Relating to: expanding the Court-Appointed Special Advocate program. (FE)
This bill requires the governor to allocate $6.8 million from federal funds to expand the CASA program. It aims to create two new CASA county programs in 2022 and two in 2023.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 925 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 925.
You're tracking AB 925
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 925 — Relating to: expanding the Court-Appointed Special Advocate program. (FE)
Last action — Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2021-2022 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
In plain language
The bill expands the Court-Appointed Special Advocate (CASA) program with new funding and programs.
This bill requires the governor to allocate $6.8 million from federal funds to expand the CASA program. It aims to create two new CASA county programs in 2022 and two in 2023.
Bill Text
- Bill Text View text Current pdf
Action History
-
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1
-
Public hearing held
-
Fiscal estimate received
-
Read first time and referred to Committee on Judiciary
-
Introduced by Representatives Snyder, Wichgers and Katsma; cosponsored by Senator Jacque
Sponsors
- Katsma · Primary
- Chuck Wichgers · Primary
- Patrick Snyder · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →3 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 129 not signed on
Sponsors (3)
- Katsma
- Wichgers, Chuck Republican
- Snyder, Patrick Republican
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (129)
129 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 129 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors AB 925?
- AB 925 is sponsored by Katsma, Wichgers, Chuck (Republican), and Snyder, Patrick (Republican).
- What is the current status of AB 925?
- This bill died with 2021-2022 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 925?
- Track AB 925 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 925
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 925
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →