Reducing statute of limitations on actions to recover on oral and written contracts
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 124 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 124.
You're tracking SB 124
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 124 — Reducing statute of limitations on actions to recover on oral and written contracts
Last action — Markup Discussion
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House of Delegates
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2025 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
38 added · 38 removedPlain-language change summary
The amended version of Bill SB 124 shortens the time limit for bringing legal actions related to written and oral contracts from ten years to five years and some other contracts from five years to two years. Additionally, the amendment clarifies how the "discovery rule" applies, meaning that the clock for starting these time limits begins when a person knows or should reasonably know they have a cause for action. This change is significant because it could impact how long individuals and businesses have to resolve disputes, potentially reducing the time available for legal recourse.
WEST VIRGINIA LEGISLATURE REGULAR SESSION IntroducedCommittee Substitute for Senate Bill 124 ByBYSENATORBARRETT SenatorANDEEDS Barrett[Reported [Introduced February 12,26, 2025;2025, from the Committee on the Judiciary] CS for SB 124 A BILL to amend and reenact §55-2-6, §55-2-7, and §55-2-11 of the Code of West Virginia, 1931, as amended, relating to limitation of certain actions;
referredreducing totime thewithin Committeewhich onto thebring Judiciary]actions Intr SB 124 2025R1518 A BILL to amendrecover andon reenactwritten §55-2-6, §55-2-7, and §55-2-11oral ofcontracts, thecertain Codebonds, ofand Westrecognizances; Virginia, 1931, as amended, relating to limitation of certain actions;
and reducingclarifying timethat withinthe whichdiscovery torule bringapplies actions to recoverthe onaffected writtenstatutes andof orallimitations. contracts, certain bonds, and recognizances.
and if it be upon any other contract, express or implied, within five two years, unless it be an action by one party against his or her copartnerco- partner for a settlement of the partnership accounts, or upon accounts concerning the trade or merchandise between merchant and merchant, their factors or servants, where the action of account would lie, in either of which cases the action may be brought until the expiration of five years from a cessation of the dealings in which they are interested together, but not after.after:
Provided, That the limitations set forth in this section do not begin to run until either the right to a cause of action accrues or until the person with a right to a cause of action knows or reasonably should know that their right to bring a cause of action has accrued, whichever is later.
Upon CS for SB 124 a bond of a guardian or curator of a ward, from the time of the ward's attaining the age of 18 years, or from the termination of the guardian's or curator's office, whichever shall happen first;
and upon the bond of any personal representative of a decedent or committee of an insane person, the right of action of a person obtaining execution against such representative or committee, or to whom Intr SB 124 2025R1518 payment or delivery of estate in the hands of such representative or committee shall be ordered by a court acting upon his or her account, shall be deemed to have first accrued from the return day of such execution, or from the time of the right to require payment or delivery upon such order, whichever shall happen first.
Where any such fiduciary, or any other fiduciary, has settled an account under the provisions of §44et§44-4-1 et seq.
NOTE:
The purpose of this bill is to reduce the statute of limitations on actions to recover on both oral and written contracts, on bonds of fiduciaries and personal representatives, and on recognizances.
Strike-throughs indicate language that would be stricken from a heading or the present law and underscoring indicates new language that would be added.
View plain text versions (2)
- Committee Substitute View text pdf
- Introduced Introduced Version Current pdf
Action History
-
Markup Discussion
-
To House Judiciary
-
To Judiciary
-
Introduced in House
-
House received Senate message
-
Ordered to House
-
Passed Senate (Roll No. 50)
-
Read 3rd time
-
On 3rd reading
-
Read 2nd time
-
On 2nd reading
-
Read 1st time
-
On 1st reading
-
Committee substitute reported
-
To Judiciary
-
Introduced in Senate
-
To Judiciary
-
Filed for introduction
Sponsors
- Jason Barrett · Primary
- Vince Deeds · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 150 not signed on · 2 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Jason Barrett Republican
Co-sponsors (1)
- Vince Deeds Republican
Not signed on (150)
150 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 150 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 28 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 31 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 91% | 6% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (34)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| STUART | — | Yea |
| BOLEY | — | Yea |
| MR PRESIDENT | — | Yea |
| Joey Garcia | Democrat | Nay |
| Mike Woelfel | Democrat | Nay |
| Amy Grady | Republican | Yea |
| Anne B. Charnock | Republican | Yea |
| Ben Queen | Republican | Yea |
| Bill Hamilton | Republican | Yea |
| Brian Helton | Republican | Yea |
| Charles H. Clements | Republican | Yea |
| Chris Rose | Republican | Yea |
| Craig A. Hart | Republican | Yea |
| Darren Thorne | Republican | Yea |
| Eric Tarr | Republican | Yea |
| Glenn Jeffries | Republican | Yea |
| Jack Woodrum | Republican | Yea |
| Jason Barrett | Republican | Yea |
| Jay Taylor | Republican | Yea |
| Laura Wakim Chapman | Republican | Yea |
| Mark R. Maynard | Republican | Yea |
| Mike Azinger | Republican | Yea |
| Mike Oliverio | Republican | Yea |
| Patricia Rucker | Republican | Yea |
| Patrick Martin | Republican | Yea |
| Robbie Morris | Republican | Yea |
| Rollan A. Roberts | Republican | Yea |
| Rupie Phillips | Republican | Yea |
| Ryan Weld | Republican | Yea |
| Scott Fuller | Republican | Yea |
| T. Kevan Bartlett | Republican | Not Voting |
| Tom Takubo | Republican | Yea |
| Tom Willis | Republican | Yea |
| Vince Deeds | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 124?
- SB 124 is sponsored by Jason Barrett (Republican) and Vince Deeds (Republican).
- What is the current status of SB 124?
- This bill died with 2025 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 124?
- Track SB 124 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 124
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 124
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →