SB 494 — Relating to: aquatic plant management plans and permit exemptions.
Last action — Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2021-2022 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
49 added · 105 removedPlain-language change summary
The recent changes to Senate Bill 494 focus on managing aquatic plant life in Wisconsin's waters. Key updates include defining "private ponds" and ensuring that management plans for invasive plants are based on scientific methods. Additionally, the bill clarifies that permit fees should not place an undue financial burden on property owners, making it easier and more affordable for them to manage aquatic plants on their land. These changes aim to balance environmental protection with property rights and ease of access for pond owners.
-Date 2022of LEGISLATUREenactment: LRB-3540/1 ZDW:skw SENATE BILL 494 August 5, 2021 - Introduced by Senators FEYEN , ALLWEG , COWLES, FELZKOWSKI, JACQUE , MARKLEIN, TAFSHOLT and STROEBEL , cosponsored by Representatives STEINEKE , KITCHENS, K NODL, KUGLITSCH , LOUDENBECK , M URPHY, M URSAU, R OZAR, SCHRAA , TITTL and T USLER.
ReferredSenate toBill Committee494 onDate Naturalof Resourcespublication*: and Energy.
WISCONSIN ACT A N A CT to amend 23.24 (2) (a) 1., 23.24 (2) (a) 2., 23.24 (2) (c) 7., 23.24 (3) (b) and 23.24 (3) (c);
AnalysisThe bypeople of the Legislativestate Referenceof BureauWisconsin, Thisrepresented billin makesmentsmaynotimposeanunduefinancialburdenonper- numeroussenate changesand relatingassembly, todo theenact controlas offollows: aquatic plants using chemicals or biological agents.
Currentmit lawapplicants requiresor theproperty Departmentowners. of Natural Resources to establish a program for the waters of this state that meet several goals, including implementing efforts to protect and develop native aquatic plants and regulate how aquatic plants are managed.
TheSECTION bill5. requires that DNR efforts to protect native aquatic plants rely on widely accepted methods supported by peer-reviewed science to suppress or eradicate invasive or nuisance aquatic plants.
The23.24 bill(3) also(b) requiresof thatthe DNRstatutes plansis toamended regulateSECTION aquatic1. plants ensure invasive and nuisance aquatic plants are suppressed or eradicated to the greatest extent possible.
Under23.24 current(1) law,(je) subject to exceptions, a person may not control aquatic plants in waters of the statestatutes byis thecreated useto ofto chemicalsread: or the introduction of biological agents without a valid aquatic plant management permit issued by DNR.
Asread: a condition of receiving an aquatic plant management permit, DNR may require the applicant to submit a plan for how aquatic plants will be introduced, removed, or controlled.
23.24 (3) (b) The billdepartment providesmay require that DNRan must23.24 give(1) equal(je) consideration“Private topond” plansmeans thata willsurface suppresswater orapplication eradicatefor invasivean oraquatic nuisanceplant aquaticmanagement plantspermit bycon- useless ofthan chemicals10 -acres 2022in Legislaturesize -that 2is -surrounded LRB-3540/1by ZDW:skwthe SENATEprivate BILLtain 494a andplan providesfor thatthe department’s approval as to how the planproperty requirementsof mayone notor imposemore anowners, unduewith financialno burdenpublic onaccess permitto applicantsaquatic orplants propertywill owners.be introduced, removed, or controlled.
The bill also creates exemptions from the permit requirement for the introduction of chemicals or biological agents to a private pond, which the bill defines as “a surface water less than 10 acres in size that is surrounded by the private property of one or more owners, with no public access to the water, and that has either no surface water discharge orThe surfacedepartment watershall dischargegive thatequal canconsideration be controlled.” Under the bill, a person who applies a chemical treatment to aplans private pond to suppress or eradicatesurface invasivewater ordischarge nuisancethat aquaticcan plantsbe iscontrolled. exempt if the person is certified as a commercial applicator by the Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection in the aquatic and mosquito pest control category and follows U.S.
Environmentalthat Protectionwill Agencysuppress standardsor foreradicate chemicalinvasive typeor andnuisance use.SECTION 2.
The bill also exempts a person who applies to a private pond a biological agent to improve water quality at a concentration that does not cause acute or chronic toxicity for aquatic organisms or a dye that is not labeled for herbicide use.
The people of the state of Wisconsin, represented in senate and assembly, do enact as follows:
S ECTION 1.
23.24 (1) (je) of the statutes is created to read:
23.24 (1) (je) “Private pond” means a surface water less than 10 acres in size that is surrounded by the private property of one or more owners, with no public access to the water, and that has either no surface water discharge or surface water discharge that can be controlled.
S ECTION 2.
of the statutes is amended aquatic plants by use of chemicals that have been labeled to read:
23.24and (2)registered (a)for 1.aquatic plant control by the U.S.
Implementenvi- efforts23.24 to(2) protect(a) and1. develop diverse and stable communities of native aquatic plants using widely accepted methods that are supported by peer-reviewed science to suppress or eradicate invasive or nuisance aquatic plants.
SImplement ECTIONefforts 3.to protect and ronmental protection agency.
develop diverse and stable communities of native aquatic SECTION 6.
23.24 (3) (c) of the statutes is amended plants using widely accepted methods that are supported to read:
by peer−reviewed science to suppress or eradicate inva- 23.24 (3) (c) The department may promulgate a rule sive or nuisance aquatic plants.
to establish fees for aquatic plant management permits.
SECTION 3.
of the statutes is amended Under the rule, the department may establish a different to read:
23.24fee (2)for an aquatic plant management permit to manage 23.24(2) (a) 2.
Regulate how aquatic plants are managedman- aquatic plants that are located in a body of water that is aged to ensure invasive or nuisance aquatic plants are entirely confined on the property of one private property suppressed or eradicated to the greatest extent possible.
LRB-3540/1owner -owners. 2022 Legislature - 3 - ZDW:skw SECTION 4 SENATE BILL 494 SECTION 4.
SECTION 4.
of the statutes is amended toSECTION read:7.
23.24 (2) (c) 7.
The requirements for plans that the department may require under sub.
(3) (b).
Plan requirements may not impose an undue financial burden on permit applicants or property owners.
SECTION 5.
23.24 (3) (b) of the statutes is amended to read:
23.24 (3) (b) The department may require that an application for an aquatic plant management permit contain a plan for the department's approval as to how the aquatic plants will be introduced, removed, or controlled.
Show all 74 changed lines (34 more)
The department shall give equal consideration to plans that will suppress or eradicate invasive or nuisance aquatic plants by use of chemicals that have been labeled and registered for aquatic plant control by the U.S.
environmental protection agency.
SECTION 6.
23.24 (3) (c) of the statutes is amended to read:
23.24 (3) (c) The department may promulgate a rule to establish fees for aquatic plant management permits.
Under the rule, the department may establish a different fee for an aquatic plant management permit to manage aquatic plants that are located in a body of water that is entirely confined on the property of one private property owner owners.
SECTION 7.
23.24to (4)read: (b) 5.
A23.24 person(2) who(c) applies7. a chemical treatment to a private pond to suppress or eradicate invasive or nuisance aquatic plants if all of the following apply:
The requirements for plans that the 23.24 (4) (b) 5.
A person who applies a chemical departmentmayrequireundersub.(3)(b).
Planrequire- treatment to a private pond to suppress or eradicate inva- * Section 991.11,ISCONSISTATUTES:
Effective date of acts.
“Every act and every portion of an act enacted by the legislature over the governor’s partial veto which does not expressly prescribe the time when it takes effect shall take effect on the day after its date of publication.” Wisconsin Act − 2 − 2021 Senate Bill 494 sive or nuisance aquatic plants if all of the following notified of the application of the chemical treatment to apply:
the private pond.
The person is certified as a commercial applicator bye. the department of agriculture, trade and consumer protection in the aquatic and mosquito pest control category.
-The 2022person Legislatureretains -for 4a -period LRB-3540/1of ZDW:skwnot SENATEless BILLthan 4942 SECTIONby 7the b.department of agriculture, trade and consumer years a record of any pesticide the person applies to the protection in the aquatic and mosquito pest control cate- private pond.
TheAll personrecords usesretained onlyunder thosethis chemicalssubd. that have been labeled and registered for aquatic plant control by the U.S.
5.
e.
gory.
shall be made available to the department for inspection b.
The person uses only those chemicals that have upon request.
been labeled and registered for aquatic plant control by SECTION 8.
23.24 (4) (b) 6.
of the statutes is created the U.S.
to read:
environmental protection agency23.24 label(4) directions(b) for6. appropriate application methods and rates.
SECTIONA 8.person who applies to a private agency label directions for appropriate application meth- pond a biological agent to improve water quality at a con- ods and rates.
23.24centration (4)that (b)does 6.not cause acute or chronic toxicity d.
ofIf the statutesprivate pond abuts multiple parcels, the own- for aquatic organisms or a dye that is creatednot tolabeled read:for her- ers of all parcels that abut the private pond have been bicide use.
23.24 (4) (b) 6.
A person who applies to a private pond a biological agent to improve water quality at a concentration that does not cause acute or chronic toxicity for aquatic organisms or a dye that is not labeled for herbicide use.
(END)
Show all 74 changed rows (34 more)
View plain text versions (3)
- Enrolled Text as Enrolled pdf
- Bill Text View text pdf
- Amended Senate Amendment 2 Current pdf
Action History
-
Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82
-
Placed on calendar 5-17-2022 pursuant to Joint Rule 82 (2)(a)
-
Report vetoed by the Governor on 4-15-2022
-
Presented to the Governor on 4-14-2022
-
Report correctly enrolled
-
Received from Assembly concurred in
-
Ordered immediately messaged
-
Read a third time and concurred in
-
Rules suspended
-
Ordered to a third reading
-
Read a second time
-
Made a special order of business at 8:15 AM on 2-23-2022 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 29
-
Read first time and referred to committee on Rules
-
Received from Senate
-
Ordered immediately messaged
-
Read a third time and passed, Ayes 21, Noes 12
-
Rules suspended
-
Ordered to a third reading
-
Senate Amendment 2 adopted
-
Read a second time
-
Placed on calendar 1-25-2022 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
-
Available for scheduling
-
Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Natural Resources and Energy, Ayes 3, Noes 2
-
Report adoption of Senate Amendment 2 recommended by Committee on Natural Resources and Energy, Ayes 3, Noes 2
-
Executive action taken
-
Senate Amendment 2 offered by Senator Feyen
-
Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senator Feyen
-
Representative Dallman added as a cosponsor
-
Public hearing held
-
Read first time and referred to Committee on Natural Resources and Energy
-
Introduced by Senators Feyen, Ballweg, Cowles, Felzkowski, Jacque, Marklein, Stafsholt and Stroebel; cosponsored by Representatives Steineke, Kitchens, Knodl, Kuglitsch, Loudenbeck, Murphy, Mursau, Rozar, Schraa, Tittl and Tusler
Sponsors
- Stroebel · Primary
- Rob Stafsholt · Primary
- Howard Marklein · Primary
- André Jacque · Primary
- Mary Felzkowski · Primary
- Cowles · Primary
- Ballweg · Primary
- Dan Feyen · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →8 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 124 not signed on · 8 voted No
Sponsors (8)
- Stroebel
- Stafsholt, Rob Republican
- Marklein, Howard Republican
- Jacque, André Republican
- Felzkowski, Mary Republican
- Cowles
- Ballweg
- Feyen, Dan Republican
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (124)
124 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 124 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 0 | 8 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 21 | 12 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 64% | 36% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (33)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| BALLWEG | — | Yea |
| PETROWSKI | — | Yea |
| BERNIER | — | Yea |
| ROTH | — | Yea |
| COWLES | — | Yea |
| KOOYENGA | — | Yea |
| STROEBEL | — | Yea |
| DARLING | — | Yea |
| AGARD | — | Nay |
| BEWLEY | — | Nay |
| ERPENBACH | — | Nay |
| RINGHAND | — | Nay |
| Carpenter, Tim | Democrat | Nay |
| Johnson, LaTonya | Democrat | Nay |
| Larson, Chris | Democrat | Nay |
| Pfaff, Brad | Democrat | Nay |
| Roys, Kelda | Democrat | Nay |
| Smith, Jeff | Democrat | Nay |
| Taylor, Sequanna | Democrat | Nay |
| Wirch, Robert | Democrat | Nay |
| Bradley, Julian | Republican | Yea |
| Felzkowski, Mary | Republican | Yea |
| Feyen, Dan | Republican | Yea |
| Jacque, André | Republican | Yea |
| Jagler, John | Republican | Yea |
| Kapenga, Chris | Republican | Yea |
| LeMahieu, Devin | Republican | Yea |
| Marklein, Howard | Republican | Yea |
| Nass, Steve | Republican | Yea |
| Stafsholt, Rob | Republican | Yea |
| Testin, Patrick | Republican | Yea |
| Wanggaard, Van | Republican | Yea |
| Wimberger, Eric | Republican | Yea |
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 494?
- SB 494 is sponsored by Stroebel, Stafsholt, Rob (Republican), Marklein, Howard (Republican), Jacque, André (Republican), Felzkowski, Mary (Republican), Cowles, Ballweg, and Feyen, Dan (Republican).
- What is the current status of SB 494?
- This bill died with 2021-2022 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 494?
- Track SB 494 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 494
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 494
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →