SB 212 — Relating to: defects on absentee ballot certificates, certain kinds of election fraud, and providing a penalty. (FE)
Last action — Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2021-2022 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
47 added · 87 removedPlain-language change summary
The recent amendments to SB 212 clarify the rules surrounding absentee ballot certificates in Wisconsin. Now, if an absentee ballot certificate is missing important information, such as the elector's name or address, the municipal clerk is allowed to return the ballot to the voter so they can correct the issue, provided there is enough time to do so. This change also specifies that only the voter or their witness can fix any defects on the ballot certificates, which aims to reduce chances of fraud and ensure the integrity of the election process. Ultimately, these updates help streamline the voting process and protect voters' rights.
-Date 2022of LEGISLATUREenactment: LRB-2033/1 MPG:wlj/skw/kjf SENATE BILL 212 March 16, 2021 - Introduced by Senators D ARLING, STROEBEL, W IMBERGER, BALLWEG , BRADLEY, F ELZKOWSKI, FEYEN , JACQUE, M ARKLEIN, N ASS and W ANGGAARD, cosponsored by RepresentativesANFELIPPO, DMING, GUNDRUM , KNODL , KRUG, M URPHY, NEYLON, SKOWRONSKI , STEFFEN, VANDERM EER and W ICHGERS.
ReferredSenate toBill Committee212 onDate Elections,of Electionpublication*: Process Reform and Ethics.
WISCONSIN ACT A N A CT to renumber and amend 6.87 (9)(6d) and 12.606.87 (1)(9); (a);
and to createamend 12.1312.60 (2)(1) (b)(a); 3g., 12.13 (2) (b) 3r.
and to create 6.87 (6d) (a) to (L), 6.87 (9) (b), 12.13 (2) (b) 3g., 12.13 (2) (b) 3r.
AnalysisThe bypeople of the Legislativestate Referenceof BureauWisconsin, Erepresented LECTIONin FRAUD6.87(9) Current(a) lawIf prohibits election officials from committing certain kinds of election fraud, including permitting a personmunicipal toclerk registerreceives toan voteabsentee orsenate voteand whenassembly, thedo electionenact officialas knowsfollows: the person is not qualified to do so.
Thisballot billwith providesan furtherimproperly thatcompleted certificate or with no electioncertificate, officialthe clerk may doreturn anythe ofballot to the following:elec- SECTION 1c.
1.6.87 (6d) of the statutes is renumbered tor, inside the sealed envelope when an envelope is 6.87 (6d) (intro.) and amended to read:
Intentionally6.87(6d) assist(intro.) orIf causea certificate is missing the castingaddress orreceived, countingtogether with a new envelope if necessary, of a votewitness, orthe ballot An absentee ballot with no certifi- whenever time permits the receiptelector ofto correct the defect cate or with a registrationcertificate that does not include all of the electionand officialreturn knowsthe isballot invalid.within the period authorized under following may not be counted.:
2.sub.
Intentionally(6), assistand orthe causeclerk ashall votepost ora registrationnotification toof be rejected when the electionSECTION official1d. knows the vote or registration is valid.
3.6.87 (6d) (a) to (L) of the statutes are defect on the elector’s voter information page on the Internet site that is used by electors for original registra- created to read:
Intentionallytion failunder tos. promptly report election fraud committed by another election official.
Under current law, an election official who commits election fraud is generally subject to a fine not to exceed $10,000 or imprisonment not to exceed three years and six months or both.
Under the bill, election officials violating the prohibitions described above are likewise subject to that penalty.
A BSENTEE BALLOT CERTIFICATES Under current law, absentee ballot envelopes include a printed certificate that must be completed, signed by the voter and a qualified witness, and returned to the - 2022 Legislature - 2 - LRB-2033/1 MPG:wlj/skw/kjf SENATE BILL 212 municipal clerk with the completed ballot so that it is delivered to the polling place no later than 8 p.m.
on election day.
By completing and signing the certificate, the voter certifies that he or she is entitled to vote in the election and that the voter completed his or her absentee ballot in the presence of the witness.
The witness certificate includes the witness's printed name and address in addition to his or her signature.
If a municipal clerk receives an absentee ballot with an improperly completed certificate or with no certificate, the clerk may, but is not required to, return the ballot to the voter whenever time permits so that the voter may correct the defect.
Under this bill, if a municipal clerk receives an absentee ballot with an improperly completed certificate or with no certificate, the clerk is required to return the ballot to the voter and post a notification of the defect on the voter's voter information page on the Internet site that is used by voters for original registration, currently titled MyVote Wisconsin.
The bill also prohibits the municipal clerk from correcting a defect in the certificate.
Because this bill creates a new crime or revises a penalty for an existing crime, the Joint Review Committee on Criminal Penalties may be requested to prepare a report.
For further information see the state and local fiscal estimate, which will be printed as an appendix to this bill.
The people of the state of Wisconsin, represented in senate and assembly, do enact as follows:
S ECTION 1.
6.87 (9) of the statutes is amended to read:
6.87 (9) If a municipal clerk receives an absentee ballot with an improperly completed certificate or with no certificate, the clerk may shall return the ballot to the elector, inside the sealed envelope when an envelope is received, together with a new envelope if necessary, whenever time permits the elector to correct the defect and return the ballot within the period authorized under sub.
(6) and shall post a notification of the defect on the elector's voter information page on the Internet site that is used by electors for original registration under s.
The municipal clerk may notalso correctattempt ato defect6.87 in(6d) the(a) certificate.The elector’s printed first name.
S(b) ECTIONThe 2.elector’s printed last name.
notify the elector of the defect by other means.
(c) The elector’s house or apartment number.
SECTION 1h.
6.87 (9) (b) of the statutes is created to (d) The elector’s street name.
read:
(e) The elector’s municipality.
6.87 (9) (b) No person other than the elector, or the (f) The elector’s signature.
witness with respect to the witness certificate, may cor- rect a defect in the elector’s absentee ballot certificate.
(g) The witness’s printed first name.
Show all 77 changed lines (37 more)
(h) The witness’s printed last name.
Whoever violates this paragraph is guilty of a misde- (i) The witness’s house or apartment number.
meanor punishable by a fine not to exceed $500 or (j) The witness’s street name.
imprisonment not to exceed 30 days, or both.
(k) The witness’s municipality.
SECTION 2.
of the statutes is created to(L) read:The witness’s signature.
LRB-2033/1to -read: 2022 Legislature - 3 - MPG:wlj/skw/kjf SECTION 2 SENATE BILL 212 12.13 (2) (b) 3g.
IntentionallySECTION assist1g. or cause the casting or counting of a vote or the receipt of a registration that is invalid for any reason in addition to those specified in subd.
6.87 (9) of the statutes is renumbered 12.13(2) (b) 3g.
Intentionally assist or cause the cast- 6.87 (9) (a) and amended to read:
ing or counting of a vote or the receipt of a registration * Section 991.11,ISCONSISTATUTES:
Effective date of acts.
“Every act and every portion of an act enacted by the legislature over the governor’s partial veto which does not expressly prescribe the time when it takes effect shall take effect on the day after its date of publication.” Wisconsin Act − 2 − 2021 Senate Bill 212 that is invalid for any reason in addition to those specified to the district attorney for the county in which the viola- in subd.
tion occurred.
of the statutes is created toS read:ECTION 5.
12.13 (2) (b) 3r.
Intentionally assist or cause the rejection of or failure to otherwise count a valid vote or the rejection of a valid registration.
SECTION 4.
12.13 (2) (b) 9.
of the statutes is created to read:
12.13 (2) (b) 9.
Intentionally fail to promptly report a violation under this subsection to the commission and to the district attorney for the county in which the violation occurred.
SECTION 5.
12.60to (1)read: (a) Whoever violates s.
12.09, 12.11, or 12.13 (1), (2) (b) 1.3r.
Intentionally assist or cause the 12.60 (1) (a) Whoever violates s.
12.09, 12.11, or rejection of or failure to otherwise count a valid vote or 12.13 (1), (2) (b) 1.
or (3) (a), (e), (f), (j), (k), (L),the (m),rejection (y) or (z) is guilty of a Classvalid Iregistration. felony, except that a whoever violates s.
(L), (m), (y) or (z) is guilty of a Class I felony, except that SECTION 4.
byof failingthe tostatutes reportis created a violationwhoever ofviolates s.
12.13 (2) (b) 9.
by failing to report to read:
a violation of s.
is subject to the penalty specified12.13 in(2) par.(b) 9.
Intentionally fail to promptly report specified in par.
(END)a violation under this subsection to the commission and
Show all 77 changed rows (37 more)
View plain text versions (3)
- Enrolled Text as Enrolled pdf
- Bill Text View text pdf
- Amended Senate Amendment 1 Current pdf
Action History
-
Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82
-
Placed on calendar 5-17-2022 pursuant to Joint Rule 82 (2)(a)
-
Report vetoed by the Governor on 8-10-2021
-
Presented to the Governor on 8-5-2021
-
Report correctly enrolled
-
LRB correction (Senate Amendment 1)
-
Received from Assembly concurred in
-
Ordered immediately messaged
-
Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 60, Noes 38
-
Rules suspended
-
Ordered to a third reading
-
Read a second time
-
Rules suspended to withdraw from calendar and take up
-
Placed on calendar 6-22-2021 by Committee on Rules
-
Read first time and referred to committee on Rules
-
Received from Senate
-
Ordered immediately messaged
-
Read a third time and passed, Ayes 20, Noes 13
-
Rules suspended
-
Ordered to a third reading
-
Senate Amendment 1 adopted
-
Read a second time
-
Placed on calendar 5-11-2021 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
-
Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senator Darling
-
Available for scheduling
-
Report passage recommended by Committee on Elections, Election Process Reform and Ethics, Ayes 3, Noes 2
-
Executive action taken
-
Public hearing held
-
Fiscal estimate received
-
Read first time and referred to Committee on Elections, Election Process Reform and Ethics
-
Introduced by Senators Darling, Stroebel, Wimberger, Ballweg, Bradley, Felzkowski, Feyen, Jacque, Marklein, Nass and Wanggaard; cosponsored by Representatives Sanfelippo, Edming, Gundrum, Knodl, Krug, Murphy, Neylon, Skowronski, Steffen, VanderMeer and Wichgers
Sponsors
- Van Wanggaard · Primary
- Steve Nass · Primary
- Howard Marklein · Primary
- André Jacque · Primary
- Dan Feyen · Primary
- Mary Felzkowski · Primary
- Julian Bradley · Primary
- Ballweg · Primary
- Eric Wimberger · Primary
- Stroebel · Primary
- Darling · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →11 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 27 voted No
Sponsors (11)
- Wanggaard, Van Republican
- Nass, Steve Republican
- Marklein, Howard Republican
- Jacque, André Republican
- Feyen, Dan Republican
- Felzkowski, Mary Republican
- Bradley, Julian Republican
- Ballweg
- Wimberger, Eric Republican
- Stroebel
- Darling
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 37 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 23 | 19 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 0 | 18 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 60 | 38 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 61% | 39% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (98)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| KUGLITSCH | — | Yea |
| LOUDENBECK | — | Yea |
| MACCO | — | Yea |
| MAGNAFICI | — | Yea |
| MEYERS | — | Nay |
| MILROY | — | Nay |
| MOORE OMOKUN | — | Nay |
| MYERS | — | Nay |
| OHNSTAD | — | Nay |
| OLDENBURG | — | Yea |
| PETRYK | — | Yea |
| PLUMER | — | Yea |
| POPE | — | Nay |
| RAMTHUN | — | Yea |
| RIEMER | — | Nay |
| ROZAR | — | Yea |
| SANFELIPPO | — | Yea |
| VORPAGEL | — | Yea |
| VRUWINK | — | Nay |
| SPEAKER | — | Yea |
| BALDEH | — | Nay |
| BOWEN | — | Nay |
| BRANDTJEN | — | Yea |
| BROSTOFF | — | Nay |
| CABRAL-GUEVA | — | Yea |
| CABRERA | — | Nay |
| CONLEY | — | Nay |
| CONSIDINE | — | Nay |
| EDMING | — | Yea |
| GOYKE | — | Nay |
| HEBL | — | Nay |
| HINTZ | — | Nay |
| HORLACHER | — | Yea |
| KATSMA | — | Yea |
| KERKMAN | — | Yea |
| SCHRAA | — | Yea |
| SHANKLAND | — | Nay |
| SHELTON | — | Nay |
| SKOWRONSKI | — | Yea |
| STEINEKE | — | Yea |
| TAUCHEN | — | Yea |
| THIESFELDT | — | Yea |
| Anderson, Clinton | Democrat | Nay |
| Andraca, Deb | Democrat | Nay |
| Billings, Jill | Democrat | Nay |
| Doyle, Steve | Democrat | Nay |
| Drake, Dora | Democrat | Nay |
| Emerson, Jodi | Democrat | Nay |
| Haywood, Kalan | Democrat | Nay |
| Hesselbein, Dianne | Democrat | Nay |
| Hong, Francesca | Democrat | Nay |
| McGuire, Tip | Democrat | Nay |
| Neubauer, Greta | Democrat | Nay |
| Ortiz-Velez, Sylvia | Democrat | Nay |
| Sinicki, Christine | Democrat | Nay |
| Snodgrass, Lee | Democrat | Nay |
| Spreitzer, Mark | Democrat | Nay |
| Stubbs, Shelia | Democrat | Nay |
| Subeck, Lisa | Democrat | Nay |
| Vining, Robyn | Democrat | Nay |
| Allen, Scott | Republican | Yea |
| Armstrong, David | Republican | Yea |
| August, Tyler | Republican | Yea |
| Behnke, Elijah | Republican | Yea |
| Born, Mark | Republican | Yea |
| Brooks, Robert | Republican | Yea |
| Callahan, Calvin | Republican | Yea |
| Dallman, Alex | Republican | Yea |
| Dittrich, Barbara | Republican | Yea |
| Duchow, Cindi | Republican | Yea |
| Gundrum, Rick | Republican | Yea |
| James, Jesse | Republican | Yea |
| Kitchens, Joel | Republican | Yea |
| Knodl, Daniel | Republican | Yea |
| Krug, Scott | Republican | Yea |
| Kurtz, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Moses, Clint | Republican | Yea |
| Murphy, David | Republican | Yea |
| Mursau, Jeffrey | Republican | Yea |
| Neylon, Adam | Republican | Yea |
| Novak, Todd | Republican | Yea |
| Petersen, Kevin | Republican | Yea |
| Pronschinske, Treig | Republican | Yea |
| Rodriguez, Jessie | Republican | Yea |
| Rodriguez, Jessie | Republican | Nay |
| Snyder, Patrick | Republican | Yea |
| Sortwell, Shae | Republican | Yea |
| Spiros, John | Republican | Yea |
| Steffen, David | Republican | Yea |
| Summerfield, Rob | Republican | Yea |
| Swearingen, Rob | Republican | Yea |
| Tittl, Paul | Republican | Yea |
| Tranel, Travis | Republican | Yea |
| Tusler, Ron | Republican | Yea |
| VanderMeer, Nancy | Republican | Yea |
| Wichgers, Chuck | Republican | Yea |
| Wittke, Robert | Republican | Yea |
| Zimmerman, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 0 | 8 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 20 | 13 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 61% | 39% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (33)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| BALLWEG | — | Yea |
| PETROWSKI | — | Yea |
| BERNIER | — | Yea |
| STROEBEL | — | Yea |
| COWLES | — | Yea |
| KOOYENGA | — | Yea |
| DARLING | — | Yea |
| AGARD | — | Nay |
| BEWLEY | — | Nay |
| RINGHAND | — | Nay |
| ERPENBACH | — | Nay |
| ROTH | — | Nay |
| Carpenter, Tim | Democrat | Nay |
| Johnson, LaTonya | Democrat | Nay |
| Larson, Chris | Democrat | Nay |
| Pfaff, Brad | Democrat | Nay |
| Roys, Kelda | Democrat | Nay |
| Smith, Jeff | Democrat | Nay |
| Taylor, Sequanna | Democrat | Nay |
| Wirch, Robert | Democrat | Nay |
| Bradley, Julian | Republican | Yea |
| Felzkowski, Mary | Republican | Yea |
| Feyen, Dan | Republican | Yea |
| Jacque, André | Republican | Yea |
| Jagler, John | Republican | Yea |
| Kapenga, Chris | Republican | Yea |
| LeMahieu, Devin | Republican | Yea |
| Marklein, Howard | Republican | Yea |
| Nass, Steve | Republican | Yea |
| Stafsholt, Rob | Republican | Yea |
| Testin, Patrick | Republican | Yea |
| Wanggaard, Van | Republican | Yea |
| Wimberger, Eric | Republican | Yea |
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 212?
- SB 212 is sponsored by Wanggaard, Van (Republican), Nass, Steve (Republican), Marklein, Howard (Republican), Jacque, André (Republican), Feyen, Dan (Republican), Felzkowski, Mary (Republican), Bradley, Julian (Republican), Ballweg, Wimberger, Eric (Republican), Stroebel, and Darling.
- What is the current status of SB 212?
- This bill died with 2021-2022 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 212?
- Track SB 212 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 212
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 212
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →