Relating to: requiring the Elections Commission to send guidance documents to the Joint Committee for Revie...
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 943 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 943.
You're tracking SB 943
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 943 — Relating to: requiring the Elections Commission to send guidance documents to the Joint Committee for Review of Administrative Rules.
Last action — Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2021-2022 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
26 added · 70 removedPlain-language change summary
The amendment to Senate Bill 943 requires the Wisconsin Elections Commission to send all guidance documents it issues to municipal clerks to the Joint Committee for Review of Administrative Rules (JCRAR) on a weekly basis. This change ensures that lawmakers are informed about guidance that might impact local election processes and allows for better oversight. Additionally, any guidance documents sent will come with a disclaimer stating they do not carry the force of law, clarifying their purpose and status for municipal clerks. These updates matter as they aim to improve transparency and accountability in election administration.
-Date 2022of LEGISLATUREenactment: LRB-5497/1 JK:cjs&cdc SENATE BILL 943 February 3, 2022 - Introduced by Senators D ARLING, NASS, FELZKOWSKI and STROEBEL , cosponsored by Representatives S PIROS, GUNDRUM , B EHNKE , STEFFEN , ARMSTRONG , S ANFELIPPO, PENTERMAN , C ABRAL-GUEVARA , TITTL, M URSAU, ROZAR, OLDENBURG , KNODL, MURPHY, WITTKE and N EYLON.
ReferredSenate toBill Committee943 onDate Elections,of Electionpublication*: Process Reform and Ethics.
WISCONSIN ACT A N A CT to create 5.05 (16) (d) of the statutes;
AnalysisThe bypeople theof Legislative Reference Bureau This bill requires the Electionsstate Commissionof toWisconsin, weeklyrepresented submitin to whom the Jointdocument Committeeor forcommunication Reviewwas ofprovided Administrativesenate Rules all documents and communicationsassembly, fromdo theenact commission that the commission issued in the previous week that are applicable to municipal clerks generally and qualify as guidancefollows: documents.
If JCRAR determines that such a document or communication satisfies the definition of a rule under current law, JCRAR must notify the commissioncommittee’s of that determination and the commission must notify the municipal clerks that the document or communication is withdrawn and no longer applicable.applica- SECTION 1.
Under5.05 this(16) bill,(d) theof commission may promulgate the withdrawnstatutes documentis orcreated communicationto asble. a rule, if necessary for preserving the public peace, health, safety, or welfare.
For purposes of promulgating administrative rules, a “rule” is defined under current law as “a regulation, standard, statement of policy, or general order of general application that has the force of law and that is issued by an agency to implement, interpret, or make specific legislation enforced or administered by the agency or to govern the organization or procedure of the agency.” The bill also requires the commission tomay providepromulgate a disclaimer with all guidance documents that it provides to municipal clerks providing the statutorywithdrawn definitionread: of “guidance document” and indicating that guidance documents do not have the force - 2022 Legislature - 2 - LRB-5497/1 JK:cjs&cdc SENATE BILL 943 of law.
Under current law, “guidance document” means, generally, any formal or official document or communication issuedas by a staterule, agencyif that explains the agency'sdocument implementation of the current law that is enforced or administered5.05(16) by(d) the1. agency or provides advice with respect to how a state agency is likely to apply the current law that is enforced or administered by the agency.
The peoplecommission ofshall theweekly statesubmit ofcommunication Wisconsin,satisfies representedthe inrequirement senateunder ands. assembly, do enact as follows:
S227.24 ECTIONto 1.the joint committee for review of administrative rules (1) (a).
5.05all (16)documents (d)and ofcommunications from the statutescommission is2. created to read:
5.05All (16)guidance (d)documents 1.that the commission pro- that the commission issued in the previous week that are vides to municipal clerks shall include a disclaimer that applicable to municipal clerks generally and qualify as provides the definition of “guidance document” under s.
The commission shall weekly submit to the joint committee for review of administrative rules all documents and communications from the commission that the commission issued in the previous week that are applicable to municipal clerks generally and qualify as guidance documents, as defined in s.
The 227.01 (3m) and indicates that a guidance document does commission shall submit the documents and communicationscommuni- tonot thehave committee in the mannerforce establishedof bylaw. the committee.
Ifcations to the committee determinesin thatthe amanner documentestablished orby communicationthe itSECTION receives2.0Nonstatutory underprovisions. this paragraph or under 2021 Wisconsin Act ....
(thiscommittee. act), section 2 (1), satisfies the definition of a rule under s.
227.01If (13), the committee shalldetermines notifythat thea commissiondocument of(1) itsOn determination and the commissioneffective shalldate notifyof allthis municipalsubsection, clerks to whom the documentelec- or communication wasit providedreceives ofunder thethis committee'sparagraph determinationor andtions thatcommission theshall documentsubmit orto communicationthe isjoint withdrawncommittee andfor nounder longer2021Wisconsin applicable.Act ....
The(this commissionact), maysection promulgate2 the(1), withdrawnsat- documentreview orof communicationadministrative asrules aall rule,guidance ifdocuments, theas documentisfies orthe communicationdefinition satisfiesof thea requirementrule under s.
227.24227.01 (1)(13), (a).the defined in s.
2.227.01 (3m), that the commission provided committee shall notify the commission of its determina- to municipal clerks beginning on January 1, 2020, and tion and the commission shall notify all municipal clerks ending on the effective date of this subsection.
All* guidanceSection documents991.11,ISCONSISTATUTES: that the commission provides to municipal clerks shall include a disclaimer that provides the definition of “guidance document” under s.
227.01Effective (3m)date and indicates that a guidance document does not have the force of law.acts.
S“Every ECTIONact 2.Nonstatutoryand provisions.every portion of an act enacted by the legislature over the governor’s partial veto which does not expressly prescribe the time when it takes effect shall take effect on the day after its date of publication.”
LRB-5497/1 - 2022 Legislature - 3 - JK:cjs&cdc SECTION 2 SENATE BILL 943 (1) On the effective date of this subsection, the elections commission shall submit to the joint committee for review of administrative rules all guidance documents, as defined in s.
227.01 (3m), that the commission provided to municipal clerks beginning on January 1, 2020, and ending on the effective date of this subsection.
(END)
View plain text versions (2)
- Enrolled Text as Enrolled pdf
- Bill Text View text Current pdf
Action History
-
Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82
-
Placed on calendar 5-17-2022 pursuant to Joint Rule 82 (2)(a)
-
Report vetoed by the Governor on 4-8-2022
-
Presented to the Governor on 4-5-2022 by directive of the Majority Leader
-
Report correctly enrolled
-
Received from Assembly concurred in
-
Ordered immediately messaged
-
Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 59, Noes 35, Paired 4
-
Rules suspended
-
Ordered to a third reading
-
Read a second time
-
Made a special order of business at 8:14 AM on 2-24-2022 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 30
-
Read first time and referred to committee on Rules
-
Received from Senate
-
Ordered immediately messaged
-
Read a third time and passed, Ayes 21, Noes 12
-
Rules suspended
-
Ordered to a third reading
-
Read a second time
-
Placed on calendar 2-22-2022 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
-
Available for scheduling
-
Report passage recommended by Committee on Elections, Election Process Reform and Ethics, Ayes 3, Noes 2
-
Executive action taken
-
Representative Schraa added as a cosponsor
-
Public hearing held
-
Senator Ballweg added as a coauthor
-
Representatives Brooks, Duchow and Magnafici added as cosponsors
-
Read first time and referred to Committee on Elections, Election Process Reform and Ethics
-
Introduced by Senators Darling, Nass, Felzkowski and Stroebel; cosponsored by Representatives Spiros, Gundrum, Behnke, Steffen, Armstrong, Sanfelippo, Penterman, Cabral-Guevara, Tittl, Mursau, Rozar, Oldenburg, Knodl, Murphy, Wittke and Neylon
Sponsors
- Stroebel · Primary
- Mary Felzkowski · Primary
- Steve Nass · Primary
- Darling · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →4 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 128 not signed on · 26 voted No
Sponsors (4)
- Stroebel
- Felzkowski, Mary Republican
- Nass, Steve Republican
- Darling
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (128)
128 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 128 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 23 | 17 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 0 | 17 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 36 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 59 | 35 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 63% | 37% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (94)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| HEBL | — | Nay |
| HINTZ | — | Nay |
| HORLACHER | — | Yea |
| KATSMA | — | Yea |
| KERKMAN | — | Yea |
| KUGLITSCH | — | Yea |
| LOUDENBECK | — | Yea |
| MACCO | — | Yea |
| MAGNAFICI | — | Yea |
| MEYERS | — | Nay |
| MILROY | — | Nay |
| MOORE OMOKUN | — | Nay |
| MYERS | — | Nay |
| OHNSTAD | — | Nay |
| OLDENBURG | — | Yea |
| PETRYK | — | Yea |
| PLUMER | — | Yea |
| POPE | — | Nay |
| RAMTHUN | — | Yea |
| RIEMER | — | Nay |
| ROZAR | — | Yea |
| SANFELIPPO | — | Yea |
| SCHRAA | — | Yea |
| SHELTON | — | Nay |
| SKOWRONSKI | — | Yea |
| BALDEH | — | Nay |
| BOWEN | — | Nay |
| BRANDTJEN | — | Yea |
| BROSTOFF | — | Nay |
| CABRAL-GUEVA | — | Yea |
| CABRERA | — | Nay |
| CONLEY | — | Nay |
| CONSIDINE | — | Nay |
| EDMING | — | Yea |
| GOYKE | — | Nay |
| TAUCHEN | — | Yea |
| THIESFELDT | — | Yea |
| VORPAGEL | — | Yea |
| SPEAKER | — | Yea |
| STEINEKE | — | Yea |
| Anderson, Clinton | Democrat | Nay |
| Andraca, Deb | Democrat | Nay |
| Billings, Jill | Democrat | Nay |
| Doyle, Steve | Democrat | Nay |
| Drake, Dora | Democrat | Nay |
| Emerson, Jodi | Democrat | Nay |
| Haywood, Kalan | Democrat | Nay |
| Hesselbein, Dianne | Democrat | Nay |
| Hong, Francesca | Democrat | Nay |
| McGuire, Tip | Democrat | Nay |
| Neubauer, Greta | Democrat | Nay |
| Ortiz-Velez, Sylvia | Democrat | Nay |
| Snodgrass, Lee | Democrat | Nay |
| Spreitzer, Mark | Democrat | Nay |
| Stubbs, Shelia | Democrat | Nay |
| Subeck, Lisa | Democrat | Nay |
| Vining, Robyn | Democrat | Nay |
| Allen, Scott | Republican | Yea |
| Armstrong, David | Republican | Yea |
| August, Tyler | Republican | Yea |
| Behnke, Elijah | Republican | Yea |
| Born, Mark | Republican | Yea |
| Brooks, Robert | Republican | Yea |
| Callahan, Calvin | Republican | Yea |
| Dallman, Alex | Republican | Yea |
| Dittrich, Barbara | Republican | Yea |
| Duchow, Cindi | Republican | Yea |
| Gundrum, Rick | Republican | Yea |
| James, Jesse | Republican | Yea |
| Kitchens, Joel | Republican | Yea |
| Knodl, Daniel | Republican | Yea |
| Krug, Scott | Republican | Yea |
| Kurtz, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Moses, Clint | Republican | Yea |
| Murphy, David | Republican | Yea |
| Mursau, Jeffrey | Republican | Yea |
| Neylon, Adam | Republican | Yea |
| Novak, Todd | Republican | Yea |
| Petersen, Kevin | Republican | Yea |
| Pronschinske, Treig | Republican | Yea |
| Rodriguez, Jessie | Republican | Yea |
| Rodriguez, Jessie | Republican | Nay |
| Snyder, Patrick | Republican | Yea |
| Sortwell, Shae | Republican | Yea |
| Spiros, John | Republican | Yea |
| Steffen, David | Republican | Yea |
| Summerfield, Rob | Republican | Yea |
| Swearingen, Rob | Republican | Yea |
| Tittl, Paul | Republican | Yea |
| Tranel, Travis | Republican | Yea |
| Tusler, Ron | Republican | Yea |
| VanderMeer, Nancy | Republican | Yea |
| Wichgers, Chuck | Republican | Yea |
| Zimmerman, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 0 | 8 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 21 | 12 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 64% | 36% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (33)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| BALLWEG | — | Yea |
| PETROWSKI | — | Yea |
| BERNIER | — | Yea |
| ROTH | — | Yea |
| COWLES | — | Yea |
| KOOYENGA | — | Yea |
| STROEBEL | — | Yea |
| DARLING | — | Yea |
| AGARD | — | Nay |
| BEWLEY | — | Nay |
| ERPENBACH | — | Nay |
| RINGHAND | — | Nay |
| Carpenter, Tim | Democrat | Nay |
| Johnson, LaTonya | Democrat | Nay |
| Larson, Chris | Democrat | Nay |
| Pfaff, Brad | Democrat | Nay |
| Roys, Kelda | Democrat | Nay |
| Smith, Jeff | Democrat | Nay |
| Taylor, Sequanna | Democrat | Nay |
| Wirch, Robert | Democrat | Nay |
| Bradley, Julian | Republican | Yea |
| Felzkowski, Mary | Republican | Yea |
| Feyen, Dan | Republican | Yea |
| Jacque, André | Republican | Yea |
| Jagler, John | Republican | Yea |
| Kapenga, Chris | Republican | Yea |
| LeMahieu, Devin | Republican | Yea |
| Marklein, Howard | Republican | Yea |
| Nass, Steve | Republican | Yea |
| Stafsholt, Rob | Republican | Yea |
| Testin, Patrick | Republican | Yea |
| Wanggaard, Van | Republican | Yea |
| Wimberger, Eric | Republican | Yea |
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 943?
- SB 943 is sponsored by Stroebel, Felzkowski, Mary (Republican), Nass, Steve (Republican), and Darling.
- What is the current status of SB 943?
- This bill died with 2021-2022 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 943?
- Track SB 943 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 943
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 943
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →