Large Energy Use Facilities/Rate Class
Families could experience more stable electricity rates without the added burden of costs from large energy facilities.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when HS 1 for HB 233 w/ HA 1, HA 1 to HA 1, HA 3 -SA 1, SA 2 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on HS 1 for HB 233 w/ HA 1, HA 1 to HA 1, HA 3 -SA 1, SA 2.
You're tracking HS 1 for HB 233 w/ HA 1, HA 1 to HA 1, HA 3 -SA 1, SA 2
We'll email you the moment it moves.
HS 1 for HB 233 w/ HA 1, HA 1 to HA 1, HA 3 -SA 1, SA 2 — Large Energy Use Facilities/Rate Class
Last action — Out of Committee
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill is in committee in the House. Introduced June 30, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Next likely step: a committee vote, then a floor vote in the House.
In plain language
The bill establishes a separate rate class for large energy use facilities to manage infrastructure costs.
This Act requires regulated utilities to create a distinct rate class for large energy use facilities, ensuring that costs related to these facilities do not burden other customer classes. It includes guidelines for Electric Service Agreements and mandates higher contributions from these facilities to specific funds.
What this means for you
- Families: Families could experience more stable electricity rates without the added burden of costs from large energy facilities.
- Consumers: Consumers are less likely to see increased electricity costs passed on from large energy use facilities.
- Small Business: Small businesses may benefit from reduced financial pressure from infrastructure costs associated with large energy facilities.
Summary
This Act requires regulated utilities to establish a separate rate class for large energy use facilities that mitigates the risk of costs associated with expanding infrastructure and maintaining reliability in the face of growing demand from being shifted to residential, small business, and other electric customers. Wherever possible, the costs of large energy use facilities should be directly assigned to those facilities, and where direct assignment is not possible, the costs should be allocated to the class of large energy use facilities and not to other customer classes. To accomplish this, the Act sets forth minimum requirements for Electric Service Agreements (ESAs) and Transmission Security Agreement (TSAs) to be in place for any large energy use facility. The Commission shall promulgate regulations to implement these agreements. ESAs shall be reviewed and approved by the Commission prior to the interconnection of a large energy use facility and provide a regulatory framework to enable responsible developers of large energy use facilities to enter into agreements to fairly allocate costs among customer classes. The Public Service Commission will consider several factors in determining whether to approve an ESA, including consistency with the Commission’s regulations; whether the ESA and tariff ensure that all costs attributable to the large energy use facility are assigned to the class of large energy use facilities; whether other customers are adequately protected from the risk of paying stranded asset costs; the impact of the large energy use facility on delivering safe, adequate, and reliability electricity; the impact on the State, including the economy, other ratepayers, and environmental impacts; and the viability of the developer of the facility. In combination, the ESAs and the large load tariff shall ensure that, wherever possible, distribution infrastructure investment costs, capacity procurement costs, reliability backstop procurement costs, transmission infrastructure costs, and study costs attributable to a large energy use facility are all directly assigned to that large energy use facility. Where direct assignment is not possible, these costs should be allocated to the class of large energy use customers. The Commission shall develop an “incremental cost test” to measure the revenues and costs from a large energy use facility to ensure that there are not cost shifts to other customers. The Act further establishes interruptability requirements for large energy use facilities to ensure other customers are protected from reliability impacts caused by large energy use facilities. Facilities that construct or cause to be constructed new in state generation may exempt themselves from interruptability. Finally, the Act requires large energy use facilities to contribute to the low income fund and green energy fund at higher rates than other customers and requires large energy use facilities to contribute to renewable portfolio standard costs and qualified fuel cell provider costs. The Act takes effect upon enactment and regulated utilities must file an application to establish rates required under this Act within 180 days of the effective date.
Bill Text
We don't have the full text on file for this bill yet.
Read HS 1 for HB 233 w/ HA 1, HA 1 to HA 1, HA 3 -SA 1, SA 2 on the official Delaware source →Action History
-
Out of Committee
Sponsors
- Frank Burns · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 61 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Frank Burns Democratic
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (61)
61 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 61 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does HS 1 for HB 233 w/ HA 1, HA 1 to HA 1, HA 3 -SA 1, SA 2 do?
- This Act requires regulated utilities to establish a separate rate class for large energy use facilities that mitigates the risk of costs associated with expanding infrastructure and maintaining reliability in the face of growing demand from being shifted to residential, small business, and other electric customers. Wherever possible, the costs of large energy use facilities should be directly assigned to those facilities, and where direct assignment is not possible, the costs should be allocated to the class of large energy use facilities and not to other customer classes. To accomplish this, the Act sets forth minimum requirements for Electric Service Agreements (ESAs) and Transmission Security Agreement (TSAs) to be in place for any large energy use facility. The Commission shall promulgate regulations to implement these agreements. ESAs shall be reviewed and approved by the Commission prior to the interconnection of a large energy use facility and provide a regulatory framework to enable responsible developers of large energy use facilities to enter into agreements to fairly allocate costs among customer classes. The Public Service Commission will consider several factors in determining whether to approve an ESA, including consistency with the Commission’s regulations; whether the ESA and tariff ensure that all costs attributable to the large energy use facility are assigned to the class of large energy use facilities; whether other customers are adequately protected from the risk of paying stranded asset costs; the impact of the large energy use facility on delivering safe, adequate, and reliability electricity; the impact on the State, including the economy, other ratepayers, and environmental impacts; and the viability of the developer of the facility. In combination, the ESAs and the large load tariff shall ensure that, wherever possible, distribution infrastructure investment costs, capacity procurement costs, reliability backstop procurement costs, transmission infrastructure costs, and study costs attributable to a large energy use facility are all directly assigned to that large energy use facility. Where direct assignment is not possible, these costs should be allocated to the class of large energy use customers. The Commission shall develop an “incremental cost test” to measure the revenues and costs from a large energy use facility to ensure that there are not cost shifts to other customers. The Act further establishes interruptability requirements for large energy use facilities to ensure other customers are protected from reliability impacts caused by large energy use facilities. Facilities that construct or cause to be constructed new in state generation may exempt themselves from interruptability. Finally, the Act requires large energy use facilities to contribute to the low income fund and green energy fund at higher rates than other customers and requires large energy use facilities to contribute to renewable portfolio standard costs and qualified fuel cell provider costs. The Act takes effect upon enactment and regulated utilities must file an application to establish rates required under this Act within 180 days of the effective date.
- Who sponsors HS 1 for HB 233 w/ HA 1, HA 1 to HA 1, HA 3 -SA 1, SA 2?
- HS 1 for HB 233 w/ HA 1, HA 1 to HA 1, HA 3 -SA 1, SA 2 is sponsored by Frank Burns (Democratic).
- What is the current status of HS 1 for HB 233 w/ HA 1, HA 1 to HA 1, HA 3 -SA 1, SA 2?
- This bill is in committee in the House. Introduced June 30, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
- Where can I track HS 1 for HB 233 w/ HA 1, HA 1 to HA 1, HA 3 -SA 1, SA 2?
- Track HS 1 for HB 233 w/ HA 1, HA 1 to HA 1, HA 3 -SA 1, SA 2 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HS 1 for HB 233 w/ HA 1, HA 1 to HA 1, HA 3 -SA 1, SA 2
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HS 1 for HB 233 w/ HA 1, HA 1 to HA 1, HA 3 -SA 1, SA 2
Last checked for changes 4 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →