Wisconsin 2021-2022 Regular Session Status: To Executive 2 R cosponsors

SB 943 — Relating to: requiring the Elections Commission to send guidance documents to the Joint Committee for Review of Administrative Rules.

Last action — Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2021-2022 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

26 added · 70 removed

Plain-language change summary

The amendment to Senate Bill 943 requires the Wisconsin Elections Commission to send all guidance documents it issues to municipal clerks to the Joint Committee for Review of Administrative Rules (JCRAR) on a weekly basis. This change ensures that lawmakers are informed about guidance that might impact local election processes and allows for better oversight. Additionally, any guidance documents sent will come with a disclaimer stating they do not carry the force of law, clarifying their purpose and status for municipal clerks. These updates matter as they aim to improve transparency and accountability in election administration.

→
Previous
Latest
- 2022 LEGISLATURE LRB-5497/1 JK:cjs&cdc SENATE BILL 943 February 3, 2022 - Introduced by Senators D ARLING, NASS, FELZKOWSKI and STROEBEL , cosponsored by Representatives S PIROS, GUNDRUM , B EHNKE , STEFFEN , ARMSTRONG , S ANFELIPPO, PENTERMAN , C ABRAL-GUEVARA , TITTL, M URSAU, ROZAR, OLDENBURG , KNODL, MURPHY, WITTKE and N EYLON.
Date of enactment:
Referred to Committee on Elections, Election Process Reform and Ethics.
Senate Bill 943 Date of publication*:
A N A CT to create 5.05 (16) (d) of the statutes;
WISCONSIN ACT A N A CT to create 5.05 (16) (d) of the statutes;
Analysis by the Legislative Reference Bureau This bill requires the Elections Commission to weekly submit to the Joint Committee for Review of Administrative Rules all documents and communications from the commission that the commission issued in the previous week that are applicable to municipal clerks generally and qualify as guidance documents.
The people of the state of Wisconsin, represented in to whom the document or communication was provided senate and assembly, do enact as follows:
If JCRAR determines that such a document or communication satisfies the definition of a rule under current law, JCRAR must notify the commission of that determination and the commission must notify the municipal clerks that the document or communication is withdrawn and no longer applicable.
of the committee’s determination and that the document or communication is withdrawn and no longer applica- SECTION 1.
Under this bill, the commission may promulgate the withdrawn document or communication as a rule, if necessary for preserving the public peace, health, safety, or welfare.
5.05 (16) (d) of the statutes is created to ble.
For purposes of promulgating administrative rules, a “rule” is defined under current law as “a regulation, standard, statement of policy, or general order of general application that has the force of law and that is issued by an agency to implement, interpret, or make specific legislation enforced or administered by the agency or to govern the organization or procedure of the agency.” The bill also requires the commission to provide a disclaimer with all guidance documents that it provides to municipal clerks providing the statutory definition of “guidance document” and indicating that guidance documents do not have the force - 2022 Legislature - 2 - LRB-5497/1 JK:cjs&cdc SENATE BILL 943 of law.
The commission may promulgate the withdrawn read:
Under current law, “guidance document” means, generally, any formal or official document or communication issued by a state agency that explains the agency's implementation of the current law that is enforced or administered by the agency or provides advice with respect to how a state agency is likely to apply the current law that is enforced or administered by the agency.
document or communication as a rule, if the document or 5.05(16) (d) 1.
The people of the state of Wisconsin, represented in senate and assembly, do enact as follows:
The commission shall weekly submit communication satisfies the requirement under s.
S ECTION 1.
227.24 to the joint committee for review of administrative rules (1) (a).
5.05 (16) (d) of the statutes is created to read:
all documents and communications from the commission 2.
5.05 (16) (d) 1.
All guidance documents that the commission pro- that the commission issued in the previous week that are vides to municipal clerks shall include a disclaimer that applicable to municipal clerks generally and qualify as provides the definition of “guidance document” under s.
The commission shall weekly submit to the joint committee for review of administrative rules all documents and communications from the commission that the commission issued in the previous week that are applicable to municipal clerks generally and qualify as guidance documents, as defined in s.
guidance documents, as defined in s.
The commission shall submit the documents and communications to the committee in the manner established by the committee.
The 227.01 (3m) and indicates that a guidance document does commission shall submit the documents and communi- not have the force of law.
If the committee determines that a document or communication it receives under this paragraph or under 2021 Wisconsin Act ....
cations to the committee in the manner established by the SECTION 2.0Nonstatutory provisions.
(this act), section 2 (1), satisfies the definition of a rule under s.
committee.
227.01 (13), the committee shall notify the commission of its determination and the commission shall notify all municipal clerks to whom the document or communication was provided of the committee's determination and that the document or communication is withdrawn and no longer applicable.
If the committee determines that a document (1) On the effective date of this subsection, the elec- or communication it receives under this paragraph or tions commission shall submit to the joint committee for under 2021Wisconsin Act ....
The commission may promulgate the withdrawn document or communication as a rule, if the document or communication satisfies the requirement under s.
(this act), section 2 (1), sat- review of administrative rules all guidance documents, as isfies the definition of a rule under s.
227.24 (1) (a).
227.01 (13), the defined in s.
2.
227.01 (3m), that the commission provided committee shall notify the commission of its determina- to municipal clerks beginning on January 1, 2020, and tion and the commission shall notify all municipal clerks ending on the effective date of this subsection.
All guidance documents that the commission provides to municipal clerks shall include a disclaimer that provides the definition of “guidance document” under s.
* Section 991.11,ISCONSISTATUTES:
227.01 (3m) and indicates that a guidance document does not have the force of law.
Effective date of acts.
S ECTION 2.Nonstatutory provisions.
“Every act and every portion of an act enacted by the legislature over the governor’s partial veto which does not expressly prescribe the time when it takes effect shall take effect on the day after its date of publication.”
LRB-5497/1 - 2022 Legislature - 3 - JK:cjs&cdc SECTION 2 SENATE BILL 943 (1) On the effective date of this subsection, the elections commission shall submit to the joint committee for review of administrative rules all guidance documents, as defined in s.
227.01 (3m), that the commission provided to municipal clerks beginning on January 1, 2020, and ending on the effective date of this subsection.
(END)
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82

  2. Placed on calendar 5-17-2022 pursuant to Joint Rule 82 (2)(a)

  3. Report vetoed by the Governor on 4-8-2022

  4. Presented to the Governor on 4-5-2022 by directive of the Majority Leader

  5. Report correctly enrolled

  6. Received from Assembly concurred in

  7. Ordered immediately messaged

  8. Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 59, Noes 35, Paired 4

  9. Rules suspended

  10. Ordered to a third reading

  11. Read a second time

  12. Made a special order of business at 8:14 AM on 2-24-2022 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 30

  13. Read first time and referred to committee on Rules

  14. Received from Senate

  15. Ordered immediately messaged

  16. Read a third time and passed, Ayes 21, Noes 12

  17. Rules suspended

  18. Ordered to a third reading

  19. Read a second time

  20. Placed on calendar 2-22-2022 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  21. Available for scheduling

  22. Report passage recommended by Committee on Elections, Election Process Reform and Ethics, Ayes 3, Noes 2

  23. Executive action taken

  24. Representative Schraa added as a cosponsor

  25. Public hearing held

  26. Senator Ballweg added as a coauthor

  27. Representatives Brooks, Duchow and Magnafici added as cosponsors

  28. Read first time and referred to Committee on Elections, Election Process Reform and Ethics

  29. Introduced by Senators Darling, Nass, Felzkowski and Stroebel; cosponsored by Representatives Spiros, Gundrum, Behnke, Steffen, Armstrong, Sanfelippo, Penterman, Cabral-Guevara, Tittl, Mursau, Rozar, Oldenburg, Knodl, Murphy, Wittke and Neylon

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

4 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 128 not signed on · 26 voted No

Sponsors (4)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (128)

128 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 128 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

CONCURRENCE

Passed 59 Yea · 35 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 231700
Democrat 01700
Republican 36100
Total 593500
% of votes cast 63%37%0%0%
How each member voted (94)
Member Party Vote
HEBL — Nay
HINTZ — Nay
HORLACHER — Yea
KATSMA — Yea
KERKMAN — Yea
KUGLITSCH — Yea
LOUDENBECK — Yea
MACCO — Yea
MAGNAFICI — Yea
MEYERS — Nay
MILROY — Nay
MOORE OMOKUN — Nay
MYERS — Nay
OHNSTAD — Nay
OLDENBURG — Yea
PETRYK — Yea
PLUMER — Yea
POPE — Nay
RAMTHUN — Yea
RIEMER — Nay
ROZAR — Yea
SANFELIPPO — Yea
SCHRAA — Yea
SHELTON — Nay
SKOWRONSKI — Yea
BALDEH — Nay
BOWEN — Nay
BRANDTJEN — Yea
BROSTOFF — Nay
CABRAL-GUEVA — Yea
CABRERA — Nay
CONLEY — Nay
CONSIDINE — Nay
EDMING — Yea
GOYKE — Nay
TAUCHEN — Yea
THIESFELDT — Yea
VORPAGEL — Yea
SPEAKER — Yea
STEINEKE — Yea
Anderson, Clinton Democrat Nay
Andraca, Deb Democrat Nay
Billings, Jill Democrat Nay
Doyle, Steve Democrat Nay
Drake, Dora Democrat Nay
Emerson, Jodi Democrat Nay
Haywood, Kalan Democrat Nay
Hesselbein, Dianne Democrat Nay
Hong, Francesca Democrat Nay
McGuire, Tip Democrat Nay
Neubauer, Greta Democrat Nay
Ortiz-Velez, Sylvia Democrat Nay
Snodgrass, Lee Democrat Nay
Spreitzer, Mark Democrat Nay
Stubbs, Shelia Democrat Nay
Subeck, Lisa Democrat Nay
Vining, Robyn Democrat Nay
Allen, Scott Republican Yea
Armstrong, David Republican Yea
August, Tyler Republican Yea
Behnke, Elijah Republican Yea
Born, Mark Republican Yea
Brooks, Robert Republican Yea
Callahan, Calvin Republican Yea
Dallman, Alex Republican Yea
Dittrich, Barbara Republican Yea
Duchow, Cindi Republican Yea
Gundrum, Rick Republican Yea
James, Jesse Republican Yea
Kitchens, Joel Republican Yea
Knodl, Daniel Republican Yea
Krug, Scott Republican Yea
Kurtz, Tony Republican Yea
Moses, Clint Republican Yea
Murphy, David Republican Yea
Mursau, Jeffrey Republican Yea
Neylon, Adam Republican Yea
Novak, Todd Republican Yea
Petersen, Kevin Republican Yea
Pronschinske, Treig Republican Yea
Rodriguez, Jessie Republican Yea
Rodriguez, Jessie Republican Nay
Snyder, Patrick Republican Yea
Sortwell, Shae Republican Yea
Spiros, John Republican Yea
Steffen, David Republican Yea
Summerfield, Rob Republican Yea
Swearingen, Rob Republican Yea
Tittl, Paul Republican Yea
Tranel, Travis Republican Yea
Tusler, Ron Republican Yea
VanderMeer, Nancy Republican Yea
Wichgers, Chuck Republican Yea
Zimmerman, Shannon Republican Yea

Official roll call →

PASSAGE

Passed 21 Yea · 12 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 8400
Republican 13000
Democrat 0800
Total 211200
% of votes cast 64%36%0%0%
How each member voted (33)
Member Party Vote
BALLWEG — Yea
PETROWSKI — Yea
BERNIER — Yea
ROTH — Yea
COWLES — Yea
KOOYENGA — Yea
STROEBEL — Yea
DARLING — Yea
AGARD — Nay
BEWLEY — Nay
ERPENBACH — Nay
RINGHAND — Nay
Carpenter, Tim Democrat Nay
Johnson, LaTonya Democrat Nay
Larson, Chris Democrat Nay
Pfaff, Brad Democrat Nay
Roys, Kelda Democrat Nay
Smith, Jeff Democrat Nay
Taylor, Sequanna Democrat Nay
Wirch, Robert Democrat Nay
Bradley, Julian Republican Yea
Felzkowski, Mary Republican Yea
Feyen, Dan Republican Yea
Jacque, André Republican Yea
Jagler, John Republican Yea
Kapenga, Chris Republican Yea
LeMahieu, Devin Republican Yea
Marklein, Howard Republican Yea
Nass, Steve Republican Yea
Stafsholt, Rob Republican Yea
Testin, Patrick Republican Yea
Wanggaard, Van Republican Yea
Wimberger, Eric Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SB 943?
SB 943 is sponsored by Stroebel, Felzkowski, Mary (Republican), Nass, Steve (Republican), and Darling.
What is the current status of SB 943?
This bill died with 2021-2022 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 943?
Track SB 943 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 943

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 943

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →