

  10. Ordered to a third reading

  11. Read a second time

  12. Made a special order of business at 8:15 AM on 2-23-2022 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 29

  13. Read first time and referred to committee on Rules

  14. Received from Senate

  15. Ordered immediately messaged

  16. Read a third time and passed, Ayes 21, Noes 12

  17. Rules suspended

  18. Ordered to a third reading

  19. Senate Amendment 2 adopted

  20. Read a second time

  21. Placed on calendar 1-25-2022 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  22. Available for scheduling

  23. Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Natural Resources and Energy, Ayes 3, Noes 2

  24. Report adoption of Senate Amendment 2 recommended by Committee on Natural Resources and Energy, Ayes 3, Noes 2

  25. Executive action taken

  26. Senate Amendment 2 offered by Senator Feyen

  27. Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senator Feyen

  28. Representative Dallman added as a cosponsor

  29. Public hearing held

  30. Read first time and referred to Committee on Natural Resources and Energy

  31. Introduced by Senators Feyen, Ballweg, Cowles, Felzkowski, Jacque, Marklein, Stafsholt and Stroebel; cosponsored by Representatives Steineke, Kitchens, Knodl, Kuglitsch, Loudenbeck, Murphy, Mursau, Rozar, Schraa, Tittl and Tusler

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

8 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 124 not signed on · 8 voted No

Sponsors (8)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (124)

124 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 124 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

PASSAGE

Passed 21 Yea · 12 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 8400
Republican 13000
Democrat 0800
Total 211200
% of votes cast 64%36%0%0%
How each member voted (33)
Member Party Vote
BALLWEG — Yea
PETROWSKI — Yea
BERNIER — Yea
ROTH — Yea
COWLES — Yea
KOOYENGA — Yea
STROEBEL — Yea
DARLING — Yea
AGARD — Nay
BEWLEY — Nay
ERPENBACH — Nay
RINGHAND — Nay
Carpenter, Tim Democrat Nay
Johnson, LaTonya Democrat Nay
Larson, Chris Democrat Nay
Pfaff, Brad Democrat Nay
Roys, Kelda Democrat Nay
Smith, Jeff Democrat Nay
Taylor, Sequanna Democrat Nay
Wirch, Robert Democrat Nay
Bradley, Julian Republican Yea
Felzkowski, Mary Republican Yea
Feyen, Dan Republican Yea
Jacque, André Republican Yea
Jagler, John Republican Yea
Kapenga, Chris Republican Yea
LeMahieu, Devin Republican Yea
Marklein, Howard Republican Yea
Nass, Steve Republican Yea
Stafsholt, Rob Republican Yea
Testin, Patrick Republican Yea
Wanggaard, Van Republican Yea
Wimberger, Eric Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SB 494?
SB 494 is sponsored by Stroebel, Stafsholt, Rob (Republican), Marklein, Howard (Republican), Jacque, André (Republican), Felzkowski, Mary (Republican), Cowles, Ballweg, and Feyen, Dan (Republican).
What is the current status of SB 494?
This bill died with 2021-2022 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 494?
Track SB 494 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 494

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 494

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →