Wisconsin 2021-2022 Regular Session Status: To Executive 22 R cosponsors

AB 937 — Relating to: the amount of benefits received under the unemployment insurance law. (FE)

Last action — Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2021-2022 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

61 added · 148 removed

Plain-language change summary

The changes made to Bill AB 937 revise how the maximum amount of regular unemployment benefits is determined. Previously, all claimants were capped at a fixed 26 weeks of benefits. Now, this duration will fluctuate based on the average statewide unemployment rate during specific quarters of the year, allowing for potentially longer benefits during higher unemployment times. This amendment is significant because it aims to better align support with the economic conditions, providing more assistance when people need it the most.

→
Previous
Latest
- 2022 LEGISLATURE LRB-2943/1 MED:ekg&cjs ASSEMBLY BILL 937 January 31, 2022 - Introduced by Representatives ALLMAN , VORPAGEL, WITTKE, ALLEN , ARMSTRONG , A UGUST, B RANDTJEN , C ABRAL-GUEVARA, C ALLAHAN , D ITTRIC, D UCHOW, E DMING, J AMES, K ATSMA, K ITCHENS, KNODL , KRUG , K UGLITSCH, MAGNAFICI, M OSES, PENTERMAN , PETERSEN, P LUMER, SCHRAA , SNYDER , ORTWELL , TEFFEN, TUSLER, ZIMMERMAN and B ORN, cosponsored by Senators FEYEN, BERNIER, ELZKOWSKI , MARKLEINand S TROEBEL.
Date of enactment:
Referred to Committee on Workforce Development.
Assembly Bill 937 Date of publication*:
A N A CT to amend 108.06 (1) and 108.142 (4);
WISCONSIN ACT A N A CT to amend 108.06 (1) and 108.142 (4);
relating to:
relat- ing to:
Analysis by the Legislative Reference Bureau This bill changes the maximum number of weeks of regular unemployment insurance (UI) benefits payable to an eligible claimant who is totally unemployed to an amount that varies depending upon the seasonally adjusted statewide average unemployment rate for the first or third calendar quarter immediately preceding the beginning of the claimant's benefit year.
The people of the state of Wisconsin, represented in celed or suspended which were paid or payable to the senate and assembly, do enact as follows:
Currently, the maximum number of weeks of regular UI benefits payable to an eligible claimant who is totally unemployed and who earns sufficient wages to qualify for those benefits is fixed at 26 weeks.
claimant, whichever is lower.
Under the bill, the maximum number of weeks for claimants whose benefit years begin during the first half of a given year is based upon the unemployment rate for the third quarter of the preceding year, and the maximum number of weeks for claimants whose benefit years begin during the second half of a given year is based upon the unemployment rate for the first quarter of that year.
SECTION 2.
Once a claimant begins a benefit year, the claimant's maximum number of weeks of regular benefits is fixed for that benefit year.
108.06 (1m) of the statutes is created to S ECTION 1.
Because the maximum number of weeks of state supplemental benefits payable to a claimant is calculated in part based upon the maximum number of weeks of regular benefits payable to a claimant, the change also affects the maximum number of weeks of state supplemental benefits payable to a - 2022 Legislature - 2 - LRB-2943/1 MED:ekg&cjs ASSEMBLY BILL 937 claimant.
Under the bill, the maximum number of weeks of regular benefits for total unemployment is determined as follows:
Statewide unemployment rate Maximum weeks of benefits Greater than 9.0 percent 26 Greater than 8.5 percent but less than or 25 equal to 9.0 percent Greater than 8.0 percent but less than or 24 equal to 8.5 percent Greater than 7.5 percent but less than or 23 equal to 8.0 percent Greater than 7.0 percent but less than or 22 equal to 7.5 percent Greater than 6.5 percent but less than or 21 equal to 7.0 percent Greater than 6.0 percent but less than or 20 equal to 6.5 percent Greater than 5.5 percent but less than or 19 equal to 6.0 percent Greater than 5.0 percent but less than or 18 equal to 5.5 percent Greater than 4.5 percent but less than or 17 equal to 5.0 percent Greater than 4.0 percent but less than or 16 equal to 4.5 percent Greater than 3.5 percent but less than or 15 equal to 4.0 percent Less than or equal to 3.5 percent 14 For further information see the state and local fiscal estimate, which will be printed as an appendix to this bill.
The people of the state of Wisconsin, represented in senate and assembly, do enact as follows:
S ECTION 1.
108.06 (1) Except as provided in sub.
read:
108.06 (1m) (a) The department shall determine the 108.06 (1) Except as provided in sub.
108.141 and 108.142, no claimant may receive total benefits based on employment in a base period greater than 26 times the number of weeks determined under sub.
maximum number of weeks of regular benefits under 108.141 and 108.142, no claimant may receive total ben- sub.
(1m) multiplied by the claimant's weekly benefit rate under s.
(1) by calculating for the first and 3rd quarter of each year the average of the seasonally adjusted statewide efits based on employment in a base period greater than unemployment rates for the months in the quarter, as times the number of weeks determined under sub.
108.05 (1) or 40 percent of the claimant's base period wages, whichever is lower.
determined by the bureau of labor statistics for the U.S.
Except as provided in sub.
(1m) multiplied by the claimant’s weekly benefit rate under s.
108.05 (1) or 40 percent of the claimant’s base department of labor.
For claimants whose benefit years period wages, whichever is lower.
Except as provided in begin on or after January 1 and before July 1 of any year, the department shall make the determination by using the sub.
108.141 and LRB-2943/1 - 2022 Legislature - 3 - MED:ekg&cjs SECTION 1 ASSEMBLY BILL 937 108.142, if a claimant's base period wages are reduced or canceled under s.
108.141 and 108.142, if a claimant’s base 3rd calendar quarter of the preceding year.
108.04 (5) or (18), or suspended under s.
For claimants period wages are reduced or canceled under s.
108.04 (1) (f), (10) (a), or (17), the claimant may not receive total benefits based on employment in a base period greater than 26 times the number of weeks determined under sub.
108.04 (5) whose benefit years begin after June 30 and on or before or (18), or suspended under s.
(1m) multiplied by the claimant's weekly benefit rate under s.
108.04 (1) (f), (10) (a), or December 31 of any year, the department shall make the (17), the claimant may not receive total benefits based on determination by using the first calendar quarter of that employment in a base period greater than 26 times the year.
108.05 (1) or 40 percent of the base period wages not reduced, canceled or suspended which were paid or payable to the claimant, whichever is lower.
For benefit years to which each determination number of weeks determined under sub.
SECTION 2.
(1m) multiplied applies, the maximum number of weeks of regular bene- by the claimant’s weekly benefit rate under s.
108.06 (1m) of the statutes is created to read:
108.05 (1) fits is as follows:
108.06 (1m) (a) The department shall determine the maximum number of weeks of regular benefits under sub.
[See Figure 108.06 (1m) (a) following] or 40 percent of the base period wages not reduced, can- Figure 108.06 (1m) (a):
(1) by calculating for the first and 3rd quarter of each year the average of the seasonally adjusted statewide unemployment rates for the months in the quarter, as determined by the bureau of labor statistics for the U.S.
Statewide average unemployment rate Maximum weeks of benefits Greater than 9.0 percent 26 Greater than 8.5 percent but less than or equal to 9.0 percent 25 Greater than 8.0 percent but less than or equal to 8.5 percent 24 * Section 991.11ISCONSINSTATUTE:
department of labor.
Effective date of acts.
For claimants whose benefit years begin on or after January 1 and before July 1 of any year, the department shall make the determination by using the 3rd calendar quarter of the preceding year.For claimants whose benefit years begin after June 30 and on or before December 31 of any year, the department shall make the determination by using the first calendar quarter of that year.
“Every act and every portion of an act enacted by the legislature over the governor’s partial veto which does not expressly prescribe the time when it takes effect shall take effect on the day after its date of publication.” Wisconsin Act − 2 − 2021 Assembly Bill 937 Greater than 7.5 percent but less than or equal to 8.0 percent 23 Greater than 7.0 percent but less than or equal to 7.5 percent 22 Greater than 6.5 percent but less than or equal to 7.0 percent 21 Greater than 6.0 percent but less than or equal to 6.5 percent 20 Greater than 5.5 percent but less than or equal to 6.0 percent 19 Greater than 5.0 percent but less than or equal to 5.5 percent 18 Greater than 4.5 percent but less than or equal to 5.0 percent 17 Greater than 4.0 percent but less than or equal to 4.5 percent 16 Greater than 3.5 percent but less than or equal to 4.0 percent 15 Less than or equal to 3.5 percent 14 (b) The maximum number of weeks of regular bene- sum of the number of weeks determined under s.
For benefit years to which each determination applies, the maximum number of weeks of regular benefits is as follows:
108.06 fits payable to a claimant under sub.
[See Figure 108.06 (1m) (a) following] Figure 108.06 (1m) (a):
(1) in the first week (1m) and 8, multiplied by the claimant’s weekly benefit of the claimant’s benefit year remains the same regard- rate under s.
Statewide average unemployment rate Maximum weeks of benefits Greater than 9.0 percent 26 Greater than 8.5 percent but less than or 25 equal to 9.0 percent - 2022 Legislature - 4 - LRB-2943/1 MED:ekg&cjs ASSEMBLY BILL 937 SECTION 2 Greater than 8.0 percent but less than or 24 equal to 8.5 percent Greater than 7.5 percent but less than or 23 equal to 8.0 percent Greater than 7.0 percent but less than or 22 equal to 7.5 percent Greater than 6.5 percent but less than or 21 equal to 7.0 percent Greater than 6.0 percent but less than or 20 equal to 6.5 percent Greater than 5.5 percent but less than or 19 equal to 6.0 percent Greater than 5.0 percent but less than or 18 equal to 5.5 percent Greater than 4.5 percent but less than or 17 equal to 5.0 percent Greater than 4.0 percent but less than or 16 equal to 4.5 percent Greater than 3.5 percent but less than 4.0 15 percent Less than or equal to 3.5 percent 14 (b) The maximum number of weeks of regular benefits payable to a claimant under sub.
108.05 (1) or 40 percent of wages paid or less of the maximum number of weeks of regular benefits payable to the claimant in his or her base period under s.
(1) in the first week of the claimant's benefit year remains the same regardless of the maximum number of weeks of regular benefits in effect in any subsequent week that benefits become payable to the claimant.
in effect in any subsequent week that benefits become 108.04 (4) (a), whichever is lower.
(c) The department shall publish on its Internet site a notice about the maximum number of weeks of regular benefits available as calculated in accordance with this subsection.
payable to the claimant.
S ECTION 3.
(c) The department shall publish on its Internet site SECTION 4.
108.142 (4) of the statutes is amended to read:
Show all 56 changed rows (16 more)
Previous
Latest
108.142 (4) D URATION OF W ISCONSIN SUPPLEMENTAL BENEFITS.
During a Wisconsin supplemental benefit period, no claimant may receive total benefits based LRB-2943/1 - 2022 Legislature - 5 - MED:ekg&cjs SECTION 3 ASSEMBLY BILL 937 on employment in a base period greater than 34 timeshe sum of the number of weeks determined under s.
108.06 (1m) and 8, multiplied by the claimant's weekly benefit rate under s.
108.05 (1) or 40 percent of wages paid or payable to the claimant in his or her base period under s.
108.04 (4) (a), whichever is lower.
S ECTION 4.
227.01 (13) (yL) Determines, under s.
a notice about the maximum number of weeks of regular 227.01 (13) (yL) Determines, under s.
108.06 (1m), the maximum number of weeks of regular unemployment insurance benefits available under s.
108.06 (1m), benefits available as calculated in accordance with this the maximum number of weeks of regular unemploy- subsection.
SECTION 3.
108.142 (4) of the statutes is amended to ment insurance benefits available under s.
S ECTION 50Initial applicability.
read:
(1) This act first applies with respect to benefit years established on the effective date of this subsection.
SECTION 5.0Initial applicability.
S ECTION 60Effective date.
108.142 (4) D URATION OF W ISCONSIN SUPPLEMENTAL (1) This act first applies with respect to benefit years established on the effective date of this subsection.
(1) This act takes effect on July 3, 2022.
BENEFITS.
(END)
During a Wisconsin supplemental benefit period, no claimant may receive total benefits based on SECTION 6.0Effective date.
employment in a base period greater than 34 times the (1) This act takes effect on July 3, 2022.
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82

  2. Placed on calendar 5-17-2022 pursuant to Joint Rule 82 (2)(a)

  3. Report vetoed by the Governor on 4-15-2022

  4. Presented to the Governor on 4-13-2022

  5. Report correctly enrolled on 3-1-2022

  6. LRB correction

  7. Received from Senate concurred in

  8. Ordered immediately messaged

  9. Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 19, Noes 14

  10. Rules suspended

  11. Ordered to a third reading

  12. Read a second time

  13. Placed on calendar 2-22-2022 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  14. Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 5, Noes 0

  15. Available for scheduling

  16. Read first time and referred to committee on Senate Organization

  17. Received from Assembly

  18. Ordered immediately messaged

  19. Read a third time and passed, Ayes 57, Noes 35, Paired 4

  20. Rules suspended

  21. Ordered to a third reading

  22. Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 58, Noes 34

  23. Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Representatives Sinicki, Shankland, Andraca, Drake, Spreitzer, Subeck, Neubauer, Hong, Emerson, B. Meyers, Ohnstad, Billings, Goyke, Doyle, Hesselbein, Conley, Vining, S. Rodriguez, McGuire, Baldeh, Shelton, Considine, Stubbs, Brostoff, Snodgrass, Bowen, Hebl, Vruwink, Pope, Riemer and Haywood

  24. Read a second time

  25. Placed on calendar 2-17-2022 by Committee on Rules

  26. Referred to committee on Rules

  27. Report passage recommended by Committee on Workforce Development, Ayes 7, Noes 5

  28. Executive action taken

  29. Fiscal estimate received

  30. Public hearing held

  31. Representative Murphy added as a coauthor

  32. Read first time and referred to Committee on Workforce Development

  33. Introduced by Representatives Dallman, Vorpagel, Wittke, Allen, Armstrong, August, Brandtjen, Cabral-Guevara, Callahan, Dittrich, Duchow, Edming, James, Katsma, Kitchens, Knodl, Krug, Kuglitsch, Magnafici, Moses, Penterman, Petersen, Plumer, Schraa, Snyder, Sortwell, Steffen, Tusler, Zimmerman and Born; cosponsored by Senators Feyen, Bernier, Felzkowski, Marklein and Stroebel

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

30 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 102 not signed on · 29 voted No

Sponsors (30)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (102)

102 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 102 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

CONCURRENCE

Passed 19 Yea · 14 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 8400
Republican 11200
Democrat 0800
Total 191400
% of votes cast 58%42%0%0%
How each member voted (33)
Member Party Vote
BALLWEG — Yea
ROTH — Yea
BERNIER — Yea
STROEBEL — Yea
COWLES — Yea
KOOYENGA — Yea
DARLING — Yea
PETROWSKI — Yea
AGARD — Nay
BEWLEY — Nay
ERPENBACH — Nay
RINGHAND — Nay
Carpenter, Tim Democrat Nay
Johnson, LaTonya Democrat Nay
Larson, Chris Democrat Nay
Pfaff, Brad Democrat Nay
Roys, Kelda Democrat Nay
Smith, Jeff Democrat Nay
Taylor, Sequanna Democrat Nay
Wirch, Robert Democrat Nay
Bradley, Julian Republican Yea
Felzkowski, Mary Republican Yea
Feyen, Dan Republican Yea
Jacque, André Republican Yea
Jagler, John Republican Yea
Kapenga, Chris Republican Yea
LeMahieu, Devin Republican Yea
Marklein, Howard Republican Yea
Nass, Steve Republican Nay
Stafsholt, Rob Republican Yea
Testin, Patrick Republican Yea
Wanggaard, Van Republican Nay
Wimberger, Eric Republican Yea

Official roll call →

PASSAGE

Passed 57 Yea · 35 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 35100
Democrat 01800
Unaffiliated 221600
Total 573500
% of votes cast 62%38%0%0%
How each member voted (92)
Member Party Vote
BALDEH — Nay
BOWEN — Nay
BRANDTJEN — Yea
CABRAL-GUEVA — Yea
CABRERA — Nay
CONLEY — Nay
CONSIDINE — Nay
EDMING — Yea
GOYKE — Nay
HEBL — Nay
HINTZ — Nay
HORLACHER — Yea
KATSMA — Yea
KERKMAN — Yea
KUGLITSCH — Yea
LOUDENBECK — Yea
MACCO — Yea
MAGNAFICI — Yea
MEYERS — Nay
MYERS — Nay
OHNSTAD — Nay
OLDENBURG — Nay
PETRYK — Yea
PLUMER — Yea
POPE — Nay
RAMTHUN — Yea
RIEMER — Nay
ROZAR — Yea
SANFELIPPO — Yea
SCHRAA — Yea
SHELTON — Nay
SKOWRONSKI — Yea
STEINEKE — Yea
TAUCHEN — Yea
THIESFELDT — Yea
VORPAGEL — Yea
VRUWINK — Nay
SPEAKER — Yea
Anderson, Clinton Democrat Nay
Andraca, Deb Democrat Nay
Billings, Jill Democrat Nay
Doyle, Steve Democrat Nay
Drake, Dora Democrat Nay
Emerson, Jodi Democrat Nay
Haywood, Kalan Democrat Nay
Hesselbein, Dianne Democrat Nay
Hong, Francesca Democrat Nay
McGuire, Tip Democrat Nay
Neubauer, Greta Democrat Nay
Ortiz-Velez, Sylvia Democrat Nay
Sinicki, Christine Democrat Nay
Snodgrass, Lee Democrat Nay
Spreitzer, Mark Democrat Nay
Stubbs, Shelia Democrat Nay
Subeck, Lisa Democrat Nay
Vining, Robyn Democrat Nay
Allen, Scott Republican Yea
August, Tyler Republican Yea
Behnke, Elijah Republican Yea
Born, Mark Republican Yea
Brooks, Robert Republican Yea
Callahan, Calvin Republican Yea
Dallman, Alex Republican Yea
Dittrich, Barbara Republican Yea
Duchow, Cindi Republican Yea
Gundrum, Rick Republican Yea
James, Jesse Republican Yea
Kitchens, Joel Republican Yea
Knodl, Daniel Republican Yea
Krug, Scott Republican Yea
Kurtz, Tony Republican Yea
Moses, Clint Republican Yea
Murphy, David Republican Yea
Mursau, Jeffrey Republican Yea
Neylon, Adam Republican Yea
Novak, Todd Republican Yea
Petersen, Kevin Republican Yea
Pronschinske, Treig Republican Yea
Rodriguez, Jessie Republican Yea
Rodriguez, Jessie Republican Nay
Snyder, Patrick Republican Yea
Sortwell, Shae Republican Yea
Spiros, John Republican Yea
Steffen, David Republican Yea
Summerfield, Rob Republican Yea
Swearingen, Rob Republican Yea
Tranel, Travis Republican Yea
Tusler, Ron Republican Yea
VanderMeer, Nancy Republican Yea
Wichgers, Chuck Republican Yea
Wittke, Robert Republican Yea
Zimmerman, Shannon Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors AB 937?
AB 937 is sponsored by Born, Mark (Republican), Zimmerman, Shannon (Republican), Tusler, Ron (Republican), Steffen, David (Republican), Sortwell, Shae (Republican), Snyder, Patrick (Republican), Schraa, Plumer, Petersen, Kevin (Republican), Penterman, William (Republican), Moses, Clint (Republican), Magnafici, Kuglitsch, Krug, Scott (Republican), Knodl, Daniel (Republican), Kitchens, Joel (Republican), Katsma, James, Jesse (Republican), Edming, Duchow, Cindi (Republican), Dittrich, Barbara (Republican), Callahan, Calvin (Republican), Cabral-Guevara, Rachael (Republican), Brandtjen, August, Tyler (Republican), Armstrong, David (Republican), Allen, Scott (Republican), Wittke, Robert (Republican), Vorpagel, and Dallman, Alex (Republican).
What is the current status of AB 937?
This bill died with 2021-2022 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track AB 937?
Track AB 937 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 937

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of AB 937

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →